Lecture 3 - CCAR - University of Colorado Boulder

advertisement
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I
Fall 2015
Professor Brandon A. Jones
Lecture 3: Time and Coordinate Systems
University of Colorado
Boulder

Homework 0 - Not required

Homework 1 Due September 4

I am out of town Sept. 15-18
University of Colorado
Boulder
2

Provide enough detail to answer the problem and
allow for grading
◦ For a figure, we need labeled axes, fonts big enough to
read, etc.
◦ We do not need a detailed description unless it is
requested in the problem set

As stated in the syllabus, legible hand-generated
derivations are okay as an image in the PDF

If you are spending more than 20 minutes on the
write-up, you may be including too much detail
◦ This will not be true for the project write-up!
University of Colorado
Boulder
3

Orbital elements – Notes on Implementation

Perturbing Forces – Wrap-up

Coordinate and Time Systems
University of Colorado
Boulder
4
Orbit Elements – Notes on Implementation
University of Colorado
Boulder
5

The six orbit elements (or Kepler elements) are
constant in the problem of two bodies (two
gravitationally attracting spheres, or point masses)
◦ Define shape of the orbit
 a: semimajor axis
 e: eccentricity
◦ Define the orientation of the orbit in space
 i: inclination
 Ω: angle defining location of ascending node (AN)
 : angle from AN to perifocus; argument of perifocus
◦ Reference time/angle:
 tp: time of perifocus (or mean anomaly at specified time)
 v,M: True or mean anomaly
University of Colorado
Boulder
6

You will get an imaginary number from cos-1(a) if
a=1+1e-16 (for example)

The 1e-16 is a result of finite point arithmetic

You may need to use something akin to this
pseudocode:
University of Colorado
Boulder
7


Inverse tangent has
an angle ambiguity
Better to use atan2()
when possible:
(1,1)
Same value
for atan
(-1,-1)
University of Colorado
Boulder
8
Perturbed Satellite Motion
University of Colorado
Boulder
9
University of Colorado
Boulder

The 2-body problem
provides us with a
foundation of orbital motion

In reality, other forces exist
which arise from
gravitational and
nongravitational sources

In the general equation of
satellite motion, a is the
perturbing force (causes the
actual motion to deviate
from exact 2-body)
10
University of Colorado
Boulder

Sphere of constant
mass density is not an
accurate representation
for planets

Define gravitational
potential function such
that the gravitational
acceleration is:
11

The commonly used expression for the gravitational potential is
given in terms of mass distribution coefficients Jn, Cnm, Snm

n is degree, m is order

Coordinates of evaluation point are given in spherical coordinates:
r, geocentric latitude φ, longitude 
University of Colorado
Boulder
12
University of Colorado
Boulder

U.S. Vanguard satellite
launched in 1958, used
to determine J2 and J3

J2 represents most of the
oblateness; J3 represents
a pear shape

J2 ≈ 1.08264 x 10-3

J3 ≈ - 2.5324 x 10-6

You will only need to
implement a J2 model for
this class (HW2)

Our new orbit energy is

Is this constant over time? Why or why not?

What if we only include J2 in U’ and pure
rotation about Z-axis for Earth?
University of Colorado
Boulder
14
University of Colorado
Boulder
15
From D. King-Hele, 1964, Theory of
Satellite Orbits in an Atmosphere
University of Colorado
Boulder

Atmospheric drag is the
dominant nongravitational
force at low altitudes if the
celestial body has an
atmosphere

Drag removes energy from
the orbit and results in
da/dt < 0, de/dt < 0

Orbital lifetime of satellite
strongly influenced by drag

You will use a simple
exponential model for the
atmospheric density (HW2)
16

What are the other forces that can perturb a satellite’s
motion?
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Solar Radiation Pressure (SRP)
Thrusters
N-body gravitation (Sun, Moon, etc.)
Electromagnetic
Solid and liquid body tides
Relativistic Effects
Reflected radiation (e.g., ERP)
Coordinate system errors
Spacecraft radiation
University of Colorado
Boulder
17
Coordinate and Time Frames
University of Colorado
Boulder
18

Countless systems exist to measure the passage of time. To
varying degrees, each of the following types is important in
astrodynamics:
◦ Atomic Time
 Unit of duration is defined based on an atomic clock.
◦ Sidereal Time
 Unit of duration is defined based on Earth’s rotation relative to distant stars.
◦ Universal Time
 Unit of duration is designed to represent a mean solar day as uniformly as
possible.
◦
Dynamical Time
 Unit of duration is defined based on the orbital motion of the Solar System.
University of Colorado
Boulder
19
University of Colorado
Boulder
20








Question: How do you quantify the passage
of time?
Year
Month
Day
Second
Pendulums
Atoms
Sundial
University of Colorado
Boulder
What are some issues
with each of these?
Gravity
Earthquakes
Errant elbows
21

Definitions of a Year
◦ Julian Year: 365.25 days, where an SI “day” = 86400 SI “seconds”.
◦ Sidereal Year: 365.256 363 004 mean solar days
 Duration of time required for Earth to traverse one revolution about the sun,
measured via distant star.
◦ Tropical Year: 365.242 19 days
 Duration of time for Sun’s ecliptic longitude to advance 360 deg. Shorter on
account of Earth’s axial precession.
◦ Anomalistic Year: 365.259 636 days
 Perihelion to perihelion.
◦ Draconic Year: 365.620 075 883 days
 One ascending lunar node to the next (two lunar eclipse seasons)

Main idea: When we talk about time, we need to be precise with
our statements!
University of Colorado
Boulder
22

Rotating: changing orientation in space
◦ The Earth is a rotating bodyThink about the motion of a
top. The Earth has similar changes in the rotation axis

Inertial: fixed orientation in space
◦ Inertial coordinate frames are typically tied to hundreds
of observations of quasars and other very distant nearfixed objects in the sky.
◦ Underlying problem: How do we estimate the inertial
frame from a rotating one?
University of Colorado
Boulder
23



Define xyz reference frame
(Earth centered, Earth fixed;
ECEF or ECF), fixed in the
solid (and rigid) Earth and
rotates with it
Longitude λ measured from
Greenwich Meridian
0≤ λ < 360° E; or measure λ
East (+) or West (-)
Latitude (geocentric latitude)
measured from equator (φ is
North (+) or South (-))
◦ At the poles,
φ = -90° S
University of Colorado
Boulder
φ = + 90° N or
24
University of Colorado
Boulder

In this class, we will keep the
transformation simple:

In reality, this is a poor model!
25

The transformation between ECI and ECF is
required in the equations of motion
◦ Why?
◦ Depends on the current time!
◦ Thanks to Einstein, we know that time is not simple…
University of Colorado
Boulder
26
Animations/Images courtesy of WikiCommons
University of Colorado
Boulder

Accurate representations
must account for
precession, nutation, and
other effects

Classic definition of ECF
and ECI transformation
based on an `Equinox’

Modern definitions instead
use the “Celestial
Intermediate Origin” (CIO)

Coordinate Systems = Frame + Origin
◦ Inertial coordinate systems require that the system
be non-accelerating.
 Inertial frame + non-accelerating origin
◦ “Inertial” coordinate systems are usually just nonrotating coordinate systems.
 Why is a frame at the center of the Earth not a true
inertial frame?
University of Colorado
Boulder
28

Converting from ECR to ECI

BPN accounts for nutation, precision and a bias term

R is the Earth’s rotation, which is not constant! (In this class, we

W is polar motion

Caution: small effects may be important in particular application
only include this component)
◦ Earth Orientation Parameters
University of Colorado
Boulder
29


We did not spend a lot of time on this
subject, but it is very, very important to orbit
determination!
What impact can the coordinates and time
have on propagation and observing a
spacecraft?
University of Colorado
Boulder
30


Propagate a spacecraft where the model includes
the two-body, J2, and drag forces
Observe the change in the orbital elements over
time as a result of these forces
◦ Why would they change?

Make sure your propagator is working by looking
at the constants of motion
◦ Specific energy
◦ Specific angular momentum

Once you complete HW 1, you are ready to start
HW 2!
University of Colorado
Boulder
31
Download