SUCs Normative Funding
Formula (NFF) for MOOE
in the 2014 GAA
PIDS Research Project
Honesto G. Nuqui
Presented: 29 June 2015
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
1
The PIDS research project:
To analyze, review, document the
implementation of the Normative Funding
Formula for SUCS MOOE in the 2014 GAA.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
2
Legal basis of Normative Funding
Formula ( NFF) in Joint DBM & CHED
Circular No. 2, Aug 2004
•
•
•
To rationalize SUC course offerings in the light
of national priorities.
To reward or encourage quality teaching,
research and extension services.
To encourage SUCs to improve cost recovery
measures, practice fiscal prudence and
maximize resources.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
3
The 2 questions addressed
by the NFF for MOOE in SUCs:
1. In terms of MOOE, how much should it cost per
student in an SUC – in each major discipline (21+2)
and program level (10) of education?
2. Given the reality of a limited national MOOE budget
ceiling for instruction, research and extension
services in SUCs, how will the national ceiling be
divided among the SUCs?
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
4
The Normative Funding Formula
(NFF) consists of 2 sets of files:
1. The “BACK FILES” tackle the theoretical question:
Given certain assumptions, the back files compute
the normative cost per student by discipline (21+2)
and level (9).
2. The ‘FRONT FILES” tackle a very practical allocation
problem: Given the 2014 GAA national MOOE
budget ceiling for instruction, research and extension
services in the SUCs, the front files allocate the
national ceiling among the 112 SUCs.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
5
• The NFF is not one formula: it consists of
several of linked Excel spreadsheets.
• It is not a static formula with fixed values.
It is an allocation tool that is driven by
parameters which may not change every
year – plus a budget ceiling and empirical
data which definitely change every year.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
6
NF MOOE FORMULA for 2014
NORMS
salary scale, etc
PRIORITY INDICES
QUALITY INDICATORS
“NF BACK FILES”
ENROLMT
DATA
NORMATIVE PS & MOOE COST PER STUDENT
GRADUATES
DATA
RESEARCH INPUTS &
OUTPUTS
DBM ceiling
“NF FRONT FILES”
Other CHED
guidelines
29 June 2015
AND SO, HOW MUCH WOULD EACH SUC
GET– FOR PS AND MOOE?
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
FACULTY WORK
LOAD
7
The “Enrolment Matrix”
• The SUCs as a group offer thousands of
programs (12,000?) but for the NFF, the
enrolment in an SUC is specified by a 23x9
matrix.
• This allows differential treatment for 9 levels
of education and 23 disciplines. MSE Majors
and Accountancy are the 22nd and 23rd fields.
• Basic Ed lab schools are classified under
“General” discipline and each lab school is
subject to maximum 500 enrolment.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
8
Levels of education (9) in SUCs:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
29 June 2015
PRE-SCHOOL
ELEM
SECONDARY
TECH VOC
PRE-BACC
BACC
POST-BACC
MASTERS
DOCTORAL *
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
9
PRESCH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BACC
167
1,092
POST
BACC
MS
PHD
6
TOTAL
1,265
90
51
1,816
EDUCATION SCIENCE AND
TEACHER TRAINING **
3,289
139
352
129
3,909
ENGINEERING AND TECH
3,453
24
3,477
FINE AND APPLIED ARTS
GENERAL
162
527
456
203
1,348
114
114
1,641
1,641
HOME ECONOMICS
HUMANITIES
MASS COMMUNICATION
AND DOCUMENTATION
12
MATHEMATICS AND
COMPUTER SCIENCE
19
20
21
PRE
BACC
44
11
18
TV
1,631
LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE
17
HS
AGRICULTURE,
FORESTRY, FISHERIES
ARCHITECTURE AND
TOWN PLANNING
BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION AND
RELATED
10
13
14
15
16
ELEM
MEDICAL AND ALLIED
66
NATURAL SCIENCE
188
254
163
7
170
RELIGION AND THEOLOGY
SERVICE TRADES
SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL
SCIENCES
TRADE, CRAFT AND
INDUSTRIAL
IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
373
373
86
86
820
76
896
9
62
MARITIME EDUCATION
OTHER DISCIPLINES
47
22
MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE
MAJORS IN TEACHER ED
54
23
ACCOUNTANCY
29
June 2015
24
TOTAL
162
SUCS
NFF FOR GAA
2014
456
233 13,154
527
6
54
189
564
180
15,465
10
Some outputs from the old back files
still useful for GAA 2014
• For each program level(9) and major
discipline (21+2), the normative cost (in
PS and MOOE) per FTE student per year.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
11
NORMATIVE COST (PS+MOOE)
PER STUDENT
BACC
MASTERS
DOCTORAL
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHERIES
65,704
105,311
111,809
ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING
73,496
137,900
137,900
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND RELATED
58,126
150,306
184,997
EDUCATION SCIENCE AND TEACHER
TRAINING **
58,481
104,954
116,039
HUMANITIES
79,220
78,701
61,353
74,236
72,890
161,800
144,783
131,716
128,722
128,722
196,490
155,441
150,492
150,492
LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE
66,146
86,634
112,627
MASS COMMUNICATION AND DOCUMENTATION
59,775
124,330
137,733
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE
73,101
139,476
153,860
MEDICAL AND ALLIED
SERVICE TRADES
85,871
88,789
44,491
54,704
113,017
143,541
119,542
125,286
159,998
-
SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
72,936
96,732
110,445
TRADE, CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL
54,419
-
-
IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
OTHER DISCIPLINES
78,629
56,114
59,420
116,973
69,993
105,374
141,795
118,238
MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE MAJORS
58,481
104,954
116,039
ACCOUNTANCY
58,126
150,306
184,997
ENGINEERING AND TECH
FINE AND APPLIED ARTS
GENERAL
HOME ECONOMICS
NATURAL SCIENCE
RELIGION AND THEOLOGY
MARITIME EDUCATION
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
12
NORMATIVE COST PER BACC STUDENT
100,000
88,800
85,900
90,000
79,200
78,700
80,000
78,600
74,200
72,900
73,500
70,000 65,700
60,000
73,100
72,900
66,100
58,100
58,500
61,400
59,800
54,700
54,400
59,400
58,500
58,100
56,100
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
-
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
13
NORMATIVE COST PER MASTERS STUDENT
180,000
161,800
160,000
144,800
140,000
139,500
137,900
131,700
128,700
128,700
105,300
128,700
124,300
117,000
120,000
143,500
119,500
117,000
113,000
105,400
105,000
105,000
96,700
100,000
86,600
80,000
70,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
-
-
-
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
14
NORMATIVE COST PER PHD STUDENT
250,000
196,500
200,000
155,400
150,000
153,900
150,500
150,500
146,200
137,900
160,000
152,100
141,800
137,700
128,700
111,800
116,000
123,500
118,200
112,600
110,400
100,000
50,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
15
NORMATIVE RECURRENT COST FOR TEACHER EDUC
As of Feb 29 2012
140,000
116,000
120,000
104,900
100,000
80,000
60,000
58,400
40,000
20,000
-
BS EDUC
29 June 2015
MA/MS EDUC
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
PHD/ EDD
16
NORMATIVE RECURRENT COST FOR NATURAL SCI FIELD
180,000
Estimates as of Feb 29 2012
159,900
160,000
143,500
140,000
120,000
100,000
88,700
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
-
BS (NAT SCI)
29 June 2015
MS (NAT SCI)
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
PHD (NAT SCI)
17
Severe time constraints for revising
the NFF for GAA 2014:
• No time to revise the back files . Thus, the
same normative costs used for GAA 2013
will be used for 2014.
• No time to wait for Form E1 data, i.e. SUC
faculty workload at the elementary,
secondary and tech-voc levels.
• No time to verify/ analyze reported SUC
faculty workloads in Form E2, i.e. duties
in higher education.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
18
Other Limitations on 2014 NFF:
• Some missing or “apparently outlier” data, e.g.
enrolment and graduates by field and by program
level. No time to go back to the SUCs to verify or
rectify the data.
• Not enough data and guidelines to implement rewards
for SUCs “sticking to their mandates”.
• Data on SUC “performance indicators” were found not
yet suitable for NFF.
• No time to review other measures of outputs and
quality of “extension services”.
• Not enough data and time to pilot NFF on personal
services.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
19
Some changes implemented in 2014
NFF as mandated by the CHED CEB:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Cleave “Accountancy” from the generic “Business
Administration and Related” – and increase its priority index
from 0.60 to 1.00. BA and related remains at 0.60.
Cleave “Computer Science” from “IT and related”, reclassify
into “Math & Comp Sci” – and increase priority index of both
from 1.00 to 1.25. IT and related remains at 1.0
Increase priority index from 1.00 to 1.25 for English, Math,
and Science majors in Teacher Education programs.
Reward the 3 normal SUCs (PNU, CNU, LNU) for sticking to
teacher education – by assigning additional priority index
1.25.
Split research component into two parts to allow “level
playing field”: Research-A among SUCs in levels 1,2 and
Research-B among SUCs in levels 3,4.
Using interactive front files, review the allocation of points
assigned to factors in each NFF component.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
20
PRIORITY INDICES FOR BACCALAUREATE
GAA 2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY,
FISHERIES
ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN
PLANNING
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND
RELATED
EDUCATION SCIENCE AND
TEACHER TRAINING **
ENGINEERING AND TECH
FINE AND APPLIED ARTS
GENERAL
HOME ECONOMICS
HUMANITIES
LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE
MASS COMMUNICATION AND
DOCUMENTATION
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER
SCIENCE
MEDICAL AND ALLIED
NATURAL SCIENCE
RELIGION AND THEOLOGY
SERVICE TRADES
SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL
SCIENCES
TRADE, CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL
MASTERS
DOCTORAL
1.25
1.50
2.00
1.00
1.25
1.50
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.25
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
1.50
1.25
1.00
1.25
1.25
1.00
2.00
1.50
1.00
1.50
1.50
1.00
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.25
1.50
2.00
0.75
1.25
1.00
1.50
1.25
2.00
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.25
1.50
1.25
1.25
1.50
2.00
1.50
1.50
1.25
1.50
1.00
19
IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
1.00
20
MARITIME EDUCATION
1.00
21
OTHER DISCIPLINES
1.00
29 June 2015 MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
22
1.25
MAJORS
18
21
PRIORITY RATINGS (VINTAGE 2004) OF BACCALAUREATE PROGS
As assigned by the CHED CEB:
1.40
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.20
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
0.80
0.75
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.40
0.20
-
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
22
Not subjected to the 2014 MOOE formula
1.
2.
3.
4.
WVSU hospital
UP-PGH
PMMA
Cotabato Foundation State College of
S&T
5. U.P. Proper
* Scholarship Fund (P2.5B),
not part of the MOOE ceiling
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
23
GAA 2014 MOOE CEILING
GAA 2014
% SHARE 2014
32,185
0.5%
820,481
12.5%
71,302
1.1%
U.P. PROPER
1,914,594
29.1%
INSTITUTIONAL
SUPPORT
QUALITY
INSTRUCTION
1,872,602
28.4%
1,123,561
17.1%
RESEARCH A & B
561,781
8.5%
EXTN
187,260
2.8%
WVSU HOSPITAL
UP-PGH
PMMA, CFCST
TOTAL
29 June 2015
6,583,766
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
100.0%
24
HOW 2014 NFF MOOE (P6.58B) WILL BE APPORTIONED
using the NF "FRONT FILES"
HOSPITALS, 852,666 ,
EXTN, 187,260 , 3%
RESEARCH, 561,779 ,
9%
13%
QUALITY
INSTRUCTION,
1,123,558 , 17%
PMMA,
COTAB, UPS,
1,985,896 ,
30%
INSTITUTIONAL
SUPPORT, 1,872,597 ,
28%
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
25
The relative sizes of the components
of GAA allocations to an SUC. NFF applies only on
MOOE.
INSTRUCTION
RES
EXTN
PS
MOOE
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
26
MOOE as % of SUCS BUDGETS
PS
MOOE
PS+MOOE
2012 GAA
2013 GAA
2014 GAA
18.9
23.0
22.9
3.0
6.4
6.6
2015 GAA 2016 GAA
22.7
6.8
31.8
25.0
7.4
21.9
25.3
29.6
MOOE AS % OF
PS
16%
28%
29%
30%
30%
MOOE AS % OF
PS+MOOE
14%
25%
22%
21%
23%
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
32.4
27
35.0
31.8
30.0
29.6
25.3
25.0
21.9
20.0
32.4
23.0
25.0
22.9
22.7
18.9
PS
MOOE
PS+MO
15.0
10.0
6.4
6.8
6.6
7.4
5.0
3.0
- 29 June 2015
2012 GAA
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
2013 GAA
2014 GAA
2015 GAA
28
2016 GAA
New for GAA 2014
Split the original research category into:
• RESEARCH-A ( for SUCs in Levels 1-2)
• RESEARCH-B (for SUCs in Levels 3-4)
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
29
COMPONENTS & AMOUNTS
subject to the NFF for 2014 GAA
CATEGORY
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
50%
1,872,602
QUALITY INSTRUCTION
30%
1,123,561
RESEARCH-A
(SUCs level 1-2)
RESEARCH-B
(SUCS level 3-4)
5%
10%
EXTENSION SERVICES
5%
187,260
374,520
187,260
3,745,204
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
30
BASES FOR COMPUTING INSTITUTIONAL
SUPPORT for GAA 2014
ENROLMENT & GRADUATES:
• Classified by level and by field of study. Not by
program.
• Options in how to treat missing or outlier data:
» Replace missing data with the lowest value in past 3
years.
» Take the sum over 3 years and divide by 3.
» Use the Excel average.
» Final decision: just use the most recent year and
impute past if there is current data.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
31
BASES FOR COMPUTING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT….
Four sets of WEIGHTS used on
enrolment:
1. Full-time equivalence (FTE) of enrolment, esp for
graduate levels.
2. Normative cost index per student.
3. Priority indices (revised slightly for 2014) on
discipline-program level pairs (e.g. accountancy,
computer science, Math/English/Sci majors in
Teacher Education.)
4. Additional points for Teacher Education programs
in PNU, CNU, LNU.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
32
BASES FOR COMPUTING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT….
Three sets of WEIGHTS used on no. of
graduates:
1. Normative cost index per student.
2. Priority indices (revised slightly for 2014) on
discipline-program level pairs (e.g. accountancy,
computer science, Math/English/Sci majors in
Teacher Education.)
3. Additional points for Teacher Education programs
in PNU, CNU, LNU.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
33
REMINDER ON WEIGHTS FOR INSTITUTIONAL
:
SUPPORT
• Each full-time student (as measure of
input) is deemed to have the same weight
or value as a graduate (as measure of
output).
• Indices are combined by multiplication, not
addition, e.g. 1.875 = 1.50x1.25.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
34
“Heavy-weight” enrolment in 2012-13
2012-13
TOTAL WFTES
ENROLMENT
2012-13
SUC
RANK
EFFECT OF
WEIGHTING
SYSTEM
1
DR. EMILIO B. ESPINOSA, SR. MEM
ST COLL OF AGRIC AND TECH
3,236
4,534
1.40
2
SORSOGON ST COLL
8,982
12,397
1.38
3
SAMAR ST UNIV
4,869
6,604
1.36
4
MARINDUQUE ST COLL
5,343
6,987
1.31
5
UNIV OF THE PHIL SYSTEM
57,082
73,732
1.29
6
MINDANAO POLY ST COLL
9,048
11,674
1.29
7
CENTRAL MINDANAO UNIV
9,867
12,559
1.27
8
NORTHERN MINDANAO ST INST OF
SCI AND TECH
6,036
7,673
1.27
9
UNIV OF SOUTHEASTERN PHIL
14,549
18,443
1.27
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
36
“Low-weight” enrolment in 2012-13
SUC
RANK
2012-13
TOTAL WFTES
ENROLMENT
2012-13
NORMALIZED
EFFECT OF
WEIGHTING SYSTEM
106
MINDANAO ST UNIV - MAIN
48,607
43,091
0.89
107
OCC MINDORO NATL COLL
8,897
7,797
0.88
108
NORTHERN NEGROS ST COLL
OF SCI AND TECH
3,680
3,190
0.87
109
ADIONG MEM POLY ST COLL
2,103
1,755
0.83
110
QURINO ST COLEGE
2,174
1,806
0.83
111
MINDORO ST COLL OF AGRIC
AND TECH
5,567
4,606
0.83
112
ILOCOS SUR POLY ST COLL
5,681
4,691
0.83
113
MINDANAO ST UNIV - TCTO
7,992
4,223
0.53
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
37
Effective weight per capita
1.40
1.22
1.17
1.20
1.08
1.06
1.00
0.80
0.67
0.72
0.60
0.51
0.40
0.31
0.31
ELEM
HS
0.20
0.02
PRE-SCH
29 June 2015
TECH-VOC PRE-BACC
BACC
POST-BACC MASTERS
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
PH D
TOTAL
38
50% COMPONENT 1: INSTITUTIONAL
SUPPORT
50%
ENROLMENT
WEIGHTED FOR FULLTIME EQUIVALENCE
WEIGHTED FOR COST
WEIGHTED FOR PRIORITY
TEACHER EDUC ENROLMENT IN PNU. CNU, LNU
50%
GRADUATES
WEIGHTED FOR COST
WEIGHTED FOR PRIORITY
TEACHER EDUC ENROLMENT IN PNU. CNU, LNU
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
39
30% COMPONENT 2: QUALITY
INSTRUCTION
11.7% WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY WITH MASTERS
13.4%
DEGREES
WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY WITH DOCTORAL
DEGREES
CHED CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE
7.7%
4.6% CHED CENTERS OF DEVT
45.8% ALL-PRC PASSING % (AVERAGE OVER 3
YEARS) BUT COUNTED ONLY IF ABOVE
NATIONAL PASSING RATE
WEIGHTED FOR HEADCOUNT OF PRC
PASSERS (REGARDLESS OF NO. OF TAKES)
16.7% AGGREGATE BORDA SCORE FOR
ACCREDITED PROGRAMS
QUALITY INSTRUCTION
100.0% TOTAL FOR
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
40
Example: PRC pass rates as used in NFF
44.0%
SUC A
SUC B
100,000
ONLY IF
ABOVE
BENCHMARK
PASS RATE
PESOS SHARE
WTD BY
OF MOOE
PASSERS
TOTAL
TAKERS
TOTAL
PASSERS
SUC PASS
RATE
2,700
1,600
59.3%
59.3%
948.1
59,328
1,500
600
40.0%
0.0%
-
-
2,000
1,000
50.0%
50.0%
500.0
31,286
600
300
50.0%
50.0%
150.0
9,386
6,800
3,500
51.5%
1,598.1
100,000
SUC C
SUC D
TOTAL
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
41
5%
0.0%
15.0%
28.8%
24.6%
COMPONENT 3-A: RESEARCH
FOR SUCS LEVEL 1-2
HEADCOUNT OF SENIOR RESEARCH STAFF
WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY WITH MASTERS
DEGREES
WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY WITH DOCTORAL
DEGREES
WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY ASSIGNED TO RESEARCH
(AS DERIVED FROM FORM E2)
0.2%
NO. OF ACCREDITED PHD PROGRAMS
22.4%
LOCAL OR NATIONAL PUBLICATIONS OR
PRESENTATIONS
9.0%
100.0%
29 June 2015
INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATIONS OR
PRESENTATIONS
TOTAL FOR RESEARCH A
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
42
Example: “Assisted” assignment of points
POINTS
5
PER ITEM
1,150
10
20
800
260
0.239
36%
12%
0.01%
NATIONAL
NO. OF
NATIONAL
PRESENTN
FACULTY
PUBLICNS
S
INT'L
PUBLICNS
INTL PUBN
PER
FACULTY
IMPLIED
WEIGHT
52%
45
10
100,000
2,210.2
100%
TOTAL POINTS IMPLIED %
ASSIGNED
SHARE
PESOS SHARE
SUC A
600
100
10
5
0.008
700.1
32%
31,675
SUC B
1,000
50
40
2
0.002
690.0
31%
31,219
SUC C
400
70
20
5
0.013
650.1
29%
29,414
SUC D
900
10
10
1
0.001
170.0
8%
7,692
2,900
230
80
13
0.004
2,210.2
100%
100,000
TOTAL
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
43
10%
COMPONENT 3-B: RESEARCH FOR
SUCS LEVEL 3-4
4.2%
WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY WITH MASTERS DEGREES
3.7%
1.7%
WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY WITH DOCTORAL
DEGREES
WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY ASSIGNED TO RESEARCH
(AS DERIVED FROM FORM E2)
NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTERS
9.1%
CHED CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE
5.9%
2.0%
CHED CENTERS OF DEVT
NO. OF ACCREDITED LEVEL 3-4 PHD PROGRAMS
6.2%
22.2%
4.7%
8.3%
12.2%
19.7%
0.0%
SCOPUS CITATIONS
NATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
100.0%
TOTAL FOR RESEARCH B
29 June 2015
NATIONAL PUBLICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATIONS
PATENTS
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
44
5%
COMPONENT 4:
EXTENSION SERVICES
5.9% HEADCOUNT OF SENIOR
EXTENSION STAFF
29.4% WEIGHTED FTE FACULTY
ASSIGNED TO EXTENSION
(FORM E2)
64.7% PERSON-DAYS TRAINED
SOCIAL WORK
100.0% TOTAL FOR EXTENSION
SERVICES
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
45
Other factors which affect the NFF
• The national budget ceiling (esp. MOOE) as
set by DBM.
• The authority of SUC boards and
administrators to open new programs and
satellite campuses, to cross-subsidize
between programs and education levels.
• Actions of CHED commissioners as Chairs of
SUC Boards.
• Data gaps due to late-submitting or nonsubmitting SUCs.
• Unanalyzed and unused information from the
existing CHED database.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
46
Other factors which affect the NFF….
• National policies such as “No tuition fee
increases in SUCs”.
• SSL.
• Civil Service Rules, e.g. on the implications of
downloading of one year’s worth of GE from
higher education to basic education.
• Power of Congress and Senate: creation of
new SUCs, congressional insertions, PDAF,
allocation of grants-in-aid or scholarship
funds.
• IGPs as a possible modality (intended or nonintended) for “converting” GAA allotments
into SUC income.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
47
Some pending matters for 2015 and beyond:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Implications of HEI typology
How to deal with no data, late data and outlier data.
Reviewing priority indices.
How the NFF can reward SUCs sticking to their “mandates”
or regional priorities.
5. How the NFF could provide incentives for SUC
“amalgamations”.
6. Refining the assessment of outputs from research and
extension services.
7. Completing, analyzing and utilizing info from reported
workloads in Forms E1 and E2.
8. Reviewing the back files.
9. Obtaining enough data to simulate putting PS (or some
aspects of it) under NFF.
10. Implications of upcoming SHS and downloaded GE on SUC
costs.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
48
Suggested next steps for CHED:
1. Analyze, update, refine and expand the SUCs
database in CHED and use it to continuously
improve the NFF:
•
•
•
•
Continue to validate submitted data & fill the data gaps: esp.
enrolment, graduates, PRC performance, personnel counts.
Harvest information from existing-but-unprocessed data, esp.
on actual faculty workloads (Forms E1 & E2), research &
training outputs (as reported for SUC levelling).
Transparency: make SUC data available on the website.
Provide feedback to SUCs and use the resulting goodwill to
collect more data.
2. Triangulate SUC cost-per-student estimates:
•
•
•
29 June 2015
Conduct cost accounting study of some model HEIs to
benchmark cost norms in selected fields.
Implement econometric analysis to derive production
function, thereby estimate fixed costs and variable costs.
Continue refining the normative approach.
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
49
Suggested next steps (continued)….
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Conduct tracer study to get ultimate NFF outcomes data:
how many graduates obtain employment.
Analyze further the initial PS simulation results and
formulate more detailed plans for implementing NFF on PS
in the 2015 GAA and beyond. Note 3 dimensions of PS: no.
of plantilla positions, personnel headcounts, cost.
Analyze SUC income, esp. student fees and capacity of
students to pay. Vigilance against the use of IGP as
(intended or unintended) “conversion” from GAA to SUC
income.
Align the use of HEDF with that of NFF objectives in
allocating funds for student financial assistance, faculty
development, research programs, COE/CODs.
Continue cooperation between DBM and CHED, between
PRC and CHED.
Connect HEI typology work and NFF for SUCs.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
50
Thank you.
29 June 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
51
A page from “back files” with implications on MOOE.
What % of the curriculum is lecture mode
– as opposed to lab mode, etc?
NORM COMBINATION OF EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY/DELIVERY MODE
EDUCATION LEVEL (6)
LECTURE CLASS-BASED
LABORATORY-BASED
TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3
C. TECH.VOC
60%
20%
D. BACCALAUREATE
30% 30%
15%
OTHER MODES
FIELD
WORK
ON THE
JOB
INDEP BREAK TRAINING
STUDY OUT
10 %
5%
5%
5%
5%
TOTAL
10%
100%
5%
100%
E. MASTERS
30% 20%
30% 10%
10%
100%
F. DOCTORAL
20% 30%
30% 10%
20%
100%
JUNE 21 2015
SUCS NFF FOR GAA 2014
52