Sri Rama Prasanna Pavani, Ariel Libertun, Sharon King, and Carol Cogswell
Micro Optical – Imaging Systems Laboratory
University of Colorado at Boulder http://moisl.colorado.edu
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 1
Transparent objects
(phase objects) modulate only the phase of light
Square law detectors do not detect phase modulations
Convert phase modulations into
“detectable” intensity modulations
Bright field
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 2
Phase contrast Diff. Interference Contrast
Convert phase modulations into “detectable” intensity modulations.
Digital Holography
Quantitative phase for weak phase objects
No phase wrapping
X Halo and shading-off
X Only for thin objects
Quantitative phase after reconstruction
No phase wrapping
X Polarization sensitive
X Only for thin objects
X Multiple images
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder
Quantitative phase after reconstruction
Thick phase objects
Single image
X Vibration sensitive
X Phase wrapping
3
Quantitative phase imaging
Purpose:
Applicability:
Thick, partially absorbing samples
Polarization insensitive
Speed:
Miscellaneous:
Single image
Non-scanning (wide field)
Non-Iterative
Incoherent source
Inexpensive
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 4
Amplitude mask in the field diaphragm
Pattern is imaged on the sample
Phase object distorts the pattern
Record the distorted pattern
Analytical formula calculates phase
Vs
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder
0.2
(mm)
0.1
5
2D dot shift
1D dot shift
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 6
o Analytically relate deformation to the optical path length
( ( ) )
( ( ) )
t t ( ( ) ) C
r
i o Consider a 1D phase object p(x) o Ray R from point A, after refraction, appears as if it originated from B n
1 o Deformation t(x) is the distance between A and B
A t(x)
Pavani et al, “Quantitative bright field phase microscopy”, to be sent to Applied Optics
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder
B p(x) n
2
7
p ( x )
2
( n
1 n
1 n
2
n
2
)
t ( x ) dx
C
1
2
1D deformations After 1D integrations
Quantitative Phase
2D deformation
C m
1
C m
P x
2
( m
1 , d )
P x
2
( m , d ) P y
2
( m
1 , d )
P y
2
( m , d )
Pavani et al, “Quantitative bright field phase microscopy”, to be sent to Applied Optics
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 8
Quadratic phase
50
200
25
100
0 100 200
0
X 100
5
18
0 9 Calculated Phase
-5 0
1D deformations After 1D integrations
X 100
5
18
200
100
0 100 200
0
9
50
25
0
-5
Error
8
4
0
-4
-8
0 100 200
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder
0
Peak error is 5 orders less than peak phase
9
Dot shift
Original pattern
Deformed pattern
16.54
Object:
Drop of optical cement
360
X,Y Deformations
3
0
180
Quantitative phase
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder
40
30
20
10
0
360
0 240 480
-3
3
0
180
0 240 480
-4
10
Profilometer
Our method
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 11
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 12
Prof. Rafael Piestun
Prof. Gregory Beylkin
Vaibhav Khire
CDM Optics PhD Fellowship
National Science Foundation Grant No. 0455408
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 13
J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics , (Roberts & Company, 2005)
M Pluta, Advanced Light Microscopy, vol 2: Specialised Methods , (Elsevier, 1989)
M. R. Arnison, K. G. Larkin, C. J. R. Sheppard, N. I. Smith, C. J. Cogswell, “Linear phase imaging using differential interference contrast microscopy”
Journal of Microscopy 214 (1), 7
–12 (2004)
C. Preza, "Rotational-diversity phase estimation from differential-interference-contrast microscopy images," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17 , 415-424 (2000)
Sharon V. King, Ariel R. Libertun, Chrysanthe Preza, and Carol J. Cogswell, “Calibration of a phase-shifting DIC microscope for quantitative phase imaging,”
Proc. SPIE 6443, 64430M (2007)
E. Cuche, F. Bevilacqua, and C. Depeursinge, “Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging,” Opt. Lett. 24 , 291-293 (1999)
P. Marquet, B. Rappaz, P. J. Magistretti, E. Cuche, Y. Emery, T. Colomb, and C. Depeursinge, “Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy,” Opt. Lett.
30 , 468-470 (2005)
M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics , ed. 7, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1999).
A. C. Kak, M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging , (IEEE Press, New York, NY, 1988)
A. C. Sullivan, Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Campus Box 390, Boulder, CO 80309, USA and R. McLeod are preparing a manuscript to be called “Tomographic reconstruction of weak index structures in volume photopolymers.”
Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, et al.,
“Optical coherence tomography,”
Science1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1178-81.
A. F. Fercher, C. K. Hitzenberger, “Optical coherence tomography,” Chapter 4 in Progress in Optics 44, Elsevier Science B.V. (2002)
A. F. Fercher, W. Drexler, C. K. Hitzenberger and T. Lasser, “Optical coherence tomography - principles and applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys.
66 239
–303 (2003)
M. R. Ayres and R. R. McLeod, "Scanning transmission microscopy using a position-sensitive detector," Appl. Opt. 45 , 8410-8418 (2006)
BaroneNugent, E., Barty, A. & Nugent, K. “Quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy I: optical microscopy,” J. Microsc . 206 , 194 –203 (2002).
J. Hartmann, "Bemerkungen uber den Bau und die Justirung von Spektrographen," Z. Instrumentenkd. 20, 47 (1900).
I. Ghozeil, “Hartmann and other screen tests,” in Optical Shop Testing, D. Malacara, second edition Wiley, New York, 1992, pp. 367–396.
R. V. Shack and B. C. Platt, “Production and use of a lenticular Hartmann screen,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 656 (1971).
V. Srinivasan, H. C. Liu, and M. Halioua, “Automated phase-measuring profilometry of 3-D diffuse objects,” Appl. Opt. 23 , 3105- (1984)
M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy,” Journal of Microscopy 198 (2), 82–87
(2000)
M. D. Feit and J. A. , J. Fleck, "Light propagation in graded-index optical fibers (T)," Appl. Opt. 17 , 3990- (1978)
Haralick, Robert M., and Linda G. Shapiro. Computer and Robot Vision, Volume I. Addison-Wesley, 1992. pp. 28-48.
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 14
Industrial inspection, biological imaging
Extracting information from axial deformation
Extending the depth of field of the system
Fabrication of an amplitude mask with higher spatial resolution
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 15
1 Dimensional analysis p ( x )
tan n
1
(
t r
( x
)
i
) x
A
(from geometry) p ( x )
tan sin
1
n n
1
2 sin
tan
1 n
1 t ( x ) dp ( x ) dx
tan
1 p ( x )
n
1 t ( x )
( n
1
1 ) dp ( x ) dx dp ( x ) dx
1
2 n
(Snell’s law, ) dx x
A
1
3
1
6
( n
1 )
3
1
3
( n
1 )
2
3 n
2
n
3
2
dp ( x ) dx
higher order terms
p ( x ) dp ( x )
( n n
1
1
n n
2
2
) t ( x ) dx p ( x )
2 I ( x )
C
2
1
(Taylor expansion)
( n n
1
1
n n
2
2
) t ( x ) dx
I ( x )
C
2
C = 2 (C2 – C1) n
n
1 n
2
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 16
M
2 Dimensional analysis
Apply 1D solution along x and y to obtain P x
2 and P y
2
P x
2
( m , 1 : N )
P
2
( m , 1 : N )
C m
P y
2
( 1 : M , n )
P ( 1 : M , n )
K n
C m
1
C m
P x
2
( m
1 , d )
P x
2
( m , d ) P
2
( m
1 , d )
P
2
( m , d ) ,
N
P y
2
( m
1 , d )
P y
2
( m , d )
P
2
( m
1 , d )
P
2
( m , d )
C m
1
C m
P x
2
( m
1 , d )
P x
2
( m , d )
P x
2
P 2
P y
2
( m
1 , d )
P y
2
( m , d ) .
P y
2
Pavani et al - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 17