Project evaluation
Reviewer
Date
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Instructions for reviewers
Please fill out sections 4-9 in the form below. You are asked to rate the application according to the statements by
scoring each section (replace XX with your score – e.g. ranging from 0/20 to a maximum of 20/20) and checking the
boxes. At the end of each section room has been included for comments
1. Applicant(s)
Name
Qualification
Affiliation
Country
E-mail
2. Project
2.1 Title
2.2 Duration
2.3 Funds requested
3. Summary
4. Assessment of the project
4.1 Technical value
Score
Objectives:

The application demonstrates sufficient familiarity with the international state-of the-art of related
work and provides a context for the project

The project/research question/hypothesis is clearly stated
Methodology:

The overall methodological approach is well-designed and appropriate to achieve the
objectives/specific aims

The methods and techniques are clearly described and well explained. Statistics will be used
appropriately. Shortcomings are identified.
 The expected results will be relevant to the project objective and valuable to the haemophilia
community
XX/20
4.2 Novelty/degree of field’s improvement
Score
The topic is original and innovative
XX/20
4.3 Fit with HERO scope
Click
here to
enter
score.
Score
HERO objectives: Providing greater understanding of the impact of psychosocial issues to make the
case for effective support and thereby enable improved outcomes
HERO Research Grant priorities:
The effect of comprehensive haemophilia care on joint outcomes
The physical burden of haemophilia, with a specific focus on the challenge of pain
The psychological burden of haemophilia and access to appropriate professionals
Employment and career life-cycle advice for people with haemophilia and their families
4.4 Comments
Strengths, limitations, other
Click here to enter text.
Click
here to
enter
score.
XX/20
Click
here to
enter
score.
5. Applicant/team
5.1 Sufficiently qualified to successfully undertake this study
Score
XX/20
Click
here to
enter
score.
5.2 Comments
Click here to enter text.
6. Feasibility
6.1 Feasibility of the research
Score
XX/20
Click
here to
enter
score.
6.2 Comments
Click here to enter text.
7. Timelines and budget
7.1 Timelines are realistic
7.2 Budget is realistic
7.3 Comments
Yes
No
N/A
☐
☐
☐
Yes
No
Reduce
☐
☐
☐
Click here to enter text.
8. Summary of evaluation
8.1 Overall score
Score
Please add your scores from the above sections
XX/100
Click
here to
enter
score.
8.2 Fundable
Please indicate your recommendation regarding
funding of the project
8.3 Comments
Yes
Low priority
No
☐
☐
☐
Click here to enter text.
2