1 BUILDING THE FOUNDATIONS FOR A STATE M&E SYSTEM Information for M&E in the State of Yucatán In the beginning… 2 Challenge to develop an M&E system to support planning and decision-making at the State level Stimulated from the State Secretary of Planning and Budget (SPP) Recognition of the need to start with initial step: improve information system Underlying premise: How to provide policymakers with the information needed for decision making at their fingertips The Context 3 Federal law requiring a shift towards results-based management Federal law requiring the establishment of state committees for statistical and geographic information (CEIEG) Yucatán was the first to establish CEIEG Purpose: Provide overall guidance and oversight of state information system Strong awareness and political support of State leadership Coincide with interest of INEGI to increase engagement at state level The Concept 4 Strengthen the System of Statistical, Geographical and Evaluation Information (SIEGEY in Spanish) Replicate the experience of the National Strategy for the Development of Statistics but… At the state level More closely linked to the development of an M&E system Together with practical instruments for its implementation Strategy to Strengthen the State Information System 5 INPUTS: Diagnostic of Information Demand for M&E system Diagnostic of Information Demands for decision-makers Diagnostic of Supply of Statistical Information Report of Workshop to Validate Results Diagnostic of Information Systems needed to implement the recommendations OUTPUT: Strategy to Strengthen the State Statistical, Geographic and Evaluation Information System Complemented by… 6 Geographic diagnostic by INEGI Provision of integrated data platform (SIMBAD) by INEGI Training in international standards for data documentation by the Accelerated Data Program (ADP) Grant request to the TFSCB to strengthen administrative records General Methodology for Diagnostics 7 Objective: Rapid assessments of capacity and demand for statistical information, as well as information for monitoring and evaluation Audience: 35+ State agencies, as well as the National Statistical Office (INEGI) and State Center for Municipal Development Methodology: Desk review Brief questionnaires with relevant agencies Additional interviews/meetings with specific agencies Diagnostic of Demand for Information for M&E 8 1. Planning and Budgeting Concordance with the State Development Plan Translation of development objectives into performance indicators and goals Links between the Annual Operational Plan and the State Development Plan Institutional capacity 2. Monitoring Institutional capacity for monitoring Management of performance information Institutional arrangements for the use of monitoring information Diagnostic of Demand for Information for M&E (continued) 9 3. Evaluation Institutional framework Institutional capacity Use of information from evaluation Supply and demand for M&E Diagnostic of Information Demands for Public Decision-Makers 10 1. Indicators consulted regularly by decisionmakers Link to specific goals Adequacy of frequency Sources of information 2. Use of information Monitoring/program Budgeting User satisfaction Accountability performance Diagnostic of Information Demands for Public Decision-Makers (continued) 11 3. Information demands Identification of other indicators and their attributes 4. Indicators for M&E Identification of beneficiaries Institutional capacity Diagnostic of Supply of Statistical Information 12 1. Strategic planning Institutional framework Budgeting for statistics 2. Production and documentation of statistics Inventory of statistical operations Harmonization/standardization Institutional capacity 3. Dissemination of statistics Media for dissemination of micro and meta data Frequency Monitoring by media Diagnostic of Supply of Statistical Information (continued) 13 4. Organization and management Institutional framework Harmonization of information 5. Public value Demand for information Credibility Diagnostic of Information Systems 14 1. Technological resources Policies Hardware Software Internet 2. Databases 3. Human resources 4. Interface and quality of service Timeliness Institutional capacity Quality controls The Findings 15 Capacity/institutional issues Unmet needs/demands Improvements in quality/reliability of information Results Strengthen information system Develop M&E system information Demandas Demand for de Información Statistical, Geographic and Geográfica Evaluation Sistema de Información Estadística y deInformation Evaluación Systemdelfor the de State of Yucatán, Estado Yucatán - SIEGEY Mexico Subsistema Sub-system Coordinator Coordinador Secretary of Planningdeand Secretaría Planeación yBudget Presupuesto SPP Statistical Subsistema Subsystem Estadístico Subsistema M&E Monitoreo y SubEvaluación system Impact on: •Design/re-design of public Impacto en:policies and programs Diseño y rediseño de •Accountability and programas y políticas públicas transparency Organismo Independiente Independent •Efficient budget deEvaluation Evaluación Unit Rendición de Cuentas y allocation Transparencia •Improvements in Asignación Presupuestal Geographic well-being of Eficiente Center for Subsistema Centro de Colaboración Subsystem Geo-spatial Geográfico population Geo-espacial CCG State Committee for Comité Estataland de Información Statistical Geographic Estadística y Geográfica CEIEG-Y Information (CEIEG-Y) Collaboration Information Technology Infrastructure Infraestructura Informática 16 GeneralGeneral Directorate Dirección de for Technology Tecnologías DGTI Mejora de condiciones de Bienestar de la Población Looking towards the future… 17 Replication in other states and other countries Clarity of supply and demand for information Convening power of rector agency/Importance of inter-institutional relationships Key role of NSO and other strategic partnerships Systems/programs for the management of information Expansion towards M&E Institutional framework Training Partnerships with key national and international actors