Chapter 9 Nominations and Campaigns Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy Fourteenth Edition MAG CH 9 SUM THE NOMINATING PROCESS HISTORICAL METHODS SELF-ANNOUNCEMENT CAUCUS CONVENTION MAG CH 9 SUM CURRENT NOMINATION METHODS DIRECT PRIMARY CLOSED, OPEN, BLANKET PETITION PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY NATIONAL CONVENTION DELEGATES ELECT MAG CH 9 SUM BALLOT CHARACTERISTICS (AUSTRALIAN BALLOT) PUBLIC EXPENSE LIST ALL CANDIDATES GIVEN ONLY ONE @ POLLS SECRET VOTE CH 9 SUM MONEY “THE MOTHER’S MILK OF POLITICS” INDIVIDUAL DONATIONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES (PACs) FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION Group Voting Patterns Back Nature of Modern Campaigns Most electoral contests are similar in a number of ways. Nomination campaign aimed at winning primary. General election campaign aimed at winning final race. The Nomination Game Nomination The official endorsement of a candidate for office by a political party Generally, success requires momentum, money, and media attention. Deciding to Run (Info Focuses on the Presidency) Campaigns are more physically and emotionally taxing than ever. (full time job) American campaigns are much longer. Other countries have short campaigns, generally less than two months. Competing for Delegates Nomination game is an elimination contest Goal is to win a majority of delegates’ support at the national party convention, or the supreme power within each of the parties Winning a Caucus Caucus: meetings of state party leaders for selecting delegates to the national convention A handful of states use a caucus—open to all voters who are registered with a party The Iowa caucus is first and most important. Winning a Primary Primary: elections in which voters in a state vote for a nominee (or delegates pledged to the nominee) Began at turn of 20th century by “progressive” reformers Most delegates are chosen through primaries. Superdelegates Frontloading New Hampshire is first. Competing for Delegates Disproportionate attention to early C / P Money plays too big a role. Participation is low (20 percent) and unrepresentative The system gives too much power to the media. The National Convention Now are a formality, Less TV time. Key note speaker on the 1st day Party platform on the 2nd day Formal nomination of president and v-p candidates on 3rd & 4th days The High-Tech Media Campaign Direct mail used to generate support and money for the candidate Get media attention through ad budget and “free” coverage Emphasis on “marketing” a candidate News stories focus more on the “horse race” than substantive policy issues Organizing the Campaign Get a campaign manager Get a fund-raiser and campaign counsel Hire media and campaign consultants Assemble staff and plan logistics Research staff, policy advisors, pollsters Get a good press secretary Establish multiple website Money and Campaigning Federal Election Campaign Act (1974) Created the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Created the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Partial public financing for presidential primaries Required full disclosure and limited contributions Soft Money: political contributions (not subject to contribution limits) earmarked for partybuilding expenses or generic party advertising The McCain-Feingold Act (2002) banned soft money, increased amount of individual contributions, and limited “issue ads.” 527s: independent groups that seek to influence political process but are not subject to contribution restricts because they do not directly seek election of particular candidates The Proliferation of PACs Political Action Committees (PACs) Groups that donate money to campaigns. Are registered with and monitored by the FEC. PACs contributed over $372.1 million to congressional candidates in 2006. PACs donate to candidates who support their issue. PACs do not “buy” candidates, but give to candidates who support them in the first place. The Impact of Campaigns Campaigns have three effects on voters: Reinforcement, Activation, Conversion Several factors weaken campaigns’ impact Selective perception: pay most attention to things we agree with Party identification still influence voting behavior Incumbents begin with sizeable advantage • Do Big Campaigns Lead to an Increased Scope of Government? • Candidates make numerous promises, especially to state and local interests. • Hard for politicians to promise to cut size of government Citizens United v F.E.C (2010) • 5-4 ruling (conservatives over liberals) • Freedom of Speech Protected • Money = speech • Buckley v. Valeo (1976) • Unlimited donations allowed • From independent (non-partisan) sources • Limited timely public disclosure Summary • Campaigns are media-oriented and expensive. • Delegates are selected through caucuses and primaries. • Money and contributions from PACs regulated by the FEC are essential to campaigns. • Campaigns reinforce perceptions but do not change minds. Expenditures by PACs Back CAMPAIGNS ARE NOW “PERSONALITY BASED” POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE LESS CONTROL OF CANDIDATE LOWER VOTER TURNOUTS FOCUS ON “LIKELY VOTERS” TYPES OF CAMPAIGN WORKERS * PAID POLITICAL PROFESSIONALS ISSUE CONSULTANTS ECON., FOR., & DOM. POLICIES MEDIA CONSULTANTS POLLS, MAILING, ADS * UNPAID SENIOR ADVISORS * CITIZEN VOLUNTEERS Candidate and Staff Candidates run for a number of reasons. Volunteers focus on canvassing and get out the vote. Personal staff led by campaign manager. Also have finance chair, pollster, Internet team. Communications director, direct mailer, press secretary. Campaign and media consultants may be hired. Campaign Organization Back DECISIONS TO BE MADE EXTREME IDEOLOGICAL VIEWS FOR PRIMARY VOTES? OR MODERATE VIEWS FOR GENERAL ELECTION VOTES? NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN OR POSITIVE CAMPAIGN INSIDER OR OUTSIDER PERSONALITY WHAT GROUPS TO APPEAL TO WHAT APPEARANCES TO MAKE & WHERE TELEVISION IS VERY IMPORTANT PAID “SPOTS”, ADS NEWS “VISUALS” DEBATES CONVENTIONS ARE LESS IMPORTANT “RED MEAT” FOR BASE OUTREACH FOR MODERATES POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS COST $$$$ WHOEVER SPENDS THE MOST, USUALLY (74%) WINS LARGE “MONEY ADVANTAGE” HELPS CHALLENGERS MORE THAN INCUMBENTS WHERE DOES CAMPAIGN MONEY COME FROM? 1-CANDIDATES THEMSELVES 2-THE WEALTHY $2,000 MAX PER CANDIDATE 3-ORGANIZATIONS, INTEREST GROUPS & P.A.C.s $5,000 MAX PER CANDIDATE (???) 4-SMALL INDIVIDUAL DONORS MOST MONEY COMES FROM HERE 5-THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES/ELECTIONS ONLY 2008 Election Analysis Obama made gains in South and West. Voter turnout was as high as it had been since 1964. Obama’s choice not to use public financing helped him. African Americans and women were keys for Obama. 2008 Contribution Limits An individual can give up to: $2,000 per election to any candidate or candidate committee $25,000 per calendar year to a national party committee $10,000 per calendar year to each state or local party committee $5,000 per calendar year to a Political Action Committee (PAC) $95,000 per two-year election cycle to candidates, national party committees and PACs 1972 CAMPAIGN REFORM HELPED… WEALTHY CANDIDATES THOSE WHO APPEAL TO MANY PEOPLE INCUMBENTS EARLY CAMPAIGNERS CELEBRITIES POLITIC ACTION COMMITTEES 2000 ELECTION REFORMS LIMIT “SOFT MONEY” 527 GROUPS CREATED “swift boat” groups CRITICAL OR REALIGNING PERIODS A LASTING SHIFT IN POPULAR COALITIONS 1800 - JEFFERSON’S D-R=FEDERALISTS FOLDED 1828 - JACKSONIAN DEMOCRATS IN POWER 1860 - LINCOLN REPS. REPLACE THE WHIGS 1896 - W.J. BRYANT DEMOCRATIC POPULISM 1932 - FDR NEW DEAL COALITION 1980 - THE REAGAN REVOLUTION ? CAN REALIGNMENT OCCUR WITH... WEAKER POLITICAL PARTIES? PERSONALITY ELECTIONS? MORE SPLIT TICKET VOTING? NO CRITICAL NATIONWIDE ISSUES? GERRYMANDERING • THE INTENTIONAL REALIGNMENT OF DISTRICTS TO FAVOR ONE POLITICAL PARTY GERRYMANDERING (legal) MINORITY-MAJORITY DISTRICTS (unconstitutional) 2009 ELECTION CYCLE KEY STATE RESULTS • NEW REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS • VIRGINIA & NEW JERSEY • AFFLUENT SUBURBANITES – BIG REP GAINS • DEMOCRATIC FED.HOUSE SEAT • NE NEW YORK (NY-23) • REPUBLICAN SPLIT (MOD. VS CONS.) • MAINE VOTES NO ON GAY MARRIAGE • REFERENDUM AGAINST LAW PASSED • OHIO VOTES YES TO CASINOS ELECTIONS & CAMPAIGNS OBJECTIVES 1-DEMONSTRATE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTYORIENTED CAMPAIGNS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY AND THE CANDIDATE-ORIENTED CAMPAIGNS OF TODAY. 2-EXPLAIN THE MAJOR ELEMENTS OF A SUCCESSFUL CAMPAIGN FOR OFFICE TODAY. ELECTIONS & CAMPAIGNS OBJECTIVES 3-DISCUSS HOW IMPORTANT CAMPAIGN FUNDING IS TO ELECTION OUTCOMES. 4-DEFINE THE TERM REALIGNING ELECTION AND DISCUSS THE MAJOR EXAMPLES OF SUCH ELECTIONS IN THE PAST. ALSO ADDRESS THE CONCERN OVER WHETHER REALIGNMENT IS AGAIN UNDERWAY. ELECTIONS & CAMPAIGNS OBJECTIVES 5-DESCRIBE WHAT THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS EACH MUST DO TO PUT TOGETHER A SUCCESSFUL NATIONAL COALITION TO WIN ELECTIONS. 6-DO ELECTIONS RESULT IN MAJOR CHANGES IN PUBLIC POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES? ELECTIONS & CAMPAIGNS IMPORTANT TERMS BLANKET PRIMARY CLOSED PRIMARY COATTAILS (POLITICAL) CRITICAL (REALIGNING) PERIODS DIRECT MAIL GENERAL ELECTION INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT OFFICE-BLOC BALLOT OPEN PRIMARY PARTY-COLUMN BALLOT ELECTIONS & CAMPAIGNS IMPORTANT TERMS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PAC) POSITION ISSUE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY PRIMARY ELECTION PROSPECTING VOTING RETROSPECTIVE VOTING RUNOFF PRIMARY SPLIT-TICKET VOTING STRAIGHT-TICKET VOTING VALENCE ISSUE VISUAL