Sea Power and Maritime Affairs Lesson 18: The Navy, Vietnam and the Limited War, 1964-1975 Learning Objectives Know the Navy’s roles in the Vietnam War (19641974) Comprehend the impact of the Vietnam War on the Navy’s force structure under Admiral Zumwalt during the Nixon administration. Recall the reasons for the relative decline in the U.S. naval preeminence from 1962-1977. Comprehend the differing naval policies of the U.S. and the Soviet Union and how those differences affected their resulting force structure. Republic of Vietnam (South) Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North) U.S. Ally Capital: Saigon Communist Capital: Hanoi Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) Succeeds Kennedy as President after his assassination in Dallas in 1963. Increases U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. High level of restrictions put on military planners by his administration. Concerned with “Great Society” and domestic politics. Robert S. McNamara Secretary of Defense in Kennedy and Johnson Administrations. Use of mathematical models to calculate required military force in Vietnam. Attempted to avoid escalation of the war by putting restrictions on military operations. Tonkin Gulf Incident - 1964 U.S. Seventh Fleet operating off Vietnam coast – Surveillance and covert operations against North Vietnam Destroyers USS Maddox and USS Turner Joy: – Night attacks by North Vietnamese torpedo boats reported – Evidence supports North Vietnam’s claim that no torpedo boats were present in the area Carrier strikes ordered in retaliation Tonkin Gulf Incident Gulf of Tonkin Resolution LBJ requests authority from Congress to increase U.S. involvement Congressional approval for the President to take “all necessary measures to repel any armed attack” in Vietnam Made him look good against Barry Goldwater Escalating Intervention - 1965 Johnson Administration goes to work after the election MACV- Military Assistance Command Vietnam – Overall- General William Westmoreland Naval Advisory Group – Sea Force – River Force – Junk Force Task Forces Ground war of attrition against North Vietnam begins. Retaliatory strike on enlisted barracks FLAMING DART TF 77 (CVs) ROLLING THUNDER TF 77 (CVs) MARKET TIME TF 115 (WPBs, PCFs) Coastal Interdiction GAME WARDEN TF 116 (PRBs) Mekong Delta Interdiction SEALORDS TF 194 (PRBs) North Vietnamese bombing campaign Interdiction in Mekong Delta on Cambodia border Westmoreland and LBJ Cam Ranh Bay 23 DEC ‘67 WESTY’s STRATEGY: “SEARCH AND DESTROY” MEASUREMENT: BODY BAGS “Rolling Thunder” Theory: punish north until it stops supporting V.C. in South Reality: lasted intermittently un 31 OCT 68 – Interrupted by 7 bombing halts which North used to rebuild – 304,000 fighter bombers and 2,380 B-52 sorties Evaluation “Rolling Thunder must go down in the history of aerial warfare as the most ambitious, wasteful, and ineffective campaign ever mounted. While damage was . . . done to many targets in the North, no lasting objective was achieved. Hanoi emerged as the winner of Rolling Thunder.” (CIA analyst quoted by COL Harry Summers, USA, Historical Atlas of the Vietnam War, p. 96) F-8 CRUSADER Douglas A-1 Skyraider - AD or “Able Dog” “Spad” or “Sandy” Flew close air support missions in Vietnam. USS Coral Sea launches A-4 Douglas A-4 Skyhawk Navy and Marine light attack aircraft in Vietnam. A-6A Intruder Introduced in Vietnam. Navy and Marine carrieror land-based medium bomber. Evades enemy radar by low level flight. F-4 Phantom U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter aircraft flown in Vietnam on fighter and attack missions Soviet-built MiG-19 Used by North Vietnamese Air Force to defend against U.S. attacks during the Vietnam War. May 1965: Naval shore bombardment begins against South Vietnam as supplement to air strikes; in support of military operations along the coast; first since Korean War. NGF, USS Carronade Overall Conclusions on Naval Aviation Cost were too high Results were uncertain POW suffering N. Vietnam SAM sites Coastal Patrol Force: Operation “Market Time” (March 1965- December 1972) “Market Time” Coastal interdiction of supplies moved from N. Vietnam to South Vietnam by small boats, etc. Improvised Force – 84 PCF armed with .50 cal machine guns and 81-mm mortar. – Destroyers, destroyer escorts, minesweepers – Coast Guard Cutters Not unlike North’s blockade during Civil War! Evaluation as outstandingly effective: “From January to July 1967, Market Time forces . . . inspected or boarded more than 700,000 vessels in South Vietnamese waters. Except for five enemy ships [sighted during Tet] . . . no other enemy trawlers were spotted from July 1967 to August 1969.” (COL Harry Summers, USA, Historical Atlas of the Vietnam War, p. 150) Cautious evaluation: “There are no statistics to show what MARKET TIME did not interdict. At the very least, MARKET TIME forced the enemy to be even more inventive and creative in bringing into the South the tools of war.” (Symonds, Historical Atlas, p. 210) .50 caliber machine guns of PCF S. Viet “Junk Boat Force” operating during Market Time Certain evaluation: Forced North Vietnam to expand and rely more heavily on the overland Ho Chi Minh Trail running south through Laos and Cambodia. Mobile Riverine Force of the “Brown Water Navy” Operation “Game Warden” (December 1965- September 1968 Brown Water Navy Deny use of Mekong River and tributaries Specially designed and improvised small craft – 50 FT, aluminum hull fast patrol craft (PCFs), .50 cal and 81-mm – 31 ft, fiberglass, river patrol boat. ~ 25 knots – Monitors, armored troop carriers (ATC) Highly Dangerous – Less effective and more costly than coastal interdiction – Turned over to S. Vietnamese during “Vietnamization” in Feb 69 River Patrol Boat Huey Landing on ATC Monitor leading ATCs Assault Support Patrol Boat…..sinking… SEALS on a Assault Boat on Mekong Delta Marines unloading from at ATC for a River Assault Tet and Its Impact (30 Jan 1968 – 20 Jan 1969) “The Turning Point in the War” Tet Offensive -- January 1968 Conceived by N. Vietnam’s General Vo Nguyen Giap, architect of Dien Bien Phu (1954 defeat of France) Combine attack by N Vietnamese and Vietcong – Goal: popular uprising (failed) – Achieve Dien Bien Phu- like tactical battlefield victory for propaganda purposes Scope – Struck at 36 of 44 provincial capital and military bases (most notably, Hue and Khe Sanh) – 100 other villages “What the Hell’s Ho Chi Minh Doing Answering Our Saigon Embassy Phone. . . ?” Paul Conrad, Los Angles Times, 1968 General Vo Nguyen Giap Former history teacher TET in and near Saigon 0245 Jan. 31 - 7 Mar. 1968 NVA and VC attack city-wide, especially against US Embassy and MACV HQ (Gen. Westmoreland), near Tan Son Nhut airbase. Also at Bin Hoa airbase (NE of Saigon), busiest in world. (875,000 landings & takeoffs per year) Enemy repulsed by strategic/ tactical foresight of LGEN Fred C. Weyand, veteran of China-BurmaIndia campaign, WW II A Vietcong (VC) corpse lies on the US Embassy grounds in Saigon shortly after the Tet attack. (U.S. Army photo) “We fought from house to house and street to street. When we had to go inside a house we’d just shoot inside with our rifles and then the M-60. Then we had to go up into the house and make sure they were dead. We didn’t have no flame-throwers. I didn’t see no tanks in Saigon. They didn’t have things like you see in the movies on TV about World War II. It surprised me.” -------U.S. soldier Marines in the Tet Offensive Hue City – Ancient capital of Vietnam. – Held by North Vietnamese and Viet Cong for 26 days. – Retaken by Marines and South Vietnamese forces. Street fighting from house to house. Khe Sanh – Important base in northern South Vietnam near DMZ. – 6,000 Marines under siege by 20,000 North Vietnamese Army regular troops. – Supplied by air drops and supported with air strikes. – Eventually abandoned. Hue City Tet at Hue 0330, 31 Jan. - 2 Mar. 1968 “The twenty-five day struggle for Hue was the longest and bloodiest ground action of the Tet offensive, and, quite possibly, the longest and bloodiest single action of the Second Indochina War.” --- Don Oberdorfer author of Tet!, first-hand witness Temple for victims of the resistance against French colonial rule, Hue. Marines patrol streets Hue, Feb. 1968 (USMC photo) Khe Sanh Tet at Khe Sanh 21 Jan. - 8 Apr. 1968 “I don’t want any damn Dinbinfoo.” Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson to Gen. Earle Wheeler, CJCS, as 77-day siege began Immediate Results Vietcong forces assaulted and entered U.S. Embassy, Saigon – General Westmoreland, MACV declared victory in Saigon by 0915, 30 January. After initial shock, U.S./ARVN repelled all NVA forces. No popular uprising- disappointment to Giap, BUT: Dismay in USA Short Results No popular uprising Dismay in USA President Johnson renounces candidacy for reelection (31 Mar 68) Secretary of Defense, McNamara, forced to resign General Westmoreland replaced by General Abrams as U.S. overall commander in Vietnam. VADM Zumwalt appointed Commander, U.S. naval Forces , Vietnam ( Sept 68) – MERGES Game Warden and Mobile Riverine Force into SEALORDS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 1972 NIXON vs. SEN. GEORGE McGOVERN --- 60 % of popular vote --- 49 states “The bastards have never been bombed like they’re going to be bombed this time.” ---President Richard M. Nixon March 1972 Linebacker I (ended 22 Oct.): 40,000 sorties; 125,000 tons of bombs Linebacker II (18-26 Dec. 1972) 742 B-52, 640 fighter-bomber sorties 15 B-52s lost!!! VADM Elmo R. Zumwalt, Jr. Commander, U.S. Forces, Vietnam ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT Chicago, Demo. Convention Aug. 1968 Kent State University 4 May 1970 Vietnamization Turning over the war to S. Vietnamese with withdrawing American forces as quickly as possible U.S. forces reduced from over 500,000 combat/combat support to a handful of advisors. Admiral Zumwalt, Jr. - withdrawal of naval forces Hanoi signed Paris Accords (Jan 1973) calling for ceasefire throughout S. Vietnam and release of POWs – Nixon opens to China and conducts arms limitation summit with – Moscow Peace negotiations in Paris - Henry Kissinger. U.S. withdraws forces from South Vietnam North Vietnam agrees to allow South Vietnam to decide government in a free election and to release American POWs “Vastly different from last two years of Korea: U.S. was now withdrawing before indigenous forces were built-up and able to stand on their own.” -- COL Harry Summers Marine regimental commander to Marine LCOL Bernard Trainor, 1969: “We’re no longer here to win, we’re merely ‘campaigning,’ so keep the casualties down.” -- from Marine retired MGEN Bernard Trainor, author of General’s War on Gulf “Vietnamization offered a way to get the United States, the Republicans, Richard Nixon, and most important, [Secretary of Defense] Melvin Laird, out of the Vietnam quagmire. Whether it would work or not was secondary. It was an exit.” -- LGEN Philip Davidson Vietnamization was “the model or paradigm of a new strategy of retreat.” -- Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary 1972: “The fighting wasn’t over, but the war was won . . . There came a later point at which the war was no longer won.” -- Lewis Sorley, author of Thunderbolt: General Creighton Abrams and the Army of His Times ( Watching South Vietnam Go Under (1973-1975) Congress rejected any further military intervention in Southeast Asia and refused to appropriate the full $1 billion in military aid promised South Vietnam by the Nixon administration 30 April 1975: North Vietnamese forces overran South Vietnam; South Vietnam’s president proclaimed unconditional surrender; U.S. Embassy in Saigon evacuated, the final few Americans leaving by helicopter from the Embassy’s roof. In operations Eagle Pull and Frequent Wind, 7th Fleet evacuates remaining Americans and foreign nationals Postwar Problems of U.S. Navy Impact of Vietnam – Hiatus in shipbuilding – Inadequate Funding – High personnel costs Aging WWII fleet Skyrocketing procurement costs – Bigger, more sophisticated ships – Push for Nuke power: Admiral Rickover Shaping the Navy after Vietnam ADM Elmo Zumwalt, Jr. “High-low” mix – Missions: Sea Control Power Projection – High End: Carriers – Low End: Inexpensive platforms, escort duty etc. – “Sea Control Ship” Other Issues – Equal opportunity for minorities – Adm Rickover – Differences with Nixon Comparison Between U.S. and Soviet Navies Categories of differences: number of major ships, number of ships by type, tonnage by type fleets, operational ship days out of area Reasons: geography, internal defense, perceived threats, naval background, economic approach to ship building Navies configured for different wars Conclusions from Vietnam The Vietnam conflict has impacted every use of the U.S. military since that time. – Cost to American people dramatic – Vietnam’s civil war became America’s civil convulsion Learning Objectives Know the Navy’s roles in the Vietnam War (19641974) Comprehend the impact of the Vietnam War on the Navy’s force structure under Admiral Zumwalt during the Nixon administration. Recall the reasons for the relative decline in the U.S. naval preeminence from 1962-1977. Comprehend the differing naval policies of the U.S. and the Soviet Union and how those differences affected their resulting force structure. Next time: The Era of Retrenchment: Presidents Ford, and Carter, 1974-1980