Operational Risk Management CAP Approach Top-down leader backing Decentralized implementation Moderate implementation tempo Safety lead role for crossfunctional implementation CAP ORM Vision “Create a Civil Air Patrol in which all personnel manage risk such that all operations are successfully completed at the least possible cost.” CAP ORM Mission “Enhance mission effectiveness at all levels while minimizing risk.” The CAP ORM Concept All are responsible for using ORM. Risk is inherent in all operations. Risk can be controlled. The Compliance Culture My job is to comply with the standard. I am told what the standard is. If I am not told, I don’t usually act. When I am given a standard, the standard is my objective. When I meet a standard, that’s it. The Performance Culture My job is to optimize risk - to perform. I’m given a standard, but that is only a baseline. I use ORM to exceed it. Standards are only a start point. Meeting a standard means little. I continuously improve. ORM Principles Accept no unnecessary risks. Make risk decisions at the appropriate level. Accept risks when benefits outweigh costs. Integrate ORM into doctrine and planning at all levels. Accept no unnecessary risk What are the three main reasons that “unnecessary risks” are sometimes taken? How can the taking of unnecessary risks be minimized? Corollary is “Accept Necessary Risk”. Three reasons for taking unnecessary risks #1 - Not aware of the risk. #2 - An incorrect assessment of cost versus benefit. #3 - Interpreting “bold risk taking” to mean gambling. Procedures for minimizing the taking of unnecessary risk Improve hazard detection procedures and awareness of risks. Improve risk decision making skills at all levels of the organization. Train personnel at all levels regarding the risk management “credo” not “Mission accomplishment at any cost”, but “Mission accomplishment at the least cost.” Make risk decision at the appropriate level What is the “appropriate” level? How do field leaders know if they are the appropriate level? Is the appropriate level a constant or does it change? Finding the appropriate level Who will answer in the event of an accident? Who is the senior person at the operational scene? Who possesses best insight into the full benefits and costs of a risk? Who has the resources to mitigate the risk? What level makes the most operational sense? What level makes these types of decisions in other operational activities? THE MAKING OF IMPORTANT RISK DECISIONS SHOULD BE PREPLANNED WHENEVER POSSIBLE ACCEPT RISKS WHEN BENEFITS OUTWEIGH COSTS What happens when organizations stop taking risks ? It becomes “bureaucratized” WEBSTER: “BUREAUCRACY: A system of administration characterized by lack of initiative and flexibility, by indifference to human needs or public opinion, and by a tendency to defer decisions to superiors or to impede action with red tape.” • • • • It loses its competitive position. Innovation is minimized. It becomes reactive to events. Morale and esprit decline. The ORM 6 - Step Process 6. Supervise and Review 5. Risk Control Implementation 4. Make Control Decisions 1. Identify the Hazards 2. Assess the Risks 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures Using the ORM process Apply the steps in sequence. Maintain balance in the process. Apply the process as a cycle. Involve people fully. STEP 1 “HAZARD ID” Hazard: Any real or potential condition that can cause mission degradation, injury, illness, or death to personnel or damage to or loss of equipment or property. 1. Identify the Hazards 6. Supervise and Review 5. Risk Control Implementation 4. Make Control Decisions 2. Assess the Risks 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures MISSION TASK ANALYSIS Action 1 What is at risk? Focus on the critical components of the mission. They will be primary targets for Hazard ID. OVERALL MISSION USING AN OPERATIONS FLOW OR TIMELINE TO IDENTIFY HAZARDS Watch for issues between phases, at the interfaces. OPERATION ALPHA PHASES START 1 2 3 4 5 6 RISK LEVELS H L H M EH M FINISH FINDING THE IMPORTANT TARGETS Review the mission statement. Focus on key capabilities and the associated equipment. Look at past patterns of mishaps to detect high impact issues. Ask operational personnel what is important. Use the timeline. LIST HAZARDS Action 2 Sources of Information The 7 Primary Hazard ID Tools BASIC SOURCES There are three basic sources: - Experts and References - Traditional Techniques - (Inspections, Mishap Reports, Interviews, Audits) - Hazard Analysis Tools SOURCES AT UNIT Unit personnel A lessons learned database or file A safety survey and/or fire inspection hazard inventory An inventory of hazardous materials with locations Mishap reports and Annual Mishap Analyses PRIMARY HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TOOLS Operations Analysis Preliminary Hazard Analysis What If Tool Scenario Process Tool Logic Diagrams Change Analysis Cause and Effect Tool (See tutorial or AFPAM91-215 for more detail) LIST CAUSES Action 3 Use the 5M model to detect root (systemic) cause factors. Man root causes - Doesn’t know - Training, Doesn’t care - Motivation, Can’t do - Selection. Machine - Poor design, faulty maintenance, procedures. Media - Weak facility design, lack of provisions for natural phenomena. Management - Inadequate procedures, standards and controls. Mission - Poorly developed, weak understanding, incompatibilities. RISK ASSESSMENT The Process which associates “hazards” with “risks”. 6. Supervise and Review 1. Identify the Hazards 2. Assess the Risks 5. Risk Control Implementation 4. Make Control Decisions 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures ASSESS THE RISK Action 1: Assess hazard exposure Action 2: Assess hazard severity Action 3: Assess mission impact Action 4: Complete assessment HAZARD VERSUS RISK HAZARD RISK A description of a condition that can impair mission accomplishment. No indication of its mission significance. A hazard for which we have estimated the severity, probability, and scope with which it can impact our mission. EXPOSURE Action 1 Expressed in terms of time, proximity, volume, or repetition. SEVERITY Action 2 What impact on mission? What impact on people? What impact on things (materiel, facilities, environment)? SEVERITY CATEGORIES CATASTROPHIC - Complete mission failure, death, or loss of system CRITICAL - Major mission degradation, severe injury, occupational illness, or major system damage MODERATE - Minor mission degradation, injury, minor occupational illness, or minor system damage NEGLIGIBLE - Less than minor mission degradation, injury, occupational illness or minor system damage PROBABILITY Action 3 Use the cumulative probability of all causation factors. Express in descriptive or quantitative terms. Use experience data when possible. Acknowledge uncertainty. PROBABILITY CATEGORIES Frequent Likely Occasional Seldom Unlikely THE RISK ASSESSMENT INDEX Probability Frequent A S E V E R I T Y Catastrophic I Critical II Moderate Negligible Likely B Occasional Seldom C D Unlikely E Extremely Hig III h High Hig h Medium Low IV Risk Levels ASSESSMENT PITFALLS Over-optimism Misrepresentation Alarmism Indiscrimination Prejudice Inaccuracy THE RISK TOTEM POLE Biggest hazard By ranking the hazards, we can work them on a worst first basis. This is vital because risk control resources are always limited and should be directed at the big problems first to assure maximum bang for the buck. Least hazard worthy of action THE TOTEM POLE DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT In the fully mature ORM world, every individual benefits from the knowledge of the priority of hazards (totem pole) that exist in their life. A key obligation of leaders is to see that their subordinates possess this knowledge . Traditional RM - Personnel can’t name or prioritize hazards -- can only name generic hazards. ORM - Personnel can name and prioritize RISKS that impact them and their mission. ANALYZE RISK CONTROL MEASURES 6. Supervise and Review 5. Risk Control Implementation 4. Make Control Decisions 1. Identify the Hazards 2. Assess the Risks 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures ANALYZE RISK CONTROL MEASURES Action 1: Identify control options Action 2: Determine control effects Action 3: Prioritize risk control measures IDENTIFY CONTROL OPTIONS Action 1 Tools Available: – The Major Risk Control Options – Risk Control Options Matrix MAJOR CONTROL OPTIONS Reject Avoid Delay Transfer Spread Compensate Reduce CONTROL OPTIONS MATRIX Engineer Guard Improve Task Design Limit Exposure Selection of Personnel Train and Educate Warn Motivate Reduce Effects Rehabilitate DETERMINE CONTROL EFFECTS Action 2 What is the impact on probability? What is the impact on severity? What will the risk control cost? How will various risk control options work together? CONSIDERATIONS IN CONTROL EFFECTS Some risk controls impede each other. Example: Security and Safety Some risk controls reinforce each other. Example: Training & Motivation When cost effective, use risk controls in depth. Be sure to evaluate the full costs. PRIORITIZE RISK CONTROL MEASURES Action 3 Get operator input. Focus risk controls where they have maximum impact. Benchmark already existing risk controls. MAKE CONTROL DECISIONS 6. Supervise and Review 5. Risk Control Implementation 4. Make Control Decisions 1. Identify the Hazards 2. Assess the Risks 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures MAKE CONTROL DECISIONS Action 1: Select Risk Controls Action 2: Make Risk Decision SELECT RISK CONTROLS Action 1 SOME IMPORTANT DECISION MAKING CONSIDERATIONS Make decisions at the right time. Make decisions at the right level. Always make the mission supportive risk decision WHEN IS THE RIGHT TIME? AS LATE AS POSSIBLE. WHY? - More time to improve ORM - The need for the risk may go away BUT NEVER TOO LATE - Miss the operational train - Radically increase costs. WHAT IS THE RIGHT LEVEL? What are the operational realities? Who will take the heat if it goes bad? Who has the best grasp of the risk and the opportunity issues? Who would make the decision in combat? Who can commit the risk control resources? A BASIC OBJECTIVE Endeavor to push the average risk decision down the chain of command over time WHY? Because the detail and understanding of the implications of the decision increases the closer to the operator you get…IF THE LEADERS AT THE LOWER LEVELS HAVE GRASPED THE OVERALL IMPLICATIONS OF ORM. MAKE RISK DECISIONS Action 2 ALWAYS GO FOR THE RISK WHEN TOTAL BENEFITS OUTWEIGH TOTAL COSTS ALWAYS REJECT THE RISK WHEN TOTAL COSTS OUTWEIGH TOTAL BENEFITS WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BOLD, DECISIVE RISK AND A GAMBLE? IMPLEMENT RISK CONTROLS 6. Supervise and Review 5. Risk Control Implementation 4. Make Control Decisions 1. Identify the Hazards 2. Assess the Risks 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures IMPLEMENT RISK CONTROLS Action 1: Make implementation clear Action 2: Establish accountability Action 3: Provide support RISK CONTROLS MUST BE INTEGRATED Should be integrated fully within the plans, processes, and operations with which they are associated. Within the area in which they are integrated, risk controls should compete for resources and time based on their relative significance to the mission. Risk control should be compatible with the “system”. WHY MUST RISK CONTROLS BE FULLY INTEGRATED? Integration forces balancing of mission needs. Integration captures more of the knowledge and experience of large numbers of operators. Integration reduces the number and diversity of references needed to do the job right. Integration eliminates redundancy and gaps between functions. Integration strengthens accountability. Integration (in plans, regulations, etc..) reduces costs and workloads. MAKE IMPLEMENTATION CLEAR Action 1 Factors to consider: – Fully involve operational personnel. – Frame the control within the organizational culture. – Provide specific task-oriented guidance. – Test it on small sample of the target audience. – Coordinate as necessary. ESTABLISH ACCOUNTABILITY Action 2 Factors to consider: – Use the power of command and leadership. – Use the motivation model. – Create meaningful, positive incentives. – Assure accountability is vertically integrated. PROVIDE SUPPORT Action 3 Factors to consider: – Avoid the common problems. – Provide complete packages (clear, policy, job aids, decision tools, models, databases, training, motivation). – Provide sustained feedback on results. SUPERVISE AND REVIEW 6. Supervise and Review 5. Risk Control Implementation 4. Make Control Decisions 1. Identify the Hazards 2. Assess the Risks 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures SUPERVISE AND REVIEW Action 1: Supervise Action 2: Review Action 3: Feedback SUPERVISE Action 1 Factors to consider: – When properly integrated, supervision of risk controls is exactly the same as supervision of any leadership action. A primary reason for integration of Operational Risk Management is so that risk controls are supervised just like any other leadership action. REVIEW Action 2 Factors to consider: – Use rates and numbers when they have a sound statistical basis. – Use direct measures of risk to supplement rates and numbers or when rates and numbers are not statistically valid. – Systematically assess the results of the ORM process in De-briefs, lessons learned, etc. Was the benefit worth the cost? – Adapt and reapply ORM as the mission unfolds. DON’T USE RATES AND NUMBERS UNLESS You have an adequate exposure base. You have statistically significant changes. You make fair comparisons. You “peel” them back. AUGMENT LEGITIMATE DATA WITH MEASURES OF RISK Critical behaviors Critical conditions Critical attitudes Critical skills and knowledge Critical programmatic elements Critical means clearly connected to loss potential, i.e., high risk THE ORM CONTINUUM PLANNING Deliberate ORM Detailed Hazard ID Integration We try to get most ORM done here OPERATIONS Largely Time-critical Change Analysis Real Time Highly Decentralized AFTERACTION Assess metrics Deliberate ORM Integration Feedback to Planning FEEDBACK Action 3 Factors to consider: – Cross talk regarding successes and failures. – Feedback to leaders and other members. – Input to established databases (lessons learned). Tie back into Step 1 to continue. Questions