Pharm 202 Computer Aided Drug Design

advertisement

Pharm 202

Computer Aided Drug Design

Phil Bourne bourne@sdsc.edu

http://www.sdsc.edu/pb -> Courses -> Pharm 202

Several slides are taken from UC Berkley Chem 195

Perspective

• Principles of drug discovery (brief)

• Computer driven drug discovery

• Data driven drug discovery

• Modern target identification and selection

• Modern lead identification

Overall strong structural bioinformatics emphasis

What is a drug?

• Defined composition with a pharmacological effect

• Regulated by the Food and Drug

Administration (FDA)

• What is the process of Drug Discovery and

Development?

Drugs and the Discovery Process

• Small Molecules

– Natural products

• fermentation broths

• plant extracts

• animal fluids (e.g., snake venoms)

– Synthetic Medicinal Chemicals

• Project medicinal chemistry derived

• Combinatorial chemistry derived

• Biologicals

– Natural products (isolation)

– Recombinant products

– Chimeric or novel recombinant products

Discovery vs. Development

• Discovery includes: Concept, mechanism, assay, screening, hit identification, lead demonstration, lead optimization

• Discovery also includes In Vivo proof of concept in animals and concomitant demonstration of a therapeutic index

• Development begins when the decision is made to put a molecule into phase I clinical trials

Discovery and Development

• The time from conception to approval of a new drug is typically 10-15 years

• The vast majority of molecules fail along the way

• The estimated cost to bring to market a successful drug is now $800 million!!

(Dimasi, 2000)

Drug Discovery Processes Today

Physiological

Hypothesis

Molecular

Biological

Hypothesis

(Genomics)

Chemical

Hypothesis

Primary Assays

Biochemical

Cellular

Pharmacological

Physiological

+

Sources of Molecules

Natural Products

Synthetic Chemicals

Combichem

Biologicals

Screening

Initial Hit

Compounds

Drug Discovery Processes - II

Initial Hit

Compounds

Secondary

Evaluation

- Mechanism

Of Action

- Dose Response

Initial Synthetic

Evaluation

- analytics

- first analogs

Hit to Lead

Chemistry

- physical properties

-in vitro metabolism

First In Vivo

Tests

- PK, efficacy, toxicity

Drug Discovery Processes - III

Lead Optimization

Potency

Selectivity

Physical Properties

PK

Metabolism

Oral Bioavailability

Synthetic Ease

Scalability

Pharmacology

Multiple In Vivo

Models

Chronic Dosing

Preliminary Tox

Development

Candidate

(and Backups)

Drug Discovery Disciplines

• Medicine

• Physiology/pathology

• Pharmacology

• Molecular/cellular biology

• Automation/robotics

• Medicinal, analytical,and combinatorial chemistry

• Structural and computational chemistries

• Bioinformatics

Drug Discovery Program Rationales

• Unmet Medical Need

• Me Too! - Market - ($$$s)

• Drugs in search of indications

– Side-effects often lead to new indications

• Indications in search of drugs

– Mechanism based, hypothesis driven, reductionism

Serendipity and Drug Discovery

• Often molecules are discovered/synthesized for one indication and then turn out to be useful for others

– Tamoxifen (birth control and cancer)

– Viagra (hypertension and erectile dysfunction)

– Salvarsan (Sleeping sickness and syphilis)

– Interferona

(hairy cell leukemia and Hepatitis C)

Issues in Drug Discovery

• Hits and Leads - Is it a “Druggable” target?

• Resistance

• Pharmacodynamics

• Delivery - oral and otherwise

• Metabolism

• Solubility, toxicity

• Patentability

A Little History of Computer

Aided Drug Design

• 1960’s - Viz - review the target - drug interaction

• 1980’s- Automation - high trhoughput target/drug selection

• 1980’s- Databases (information technology) - combinatorial libraries

• 1980’s- Fast computers - docking

• 1990’s- Fast computers - genome assembly - genomic based target selection

• 2000’s- Vast information handling - pharmacogenomics

From the Computer Perspective

Progress

About the computer industry…

“If the automobile industry had made as much progress in the past fifty years, a car today would cost a hundredth of a cent and go faster than the speed of light.”

Ray Kurzweil , The Age of Spiritual Machines

Growth of pixel fill rates

1 2 0 0

1 0 0 0

8 0 0

6 0 0

4 0 0

2 0 0

0

SGI PC cards

* Not counting custom hardware or special configurations

• Fill rates recently growing by x2 every year

Data source: Product literature

Comparing Growth Rates

40

35

30

25

20

Processor performance growth

Memory bus speed growth

Pixel fill rate growth

15

10

5

0

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

From the Target Perspective

Bioinformatics - A Revolution

Biological Experiment Data Information Knowledge Discovery

Complexity

Collect Characterize Compare Model Infer

Technology

Higher-life 1 10 100 1000

Data

100000

Computing

Power

Organ Brain

Mapping

Cardiac

Modeling

Cellular

Sub-cellular

10 6

Model Metaboloic

Pathway of E.coli

10 2 Neuronal

Modeling

1

# People/Web Site

Assembly

Virus

Structure

Ribosome

Genetic

Circuits

Structure

Sequence

Human

Genome

Project

ESTs

90

Yeast

Genome

E.Coli

Genome

Gene Chips

C.Elegans

Genome

95 00

Year

(C) Copyright Phil Bourne 1998

1 Small

Genome/Mo.

Human

Genome

05

Sequencing

Technology

The Accumulation of Knowledge

This “molecular scene” for cAMP dependant protein kinase (PKA) depicts years of collective knowledge.

Traditionally structure determination has been functional driven

As we shall see it is becoming genomically driven

History

History

Strong sense of community ownership

We are the current custodians

The community watches our every move

The community itself is changing

Status - Numbers and Complexity

(a) myoglobin (b) hemoglobin (c) lysozyme (d) transfer RNA

(e) antibodies (f) viruses (g) actin (h) the nucleosome

(i) myosin (j) ribosome

Courtesy of David Goodsell, TSRI

The Structural Genomics Pipeline

(X-ray Crystallography)

Basic Steps

Target

Selection

Crystallomics

• Isolation,

• Expression,

• Purification,

• Crystallization

Data

Collection

Structure

Solution

Structure

Refinement

Functional

Annotation

Publish

Bioinformatics

• Distant homologs

• Domain recognition

Automation

Bioinformatics

• Empirical rules

Automation

Better sources

Software integration

Decision Support

MAD Phasing Automated fitting

Bioinformatics

• Alignments

• Protein-protein interactions

• Protein-ligand interactions

• Motif recognition

No?

Anticipated Developments

structure info

SCOP, PDB sequence info

NR, PFAM

Protein sequences

Building FOLDLIB:

------------------------------------

PDB chains

SCOP domains

PDP domains

CE matches PDB vs. SCOP

-----------------------------------

90% sequence non-identical minimum size 25 aa coverage (90%, gaps <30, ends<30)

Create PSI-BLAST profiles for FOLDLIB vs. NR

Prediction of : signal peptides (SignalP, PSORT) transmembrane (TMHMM, PSORT) coiled coils (COILS) low complexity regions (SEG)

Structural assignment of domains by

PSI-BLAST on FOLDLIB-PRF

Only sequences w/out A-prediction

Structural assignment of domains by

123D on FOLDLIB-PRF

Only sequences w/out A-prediction

Functional assignment by PFAM, NR,

PSIPred assignments

FOLDLIB-PRF

The Genome Annotation Pipeline

Domain location prediction by sequence

Store assigned regions in the DB

Example - http://arabidopsis.sdsc.edu

From the Drug Perspective

Combinatorial Libraries

• Thousands of variations to a fixed template

• Good libraries span large areas of chemical and conformational space - molecular diversity

• Diversity in - steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic interactions...

• Desire to be as broad as “Merck” compounds from random screening

• Computer aided library design is in its infancy

Blaney and Martin - Curr. Op. In Chem. Biol. (1997) 1:54-59

Statement of the Director, NIGMS, before the House Appropriations

Subcommittee on Labor, HHS, Education Thursday, February 25, 1999

Download