3A BIO HUMAN EVOLUTION Slide 2 Slide 3 Slide 4 Slide 5 Slide 6 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Slide 10 Slide 11 Slide 12 Slide 13 Slide 14 Slide 15 Slide 16 Slide 17 Important Bipedal finds Hominin Evolution Human Origin Out of Africa Theory Multiregional Theory H. floresiensis Cultural Evolution The Catalyst for Culture Cultural Periods Lower Paleolithic Fire Middle Paleolithic Art and Spirituality Upper Paleolithic Neolithic Agriculture Main Menu IMPORTANT BIPEDAL FINDS Important “first” bipedal species finds include: Australopithecus africanus - 1942 (2.5 m.y.a) “Tuang boy” Australopithecus afarensis - “Lucy”, 1972 - “The first family”, 1975 (3 m.y.a) - “Laetoli footprints”, 1977 (3.75 m.y.a) Ardipithecus ramidus - 1995 (4.4 m.y.a) Orrorin tugenensis - 2001 (6 m.y.a! 1.5 my before thought) Main Menu HOMININ EVOLUTION About 7-8 m.y.a. the Hominid ancestor emerged. This eventually branched off into Gorillas, chimps, and us. The first solely human (hominin) ancestor may have been Ardipithecus ramidus ~5 m.y.a., or perhaps the newly found Orrorin tugenensis, around 6 m.y.a. This was followed by the Australopithecines, from 4 m.y.a. All fossils from this time have been found in Africa. Australopithecines were bipedal. Their brains were only slightly bigger than chimps’. They (probably) didn’t use tools, except twigs (as do chimps). Darwin's theory that bipedalism predated brain enlargement was proved to be correct. Why would this be the case? Hands free for walking leads to them being available for tool use. HUMAN ORIGIN 5 m.y.a. 4 3 Ardipithecus ramedus Australopithecus anamensis gracile Australopithecines A. afarensis A. africanus 2 Paranthropus robustus P. Boisei 1 0.5 Present The megadonts – vegetarians. a.k.a. robust A.s This represents one possible interpretation of the fossil data: Homo rudolfensis H. ergaster H. habilis H. erectus H. heidelbergensis H. florensiensis H. sapiens H. neanderthalensis Manual pg 355-58 Main Menu HUMAN ORIGIN There are two main theories for where H. sapiens originated. Out of Africa (replacement) Theory: H. erectus H. ergaster/ H. erectus migrated and colonised many areas. Arguments for: Only the African type evolved into humans, and then spread through the H. erectus H. erectus H. erectus world replacing the others as they went. mtDNA analysis supports the common ancestor of all humans 170,000 y.a. in Africa. Extinct H. sapiens Extinct All humans are genetically too similar to H. sapiens H. sapiens H. sapiens have evolved parallel, without large Europe Africa Asia gene flow between continents (unlikely). There is little continuity of fossils outside Africa to link H. erectus to H. sapiens. Main Menu Multiregional: HUMAN ORIGIN H. erectus H. ergaster/erectus migrated and colonised many areas. There was some interbreeding, but the populations are isolated, and evolve in H. erectus H. erectus H. erectus parallel. Arguments for: This results in distinct regional differences. H. sapiens H. sapiens H. sapiens There is evidence of H. ergaster in Europe Europe, and some regional differences between fossils. 170,000 years is too short a time for H. sapiens to take over other populations. mtDNA is less reliable than fossil evidence??? Africa Asia Some interbreeding Manual pg 370/1 Main Menu H. floresiensis H. floresiensis was discovered in late 2004 on a small Indonesian island. The fossils date back about 13,000 years – well within human habitation of Indonesia. The fossils found share more in common with H. erectus than H. sapiens. A possible evolutionary pathway is shown. Discuss if this information supports the “Multiregional” or the “Out of Africa” theory. Main Menu CULTURE Culture is non-genetic adaptation, passed on within, and between, populations. This can include: Tools Clothing Shelter Fire Division of labour Settlements Agriculture and domestication Manual pg 377/8 Main Menu CULTURAL EVOLUTION Once hands were free to make tools, our ancestors could engage in activities that required intelligence – and our brains got bigger. As communication improved, information could be passed on by language, rather than imitation. This resulted in a massive, rapid and profound leap of cultural evolution – “the great leap forward”. Biological evolution Cultural evolution Parents to offspring Anyone to anyone else Received at fertilization, then doesn’t change Constantly is developed through lifetime Changes are random, trial and error – 1 trial per generation Purposeful, cumulative, future focused Our cultural evolution has, in a short time, overrun the biological evolution of our prey, predators, competitors, and most of our parasites. Main Menu THE CATALYST FOR CULTURE Brain size increases to the point cultural evolution is possible. Longer period of learning Better tool making/cultural advances Improved food supply Longer period of parental care More post natal brain growth Birth at earlier stage of development Brain size stops increasing (stabilising selection). The latest phase of human evolution has been entirely cultural, and is happening at an exponential rate. Manual pg 382 Main Menu TOOL CULTURES Animals use tools. How is human tool use different to them? • Only humans use tools to make tools • Only humans left archeological evidence of tool use (stone tools) The cultural development has been divided into 2 stages: Paleolithic (“old stone age”) – the making and use of stone tools Neolithic (“new stone age”) – agriculture, settlement, pottery Main Menu LOWER PALAEOLITHIC There may well have been earlier tool use – wood and bone – but these have not survived. Oldowan tools: H. habilis (the “handy man”) was the first to use stone tools, about 2.5 mya. H. erectus also used this technique. The typical tools were a hammer stone, which was used to take flakes off a core stone. The flakes were used for skinning and cutting, the core stones for chopping, hammering, or digging. Acheulian tools: These include many types of hand axe made from a core stone. Used by H. ergaster, H. erectus and H. heidelbergensis. Main Menu FIRE H. ergaster was the first to use fire 800,000 y.a. H. sapiens developed this further – using sparks from flint to start fires. This would have had huge advantages: • The catching, returning, and cooking of meat would require better communication, and the development of a home base. • Warmth – more survival in previously uninhabitable areas. • Safety from animals. • Light - more time for social interactions, as well as giving a social focus. This was probably a critical factor for further language development. • Cooking – making food easier to chew and digest, and killing microbes on the food – better health. Main Menu MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC Mousterian tools: These were made between 200,000 and 40,000 y.a. by H. neanderthalensis. They are made from the flakes, which were further shaped and had a wide variety of styles and functions. The tools were difficult to make, but could be used on spears or lances. A Mousterian awl for punching holes in hide to make clothing. Main Menu H. neanderthalensis was the first hominid to arty stuff. ART AND SPIRITUALITY They had necklaces and beads, and may have also had music (in 1995 a bone whistle was found in a cave with Neanderthal tools. They buried the dead with flowers, clothes, beads, and red ochre. Often they were laid as sleeping and facing east-west… rituals? They cared for people who were too infirm to survive alone. How is this significant? Implies strong social structure and would build group cohesion. H. sapiens – Cro-Magnons drew sweet-as cave paintings depicting animals, they made figurines of clay and also buried their dead, implying superstition and/or a rudimentary religion. Manual pg 383/4 Main Menu UPPER PALAEOLITHIC These were made by the last of the Neanderthals and H. sapiens between 40,000 and 12,000 y.a. Includes tools for: Making holes in hides to sew them together Digging for plant roots Arrow heads Harpooning fish (from bone and antler) The stone tools were very effective and finely worked. Many of these tools are still used today by isolated tribes. Manual pg 379-81 Main Menu This is marked by the domestication of plants and animals. NEOLITHIC In other parts pastoralism developed instead. This is where tribes would follow the movements of partly domesticated animals, such as reindeer. Domestication began with dogs (15,000 y.a.) and cats (10,000 y.a.). Agriculture began about 10,000 y.a. as the ice age receded. Plants and naturally formed polyploids and although these may not normally reproduce, they were selected for by humans. Goats, sheep and pigs were domesticated about 8,000 y.a. Horses, donkeys and water buffalo about 4,000 y.a. Most people were lactose intolerant after weaning, but a mutation in the gene allowed milk to be processed throughout the life. This would have provided an excellent source of nutrition. The mutant gene is much rarer in Asian populations. Main Menu AGRICULTURE PROS AND CONS Positives: Negatives: More people could be fed – larger populations. People more exposed to communicable diseases. By not having to move (being sedentary, less nomadic) people could specialise in labour – developing trade. Waste disposal. Technology could develop, e.g. storage, housing, pottery. More time to develop culture, art, language, education… finance, politics. Pests attracted to feed on stored food/waste. Ownership disputes. Many people dependent on harvest outcome. Reliant on few crops – problems with storage and deficiency diseases.