Chapter fourteen Analyzing Strategic Management Cases Topics Why? Steps involved in conducting a case analysis. Better decisions from conflict-inducing discussion techniques How to get the most out of case analysis. Why Analyze Strategic Management Cases? The process of analyzing, decision making, and implementing strategic actions raises many good questions Why do some firms succeed and others fail? Why are some companies higher performers than others? What information is needed in the strategic planning process? How do competing values and beliefs affect strategic decision making? What skills and capabilities are needed to implement a strategy effectively? Why Analyze Strategic Management Cases? Case analysis Simulates the real-world experience Forces you to choose among different options Set forth a plan of action based on your choices Why Analyze Strategic Management Cases? Cases include: Detailed description of a challenging situation faced by an organization Usually includes a chronology of events and extensive support materials Financial statements Product lists Transcripts of interviews with employees Skills Developed from Case Analyses Differentiate Evaluate many different elements of a situation at once Differentiating between the factors that are influencing the situation Understanding that problems are often complex and multilayered Dig deep Being too quick to accept an easy solution will probably fail to get to the heart of the problem Skills Developed from Case Analyses Differentiate Speculate Envision explanation that might not readily be apparent Imagine different scenarios Contemplate the outcome of a decision Deal with uncertainty and incomplete knowledge Missing data Information may be contradictory Speculate about details and consequences that are unknown Skills Developed from Case Analyses Differentiate Speculate Integrate Look at the big picture Have an organizationwide perspective Integrate the information into one set of recommendations affecting the whole company Changes made in one part will affect the others Integrate the impact of various decisions and environmental influences on all parts of the organization How to Conduct a Case Analysis Prepare for a case discussion Do your homework Investigate Analyze Research potential solutions Gather the advice of others Become immersed in facts, options, and implications How to Conduct a Case Analysis Put yourself “inside” the case Think like an actual participant Strategic decision maker Board of directors Outside consultant Try different perspectives One of the most challenging is as a business founder or owner Hiring an outside consultant may not be an option Five Steps for Conducting a Strategic Management Case Analysis Become familiar with the material Step One Read quickly through the case one time Use initial read-through to assess possible links to strategic concepts Read the case again, making notes Evaluate application of strategic concepts After forming first recommendation, thumb through the case again to assess consequences of actions you propose Five Steps for Conducting a Strategic Management Case Analysis Identify problems Step One Two Some cases have more than one problem Avoid getting hung up on symptoms Articulate the problem Writing down a problem statement gives you a reference point when you proceed through the case analysis Some problems are not apparent until after you do the analysis Five Steps for Conducting a Strategic Management Case Analysis Conduct strategic analyses Step StepThree Two Determine which strategic issues are involved Use strategic tools to conduct the analysis Five-forces analysis Value chain analysis Contingency frameworks Financial analysis Test your own assumptions about the case Financial Ratio Analysis Techniques Ratio What It Measures Short-term solvency, or liquidity, ratios: Current ratio Quick ratio Cash ratio Ability to use assets to pay off liabilities. Ability to use liquid assets to pay off liabilities quickly. Ability to pay off liabilities with cash on hand. Financial Ratio Analysis Techniques Ratio What It Measures Long-term solvency, or financial leverage, ratios: Total debt ratio Debt-equity ratio Equity multiplier Times interest ratio Cash coverage ratio How much of a company’s total assets are financed by debt. Compares how much a company is financed by debt with how much is it finance by equity. How much debt is being used to finance assets. How well a company has its interest obligations covered. A company’s ability to generate cash from operations. Financial Ratio Analysis Techniques Ratio What It Measures Asset utilization, or turnover, ratios: Inventory turnover How many times each year a company sells its entire inventory. Day’s sales in How many days on average inventory is on hand before it inventory is sold. Receivables How frequently each year a company collects on its credit turnover sales. Days’ sales in How many days on average it takes to collect on credit receivables sales (average collection period). Total asset How much of sales is generated for every dollar in assets. turnover Capital intensity The dollar investment in assets needed to generate $1 in sales. Financial Ratio Analysis Techniques Ratio What It Measures Profitability ratios: Profit margin Return on assets (ROA) Return on equity (ROE) How much profit is generated by every dollar of sales. How effectively assets are being used to generate a return. How effectively amounts invested in the business by its owners are being used to generate a return. Market value ratios: Price-earnings ratio Market-to-book ratio How much investors are willing to pay per dollar of current earnings. Compares market value of the company's investments to the cost of those investments Five Steps for Conducting a Strategic Management Case Analysis Propose alternative solutions Step StepThree Four Develop a list of options first without judging them Do nothing is often a reasonable alternative Evaluate alternatives Can the company afford it? Is the solution likely to evoke a competitive response? Will employees accept the change? How will it affect other stakeholders? How does it fit with the vision, mission, objectives? Will the culture or values of the company change? Five Steps for Conducting a Strategic Management Case Analysis Make recommendations Step Step Four Five Make a set of recommendations that your analysis supports Describe exactly what needs to be done Explain why this course of action will solve the problem Include suggestions for how best to implement the proposed solution The solution you propose must solve the problem you identified Preparing an Oral Case Presentation Rule Description Organize your thoughts Emphasize strategic analysis Begin by becoming familiar with the material. Compare notes about key points of the case and share insights among team members. Make an outline. Purpose of case analysis is to diagnose problems and find solutions. You may need to unravel the case material as presented and reconfigure it in a way that can be more effectively analyzed. Three major categories • Background/Problem Statement 10-20% • Strategic Analysis/Options 60-75 % • Recommendations/Action Plan 10-20% Emphasis should be on analysis. You may need to reorganize the material so that the tools of strategic analysis can be applied. Preparing an Oral Case Presentation Rule Be logical and consistent Defend your position Description Rambling presentations are hard to follow, may confuse the listener, and fail to evoke a good discussion. Present arguments and explanations in logical sequence. Support with facts and appropriate financial analyses. Be sure solutions address the problems you identified. Anticipate what others might disagree with and be prepared to defend your views in class discussion. Be aware of the choices you made and implications of your recommendations. Be clear about your assumptions. Be able to expand on your analysis. Strategic management case analyses are often conducted Share by teams. Each member should have a clear role in the oral presentation responsibilities presentation, preferably a speaking role. Coordinate the different parts into a logical, smooth-flowing whole. How to Get the Most from Case Analysis Keep an open mind Take a stand for what you believe Draw on your own personal experience Participate and persuade Be concise and to the point Think out of the box Learn from the insights of others Apply insights from other case analyses Critically analyze your own performance Conduct outside research Using Conflict-Inducing Decision-Making Techniques in Case Analysis Devil’s Advocacy Dialectical Inquiry Groupthink Use conflict-inducing decision-making techniques to help prevent groupthink and lead to better decisions. Symptoms of Groupthink and How to Prevent It Symptoms Groupthink Illusion of invulnerability Belief in the inherent morality of the group Stereotyped views of members of opposing groups Application of pressure to members who express doubts about the group’s shared allusions or question the validity of arguments proposed Practice of self-censorship Appointment of mindguards Symptoms of Groupthink and How to Prevent It Preventing groupthink Groupthink Leaders must encourage group members to address concerns and objectives Leaders should adopt impartial stance Leader should encourage members to discuss deliberations with trusted associates and report perspectives back to group Invite outside experts, challenge group’s viewpoints and positions Divide into subgroups, meet at different times, reconvene to resolve differences Hold a “second chance” meeting Using Conflict to Improve Decision Making Devil’s Advocacy Devil’s advocacy One of the groups (or members) acts as a critic to the plan Devil’s advocate comes up with problems of the proposed alternative and suggests reasons for not adopting it Forces the group to take a hard look at its proposed solution Can be demoralizing May not lead to better suggestions Using Conflict to Improve Decision Making Devil’s Advocacy Dialectical Inquiry Dialectical inquiry Identify proposal and information used to derive it State underlying assumptions Identify counter plan (antithesis) Engage in debate Identify a synthesis (best components of each alternative) Can be very time consuming May result in undesirable compromises (original solution was better)