Emotion Emotions Organize action, physiology, cognition, and perception to meet ever-changing environmental and internal demands In patterns constituting core aspects of temperament/personality functioning Motivate action and thought, creating value in life—and impacting wellness and sickness dmessinger@miami.edu 3 History Emotions don’t exist (or can’t be studied) – Emotional expressions are infinitely malleable – Some anthropological accounts Emotions are things – structural accounts – – – Behaviorism, ’50s - ‘60s Discrete/Differential theory, ’70s – ’80s Cross-cultural recognition of expressions Demonstrates hard-wiring of universal emotions? Emotions are processes and have functions – Functionalist, dynamic systems, emotion regulation, constuctivist ‘90s – ’10s dmessinger@miami.edu 4 Universality What emotions do you see here? Cohn dmessinger@miami.edu 6 Postulate “There are some facial expressions of emotion that are universal.” “why do we not press our lips tightly together when happy and curve the corners up when angry, rather than the reverse?” • (Ekman, 1973, p. 219) ‘facial affect program’ • p. 220 dmessinger@miami.edu 8 Who’s friends came to visit From Cohn dmessinger@miami.edu 9 Pre-literate culture study Read an emotion-situation story. Shown three photos and asked to choose one A high % correctly identified (p. 212) Why is expression identification in preliterate cultures important? dmessinger@miami.edu 10 Critique Are identified expressions posed or spontaneous – Emblematic denotative expressions – caricatures? Verbal identification of posed expressions Relevant to of expression recognition Not to universality of expression production – Or their innateness dmessinger@miami.edu 11 What about development? Infant emotions Core elements of infant behavior Quickly motivate behavior – – – Hunger-Distress-Cry Interest-Attentive face Engaging playful other – joy - smile Organize action, physiology, cognition, and perception To meet environmental and internal demands Patterns constitute core aspects of temperament/personality functioning dmessinger@miami.edu 13 Infant emotional development Distress is present at birth Interest and joy emerge in the first 2 mos. – joy developing through at least 6 mos. Anger, sadness, fear differentiate after 4 m. Pride and shame develop between 1 & 2 years dmessinger@miami.edu 14 Developmental patterns Socialization – – Emotion displays become more restricted Full-face to partial face - miniaturization Cognitive input – shame, guilt, contempt emerge involve – rudimentary appraisal of self vis-à-vis other dynamic systems dmessinger@miami.edu 20 THEORIES dmessinger@miami.edu 21 Cole & Moore (2015) Are infants biologically prepared to express certain emotions? Izard says “yes,” developed Differential Emotions Theory (DET) and focused on distress, enjoyment, and interest. Emotion expressions are innate and shaped by interaction with caregiver in order to effectively communicate current goal states Will M. 22 Evidence for DET Specific emotional responses to paradigm situations in infants Cross-cultural evidence in adults Infants have mature facial musculature Expressions in fetuses are similar to human children and primates. People blind from birth produce discrete emotion expressions. Will M. 23 Criticism Infant facial expression is often ambiguous, could depend more on integrated systems than changes in goal states Response: “facial babbling” is a precursor to functional movements; feedback allows infant to tailor emotion expressions to its environment. Furthermore, success in this can facilitate attachment. Will M. 24 Response (innate ≠ no environment input required). Developmental constraints will constrain optimality (learning and maturation of visual system is necessary) Natural selection will constrain infinite variation. “Open systems” are adaptive when cultural variation affects whether the system leads to an adaptive outcome. Mapping cultural variation to different M. adaptive outcomesWillwould be a good future 25 The Structuralist View “Many models assume that each emotion kind is characterized by a distinctive syndrome of hormonal, muscular, and autonomic responses that are coordinated in time and correlated in intensity “ p. 30 Barrett, 2006 dmessinger@miami.edu 26 Discrete Emotions Theory (DET) = Natural Kind View Emotion composed of: – – – Neurochemical processes Expressive behavior Subjective feeling “Many models assume that each emotion … is characterized by a distinctive syndrome of hormonal, muscular, and autonomic responses that are coordinated in time and correlated in intensity.” Barrett, 2006 dmessinger@miami.edu 27 Neurochemical processes Emotional brain - Limbic system Border between primitive brain stem and cortex Lower portions - visceral (bodily) feelings – Developed at birth Limbic cortex – awareness of feeling dmessinger@miami.edu 29 Damasio’s theory Emotion is a neurochemical process Feeling is our sensation of that process dmessinger@miami.edu 30 Limbic system dmessinger@miami.edu 32 Amygdala Transforms sensory stimuli to emotion elicitors Not – – – mediated by neocortex Input: rapid, automatic appraisal of relevance Output: Expression and Experience Reactivity of amygdala determines temperament dmessinger@miami.edu Limbic cortex Anterior cingulate gyrus – Motivation Orbitofrontal cortex – – – – Inhibition, social control Feeds back to amygdala, other subcortical structures Neural development evident 6 – 24 months Pruning continues into adolescence dmessinger@miami.edu 34 But where are specific emotions? dmessinger@miami.edu 35 Key brain regions implicated in emotion-related processing. dmessinger@miami.edu 36 Where is joy located? One possibility is that anterior cingulate cortex, is associated with joyful responses, whereas basal ganglia are involved in related action tendencies. Greater left than right cerebral activation (Duchenne smiles, tail wagging, etc) dmessinger@miami.edu 37 Facial affect programs? Current evidence: – – – – Relevant linked brain systems But not distinct affect programs Fear may be exception Panskepp and current animal work dmessinger@miami.edu 38 Qualia: Affective-cognitive schema Emotion feeling linked to cognitions – produces thoughts and actions – Emotion-cognition does not transform feeling – i.e. self-appraisals Feeling never changes but feeling linked to different images and thoughts In development, modular systems - emotion, cognition, motor - become less insular and more integrated dmessinger@miami.edu 39 Is there emotional feeling without knowledge of feeling? Infantile memory – – – – Strong emotional associations Without explicit knowledge of associations Makes associations inaccessible to reflection and difficult to change Memories of smells, movements, even abuse dmessinger@miami.edu 40 Role of cognition DET – – Emotions are quality of consciousness If emotion = feeling, cognition not necessary Hence, babies have them! For Barrett, emotion knowledge necessary. If emotion is about something, some degree of cognition is involved No emotions for babies? dmessinger@miami.edu 42 Discrete Emotions Theory (DET) Hypotheses “Emotion-specific” programs unite expressive, physiological, and phenomenological processes As the CNS matures, “basic emotions emerge as structured wholes” – don’t come together developmentally There are no display rules operating in infancy – In infancy, as discrete emotions arise, they should be accompanied by discrete facial expressions of those emotions (read-outs) dmessinger@miami.edu 45 Expressive behavior Discrete infant emotions dmessinger@miami.edu 47 Adults expressions seen as discrete (Oster et al., 1992) dmessinger@miami.edu 51 Infant negative expressions rated as distress (Oster et al., 1992) dmessinger@miami.edu 52 Situational appropriateness: Production studies Premise: In response to an appropriate elicitor (situation), hypothesized emotional expression should occur significantly more than other expressions dmessinger@miami.edu 53 Specifying Specificity: Facial Expressions at 4 Months evidence for a family of frustrating, goalblocking events that elicited expressions and cortisol responses indicative of anger at 4 months. Yet situations also elicited expressions and cortisol changes indicative of sadness. Bennett, David S.; Bendersky, Margaret; Lewis, Michael Infancy. Vol 6(3), 2004, 425-429 dmessinger@miami.edu 54 Negative emotional expressions are not situationally specific Through 2 months, Justine – shows distress to bathing, being moved, & pacifier removal (inoculation and hunger) After 2 months, anger and, to a much lesser degree, sadness are most common reaction to all negative elicitors – infants cry, not a specific reaction • dmessinger@miami.edu Camras, 1992 55 Examples Sad distresssmile: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akPVtObBUOk&feature=related Saddisress: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7oD9WX-1CU Fear/orientdistress: http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=fvwp&v=QiBrPkGoqFM Feardistress: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fASp42ZvjIM&feature=fvwrel, Distress: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&NR=1&v=H-1me_wsuyk (alligator bite) Sad : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szLjXta0Szw, dad singing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAzLsnYvdYo&feature=related (lower lip in response to rasberries) dmessinger@miami.edu 56 Maze game—Scary—children http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGd5NqP6qd4 Slow-motion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LC5qPvTQUdo Compendium: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cypeLuCIrU0 Long: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9kNCBGEyfk 0:55-1:07, 1:45-2:30 dmessinger@miami.edu 57 Dynamic blends Discrete emotions—pattern of facial action. When patterns from different emotion expressions occur together, a blend occurs. Matias & Cohn found that negative blends were as frequent as negative discrete emotions. – Positive discrete > positive blends dmessinger@miami.edu 58 Summary Some negative facial expressions – – – are not recognizably expressions of discrete emotions do not always occur in response to appropriate elicitors nor do they occur discretely in time dmessinger@miami.edu 59 Beyond DET Structuralism Alternate Views Functional and dynamic views Emotion is not inside you. Emotions are process of changing (or maintaining) relations with environment significant to the individual. Emotions influence situation. dmessinger@miami.edu 62 Alternative views Functional – Insight: Recognition of function of emotions and their flexibility in functioning – Regulating emotion to achieve goals Difficulty: Use goals to interpret behavior but use behavior to infer goals Dynamic – – Insight: Recognition of interfacing role of multiple components in emotional process Difficulty: Specifying process dmessinger@miami.edu 63 Functionalist theory Emotion is the person’s attempt or readiness to establish, maintain, or change the relation between the person and the environment on matters of significance to that person (Saarni et al., 1998). – Emotion is associated with goal-attainment, social relationships, situational appraisals, action tendencies, self-understanding, self regulation, etc. dmessinger@miami.edu 64 Functions Interest Fear Anger Joy Sadness Disgust Surprise Orienting/exploration Avoidance/flight Goal removal Approach/continuation Withdrawal Expulsion Orienting dmessinger@miami.edu 66 Dynamic systems Development, interaction, and (emotional) behavior are complex involving multiple interfacing/interacting constituents which produce patterns we see as pre-designed regularities A bottom-up approach – Discrete emotions as preferred states formed from the interface of multiple constituents dmessinger@miami.edu 69 Dynamic phenomena The raised brow of interest occurs with raising the head There are different interest expressions – Problems with top-down approaches Duchenne smiling as a muscular dynamic Joy appears to develop in time Neonatal (Duchenne) smile may emerge before happiness Importance? dmessinger@miami.edu 71 Dynamic systems alternative ‘Distress-pain, anger, sadness often seen together during crying’ Perhaps negative emotion in infancy differs in intensity - phases of crying - distress & anger, with sadness reflecting a weakening of intensity – Camras dmessinger@miami.edu 72 Surprise expressions as coordinative motor structures Results indicate that MO is selectively associated with raised brows – Brow raises occurred after the onset of the MO movement, further suggesting that MO recruits raised brows. Facial criteria may be inappropriate for identifying "surprise" expressions in infants. – Camras, L. A., Lambrecht, L., & Michel, G. F. (1996). Infant "surprise" expressions as coordinative motor structures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(3), 183-195. dmessinger@miami.edu 73 Interest expressions as coordinative motor structures Opening the mouth is accompanied by brow raising in infants, thus producing "surprise“ expressions in non-surprise situations. – – Raised-brow movements significantly cooccurred with head-up and/or eyes-up movements for both ages. Knit-brows co-occurred with eyes-down at 5 mo and head-down at 7 mo Michel, G. F., Camras, L. A., & Sullivan, J. (1992). Infant interest expressions as coordinative motor structures. Infant Behavior and Development, 15(3), 347-358. dmessinger@miami.edu 74 Surprise! Its not in the face Covert toy switch dmessinger@miami.edu Camras, et al. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/152875 3542.2.2.179 Surprise examples Expression on demand: Coordinative structure? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DaKcKqVheE&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOvtNPljtv0&feature=related Posed adult: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4AyfrM8Q2o Girl and Dad 1:05—1:40. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5HXl_zJ5po [ad preceding] dmessinger@miami.edu 76 Criticism Infant facial expression is often ambiguous, could depend more on integrated systems than changes in goal states Response: “facial babbling” is a precursor to functional movements; feedback allows infant to tailor emotion expressions to its environment. Furthermore, success in this can facilitate attachment. Will M. 77 Response (innate ≠ no environment input required). Developmental constraints will constrain optimality (learning and maturation of visual system is necessary) Natural selection will constrain infinite variation. “Open systems” are adaptive when cultural variation affects whether the system leads to an adaptive outcome. Mapping cultural variation to different adaptive outcomes would be a good future direction. Will M. 78 Feedback loops Internal: Proprioceptive External: Social – "I take smiling to be a social signal," Messinger says. "I really think that babies are learning what joy is by sharing it with someone else." In other words, smiling might not be so much an expression of a preexisting state as a path we take to get to that state. Why do babies smile? - Slate Magazine, Jul 1, 2010 – dmessinger@miami.edu 79 Mirror Neuron System Neural basis for apperception of others’ experience What you see is what you feel Research limitations – Inter-species generalization, imaging constraints, etc But potential source of ASD affective deficits… Relative reduced activity of pars opercularis of inferior frontal gyrus to facial expressions RH LH Figure 1 Reliable activity during imitation of emotional expressions. (a,b) Activity in bilateral pars opercularis (stronger in the right) of the inferior frontal gyrus is seen in the typically developing group (a) but not in the ASD group (b). A between-group comparison (c) revealed that this difference was significant (t 4 1.83, P o 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster level). RH, right hemisphere; LH, left hemisphere. Internalization model 1. 2. 3. Three postulates describing the mechanisms involved in the development of the emotion components The processes that differentiate the appraisal and expression components are interdependent Expression signs can be used symbolically Body sensations accompanying emotions are transformed into conscious feeling Oberwelland Holodynski & Friedlmeier (2010). The Development of Emotions and Emotion Regulation Emotion is not facial expression “Happiness alone is not sufficient to produce smiles. Rather, happiness produces smiles only during social interaction.” (Ferenandez-Dols & Ruiz-Belda, 1995, p. 1114). dmessinger@miami.edu 91 Behavioral ecologists. Biologically oriented ethologists attempting to explain signaling behavior across species within a framework of evolution through natural selection. Facial expressions do not reflect emotions They occur during social interaction & reflect social motives and negotiation dmessinger@miami.edu 92 Behavioral ecology view Facial displays: – – – “signify our trajectory in a given social interaction” “’social tools’ aiding the negotiation of social encounters” “specific to intent and context” dmessinger@miami.edu 93