1133587496_370660

advertisement

Dispute Resolution

“Facts are ventriloquists’ dummies. Sitting on a wise man’s knee they may be made to utter words of wisdom; elsewhere, they say nothing, or talk nonsense or indulge in sheer diabolism.”

Aldus Huxley, British Author

Structure of our court systems

Civil lawsuits

Alternative dispute resolution

Litigator: Lawyer who handles court cases

Litigation: Process of filing claims in court, and ultimately going to trial

Alternative dispute resolution: Formal or informal process used to settle disputes without resorting to a trial

United States has over 50 systems of courts

Nationwide system of federal courts serves the entire country

Each individual state has its court system

Determine the facts of a particular dispute

◦ Apply to those facts the law given by earlier appellate court decisions

Jurisdiction: Court’s power to hear a case

Court has the authority to hear a particular type of case

Trial courts of limited jurisdiction

◦ Hear only certain types of cases

◦ Small claims court - Jurisdiction over civil lawsuits

◦ Juvenile court - Hears only cases involving minors

◦ Probate court - Settling the estates of deceased persons

Trial courts of general jurisdiction

◦ Hear a very broad range of cases

◦ Most important court - General civil division

Personal jurisdiction: Legal authority to require the defendant to:

◦ Stand trial

◦ Pay judgments

Personal jurisdiction exists if:

◦ Defendant is a resident of the state in which a lawsuit is filed

◦ Defendant takes a formal step to defend a lawsuit

◦ Summons is served on a defendant

 Summons: Court’s written notice that a lawsuit has been filed against the defendant

◦ A long-arm statute applies

 Long-arm statute: Gives a court jurisdiction over someone who commits a tort, signs a contract, or conducts “regular business activities” in the state

Accept the facts given to them by trial courts

◦ Review the trial record to see if the court made errors of law

Will accept a factual finding unless there was no evidence at all to support it

Error of law: Appeals court may require a new trial

Court of appeals

◦ Appellant: Party filing the appeal

◦ Appellee: Party opposing the appeal

◦ Briefs: Written arguments on the case

◦ Reversed: Nullified

◦ Affirmed: Permitted to stand

State Supreme Court

◦ Highest court in the state

◦ Accepts some appeals from the court of appeals

◦ Seven judges – Justices sit on the Supreme Court

Federal question case: Claim based on the

United States Constitution, a federal statute, or a federal treaty

◦ Federal courts have jurisdiction

Diversity case

Diversity jurisdiction: When:

◦ Plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states

◦ The amount in dispute exceeds $75,000

United States district court

◦ Primary trial court in the federal system

◦ Nation is divided into about 94 districts

 Each has a district court

Other trial courts

◦ Bankruptcy court

◦ Tax court

◦ United States court of International trade

Judges

◦ President of the United States nominates all federal court judges

United States courts of appeals

◦ Intermediate courts of appeals

◦ Divided into “circuits”

United States Supreme Court

◦ Highest court in the country

◦ Nine justices on the court

 One justice - Chief justice

 Eight - Associate justices

◦ Power to hear appeals in any federal case

◦ Writ of certiorari the case

: Petition asking the court to hear

Pleadings: Documents that begin a lawsuit

◦ Complaint

◦ Answer

◦ Sometimes a reply

Complaint: Short, plain statement of the facts alleged and the legal claims made

Service

◦ Summons - Paper ordering the defendant to answer the complaint within 20 days

Answer - Brief reply to each of the allegations in the complaint

◦ Default judgment: Decision that the plaintiff wins without trial because the defendant failed to answer in time

Counter-claim: Second lawsuit by the defendant against the plaintiff

◦ Reply - Answer to a counter-claim

Class actions: One plaintiff represents the entire group of plaintiffs

◦ Those who are unaware of the lawsuit or even unaware they are harmed

Judgment on the pleadings

◦ Motion: Formal request to the court that the court take some step or issue some order

◦ Motion to dismiss: Request that the court terminate a case without permitting it to go further

Discovery: Critical, pre-trial opportunity for both parties to:

◦ Learn the strengths and weaknesses of the opponent’s case

Discovery

◦ Interrogatories - Written questions that the opposing party must answer, in writing, under oath

◦ Depositions - Provide a chance for one party’s lawyer to question the other party

 Deponent: Person being questioned

◦ Production of documents and things

Discovery

◦ Physical and mental examination

 Motion for a protective order: Request that the court limit discovery

 Motion to compel answers to interrogatories

 Memorandum: Supporting argument

 In camera inspection: Judge views the requested documents alone, with no lawyers present

 Decides whether the other side is entitled to view them

E-Discovery

◦ Businesses large and small have vast amounts of data stored electronically

Other discovery

Ruling by the court that no trial is necessary because:

◦ Some essential facts are not in dispute

Attorneys make lists of all witnesses they will call

Prepare each witness very carefully

Rehearse the questions

Takes hours and hours, for many days

Adversary system

◦ Putting a witness on the stand and letting both lawyers question

 Truth will emerge

Right to jury trial

◦ Plaintiff and defendant have a right to demand a jury trial when:

 Lawsuit is one for money damages

Voir dire: Process of selecting a jury

◦ Challenges for cause: Claiming that a juror has demonstrated probable bias

◦ Peremptory challenges: Right to excuse a juror for virtually any reason

Opening statements - Summarizing the proof he or she expects to offer, with the plaintiff going first

Burden of proof

◦ Preponderance of the evidence: Plaintiff’s burden in a civil lawsuit

◦ Beyond a reasonable doubt: Government’s burden in a criminal prosecution

Plaintiff’s case

◦ Direct examination: When a lawyer asks questions of her own witness

◦ Cross-examine: Ask questions of an opposing witness

Rules of evidence

◦ Law of evidence:

 What questions a lawyer may ask

 How the questions are to be phrased

 What answers a witness may give

 What documents may be introduced

Motion for directed verdict

◦ Directed verdict: Ruling that the plaintiff has entirely failed to prove some aspect of her case

◦ Permissible only if the evidence favors the defendant that:

 Reasonable minds could not disagree on it

Defendant’s case

Closing arguments

◦ Lawyers sum up their case to the jury:

 Explaining how they hope the jury will interpret what they have heard

Jury instructions

◦ The judge instructs the jury to evaluate the case solely on the facts of the evidence presented

Verdict

◦ Jury deliberates informally, with all jurors entitled to voice their opinion

Motions after the verdict

◦ Judgment non obstante veredicto notwithstanding the jury’s verdict

(JNOV): Judgment

Precedent: Earlier decisions by the state appellate courts on similar issues

Appeals court options

◦ Affirm: Allow the decision to stand

◦ Modify: Affirm the outcome but with changes

◦ Reverse and remand: Nullify the lower decision and return the case for reconsideration

◦ Reverse: Turning the loser into the winner, with no new trial

◦ Harmless error: Mistake by the trial judge that was too minor to affect the outcome

Negotiation

◦ Majority of disputes are resolved this way

Mediation

◦ Mediator - Attempts to guide the two disputing parties toward a voluntary settlement

◦ Advantages - Two antagonists can speak freely

 All discussions are confidential

 Offers the strongest “win–win” potential

Arbitration

◦ Bring in a neutral third party

 Arbitrator has the power to impose an award

Arbitrator after deliberation, issues a binding decision

Download