Reducing racial disparities in discipline through transformative action for equity ANNE G R E G O R Y, PH.D. A NNE G R EG@R UTGER S.E DU R U TG ER S UNIVER SI TY NJ PR INCIPA LS A ND S U P E R VI SOR S A S S O CI ATI ON Workshop in 7 parts • Part 1: Overview of national issues in school discipline. We will discuss contributors to school discipline disparities • Part 2: African American male students talk about their experiences • Part 3: Change is possible: Introducing on-line teacher professional development modules, Creating Opportunities through Relationships (COR) • Part 4: Data-based decision-making, needs assessment, and readiness for change • Part 5 Change is possible: Teacher coaching and strengthening instruction as prevention • Part 6: Introduction to Restorative Justice and Restorative Practice • Part 7: Policy reform: Syracuse District Student Code of Conduct Character and Support and Getting starting, building momentum, and anticipating obstacles Part 1: The urgency Racial Disparities in Secondary School Suspension Rates* 30 25 Asian/PI 20 American Indian 15 10 White 5 Latino 0 1972-73 2009-10 Source: Data from the U.S. Department of Education’s 2009-10 Civil Rights Data Collection Figure from Losen, D. & Martinez, T. (2013) Out of School & Off Track: The overuse of Suspensions in American Middle and High Schools. * Based on non-duplicated student counts. Racial Disparities in Secondary School Suspension Rates* 30 24.3% 25 20 Asian/PI American Indian 15 10 White 11.8% Latino Black 5 0 1972-73 2009-10 Source: Data from the U.S. Department of Education’s 2009-10 Civil Rights Data Collection Figure from Losen, D. & Martinez, T. (2013) Out of School & Off Track: The overuse of Suspensions in American Middle and High Schools. * Based on non-duplicated student counts. Alternative explanations • Really about lags in achievement? • Disproportionate representation in special education? • Higher poverty rates? A statewide longitudinal study • Rigorously examined the link between race and discipline. • Isolate the effects of race controlling for 83 risk factors. • (Multivariate methodologies make it possible to isolate the effect of a single factor, while holding the remainder of the factors statistically constant.) Accounting for 83 different variables and compared to otherwise identical White and Latino students…African American students had a 31 percent higher likelihood of a school discretionary discipline action 35% 30% 25% 20% White 15% Black Hispanic 10% 5% 0% Chance of Discipline Action Breaking School Rules report . 8 Other groups to be concerned about… GENDER Male students Across a K-12 sample, males received 3 times more referrals for behavior and 22% more referrals for attendance than females (Kaufman et al., 2010). Black females In 2009, the average national suspension rate for Black females was 13%; 5% higher than the national average for all students and comparable to the suspension rate of Latino males (Losen & Martinez, 2013). Other groups to be concerned about… Latino students Latino 10th graders were twice as likely as White students to be issued an outof-school suspension. Findings accounted for student- and teacher-reported misbehavior (Finn & Servoss, 2013). LGBT youth and gender non-conforming youth LGB girls experienced about twice as many arrests and convictions as other girls who had engaged in similar transgressions. They also were expelled at higher rates (Himmelstein & Bruckner, 2011). The urgency For many students, the snowball starts rolling in elementary school Small paper cuts of negative interactions with school staff… • Can snowball! • Lower school bonding • Affiliate with other peers who are less bonded. • Internalized sense that “I am the bad kid” or I hang with the “bad kids.” • Develop a race-based sense of “us” and “them” – school is for “them” not “us.” Suspension and college coursework Percentage any college 0.7 0.6 0.66 0.5 0.55 0.53 0.4 Never Suspended 0.3 0.2 Suspended 10+ days 0.23 0.1 0.2 0.24 0 White boys Black boys Latino boys Shollenberger, T. L (2015). Racial disparities in school suspension and subsequent outcomes: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. In D. J. Losen (Ed.) Closing the Discipline Gap. Statewide sample of 9th graders followed over time: Each additional suspension further decreased a student’s odds of graduating high school by 20% ( High School Graduation Accounting for poverty, special ed status, course failures, and attendance High School Drop Out (Balfanz, Byrnes, & Fox, 2015). School to prison pipeline • To what extent is school discipline an indicator of risk for juvenile justice involvement, particularly for students who cycle through the disciplinary system? Frequently disciplined students and juvenile justice contact 35.0% 30.0% No prior discipline 25.0% Frequent discipline (11+ times) 20.0% 17.5% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 5.5% 0.0% Justice contact Breaking School Rules, Texas report Accounting for 83 different risk variables… “A student who had been disciplined more than 11 times faced a nearly one in five chance (17.3 %) of a . juvenile justice contact” p. 71. 17 Suspension and confinement in correctional facilities Percent confined by mid to late 20’s 0.4 0.35 0.38 0.35 0.3 0.32 0.25 Never Suspended 0.2 Suspended 10+ days 0.15 0.1 0.09 0.05 0 0.07 0.04 White males Black males Latino males Shollenberger, T. L (2015). Racial disparities in school suspension and subsequent outcomes: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. In D. J. Losen (Ed.) Closing the Discipline Gap. • “The indications and effectiveness of exclusionary discipline policies that demand automatic or rigorous application are increasingly questionable... • Periodic scrutiny of policies should be placed not only on the need for a better understanding of the educational, emotional, and social impact of out-of-school suspension and expulsion on the individual student but also on the greater societal costs of such rigid policies.” • Feb, 2013 US DOJ Office of Civil Rights holding schools legally accountable through “disparate impact” • U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights ("OCR") investigates civil rights violations • Violations of the U.S. Department of Education's regulations interpreting Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. • Civil right complaints are being filed related to how school discipline practices have disparate impact on some racial groups. • Proving intention is unnecessary for the plaintiff to win in a disparate impact case. Framework for today’s workshop from: How educators can eradicate disparities in school discipline • Preventing discipline disparities: • Offer supportive relationships, • Academic rigor, • Culturally relevant and responsive teaching, • Bias-free classrooms and respectful school environments • Intervening when conflict occurs: • Problem-solve, • Engage youth and families, • Reintegrate students after conflict. See handout: Gregory, Bell, Pollock, (2014) Intervention Brief at http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers/ Questions thus far? Part 2: African American Male Student Perspectives Framework for today’s workshop from: How educators can eradicate disparities in school discipline • Preventing discipline disparities: • Offer supportive relationships, • Academic rigor, • Culturally relevant and responsive teaching, • Bias-free classrooms and respectful school environments • Intervening when conflict occurs: • Problem-solve, • Engage youth and families, • Reintegrate students after conflict. See handout: Gregory, Bell, Pollock, (2014) Intervention Brief at http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers/ Free Teacher Professional Development: Creating Opportunities through Relationships (COR) Developed at the University of Virginia and supported by Atlantic Philanthropies (to be distributed in March, 2016) COR Module 2 • Recognizing and Understanding Our Own Lenses • http://www.castllearning.org/ • annegreg@rci.rutgers.edu • Excerpt from a clip released by ColorLines Pair up to discuss • Think of an incident during childhood/adolescence when you felt misjudged or unfairly treated based on an aspect of your identity (e.g. gender, race, religion, ability, sexuality): • How did this interaction/incident affect your feelings toward the other party? • How did this interaction/incident affect your behavior? • What could have prevented the incident in the first place? Part 3: More about the Creating Opportunities through Relationships (COR) program Teacher Professional Development: Creating Opportunities through Relationships (COR) Developed at the University of Virginia and supported by Atlantic Philanthropies: Public release of free PD in March, 2016 Five interactive on-line modules • Module 1: The Power of Relationships • Module 2: Recognizing and Understanding Our Own Lenses Practical Strategies for Increasing Awareness • Module 3: Interactions that Promote Safety and Happiness • Module 4: Interactions that Promote Feeling Capable and Valued • Module 5: Interactions that Promote Engagement in Learning Feedback from teachers thus far • “I literally completed a few modules on the weekend and on Monday I felt my teaching had changed. The modules asked me to think about a few students and my relationships. I went back on Monday and worked on those relationships in a different way.” • On-line interface: • “You have to be honest with your baggage. It was nice having a quiet moment to reflect individually.” Company LOGO Example of a chart 90 80 70 60 East West North South 50 40 30 20 10 0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Company LOGO Examples of default styles • Text and lines are like this Table • Hyperlinks like this • Visited hyperlinks like this Text box Text box With shadow More teacher feedback • “With all the Common Core and standardized testing it’s easy to lose sight of the human connection.” • “Made me stop and think about providing a little more flexibility to make sure there is ample time for the kids to investigate and explore the things that most interest them, matter to them and motivate them.” • “Made me realize that sometimes even with our best intentions we do micromanage the kids...reminded me that they can do it, and we should expect them to try and give them that responsibility.” Part 4: Data-based decision making and readiness for change Uploaded resource There are strategies for reducing exclusionary discipline, but they are often implemented in a manner that does not reduce discipline disparities. Although schools and districts are attempting to address disparities, their work may focus on only symptoms and symbols rather than the underlying causes. This guide is designed to help you systematically examine the underlying causes of exclusionary discipline and disparities in a manner that goes beyond symptoms and drives more toward meaningful action and systemic change. (Osher, Fisher, Amos, Katz, Dwyer, Duffey, & Colombi, 2015, p. 7) Digging into the Data First: Ask the question Questions to ask (pg. 37): • Are students being subjected to differential treatment based on race/ethnicity or other characteristics? For example, a school may find that Black Latino, and American Indian students are suspended at a much higher rate than their White peers— sometimes at double the rate. • Are policies neutral on their face (e.g., rules are the same for all) and administered in an evenhanded manner but have a disparate impact such as a disproportionate and unjustified effect on students of a particular race? For example, a school may find American Indian students who must travel farther to school than their peers are suspended at higher rates. • What are the demographic characteristics of disciplined students and what is their representation in the school population? For example, a school may find 20% of secondary school students with disabilities were suspended in a single school year, compared with fewer than 10% of their peers without disabilities. • Which student demographic groups are at the greatest risk for disciplinary action? For example, a district may find LGBTQ youth are up to three times more likely to experience harsh disciplinary treatment than their heterosexual counterparts. • Do different subgroups of students receive different consequences or interventions for the same offense? For example, a school may find students of color are suspended for talking back while their counterparts are not. Digging into the Data • Imagine you ask: What are the demographic characteristics of disciplined students and what is their representation in the school population? • Imagine you find: A) Suspension rates were disproportionately high for Black males, who make up only 15% of the student population but account for 30% of suspensions. B) The majority of suspensions were issued for defiance, disruption, and insubordination C) Additionally, in-school suspensions were used for shorter time periods for White males and all females than for Black and Latino males. Getting at the roots • Formulate hypotheses • What do you think accounts for that? Getting at the roots • Consider alternate hypotheses • Look at list on pg. 45-47 • Do the disparity patterns you see potentially have their basis in any of the following issues? • Rank: 0-2 • 0=not a significant contributing factor • 1=a contributing factor • 2=a primary contributing factor Getting at the Roots • Which of these expanded your perspectives on possible contributors to the disparity you found in the data? • Which of these do you think your staff and colleagues are ready to consider and address? Getting at the Roots • Further investigation • Collect and review qualitative data • Decide on a root cause • Present data to community and colleagues Create an Action Plan • Share your findings with the community in a manner that enhances the community’s readiness to address disparities. • Develop a sustainable action plan that addresses the root causes of disparities. • Implement your action plan. An additional resource for finding discipline data: Office of Civil Rights Data Collection • http://ocrdata.ed.gov/DistrictSchoolSearch#schoolSearch • The web tool allows users to access data on suspensions and see disparities at the school level. • Users can see data disaggregated by race/ethnicity, gender, &/or disability status. The data is available at the elementary and secondary levels. Questions thus far? Part 5: The promise of coaching for teachers The My Teaching Partner-Secondary (MTP-S) professional development program • Sustained over the whole school year • Focused on teachers’ interactions with students as viewed through regular video-recorded instruction • Rigorous – based on research/theory and the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) • Developed at the Center for the Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning (CASTL) University of Virginia (Pianta, R., Allen, J., Hafen, C., Mikami, A., Gregory, A.) Classroom Assessment & Scoring System- Secondary (CLASS-S) Emotional Support Classroom Organization Positive Climate Teacher Sensitivity Regard for Adolescent Perspectives Behavior Management Productivity Negative Climate Student Outcomes Student Engagement Instructional Support Instructional Learning Format Content Understanding Analysis & Problem Solving Quality of Feedback Classroom Assessment & Scoring System- Secondary (CLASS-S) Emotional Support Classroom Organization Positive Climate Teacher Sensitivity Regard for Adolescent Perspectives Behavior Management Productivity Negative Climate Student Outcomes Student Engagement Instructional Support Instructional Learning Format Content Understanding Analysis & Problem Solving Quality of Feedback Overview of MTP™ Cycle Prior positive findings of MTP-S Prior evidence for the positive impact of MTP-S • Increased student performance on standardized tests (held across racial groups). • Increased student engagement and positive peer interactions in MTP-S classrooms (Allen, Pianta, Gregory, Mikami, Lun, 2011; Gregory, Allen, Mikami, Hafen & Pianta, 2012; Mikami, Gregory, Allen, Pianta, & Lun, 2011) Recent study: Randomized controlled trial - 5 middle and high schools; 82 teachers (one focal classroom each - 979 participating students (59% African American, 30% White, 8% Hispanic, and 3% Asian) - Rigorous controls in analyses (e.g., student SES, prior achievement) % students receiving one or more office discipline referrals 16.0% 14.0% 13.7% African American 12.0% 10.0% All Others 8.0% 6.0% 5.1% 6.0% 5.8% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Control Teachers Intervention Teachers Gregory, A., Allen, J., Mikami, A., Hafen, C., & Pianta, R. (2015). The promise of a teacher professional development program in reducing racial disparity in classroom exclusionary discipline. In D. J. Losen (Ed.). Closing the discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 166-179). New York: Teachers College Press. Reducing racial disparities •Reduce: • Implicit bias •Microaggressions • Low expectations •Cultural mismatch •Minimal access to high quality instruction More “distal” factors More Proximal Factors • Increase access to: High quality instruction and positive interactions between teachers and African American students • Reduce Punitive disciplinary responses to African American student behavior • Lower their rates of exclusion from instruction • Increase their academic engagement and trust in the teacher Outcomes Questions and Discussion Would it be feasible to integrate core elements of MTP-S into your teacher supports/mentoring? • Video-based, • Sustained, • Non-Evaluative, • Observational Framework Part 6: The promise of restorative approaches to discipline From “deporting and disciplining” to “resolving and educating” • Preventing discipline disparities: • Offer supportive relationships, • Academic rigor, • Culturally relevant and responsive teaching, • Bias-free classrooms and respectful school environments • Intervening when conflict occurs: • Problem-solve, • Engage youth and families, • Reintegrate students after conflict. See handout: Gregory, Bell, Pollock, (2014) Intervention Brief at http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers/ RESTORATIVE APPROACHES to discipline Summary: • Focuses on relationships • Gives voice to the person harmed and the person who caused the harm • Engages collaborative problemsolving • Dialogue-based decision-making process • An agreed upon plan leads to actions aimed at repairing the harm done. Schiff, M. (2013). Dignity, disparity and desistance: Effective restorative justice strategies to plug the “school-to-prison pipeline.” In Center for Civil Rights Remedies National Conference. Closing the School to Research Gap: Research to Remedies Conference. Washington, DC. RESTORATIVE APPROACHES- DEFINITIONS Restorative Justice – A theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm. Restorative practices – A framework for a broad range of restorative justice approaches that proactively build a school community based on cooperation, mutual understanding, trust and respect. From: DIGNITY IN SCHOOLS CAMPAIGN MODEL CODEWEBINAR V: RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, http://www.dignityinschools.org/files/ModelCode_Webinar_RestorativeJustice.pdf Fairfax County Public Schoolsr SFUSD Restorative Practices Multiple Tiered System of Supports Restorative Practices Continuum from the International Institute of Restorative Practices (IIRP) Formal Conference Small Impromptu Conference Affective statements Brief comments about how others were impacted by the person’s behavior. Affective Questions Affective Questions; ask who was affected, how they were affected, etc. Occur when a few people meet briefly to address and resolve a problem. Circles More formal RP that allows everyone to have some say in what should happen as a result of the wrongdoing. Adapted from Costello, B. , Wachtel, J. & Wachtel, T. (2010). Restorative circles in schools building community and enhancing learning. Brings together offenders, victims and communities of support to repair harm and promote healing. Foster reflection through a series of “restorative questions” • Questions to ask the disputant: • What happened? What were you thinking about at the time? What have your thoughts been since? • Who has been affected by what you did? In what way have they been affected? • What do you think you need to do to make things right? • Questions to ask those harmed or affected by the incident: • What did you think when you realized what had happened? • How has this affected you and others? What has been the hardest thing for you? • What do you think needs to happen to make things right? From Costello, B., Wachtel, J. & Wachtel, T. (2010). Restorative circles in schools building community and enhancing learning. RJ in Oakland, CA Questions for video clips • As you view the video clips: • Side 1- Write down two things students might learn from the circle process. • Side 2- Write down two things adults or school staff might learn from the circle process. • Also, consider: • What would you foresee being the benefit(s) of using these circles in your current setting? Community-building and Re-entry circles Restorative Justice Student Facilitators: Tier One. Community Building Circle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdKhcQrLD1w 00 to 6.15 minutes • Restorative Welcome and Re-entry Circle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSJ2GPiptvc 00. to 6.07 minutes Social and Emotional Learning for STAFF AND STUDENTS • Self-awareness: Students’ ability to accurately recognize their own emotions/thoughts and how their emotions/thoughts influence their behavior. • Self-management: Students’ ability to regulate their emotions, thoughts, and behaviors effectively in different situations. • Social awareness: Students’ ability for perspective taking and empathy with others of diverse cultures and backgrounds in their family, school, and community. • Relationship skills: Students’ ability to establish and maintain healthy and rewarding relationships with diverse individuals and groups. • Responsible decision-making: Students’ ability to make constructive and respectful choices about personal behavior and social interactions. • Cultural responsiveness: Skills, beliefs, and attitudes that facilitate cross-cultural interactions. • * The core five social emotional learning competencies as identified by the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL, 2013). See: http://www.casel.org Oakland Unified School District % suspended one or more times Suspension rates by student race/ethnicity 30 25 20 Black 15 Latino 10 White 5 0 2011-12 2012-2013 Jain, S., Bassey, H, Brown, M. A., & Kalra, P. (2014). Restorative Justice in Oakland Schools. Implementation and Impacts. Fidelity of implementation matters! A teacher recently explained: “…So many initiatives came our way. So it’s hard to know what to prioritize…once you leave a training you get in your classroom and there’s so much that they expect from you. …We have a training and maybe that next week teachers will go in and use those circles. Then it gets lost...” (Korth, 2015) Post training excitement! 100% 92% 92% 90% 90% 84% 86% 80% 70% 60% 50% Disagree 40% Agree 30% 16% 20% 10% 8% 8% 10% 14% 0% Admin. Support Org. Resources for RP for RP (N = 50) RP Fit with Schools RP Usefulness Likely to Use RP w/Students Elements Most feeling prepared… 90% 80% The training really helped me learn RP 79% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 21% 20% 10% 0% (N = 77) Strongly/Somewhat disagree Strongly/Somewhat agree BUT….a year later close to half of respondents reported that they had not facilitated any circles throughout the school year 8% 2% none one 44% two to ten 31% eleven to thirty one hundred 15% Part 7: Sample policy reform Part I •Read problem behavior one at a time. •Write down, how would you expect yourself or teachers in your school to respond? Part II •Look at suggested interventions •Are there any that you think may be more effective than the typical response? •Any suggestions surprise you? •Do you have any general reactions to the code? Concluding our seven part workshop • Part 1: Overview of national issues in school discipline. We will discuss contributors to school discipline disparities • Part 2: African American male students talk about their experiences • Part 3: Change is possible: Introducing on-line teacher professional development modules, Creating Opportunities through Relationships (COR) • Part 4: Data-based decision-making, needs assessment, and readiness for change • Part 5 Change is possible: Teacher coaching and strengthening instruction as prevention • Part 6: Introduction to Restorative Justice and Restorative Practice • Part 7: Policy reform: Syracuse District Student Code of Conduct Character and Support and Getting starting, building momentum, and anticipating obstacles Framework for today’s workshop from: How educators can eradicate disparities in school discipline • Preventing discipline disparities: • Offer supportive relationships, • Academic rigor, • Culturally relevant and responsive teaching, • Bias-free classrooms and respectful school environments • Intervening when conflict occurs: • Problem-solve, • Engage youth and families, • Reintegrate students after conflict. See handout: Gregory, Bell, Pollock, (2014) Intervention Brief at http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers/ Online Resources for Restorative Practices Introducing Restorative Justice for Oakland Youth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtdoWo1D3sY Restorative Justice Student Facilitators: Tier One. Community Building Circle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdKhcQrLD1w Restorative Justice Helps At Risk Kids in West Oakland NBC Bay Area: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSObF8hW5DY Restorative Welcome and Re-entry Circle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSJ2GPiptvc Restorative Justice Circle: http://vimeo.com/37746907 From Hostility to Harmony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQWNyS4QSao International Institute of Restorative Practices http://www.safersanerschools.org/ Other resources: Council of State Governments Other resources: African American young men commenting on their experience of school and race • http://colorlines.com/archives/2014/05/life_cycles_of_inequity_a_colorlines_series_ on_black_men.html • Produced by ColorLines