Embedded Health Data Chips for Interior Alaska A Feasibility Study Expert Panel Graduate Advisory Committee Dr. Robert Perkins, Advisor Dr. Ming Lee Dr. Leroy Hulsey Embedded Health Data Chips for Interior Alaska A Feasibility Study Prepared for the Engineering and Science Management Program Presented by UAF Masters Candidates Lien Huang Steven Roscovius Frank Toth Overview Study Statement Introduction to Tanana Chiefs Conference Background and Options Criteria and Analysis Stakeholders Economic Legal and Ethical Social Program Schedule and Costs Conclusion Is there a problem? Feasibility Study Is there a better way? We are challenged to explore new technology But we are bound to do it ethically and morally Task Force We approached this as a task force Tanana Chiefs Conference (TCC) Chosen for its unique health care situation We were challenged in our study Discovered that numbers and dollars may not always sum up the story Tanana Chiefs Conference Mission Statement Tanana Chiefs Conference provides a unified voice advancing tribal governments, economic and social development, promoting physical and mental wellness, educational opportunities and protecting language, traditional and cultural values. Tanana Chiefs Conference The Department of Health Services Mission Statement TCC Health Services, In Partnership With Those We Serve, Promotes And Enhances Spiritual, Physical, Mental And Emotional Wellness Through Education, Prevention And The Delivery Of Quality Services. Chief Andrew Isaac Health Center Jim Kohler - Director 15,000 beneficiaries 43 villages $44 million health budget Health data management is vital and continually challenging 1.5% for data management and communications $660,000 Electronic Health Record was implemented in February 2005 Quality of care and proper reimbursement Affects pharmacy, lab, radiology, continuity between providers, scheduling, and billing Communication with 43 different villages Challenges Flat budgets with double digit cost increases Staff shortages What is the problem? Identification of patients Unconscious Disabled No identification Very young Elderly What are some options? Do Nothing Radio Frequency Identification Chip Personal Data Assistant Devices ID Cards Do Nothing No apparent costs Are there hidden costs? No change in current situation RFID Chips New technology Implantable Does not require batteries Type for consideration is ID number only Can’t lose it Personal Data Assistant Carry your entire medical history X-rays Diagnostic scans Medical notes Lab tests Compatibility Issues Exist Can be lost Rural use? ID Card A card embedded a unique ID number Quick check-in Cheap Easy to lose Do you want another ID card? The Best Option Ranked in 4 categories Categories scored by weighting Initial capital costs for implementation Information stored on the device 10% Availability of the device in an emergency 15% 40% Practicality of using the device for special needs individuals 35% Scoring Options CATEGORIES AND WEIGHTS CAPITAL STORED EMER SPECIAL COSTS INFO GENCY NEEDS 15% 10% 40% 35% TOTAL Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score SCORE RANK Do Nothing 4 0.60 1 0.10 1 0.40 3 1.05 2.15 3rd RFID 2 0.30 2 0.20 4 1.60 4 1.40 3.50 1st PDA 1 0.15 4 0.40 2 0.80 1 0.35 1.70 4th ID Card 3 0.45 3 0.30 3 1.20 2 0.70 2.65 2nd VeriChip Chip was originally developed to track livestock and wildlife October of 2004, FDA approval for human implantation and use as a health device VeriChip Approximately the size of a grain of rice Implanted into subcutaneous fat takes less than 20 minutes Performed by physician Contains 16-digit unique number Scanned using VeriChip device Information via the internet VeriChip No reported complications or side effects At least 10 year lifespan Some have concerns with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Reversible with minor surgery VeriChip Who would benefit the most? Impaired speech Memory loss Loss of consciousness Chronic illnesses Common names Mistaken identities VeriChip Case Studies Alzheimer's Care in Palm Beach Infant Abduction Brittan Elementary School Mexican Attorney Generals Office Hackensack Emergency Program NJ Alzheimer's Care 2-year project 280 patients Starts in May, 2007 Provides emergency department staff easy access to those patients’ identification and medical information Infant Protection 116 abductions from health-care facilities in the last 22 years Infant mismatching Halo – infant protection systems Chip is in bracelet Brittan Elementary School Sutter, California RFID tags embedded in student badges tracked students throughout the school Ended by parental pressure Mexican Attorney Generals Office Originally reported by AP in 2004 18 members are tagged Controls access to secure areas and to restricted data Combat corruption Hackensack Emergency Program Average increase of more than 1.5 million visits per year 2.7 million were made by persons living in institutional settings such as nursing homes or prisons At the same time the number of emergency departments have decreased by about 12.4 percent Emergency Room Visits Option for more detailed study Trial Period 5 Years 1500 people that would most benefit from this technology Mental or physical handicaps, dementia, elderly or very young Full Scale After trial Is it feasible? Need to analyze Stakeholders Economic Legal and Ethical Social Program Schedule and Costs Stakeholders Economic Trial period Capital Costs Annual Costs Medical Scanners Training RFID Chips Fee Full Scale Economic Capital costs Medical Scanners Training We estimated 43 scanners for the villages plus 12 to cover the facilities in Fairbanks 55 scanners needed. Seamless Integration RFID chips 1500 initial Economic Medical scanners RFID chips $600 to $3,000 Estimate $50,000 $200 plus hospital costs, estimated up to another $200 Estimate initial cost $300,000 Annual fee $20 to $80 Estimate $100,000 yearly fee Economic Costs of Trial Present Worth (Discount Rate 6.5%) YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 Net Present Worth COST $350,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $765,000 Upgrade to Full Scale Largest cost growth would be in the RFID chips. 3 to 6 million dollars to acquire chips VeriChip and TCC could find common ground far below. No additional scanners Possible increase in yearly fee Benefits Cost Savings Less errors Improved efficiencies Improved Health Services Intangibles Benefits Cost Savings Lack of long term studies Estimates of cost savings are difficult Rand study on electronic medical records Although not a true parallel it hints at the possible savings through increased efficiency and improved patient care Benefits Rand Study National Electronic Records Potential Savings HEALTH 2 Trillion BUDGET INITIAL SAVINGS EVENTUAL SAVINGS 88 Billion 4% 346 Billion 17% Benefits From Full Electronic Records Initial If 90% adopt health information technology $77 billion from efficiencies Shorter hospital stays prompted by better-coordinated care Less nursing time on administrative tasks better use of medications better utilization resources $4 billion from improved safety primarily by reducing prescription errors Benefits for TCC Expected Cost Savings? With a annual health budget of $44 million, even 1% savings can be substantial 2% = $880,000 1% = $440,000 0.5% = $220,000 Benefits Improved Health Services Intangibles Better patient service Fewer mistakes Speedy care Less exposure to lawsuits Legal and Ethical Identification and Tracking Social Environment Privacy & Notice by Institutions Security Data Storage Options Identification and Tracking Social Environment Passive – 16 digit Active – Up to 100 Pages of Text Tracking Staff and Patients Substance Abuse Home Confinement for Inmates Insurance Profiling Privacy & Notice by Institution Griswold v Connecticut (reviewed privacy) 1st Amendment - Right of Association 3rd – Prohibition of Quartering of Soldiers 4th – Secure in houses; Search & Seizure 5th - Self Incrimination-zone of privacy 9th – Fundamental rights not specifically mentioned Health Insurance Portability & Account Notice of Privacy Practice Note use of RFIDs Security Encryption – Small Chips Lack Scanning Range (4”; 2-3 ft; 10 ft) Tracking Possible Dutch e-Passports 2006 AK Community RHIO Regional Health Information Org Improve health record exchange Lower costs Prevent medical mistakes Health Information Security & Privacy Collaboration Issues of Exchange Health Information Health care providers; Insurers; Health care agencies Data Storage-Option #1 Option 1 Patient file at TCC. Information requests through VeriChip to TCC TCC retains ownership No additional notification or release forms Health Care Provider Request for Records VeriChp Patient Information Request for Records TCC Patient File Data Storage-Option #2 Option 2: Patient file is stored at VeriChip TCC updates the patients file but VeriChip owns the data storage used Additional notification and release forms required Health Care Provider Request for Records Patient Information VeriChip Patient File Updates TCC Data Storage - Option #3 Option 3: Similar to option 2 Patient file is stored at VeriChip TCC leases data server No additional notification or releases needed Health Care Provider Request for Records Patient Information VeriChip Patient File Updates TCC Current Legal Status Current Law Federal State Federal No current laws govern RFID technology Current Bipartisan Caucus Industry, DOD, and Academics Pharmaceutical authentication, drug/product recalls, food chain safety, homeland security, supply chain efficiency State 2005 – 12 states have introduced RFID legislation Wisconsin Legislation to prevent implants w/o person’s permission California Legislation security/guidelines protect privacy rights of individuals – govnr vetoed Two other bills pending Social Analysis Are there social issues in rural Alaska that are different from Fairbanks? What are some of the issues? Remote population Language Culture Customs Tradition Points of Caution Village’s point of view? Lack of pressing need Skepticism Oral Traditional Economic Overall Based on history Stigmas Individuals Communities TCC Board Approval Small budget to continue What do we do? Evaluating Social Concerns How do we evaluate these concerns? We need a acceptance plan Hire a marketing firm? Local surveys? Meetings with TCC? Meetings with village elders? Program Implementation Creating a implementation team Investigate funding Negotiate with vendor Team will be composed of primary stakeholders Key task will be developing and implementing acceptance plan Pilot project? Evaluate the process Review Program Implementation Go / No Go Deploy the hardware Monitor the outcomes Re-evaluate Implementation Tasks Implementation Schedule Implementation Costs 1st year Capital Costs Initial + Annual Fee Implementation Costs $450,000 $34,990 $484,990 Is It Feasible? What are the needs? What are some likely solutions? We have discussed some of the pros and cons in health and economics We have considered some legal / ethical / moral issues? We have identified social issues Recommendation Further Investigations are Needed Economic and Health issues Legal issues are not defined It will work Risk involved Social issues might derail completely Special Thanks To Robert Perkins Ming Lee Leroy Hulsey Jim Kohler Perry Ahsogeak Rebecca Madison Questions THANK YOU