Animal Evidence
Source: World of Forensic Science. Ed. K. Lee Lerner and Brenda Wilmoth Lerner. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale,
2005. p25-26. From Gale Virtual Reference Library.
Evidence of animals, especially animal hair, is often discovered at crime scenes. Pet or other animal hairs can
be found on the clothes of the victim or on other items of physical evidence collected at the crime scene. The
identification and analysis of human and animal hairs from a crime scene can indicate physical contact
between the victim and a suspect, or provide other investigative leads. Transferring of pet hairs to the victim, to
a suspect, or to the crime scene may happen when the perpetrator is a pet owner (or when the victim owns a
pet), or when the crime was committed in a place where animals are kept, such as barns, stables, basements, or
transport vehicles.
Through microscopic analysis, hairs can be identified as belonging to a particular species of animal. In the case
of a known suspect, animal hair identified on the victim's clothing can be compared to hairs found either in the
suspect's home, car, or clothing in search of a match. If the pet of the victim or of the suspect is available,
further forensic analysis can be made to confirm whether that particular pet is the source of the hair in question.
The pet's bed or brush can also provide samples for such identification.
When human remains are found outdoors, forensic procedures are conducted to establish whether the cause of
death was due to homicide, suicide, accident, animal attack, or natural illness (i.e., heart attack, stroke, or other
pathological condition). Perforation wounds, bullet holes, blunt force injuries, and other lesions normally point
to a criminal act as the cause of death. However, animal access to corpses may cause such destruction of the
remains that the real cause of death can be impossible to determine in certain cases. Animals feeding on a dead
body leave distinct marks on bones and tissues. The signs of wild carnivores and scavenger birds, for instance,
are recognizable through characteristic marks left on the bones and soft tissues by claws, fangs, and beaks.
Nevertheless, even bodies found in urban areas or inside doors can suffer animal destruction by rodents and
domestic animals, such as dogs and ferrets.
Forensic anthropologists are experts in determining the gender, race, and age of unrecognizable Page 26 | Top
of Article remains (usually by studying the bones) and in identifying what kind of animal activity was
responsible by the destruction of those remains. Bodies of drowned individuals found on seashores or
riverbanks can also display signs of animal activity, such as from crabs or fish.
Animal evidence in human remains has been systematically registered and studied since 1943, including the
action of a variety of species, such as wild dogs, large cats, bears, cows, horses, poisonous snakes, marine
animals, constricting snakes, rodents, birds, and domestic dogs. The types of injuries and typical feeding
behaviors of various species are also well documented. One of the indications of animal scavenging on human
remains involves bones or body parts that are scattered, such as a skull found some distance from the body,
with teeth lost after death. This is common in bodies left on the surface or buried on shallow graves in woods or
country areas. Missing body parts or bones are often retrieved from dens of coyotes, foxes, or skunks along
tracks and pathways used by these animals.
The types of postmortem marks left on human remains by animals allow the identification of the species
involved because of the known specific anatomical features and feeding behavior of each species. Seagulls,
crows, owls, and other carrion-eating birds leave puncture wounds in the flesh, caused by their hard sharp bills.
Vultures damage bones with their talons and beaks as they remove the flesh. Coyote, fox, and other wild and
domestic canids puncture, tear, and crush the soft tissues by gnawing and shaking their heads, splintering bones,
and leaving jagged bone edges through the action of their posterior teeth. Rodents have sharp paralleled incisors
that leave parallel furrows in flesh and bones, with a pattern of layered destruction of tissues. Big cats leave vshaped punctures from their canine teeth, claw slashes, and abrasions, and great amounts of crushed and
splintered bones. Big cats, wolves, and wild dogs have a preference for eating the internal organs first, therefore
eviscerating the body. Domestic dogs also can eat human remains when they are hungry, causing great
destruction of the corpse. Such situations can pose extra challenges to forensic investigators in determining the
circumstance, time, and real cause of death.
Anthropology ; Crime scene investigation ; Death, cause of ; Evidence ; Microscope, comparison ;
Skeletal analysis ; Taphonomy .
SEE ALSO
Source Citation
"Animal Evidence." World of Forensic Science. Ed. K. Lee Lerner and Brenda Wilmoth Lerner. Vol. 1. Detroit:
Gale, 2005. 25-26. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 29 May 2012.
Document URL
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX3448300026&v=2.1&u=fsecoll&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w
Gale Document Number: GALE|CX3448300026