International Trade CHAPTER 19 © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning 1 Profile of Imports and Exports U.S. exports of goods and services amounted to about 12% of GDP in 2000 High-technology products, such as computer software and hardware, aircraft, telecommunications equipment Industrial supplies and materials Agricultural products Entertainment products such as movies and recorded music The big change over the last 25 years has been a growth in the dollar value of machinery exports nearly half the capital goods produced in U.S. are exported 2 Profile of Imports and Exports U.S. imports of goods and services were 14% the size of GDP in 2000 Manufactured consumer goods such as automobiles from Japan and Germany Capital goods such as high-tech printing presses from Germany Oil Metals such as lead, zinc, and copper Major change in U.S. imports over the last 25 years has been the increase in spending on foreign oil 3 Profile of Imports and Exports Major trading partners of the U.S. Canada is the largest followed by Mexico and Japan Other key trading partners include Germany, Great Britain, South Korea, France, Hong Kong, Italy and Brazil 4 Production Possibilities Without Trade Suppose that we have two countries, United States and Izodia who produce two goods, food and clothing The U.S. has 100 million workers and Izodia has 200 million Recall that the production possibilities table / curve assumes full employment of all resources and a fixed state of technology 5 Production Possibilities Without Trade In our example, each U.S. worker can produce more of both clothing and food than can the Izodian worker U.S. has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods Recall that having an absolute advantage means being able to produce something with fewer resources than other producers require However, so long as the opportunity cost of production differs between two countries, there are gains from specialization and trade 6 Consumption Possibilities Based on Comparative Advantage The opportunity cost of producing 1 more unit of food in the U.S. is ½ unit of clothing, compared to 2 units of clothing in Izodia Law of comparative advantage says that each country should specialize in producing the good with the lower opportunity cost Thus, the U.S. should produce food and Izodia should produce clothing U.S. exports food and imports clothing while Izodia exports clothing and imports food 7 Consumption Possibilities Based on Comparative Advantage Before the countries can trade, the terms of trade must be established Terms of trade refers to how much of one good exchanges for a unit of another good Suppose that market forces dictate that 1 unit of food trades for 1 unit of clothing 8 Summary United States Without trade U.S. citizens produce and consume 240 million units of food and 180 million units of clothing With trade they produce 600 units of food, consume 400 and exchange the remaining 200 units in return for 200 million units of clothing Izodians Without trade, produce and consume 120 million units of food and 160 million units of clothing With trade, they wear 200 million units of clothing and exchange the remaining 200 million units for 200 million units of food 9 Summary The only constraint on trade is that, for each good, total world production must equal total world consumption In our two-country world, this means that the amount of food the United States exports must equal the amount of food Izodia imports The same is true for Izodia’s exports of clothing 10 Summary Specialization and trade allow both countries to consume more of both goods Without specialization, total world food and clothing production were 360 and 340 million units, respectively After specialization, the two countries produce 600 million units of food and 400 million units of clothing 11 Reasons for International Specialization How do we know what each country should produce and what goods should be traded? Differences in Resource Endowments Economies of Scale Differences in Tastes 12 Differences in Resource Endowments Trade is often prompted by differences in resource endowments, especially with respect to labor and capital Countries differ not only in their amounts of labor and capital but in the qualities of those resources, including having an educated labor force Similarly, capital that reflects the most recent technological developments is more productive than obsolete capital The productivity of both labor and capital differ because of educational levels of the work force and because of technologically sophisticated capital 13 Differences in Resource Endowments Some countries are blessed with an abundance of fertile land and favorable growing seasons • For example, the United States has been called the “bread-basket of the world” because of its rich farmland • Honduras has the ideal climate for growing bananas; Columbia, Brazil, and Jamaica have the best climate for coffee • Differences in seasons across countries also serve as a basis for trade 14 Economies of Scale Whenever production is subject to economies of scale (long-run average cost falls as firms expand production), countries can gain from trade if each nation specializes Such specialization allows each nation to produce at a greater output rate a decline in average production costs The primary reason for establishing the single integrated market in Western Europe 15 Differences in Tastes Even if all countries had identical resource endowments and combined those resources with equal efficiency Each country would still gain from trade so long as tastes and preferences differed among countries English like tea, Americans like coffee Soft drinks are more popular in America than in Western Europe French drink more wine, while Germans prefer beer 16 Trade Restrictions Despite the benefits of international trade nearly all countries at one time or another erect barriers to impede or block free trade among nations Two primary trade restrictions are Tariffs Quotas 17 Tariffs Tariff is a tax on imports and can be either specific or ad valorem Specific tariff is a fixed fee amount, for example a tariff of $5 per barrel of oil Ad valorem tariff is a percentage of the price of imports at the point of entry 18 Import Quotas An import quota is a legal limit on the quantity of a particular commodity that can be imported Usually target imports from certain countries To have an impact on the domestic market, or to be effective, a quota must restrict imports to less than the amount imported with free trade 19 Quotas in Practice Quota rights are awarded to exporters through a variety of means By rewarding domestic producers with higher prices and foreign producers with the right to sell goods to the United States, the quota system creates two groups intent on securing and perpetuating these quotas Lobbyists for foreign producers work Congress seeking the right to export to the United States This support, coupled with a lack of opposition from consumers has resulted in quotas that have lasted for decades 20 Tariffs and Quotas Compared Similarities and differences Since the tariff and the quota in our example had identical effects on the price, they reflect the same change in quantity demanded U.S. consumers suffer the same loss of consumer surplus and U.S. producers reap the same gain of consumer surplus The primary difference is that the revenue from the tariff goes to the domestic government, whereas the revenue from the quota goes to whoever secures the right to sell foreign goods in the U.S. market 21 Tariffs and Quotas Compared If quota rights accrue to foreigners, then the domestic economy is worse off with a quota than with a tariff However, even if quota rights go to domestic importers, quotas, like tariffs, still increase the domestic price, restrict quantity reduce consumer surplus Quotas and tariffs also encourage foreign governments to retaliate with quotas and tariffs of their own shrinking U.S. export markets loss in welfare is greater than shown in Exhibits 5 and 6 22 Other Trade Restrictions Export subsidies encourage firms to export Low-interest loans to foreign buyers promote exports of large capital goods Domestic content requirements specify that a certain percentage of a final good’s value must be produced domestically Other requirements concerning health, safety, or technical standards often discriminate against foreign goods 23 Multilateral Agreement After World War II, the United States invited its trading partners to negotiate less stringent restrictions and the result was GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade – GATT – is an international tariff-reduction treaty adopted in 1947 that resulted in a series of negotiated “rounds” aimed at freer trade Adopted by 23 countries, including the United States 24 Multilateral Agreement Each member of GATT agreed to Treat all member nations equally with respect to trade Reduce tariff rates through multinational negotiations Reduce import quotas Set the stage of many trade rounds which offer a package approach rather than an issue-by-issue approach to trade negotiations 25 Trading Rounds Most early GATT trade rounds aimed at reducing tariffs The Kennedy Round in the mid-1960s included new provisions against dumping Dumping refers to selling a commodity abroad at a price that is below its cost of production or below the price charged in the domestic market The most recent round in Uruguay created the World Trade Organization to take over from GATT 26 The World Trade Organization The WTO is a permanent institution located in Geneva, Switzerland Whereas GATT involved only merchandise trade, the WTO includes services and traderelated aspects of intellectual property, such as books, movies, and computer programs Under the most-favored-nation clause, each WTO member must offer all other member countries the same trade concessions offered to any member country Average tariffs will fall from 6% to 4% Includes a dispute settlement body that should be faster, more automatic, and less susceptible to blockage than GATT 27 Common Markets Numerous countries have tried to develop free-trade pacts of their own The largest and best known of the freetrade zones being formed is the European Union. • This began in 1958 with a half-dozen countries and now has expanded to more than a dozen • The idea was to create a barrier-free European market in which goods, services, people, and capital are free to flow to their highest-valued use without restrictions • Twelve members of the European Union have adopted a common currency, the euro, that replaces national currencies in January 2002 28 Common Markets Other trading blocs The Association of Southeast Asian nations: ASEAN South Africa and its four neighboring countries: Southern African Customs Union Half dozen Latin American countries: Mercosur United States, Canada, and Mexico: NAFTA • Mexico hopes to increase U.S. investment by guaranteeing duty-free access to U.S. markets to those who build manufacturing plants in Mexico • The U.S. wants access to Mexico’s 100 million people and its huge oil reserves • U.S. would like to bolster Mexico’s move toward a market-oriented economy 29 Arguments for Trade Restrictions Trade restrictions often appear to be little more than welfare programs for the domestic producers they protect Further, it would be more efficient simply to transfer money from domestic consumers to domestic producers The problem with this is that such a blatant transfer would be politically unpopular Thus, various arguments have been advanced in support of these trade restrictions 30 Arguments for Trade Restrictions National Defense Argument Infant Industry Argument Antidumping Argument Jobs and Income Argument Declining Industries Argument 31 National Defense Argument Industries are said to be in need of protection from import competition because their production is vital in time of war protection is in the national interest Trade restrictions may shelter the defense industry, but other methods, might be more efficient Government subsidies Government could stockpile basic military hardware so that maintaining an ongoing productive capacity would become less essential 32 National Defense Argument The problem with this argument is that most industries can play some role in national defense with the result that this argument gets out of hand For example, wool producers benefited from protective policies because wool was used in military uniforms 33 Infant Industry Argument The rationale here is to protect emerging domestic industries from foreign competition In industries where a firm’s average cost per unit falls as production expands, new domestic firms may need protection from foreign competitors until they reach sufficient size to achieve sufficient economies of scale One problem here is how to identify which industries merit protection, and when do they become old enough to look out for themselves? 34 Infant Industry Argument The very existence of protection may foster inefficiencies that firms may not be able to outgrow The immediate cost of such restrictions is the net welfare loss from higher domestic prices Which may become permanent if the industry never realizes the expected economies of scale 35 Antidumping Argument Dumping is selling a commodity abroad at a price that is below its cost of production or below the price charged in the home market critics argue that a tariff should be imposed to raise the price of dumped goods Key question: Why should U.S. consumers be prevented from buying products for as little as possible even if these low prices are the result of a foreign subsidy? 36 Antidumping Argument If the dumping is persistent, the lower price may increase consumer surplus by an amount that more than offsets losses to domestic producers there is no good reason why consumers should not be allowed to buy imports for a persistently low price An alternative form of dumping, termed predatory dumping, is the temporary sale of an export at a lower price in order to drive out competing producers in that foreign market 37 Antidumping Argument Problem: when dumpers attempt to take advantage of their monopoly position by raising price, other firms, either domestic or foreign, may enter the market and sell for less It is also possible that dumping may be sporadic, as firms occasionally sell at a discount to unload excess inventories in which case it is of little concern The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 effectively eliminates all dumping by imposing a tariff whenever a good is sold for less in the U.S. than in its home market 38 Jobs and Income Argument One of the more common arguments is that they protect U.S. jobs and wage levels Problem: other countries will likely retaliate by restricting their imports to save their jobs with the net result that international trade is reduced wage rates in other countries, especially developing countries, are often a small fraction of wages in the U.S. wages represent just one component of the total production cost and may not necessarily be the most important 39 Jobs and Income Argument What is important is not wage rates per se, rather it is the labor cost per unit of output which depend on both the wage rate and labor productivity Wage rates are high in the United States partly because labor productivity remains the highest in the world Conversely, lower wages in many competing countries can be partially traced to workers’ lack of education and training, the meager amount of physical capital available to each worker, and a business climate that is less stable and less attractive 40 Jobs and Income Argument Over time, as labor productivity in developing countries increases, wage differentials will narrow The increasingly global nature of multinational firms will increase the amount of capital and technology to workers in developing countries To some extent this has already occurred in the stereo and consumer electronics market, and General Motors is planning to make more cars in Mexico 41 Declining Industries Argument Where an established domestic industry is in jeopardy of being displaced by lower-priced imports, there could be a rationale for temporary import restrictions to allow the orderly adjustment of the domestic industry This is particularly true when there are many industry-specific resources 42 Declining Industries Argument The protection offered should not be so generous as to encourage investment in the industry Free trade may displace some U.S. jobs through imports, but it also creates U.S. jobs through exports Where foreign competition appears to have displaced U.S. workers, many foreign companies have built plants in the United States and employ U.S. workers 43 Problems with Protection Trade restrictions raise a number of problems in addition to the ones already mentioned First, protecting one stage of production often requires protecting downstream stages Second, the cost of protection includes not only welfare loss arising from the higher domestic price, but also the cost of the resources used by domestic producers and groups to secure the favored protection • the cost of this rent seeking – lobbying fees, propaganda, legal actions – can equal or exceed the direct welfare loss from the restrictions 44 Problems with Protection Third, other countries often retaliate, thus further reducing the gains from trade Finally, the costs of enforcing the myriad quotas, tariffs, and other restrictions • Also run into the practice of “port shopping” where foreign producers and U.S. importers shop to see where inspections are most lax 45 Import Substitution versus Export Promotion Developing countries have two options with respect to the transformation from the production of raw materials and agriculture to manufacturing Import Substitution Export Promotion 46 Import Substitution The country manufactures products that until then had been imported and imposes tariffs and quotas to protect these industries Popular for several reasons Demand already existed for these products Provides infant industries with a protected market Those who already supply capital, labor and other resources to the favored industries gain 47 Import Substitution Problems Reduces the gains from specialization and comparative advantage Low-cost foreign goods with high-cost domestic goods Since they are shielded from foreign competition, domestic industries fail to become efficient Encourages retaliation from other countries 48 Export Promotion A development strategy that concentrates on producing for the export market Preferable approach because the emphasis is on comparative advantage and trade expansion rather than trade restriction Also forces producers to grow more efficient to compete on world markets 49