Chapter 8 Courts, Prosecution, and the Defense Overview Abstract Goals of the Court System Provide for an open and impartial forum for seeking the truth Provide for a fair and equitable hearing using regulated rules Insure that the process takes place in an atmosphere of legal competence and objectivity Provide a clear legal outcome Overview (cont.) The courts are often a scene where an atmosphere exists to “work things out” among the participants. The use of plea negotiations and other nonjudicial alternatives to “work things out” is more common than a formal trial process. Discretion sometimes results in disparity Funding problems The Criminal Court Process Criticisms of the Courts Overcrowded dockets Assembly-line justice Too many inducements to plead guilty Too few jury trials Speedy trials are unattainable The Criminal Court Process State Courts Every state has its own court system No two are alike Variety of cases ranging from homicide to property maintenance The Criminal Court Process (cont.) Courts of Limited Jurisdiction About 13,500 exist Organized at municipal or county level Restricted in types of cases they hear May be restricted to civil or criminal cases Dispose of minor cases; may do preliminary activities for some felonies Sentencing options restricted The Criminal Court Process (cont.) Specialty Courts Juvenile, family & probate courts Courts to combat specific problems Drug courts Mental health courts The Criminal Court Process (cont.) Courts of General Jurisdiction Around 2,000 in the U.S. Hear serious felony cases Civil cases with damages over a specified amount Appeals from lower courts Review of transcript Trial de novo The Criminal Court Process (cont.) Appellate Courts Each state has at least one level of appellate courts. Highest state court, usually called the “State Supreme Court” Court reconsiders a case that has been tired in order to determine whether the measures used complied with accepted rules of criminal procedure and were in line with constitutional doctrines Appeal is not a new trial Can order a new trial, allow defendant to go free, or uphold original verdict Federal Courts Federal Courts Legal basis for these courts found in Article 3, sec. 1, of U.S. Constitution Jurisdiction over laws of U.S. and treaties Maritime jurisdiction Over controversies between 2 or more states 3-tiered hierarch of court jurisdiction U.S. District Courts U.S. courts of appeals U.S. Supreme Court Federal Courts (cont.) U.S. District Courts Trial courts of the federal system Organized by Congress in the Judicial Act of 1789 Jurisdiction over violations of federal law, i.e. civil rights violations, interstate transportation of stolen vehicles and kidnappings May hear inter-state lawsuits or cases where federal government is a party to the suit Jurisdiction may overlap that of state courts Federal Courts (cont.) U.S. Courts of Appeals Organized into 13 judicial circuits Hear 40,000 appeals from district courts each year Empowered to review federal and state appellate court cases when there is a federal issue present Do not retry the case or review the facts – only matters of procedure and substance of the law Current attempts to limit the right of appeal Federal Courts (cont.) The U.S. Supreme Court Nation’s highest appellate body – court of last resort for all cases tried in federal and state courts Only federal court created by Constitution Nine justices appointed for life by the President with approval of Congress Court has discretion to choose which cases it will hear Federal Courts (cont.) Supreme Court Process Most cases (90%) are brought to the court by using a writ of certiorari Four of the nine justices must vote to hear the case If the Court decides to hear a case, it reviews legal briefs and may hear oral arguments May decide to affirm or reverse the decision of the lower court Decisions become precedent Federal and State Court Caseloads State courts handle about one hundred million new cases each year including: 20 million civil and domestic cases 15 million criminal cases 2 million juvenile cases 57 million traffic and ordinance violations Federal and State Court Caseloads (cont.) Federal courts even though smaller, are equally burdened Over 320,000 cases filed each year in District Courts Criminal cases increased 55% since 1994 Circuit Courts hear more than 60,000 appeals per year In 1969 they heard only 10,000 appeals Federal and State Court Caseloads (cont.) Causes of Court Congestion Rapidly increasing populations outpace growth in court system Aggressive attempts to lower crime rate result in more prosecutions Complexity of the law and advances in technology Legal reform efforts may require more trials Frivolous lawsuits The Judiciary Primary duty is to oversee the trial process Ensures appropriate conduct Settles questions of evidence and procedure Guides questioning of witnesses Responsible for guiding the jury Decides case when a jury is not used (bench trial) Determines the sentence The Judiciary (cont.) Judicial Functions Extensive control over probation officers and court clerk Exerts influence over police and prosecutors Decisions may shape social policy The Judiciary (cont.) Judicial Qualifications Qualification vary by state Typical qualifications are: Resident of the state Between 25 and 70 years of age Member of state bar licensed to practice law Lower courts may not require law degree The Judiciary (cont.) Judicial Selection Systems Appointment Popular election Nonpartisan election Missouri Plan Judicial nominating commission Appointed by governor from commission’s list Retention election The Prosecutor The Prosecutor May be called district attorney, county attorney, state’s attorney, or U.S. attorney depending on the level of government and jurisdiction Responsible for representing the public in criminal trials Around 2,400 state court prosecutors offices Employ 65,000 attorneys, investigators and support staff The Prosecutor (cont.) General Duties Provide advice to law enforcement officers during investigations Represents the state during pretrial plea negotiations, motions, evidence, and bail hearings Represents the state at other hearings, criminal trials and appeals Legal advisor to county commissioners and other elected officials Implementation of special programs The Prosecutor (cont.) Types of Prosecutors U.S. Attorneys – appointed by the President Federal prosecutors are professional civil service employees State & county levels, attorney general and district attorney are chief prosecutorial officers Political appointees Prosecutorial Discretion Prosecutorial Discretion Exercises great deal of discretion Decides whether to file charges – attempt to screen out weak cases May drop charges during the process nolle prosequi May leave decision to charge someone with minor crime primarily to police discretion Prosecutorial Discretion (cont.) Legal Issues Influencing Prosecutorial Discretion Quality of police work and amount of relevant evidence Seriousness of offense Defendant’s prior arrest record Danger to community Victim Issues Influencing Prosecutorial Discretion Attitude and behavior of the victim Reluctance of victim to press charges Prosecutorial Discretion (cont.) Extra Legal/Resource Issues Influencing Prosecutorial Discretion Offenders’ race, gender, and ethnicity Cost of the prosecution to the system Availability of alternatives Interest group’s influence causes to focus on particular types of offenses Fear of losing case – political ramifications Prosecutorial Discretion (cont.) The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion Can prevent unnecessarily rigid implementation of criminal law Humanize operation of criminal justice system Too much discretion can lead to abuse Judicial Selection Systems (cont.) Types of Prosecutorial Misconduct making disruptive statements in court failure to adhere to sentence recommendations pursuant to a plea bargain represented a criminal defendant currently under prosecution making public statements harmful to the office withholding evidence using power in vindictive manner to punish defendants who insist on exercising their constitutional rights The Defense Attorney Integral part of adversarial system Required to uphold integrity of the legal profession Must observe ABA Code to provide zealous defense within boundaries of law The Defense Attorney (cont.) Courts do not require assistance of counsel for accused in: Pre-indictment lineups Booking procedures Grand jury investigations Appeals beyond first review Disciplinary proceedings in correctional institutions Post-release revocation hearings The Right to Counsel Legal Services for Indigents Gideon v. Wainwright Argersinger v. Hamlin Public defender systems Assigned counsel systems Contract systems Private attorneys Most do not practice criminal law Debate over effectiveness of private attorneys versus attorneys provided by state The Competence of Defense Attorneys Strickland v. Washington Inadequate counsel Refuse to meet with client Fail to cross-examine witnesses Fail to investigate case Poor advice to client Conflict of interest between codefendants’ counsel Court Administration Administrative Office Act, 1939 States have been slow to apply court management principles All states now have some form of court administration Court Administration (cont.) Computers allow courts to fulfill many functions more efficiently Maintain case history and statistical reporting Monitor and schedule cases Prepare documents Index cases Issues summonses Notify witnesses, attorneys, and others of required appearances Select and notify jurors Prepare and administer budgets Court Administration (cont.) Developing Areas of Court Technology Communications Videoconferencing Evidence presentation Case management Internet utilization Information sharing