Lecture Objectives • Answer your questions related to CFD software • Ventilation Effectiveness • Thermal Comfort IAQ parameters Number of ACH quantitative indicator ACH - for total air - for fresh air Ventilation effectiveness qualitative indicator takes into account air distribution in the space Exposure qualitative indicator takes into account air distribution and source position and intensity IAQ parameters - Age-of-air air-change effectiveness (EV) - Specific Contaminant Concentration contaminant removal effectiveness e Single value IAQ indicators Ev and ε 1. Contaminant removal effectiveness (e) Ce concentration at exhaust ε average contaminant concentration C Contamination level 2. Air-change efficiency (Ev) τn Ev 2 τ shortest time for replacing the air average of local values of age of air Air freshness τn 1 / ACS [sec] Air-change efficiency (Ev) • Depends only on airflow pattern in a room • We need to calculate age of air (t) τ τ t t 2t 2t 2t (Vx Vy Vz ) ( t ) 2 ( t ) 2 ( t ) 2 t x y z x y z Average time of exchange τexe 2 τ, τn 1 / ACH [sec] • What is the age of air at the exhaust? Type of flow – Perfect mixing – Piston (unidirectional) flow – Flow with stagnation and short-circuiting flow Air exchange efficiency for characteristic room ventilation flow types Flow pattern Unidirectional flow Perfect mixing Short Circuiting Air-change Comparison with average efficiency time of exchange 1-2 1 0-1 tn < texc < 2tn texc = tn texc > tn τexe 2 τ Contaminant removal effectiveness (e) • Depends on: - position of a contaminant source - Airflow in the room • Questions 1) Is the concentration of pollutant in the room with stratified flow larger or smaller that the concentration with perfect mixing? 2) How to find the concentration at exhaust of the room? Differences and similarities of Ev and e Depending on the source position: - similar or - completely different air quality Ev = 0.41 e = 0.19 e = 2.20 Thermal comfort Temperature and relative humidity Thermal comfort Velocity Can create draft Draft is related to air temperature, air velocity, and turbulence intensity. Thermal comfort Mean radiant temperature potential problems Asymmetry Warm ceiling (----) Cool wall (---) Cool ceiling (--) Warm wall (-) Prediction of thermal comfort Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) PMV = +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 hot warm slightly warm neutral slightly cool cool cold PMV = [0.303 exp ( -0.036 M ) + 0.028 ] L L - Thermal load on the body Empirical correlations Ole Fanger L = Internal heat production – heat loss to the actual environment L = M - W - [( Csk + Rsk + Esk ) + ( Cres + Eres )] Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) PPD = 100 - 95 exp [ - (0.03353 PMV4 + 0.2179 PMV2)] Further Details: ANSI/ASHRAE standard 55, ISO standard 7730