John J Armstrong and Leslie A Bryce, Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd

advertisement
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd
Scottish IOR Conference
John J Armstrong
Leslie A Bryce
Cartwheel Conspiracy Case Study
26th October 2012
Why it is important
Insert Slide Title
“Our vision is that...there is a very clear lead
from the top of financial organisations – that
fraud is a significant threat that needs managing
strategically and effectively. In considering fraud
issues we will look, for example, at whether a
firm has a strong anti-fraud culture, with the lead
being given from the top.” Philip Robinson former FSA
director of financial crime
2
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Discussion Points
Insert Slide Title
 Initial Allegation – how do you react
 Is your organisation equipped to handle it?
 Management Response
 Communication
 Company Policy
 Key Decision Points
 Investigation
 Disciplinary Actions
 Civil and Criminal Proceedings
 Reputational Impact
 Anything else?
3
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
The Allegation
Insert Slide Title
 A whistle-blower has made contact to allege:
 Long-serving member of staff has stolen large amounts from the
company in the form of fraudulent claims payments.
 In particular, payments have been made to an ex-boyfriend and other
friends.
 One cheque for around £28,000 recently sent to a D Pritchard.
 Works in Southend but originally from Liverpool.
4
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
What do we know?
Insert Slide Title
 Suspected fraudster has 16 years service, mainly in the claims
function
 Expert knowledge of certain claims systems
 Trains new staff
 Claims payment authorisation of up £50,000
 Family members work for the company
 Liked by staff, generous and heavily involved with local charities
 Initial investigation has found a cheque payment for £28,275 to D
Pritchard with no apparent connection to the associated claim
5
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Risks?
Insert Slide Title
 False allegation
 Mishandling of the case resulting in failure to recover any losses
 Reputational risk to the company from bad publicity
 Potentially unidentified control failures in the claims handling
and
 claims payment systems
6
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Management Response
Insert Slide Title
 Supportive of the investigation?
 Complying with legislation?
 Creating the right culture?
 Willingness to address control failures?
7
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Key decision points
Insert Slide Title
Who investigates?
Who is told about the investigation and when?
Who makes the decision on civil and/or criminal proceedings?
Who handles the legal aspects?
Who handles external communication?
8
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Reputational Impact
Insert Slide Title
On the Company?
On clients?
On staff?
On shareholders?
On the regulators?
9
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
The Suspect
Insert Slide Title
10
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Involved
Insert Slide Title
11
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
What to do if fraud is suspected
Insert Slide Title
 Do not voice your suspicions to anyone who does not need to know. This
could be deemed to be ‘tipping off’ and is a criminal offence
 Do not challenge the individual
 Contact the appropriate investigation function as soon as possible
 Secure or photocopy relevant documents in your possession. However, if
fingerprints are a factor, avoid touching the documents
 Document any relevant conversations
 Do act quickly to minimise risk
 Act normally
Remember! Employees who suspect fraud and do not report through the
appropriate channels can be prosecuted personally under the Proceeds of
Crime Act 2002.
12
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Insert Slide Title
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd
info@fortinbrasrisk.com
07557 994882
13
Fortinbras Risk Consultancy Ltd ©
Download