Scottish Organisation for Practice Teachers (ScOPT) Annual Conference 2015 12th November 2015 Outside the Box: how can we use our social work skills and the relationships we build to ‘humanise’ managerialism? Dr Pamela Trevithick Visiting Professor in Social Work, Buckinghamshire New University/ Coordinator of GAPS (promoting relationship-based approaches, and psychodynamic and systemic thinking in social work) What I intend to cover . . . 1. an outline of the knowledge and skills practice framework and lexicon of 80 skills 2. the importance of emotions in social work 3. the importance of relationship-based practice 4. the challenges to be faced in relation to effective social work practice 1 knowledge and skills in social work The importance of relationships See: Trevithick, P. (2003) ‘Effective relationship-based practice: a theoretical exploration’, Journal of Social Work Practice, 17(2), pp. 173-186 k n o w l e d g e A c q u i s i t i o n Theoretical knowledge domain (TK) (abstract theories) Adapted, abstract ‘parent theories theories that are developed, adapted, or ‘borrowed’ from other disciplines, particularly psychology, sociology, organizational theory, etc. Role and task Practice theories abstract theories that analyse the role, task and purpose of social work (e.g. social work’s care and control functions, /‘revolution’ versus ‘reform’?) theories relating to direct practice: (i) generalist skills and interventions (ii) fields of practice (iii) practice approaches (iv) values-based perspectives Factual knowledge domain (FK) (facts, statistics, evidence, research) Law Social policy Agency Problems People knowledge of the principles of law/relevant legislation knowledge of relevant social policy knowledge of relevant agency policy, procedures and practice knowledge of particular problems (e.g. domestic violence) knowledge of specific groups of people (e.g. children/yp) k n o w l e d g e A c q u i s i t i o n Professional use of self/the relationships we build: use of self-knowledge, intuition, tacit knowledge, self care K n o w l e d g e u s e Practice knowledge domain (PK) (knowledge gained through direct practice/practice wisdom) Use Creation Knowledge and skills use/ Utilisation knowledge creation and skills development (i) skills and interventions (ii) fields of practice (iii) practice approaches (iv) values-based perspectives Service users’ TK, FK + PK Skills/interventions = knowledge, skills and values in action Working creatively with complex and unpredictable contextual situations that have new or unique features K n o w l e d g e u s e This framework identifies 9 or at best 10 features that are evident in every interaction in social work The framework identifies how relationships are important, e.g. - relationships between people - relationships between different areas of practice - the relationship between the government and social work A lexicon of 80 generalist skills/interventions 1 creating a rapport /relationship 2 welcoming skills 3 self-awareness/ ‘use of self’ as a catalyst for change 4 language skills/being articulate 5 non-verbal communication skills 6 observation skills 7 active listening 8 memory skills 9 capacity to engage/open to others 10 emotional attunement skills 11 demonstrating sympathy 12 demonstrating empathy 13 using intuition/intuitive reasoning 14 information gathering/investigative skills/asking good questions 15 open questions 16 closed questions 17 what questions 18 why questions 19 circular questions 20 hypothetical questions 21 paraphrasing 22 clarifying 23 summarizing 24 giving feedback thoughtfully 25 inviting feedback openly 26 appropriate use of self disclosure 27 prompting/probing 28 allowing/using silences 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ending/closure/termination skills providing practical hands-on help providing emotional support giving advice (cautiously) providing information clearly providing explanations clearly providing encouragement/inspiration offering affirmation/praise/validation providing reassurance using persuasion/thoughtfully directive demonstrating leadership/initiative breaking ‘bad news’ sensitively modelling and social skills training reframing offering interpretations skilfully adapting to need counselling skills containing anxiety skills of self-care negotiating skills contracting skills networking skills working in partnership mediation skills advocacy skills assertiveness skills challenging/confrontational skills dealing with hostility/aggression managing explosive encounters (v29) 58 managing professional boundaries/confidentiality 59 conveying an appropriate sense of authority/confidence 60 ability to apologise in ways that reclaim lost trust/recover lost options 61 recording/form filling skills 62 note taking/minute-taking skills 63 report writing skills 64 letter writing skills 65 computer skills/IT skills 66 telephone skills 67 use of mobile phones/text messaging 68 presentation skills 69 chairing/facilitation skills 70 using supervision creatively 71 organizational /administrative skills 72 reading/comprehension skills 73 analytic and critical thinking skills /reflection/reflexivity to unravel complexity and aid decision-making 74 critically evaluate and apply quantitative and qualitative research 75 skilled use of interventions targeted at structural barriers 76 courtroom skills 77 skilled use of diplomacy 78 skilled use of touch (e.g. shaking hands) 79 skilled use of humour 80 skilled us of social media These 80 skills can be used to challenge the worst excesses of managerialism. Managerialism’s main weakness is its failure to recognise the importance of emotions – the emotional impact of its policies and procedures on service users and practitioners. It also fails to recognise the the fact that a central feature of good practice lies the relationships we build Therefore any presentation on the importance of relationships also needs to include the importance of emotions 2 Why are emotions important in social work? The importance of emotions is covered in my paper ‘Humanising managerialism’ See: Trevithick, P. (2014) ‘Humanising managerialism: reclaiming emotional reasoning, intuition, the relationship, and knowledge and skills in social work’, Journal of Social Work Practice , Vol. 28 (3), pp. 287–311 In this paper I explore the meaning of key terms, including: emotion feelings affect attunement empathy social emotions display rules self-regulation learning defences Question What emotions would you consider to be universal and basic to all human beings? Basic and universal human emotions There is no agreement about what constitutes the basic emotions that all human beings experience Plutchik (1991) identifies eight basic emotions: fear, anger, disgust, sadness, surprise, joy, trust, and anticipation. Ekman (2003) and Damasio (2000) have an almost identical list but substitute joy with happiness: fear, anger, disgust, sadness, surprise, happiness, trust, and anticipation Basic and universal human emotions Howe’s list of basic emotions includes: fear, shame, disgust, embarrassment, terror, jealousy, anger, loss, rejection, abandonment, surprise, love, joy and happiness (Howe 2008: 27) In an amusing quote cited by Damasio (2012: 319), love was described by Stuart Sutherland (1996) in The Macmillan Dictionary of Psychology as: ‘A form of mental illness not yet recognised by any of the standard diagnostic manuals’. We learn through our emotions We react and act on the world through our emotions – how we feel about things that happen in our lives The emotions we want to experience as all human beings . . . - trust - security - safety - hope - comfort - reassurance - warmth - love - to be touched by another human being Most service users are looking for the same emotions – a sense of safety, the ability to trust, the sense of being valued, respected, loved Too much pain that’s left unresolved, neglected and without healing can lead to defensiveness - a lack of trust in others and a sense of defeat, powerlessness and hopelessness Defences - 3 sources Defences in organisations defensiveness Defences in ourselves Defences in others Defences and defensiveness See: Trevithick, P. (2011) ‘Understanding defences and defensive behaviour in social work’, Journal of Social Work Practice, Vol. 25(4): 389-412. 3 Relationship-based practice – why are relationships important? A definition of relationship-based practice ‘Relationship-based practice promotes the view that the relationships we create are fundamental to understanding and action, and it is this understanding and the meaning given to experience - that shapes the way we work with people. The aware and unaware emotions and feelings that all parties bring to an encounter – and the impact of wider social factors constitute a central element of the understanding that is achieved and the actions based on that understanding’ (Trevithick 2015) The importance of relationships is clearly evident in: a. attachment theory b. neurobiology/neuroscience c. what you and I know from our own personal and practice experience as: (i) as social workers and (ii) as human beings The findings of neuroscience ‘The very nature of humanity arises from relationships . . . essentially everything that’s important about life as a human being you learn in context of relationships’ (Perry 2003) ‘Relationship experiences have a dominant influence on the brain . . . Interpersonal experience thus plays a special organising role in determining the development of brain structure early in life and the ongoing emergence of brain function throughout the lifespan’ (Siegal 2012: 33) The relationships we build in social work are crucial for 5 key reasons: (a) the relationships we create can tell us something about the quality of people’s early and current relationships (Trevithick 2003) (b) this closer proximity can help to analyse and to identify what is happening and why – particularly whether defences are operating and the impact of social factors – and how both can have a bearing on the work at hand The relationships we build in social work are crucial for 5 key reasons: (c) relationship-based practice should embrace the importance of ‘emotional dimensions’ in social work and encourage the development of a more emotional language and dialogue, and a more inquisitive, sensitive and responsive understanding, analysis and practice The relationships we build in social work are crucial for 5 key reasons: (d) successful relationships can open up new possibilities and horizons for people (e) good relationships, including those with other professionals - can allow us to grow – as people and as professionals Creating meaningful relationships can open up new possibilities and horizons Five positive outcomes have been identified by the Stone Center in Boston, USA: an increase in zest and vitality an increase in empowerment to act an enlarged picture of ourselves and others an increase in self-worth - a greater sense of confidence in our abilities and competence to act a growing desire for more connection and contact with others (Judith Jordan 1991: 95) Our greatest joys are felt in relationship but on the down side our deepest pain is experienced in relationships 4 the challenges to be faced in relation to effective social work practice The end game: The marketisation and privatisation of children’s social work and child protection. Ray Jones Critical Social Policy 2015, Vol. 35(4): 447–469 Abstract There is a long history of voluntary and other organisations, along with the state, providing social services for children in England. But crucial assessments and decision-making about the care and protection of children have been undertaken by local authorities within the context of democratic accountability and transparency. This is changing. The government is opening up children’s social work services, including child protection investigations and assessments, decisions about initiating care proceedings in the courts to have children removed from their families, and decisions where children should then live, to the market and to the private sector with companies such as G4S and Serco expanding into children’s social services. Nowhere else in the world are profit driven companies given these powers. This article traces how this radical change is moving forward at pace. It’s important to remember . . . technology and information systems are not the enemy – it is how these are being used that is dehumanising and demoralising all organisations, and particularly public services, have to have high levels of accountability, transparency and sound and accurate recording systems What is managerialism? Managerialism target-driven, time-limited, ‘onesize-fits-all’, frequently computerbased approach in social care and social work? A ‘tick-box approach’ Managerialism – was born in Harvard University, USA . Management Ideology Expansion Managerialism What is managerialism? Managerialism, or New Public Management (NPM), replaced the previous system of Progressive Public Administration [PPA] or old public administration and introduced a new approach to the co-ordination, management and delivery of public services (Dunleavy & Hood 1994; Hood 1995) Managerialism’s principles are loosely based around: the 3 E’s: economy, efficiency, and effectiveness (Audit Commission 1983: 8) the 3 M’s: markets, managers and measurement (Ferlie et al. 1996) that is, to do more with less Its ideology stronghold: unquestioned and unquestionable assumptions neo-liberal ideology – the market will provide managerialism – the system will provide the role of government – to promote marketisation for the benefit of the few What is managerialism? Managerialism combines management knowledge and ideology to establish itself systematically in organizations and society while depriving owners, employees (organizational-economical) and civil society (socialpolitical) of all decision-making powers. Managerialism justifies the application of managerial techniques to all areas of society on the grounds of superior ideology, expert training, and the exclusive possession of managerial knowledge necessary to efficiently run corporations and societies . . . . (Klikauer 2013) Management Ideology Expansion Managerialism Ideology Giddens – an influential sociologist has argued that: ‘the concept of ideology has a close connection with power, since ideological systems serve to legitimate the differential power held by groups’ (Giddens 2001: 691) Key features - obsessed with numbers - promotes maximum outputs with minimum input - replaces the concept of collaboration with that of control - fails to recognise the importance of ‘soft’ variables e.g. the part played by intuition - holds a dubious position its moral and ethical role and responsibilities in society Evidence-base??? What is the evidence base for the claim that managerialism offers a more economic, efficient and effective approach to service delivery in social work when compared to previous systems? None Managerialism – its dangers denies people’s rights to key resources and services on economic grounds and shifts the focus from needs to risk reduces human need and emotional concerns to a ‘target’ or an ‘outcome’ that too often ignores the ‘real’ problem denies the situational uniqueness that every case carries and the complex and social nature of problems replaces professional judgements, and knowledge, skills and expertise, with procedures and performance targets triggers defensiveness in people and organisations – a ‘watch your back mentality’, territorial disputes among professionals and people exaggerating concerns creates a divisive culture that leads to blaming, bullying, intimidation and complaints extensive data collection and inspection regimes are costly time-consuming, and starve front line services of funding The ideological shift from ‘need’ to ‘risk’ The result: a) people’s own definition of need (for housing, food, adequate income, benefits) is too often denied and replaced by a professional assessment of ‘risk’ b) only people who fit the ‘risk’ category become eligible for a service. Therefore, some people’s access to key services and their fundamental rights as citizens are being denied c) restricting and ‘gate-keeping’ access to services can encourage ‘risk-taking’ behaviour to meet threshold requirements To summarise Managerialism is not: economic, efficient, and effective has almost no ethical and moral interest in the human cost and emotional impact of its policies and procedures it promotes the commodification and marketisation of human need and human concerns Survival strategies – are essential The impact of recent government policies has led to: more work less resources/services to draw on less staff a massive rise in inequality the breakup of the welfare state The breakup of the welfare state and rise in poverty and inequality The widening gap between rich and poor This graph shows that greater the income gap between the richest and poorest 20% in a country, the greater the likelihood of health and social problems being intensified. This is detrimental not just to people living in poverty, but to the vast majority of society. This research suggest that many health and social problems, such as high levels of mental illness, numbers in prison, rates of drug and alcohol use, weight problems, and low levels of public trust tend to be worse in less equal societies http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk From Wilkinson and Pickett’s (2010) The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin. Wilkinson and Pickett are the founders of the Equality Trust http://equalitybristol.wordpress.com/ The breakup of the welfare state and rise in poverty and inequality Joseph Rowntree Foundation [JRF] Report 2014 13 million people in the UK are living in poverty 1/5th of working-age adults without children are living in poverty in the last decade, the number of people in poverty in the private sector has doubled (private + public housing both have approx 4m people) unemployment has fallen by 300,000 but . . . . . . 1.4 million adults work part-time because they can’t find full-time employment 3/5ths of people who moved out of unemployment in the last year are paid below the living wage (£7.85 per hour). [minimum wage = £6.30/adults, £5.13/ under 18s) there has been a dramatic rise for people self-employed (4.6 million) many of whom have experienced a 22% fall in real pay since 2008-09. It’s estimated that self-employed average earnings stand at £207 a week – less than half that of paid employees The concept of resilience Its value it raises important issues about people’s quality of life, particularly the quality of people’s experiences at work it’s given rise to new thinking and encouraged the promotion of new approaches such as mindfulness Its limitations it focuses too heavily on individual’s ‘getting on with it’ at the expense of understanding why people lack resilience it easily ignores the impact of structural factors it has been corrupted by governments and employers in ways that blame individuals who struggle to ‘keep going’ Resilience described ‘Resilience is used as a concept that describes people’s ability to deal with stress, pressure and the demands made of them. It suggests the ability positively to adapt to situations of risk that might easily lead to maladjustment in those who are vulnerable . . . Resilience is a complex phenomenon. It is not a unitary concept. No-one possesses across-the-board resilience. Each of us may show varying degrees of resilience in different situations. You may be able to deal well and with skill when confronted by social conflict. However, if your boss pushes too many technical tasks your way, you may quickly feel unable to cope and your stress level begins to rise’. (Howe 2008: 106) Suggestions to reduce occupational stress and enhance resilience? What helps? good supervision (but the right kind) good social support (be alert to what is measured and how) changing the nature of the work managing expectations and responses other strategies – food, exercise or both? (Moriarty and Manthorpe 2015) How can employers/managers enhance resilience?? join with other employers to argue vehemently for the funding and resources to meet demand and to do the job value employees reduce caseload sizes, particularly for complex cases be clear about the expectations laid on social workers in terms of their roles and responsibilities undertake careful workload planning encourage peer social support provide good reflective supervision (not driven by targets) provide supportive working environment and collaborative organisational and learning culture Tips for survival – how to care for ourselves and others. Some suggestions . . . 1 Strengthen our voice - avoid being isolated by joining trade unions; BASW, GAPS, unions, College of Social Work, BACSPAN - look for allies, particularly with service users and also nurses, teachers, other workers and their unions, etc. 2 Stay relationship-based - develop an emotionally receptive and responsive approach in your work, and a self-aware ‘use of self’ 3 Work between the cracks (search for opportunities that exist) - find ways to do joint work/argue for its effectiveness - find someone to talk to - someone you can trust - avoid burnout by balancing de-energising/demoralising feelings with experiences that energise and inspire hope and possibility - share good news/positive experiences/creative interventions Tips for survival – how to care for ourselves and others. Some suggestions . . . 4 Be strategic - speak out but ask others to take forward information that’s too risky to reveal without being threatened - work out the difference between a defensive compliance and a strategic compliance - work for change but with a shared strategy about what can be achieved. Success breeds success. - claim the knowledge, skills and expertise you’ve acquired/revealed - stay emotionally energised and optimistic - view taking action as a re-energising activity 5 Stay well informed - keep up with developments in social work by joining information networks, blogs, 38 degrees, etc. - respond to government/agency consultation opportunities - respond to media criticism and misinformation Inequality: is compounded by the growing divide between rich and poor UK cabinet 2009: 23 millionaires out of 29 Only 4 female cabinet members Cameron’s 2015 Cabinet - has less millionaires but there are still too many Inequality: has been compounded by the Conservative government’s policies, such as the Bedroom Tax As a cabinet minister, Ian Duncan Smith – who initiated the Bedroom Tax - who in 2013 earned £134,565 a year, which is £2,587.00 a week The Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9964767/Iain-DuncanSmith-I-could-live-on-53-per-week.html Photo Independent Tuesday 2 April 2013 300,000 people signed the petition at www.change.org challenging Duncan Smith to try to live on £53.00 pw. He refused Mr Duncan Smith lives in a 16th-century Grade-II listed Tudor house in Swanbourne which is said to be worth £2m. The property includes a swimming pool, tennis courts and three acres of grounds. It belongs to Mrs Duncan Smith's father, John Tapling Fremantle, the fifth Baron Cottesloe, who moved out of the house with his wife several years ago. Mr Duncan Smith is technically a tenant and living rent-free with his wife and children. The Independent http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/george-osbornemounts-fierce-defence-of-essential-cut-in-top-tax-8556168.html REFERENCES Audit Commission (1983) Performance Review in Local Government: A Handbook for Auditors and Local Authorities. London: Audit Commission. Damasio, A. R. (2012) Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. London: Vintage. Dunleavy P. and Hood, C. (1994) ‘From old public administration to new public management’, Public Money and Management, 14 (3): 9-16 Ekman, P. (2003) Emotions Revealed: Understanding Faces and Feelings. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. and Pettigrew, A. (1996) The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press Garrett, P. M. (2015) ‘Questioning tales of ‘ordinary magic’: ‘resilience’ and neo-liberal reasoning’, British Journal of Social Work Advance Access published April 15 2015 doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv017: 1– 17. Giddens, A. (2001) Sociology. 4th edn. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hood, C. (1995) ‘The “new public management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme’. Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2/3: 93-109. Howe, D. (2008) The Emotionally Intelligent Social Worker. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Jones, R. (2015) ‘The end game: the marketisation and privatisation of children’s social work and child protection’, Critical Social Policy 2015, Vol. 35(4): 447–469 Jordan, J.V. (1991) ‘Empathy, mutuality, and therapeutic change: clinical implications of a relational model’, in J.V. Jordan, A.G. Kaplan, J.B. Miller, I.P. Stiver and J.L. Surrey (eds.) Women’s Growth and Connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press. Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2014) Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion 2014 http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/monitoring-poverty-and-social-exclusion-2014 Klikauer, T, (2013) Managerialism: A Critique of an Ideology. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Moriarty, J. and Manthorpe, J. (2015) The College of Social Work Annual Conf. 12 March 2015 Perry, B. D. (2003) ‘From neurons to neighbourhoods: new ways to prevent and heal emotional trauma in children and adults’, http://www.healingresources.info/video_bruceperry.htm [accessed 8 April 2014] Plutchik, R. (1991) The Emotions. London: University Press of America Siegel, D. J. (2012) The Developing Mind: Toward a Neurobiology of Interpersonal Experience. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press. Trevithick, P. (2003) ‘Effective relationship-based practice: a theoretical exploration’, Journal of Social Work Practice, Vol. 17: 173-186. Trevithick, P. (2008) ‘Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: a framework for practice’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 38 (6): 1212-1237. Trevithick, P. (2011) ‘Understanding defences and defensive behaviour in social work’, Journal of Social Work Practice, Vol. 25(4): 389-412. Trevithick, P. (2012) Social Work Skills and Knowledge: A Practice Handbook. 3rd edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Trevithick, P. (2014) ‘Humanising managerialism: reclaiming emotional reasoning, intuition, the relationship, and knowledge and skills in social work’, Journal of Social Work Practice, Vol. 28 (3): 287311. Webber, M. (2015) ‘Stress, mental health and wellbeing in social work: a summary of the evidence’, presentation at the IASW National Social Work Conference and AGM on Building Professional Resilience, Dublin, 5th Jun 2015. Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2010) The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin. See the Equality Trust http://equalitybristol.wordpress.com/