Congress Chapter 11 The Evolution of Congress Congress as the central lawmaking body was a unique invention – rule by emperors/kings was the common method The intent of the Framers: ◦ To oppose the concentration of power in a single institution ◦ To balance large and small states and checks and balances Bicameralism House = closer/more accountable to the people 2 year elections, smaller districts Senate = more elite, aristocratic, educated House, closer to President 6 year elections, represent entire state, stricter qualifications They expected Congress to be the dominant institution but limited by checks ◦ The “First branch” of American government Has the “power of the purse” BUT checked by president’s veto power (even though Congress Can pass a law even if president vetoes it) Only legislature that exercises almost independently of executive Checked by Supreme Court – laws can be deemed unconstitutional Virginia Plan New Jersey Plan Connecticut Compromise The Legislative Compromise • Recall the Great (Connecticut) Compromise creating the legislative (lawmaking) branch of government • Congress is a bicameral legislature with: • two coequal houses with substantially equal powers; and • in particular, legislation (laws, policy, public policy) requires the support of a concurrent majority in both houses (51% in both houses) – In the House of Representatives, states have representation proportional to population • Members serve two-year terms. • Representative districts = smaller areas (Hialeah, South Miami, L.C.) – In the Senate, states are equally represented (2 Senators/state) • • • • The size of the Senate =100 members Senators serve staggered six-year terms. Senate “districts” = states. Since ratification of the 17th Amendment (1913), Senators have been popularly elected, in the same manner as Representatives. Major Functions of Congress • Representative of the people – Closer to the people and directly elected by the people (smaller group, inhabitants of area) • Lawmaking (public policy = law) – Congressional powers defined in Article I, Section 8 (taxes, interstate and foreign commerce, *elastic clause) • Consensus building (amongst parties) • Special, exclusive powers: • House – Revenue bills must originate in the House (though usually happen simultaneously) and impeachment power (officials charged in the house of high crimes) • Senate – Confirms major presidential appointments, makes treaties with foreign nations (along with president), and holds hearings for impeached officials • Congress Evolutionary powers (due to elastic clause) – oversight of the budget ($ and presidential proposals approved by Congress), investigation and hearings of public officials Constitutional Differences House of Representatives Senate 2 year terms, unlimited 6 year terms, unlimited 435 members (proportional 100 members (equal representation-2 representation) – changes every 10 year per state) initially elected by state with census legislatures - considered “Millionaires’ Club;” 17th Amendment (1913) made popular election of Senators “Advice and Consent” on president’s Initiates all “money” bills (taxation and appointments and treaties spending) Initiates impeachment proceedings Tries impeached officials 25 years old, 7 years a citizen 30 years old, 9 years a citizen Election of Representatives • Since 1968, Congress has required states to use single-member districts for the election of their House members – Single Member district - The state is divided into several separate districts with one representative elected from each district (example: Key West, Aventura, Miami Beach) • Majority (over 50%) is not needed to win an election, just a plurality – candidate with the most votes wins – Encourages a two party system • Contrasts to proportional representation system in which legislative seats are given to parties in proportion to the # of votes they receive in election Reapportionment of seats in the House of Representatives The [original] Apportionment Clause: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. In 1940, Congress permanently set # of reps as 435 seats Reapportionment: • Apportionment (or reapportionment), is the process of distributing seats for a legislative body (the House of Representatives) among the states • done proportionally to the population in the states to prevent unequal representation among different constituencies. • dividing up the # of representatives per states based on population • the 435 seats in the House of Representatives are allotted proportionately between the states, who then (state legislatures) create districts for House members to run in 1 representative per apx. 690,000 people (every state has at LEAST one rep) In April 2011, the Census Bureau will announce the official apportionment population of each state (based on the 2010 census), and the number of House seats each state will have for the coming decade The 1990 and 2000 Apportio nments Congressional Districting Redistricting = Each state with more than one House seat is divided into districts equal in number to its apportionment of House seats. State legislatures determine how Congressional District boundaries are drawn following each census. The districting process is highly contested and political and often partisan. Legislative districting involves two controversial: Gerrymandering drawing a district boundary in some bizarre or unusual shape to make it easy for the candidate of one party to win election in that district (to influence outcome of elections) Malapportionment - having districts of very unequal size so that one district is twice as populous as another District size: If districts with unequal populations each elect one representative (with one vote in the legislature), the voting power of individual voters is unequal from district to district. The Original Gerrymander What is the purpose of gerrymandering? To either concentrate opposition votes into a few districts to gain more seats for the majority in surrounding districts (called packing), or to diffuse minority strength across many districts (called dilution). Types of gerrymandering: Partisan, Racial/ethnic, protecting incumbents, non-partisan Minority/ majority districting – rearranging a district to allow for the election of a minority representative Has led to an increase in Hispanic and Black Reps Redrawing the balanced electoral districts in this example creates a guaranteed 3-to-1 advantage in representation for the blue voters as 14 red voters are packed into the light green district and the remaining 18 are cracked across the 3 remaining blue districts. Cracking and Packing crack apart areas of support for the other party, and/or pack supporters of the other party into as few districts as possible Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering Courts Does malapportionment violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment? Baker v. Carr (1963): First malapportionment case taken by Court Memphis, TN had not redistricted since 1901 but population drew in urban areas drastically; Memphis had 10 times as many people as rural districts resident Joe Baker sued TN Sec. of State Carr for unequal representation under the law court ruled that state legislatures must redistrict every 10 years Wesberry v. Sanders (1964): the Court applied “one man, one vote” specifically to Congressional Districts; districts must be as equal in size (population) as possible “as nearly as is practicable, one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's.” Shaw v. Reno (1993) – GERRYMANDERING Race can be a factor, but cannot be the sole factor for gerrymandering BUT Easley v. Cromartie (2001) political party gerrymandering is legal Who is in Congress? Typical member = wealthy, well-educated, white, male (80%), Protestant, middle-aged (Sen.=61,Rep=57), lawyers (40%) Controversial – can this unrepresentative group represent diverse groups? The House has become less male and less white Between 1950 and 2005: Women Senators rose from 2 to 20 Women representatives rose from 10 to 108 Black representatives rose from 2 to 46 Black Senators from 0 to 2 Today, 34 Hispanic Reps, 4 Hispanic Senators Today, 11 Asian Reps, 1 Asian Senator Today 2 Native Americans in the House Membership in Congress became a career, unlike past Incumbents still have a great electoral advantage Democratic party largely controlled Congress from 1933-1998 But in 1994, voters opposed incumbents due to budget deficits, various policies, legislative-executive bickering, and scandal Blacks, Hispanics, and Women in Congress, 1971-2002 111th Congress: January 3, 2009January 11, 2011 House of Reps breakdown: 258 Democrats (blue) 177 Republicans (red) Senate Breakdown: 58 Democrats 40 Republicans, 2 Independent The Incumbency Advantage Incumbency tradition is high in both Senate (generally above 50%) and House (generally above 80%, incumbent rate more stable than Senate) Media coverage is higher for incumbents Incumbents have greater name recognition due to franking (use govt $), travel to the district, news coverage Members secure policies and programs for voters Easier to raise campaign contributions because lobbyists seek their favors Redistricting that incumbents do (gerrymandering and malapportionment) Sophomore surge Constituents can see what incumbents are doing in their community Exception to incumbency advantage: scandal or unpopular president Consequences? + Continuity (less radical change), more experienced, established relationships with interest groups, policy specialization - discourages challengers, lack of responsiveness, fewer minorities Incumbent House Members Running for Reelection, 1964-2006 Number defeated Number reelected 400 300 200 100 0 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 Reelection Rates of House and Senate Incumbents, 1946-2006 Percen t reelected 100 90 80 70 60 Hou se Senate 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 50 In 1974, huge drop in House and Senate Republican seats due to Watergate scandal; huge drop of Democratic incumbents due to Ronald Reagan’s popularity and Jimmy Carter’s failure Determinants of voting patterns Representative as Delegate vs. trustee Delegate: act on what constituents want (agent of the voters, even if they disagree) Trustee: members act on their own personal beliefs of what is best for society Representational view (Constituent influence): members vote to please their constituents, in order to secure re-election Interest group influence, constant visits at home with constituents, emails, phone calls, town hall meetings Organizational/ party view (colleague and party influence): where constituency interests are not vitally at stake, members primarily respond to cues from colleagues Party leadership pressure, vote along party lines (more than 75% of the time) Attitudinal view (personal views): the member’s ideology determines her/his vote Congressional approval ratings very low (30%) overall distrust of Congress as a whole; higher approval of individual members Anomaly: incumbents reelected Confidence in American Institutions, 2007 "I am going to read you a list of institutions in American society. Please tell me how much confidence you, yourself, have in each one--a great deal, quite a lot, some, or very little?" T h e m ilitary Sm all bu sin ess T h e police T h e ch u rch Ban ks Su prem e Cou rt P u blic sch ools M edical system T h e presiden cy T elevision n ews Newspapers Crim in al ju stice Organ iz ed labor Big bu sin ess HM Os Con gress 0 Confidence in government institutions is comparatively low. 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent responding "great deal" or "quite a lot" Source: CNN/USA Today/ Gallup poll, June 11-44, 2007. 70 80 Congressional Approval, 1974-2006 “Do you approve or disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job?” 90 80 Americans are far more favorable towards their own member of Congress 60 50 40 30 20 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1996 1997 1995 1994 1992 1986 1990 1978 10 1974 1975 1976 Percent responding " approve" 70 Party Leadership in Congress Overview • After legislative election (every 2 years), the party with the most representatives is the “majority” party – Significance: majority party holds the most sign. Leadership positions and the majority of seats in committees • Political parties are very important in the basic organization of leadership and member’s voting in the House and Senate • Overview of leadership positions: • Speaker of the House (House of Reps) – Paul Ryan • Majority leader (House and Senate) • Minority leader (House and Senate) • Party whips (House and Senate) • President pro-tempore (Senate) • President of the Senate (Senate) -p.300 for roles of leadership - Currently the 111th Congress January 2009- January 2011 Democrats Party Structure in the House House Speaker of the House is most impt leader of majority party and presides over House (once all powerful until revolt in 1910) – voted for by majority party, senior member w/ leadership exp Presides over meetings Recognizes members to speak Appoints members to select & conference committees Directs business on the floor Assigns bills to committees Exercises behind the scenes influence over party members 3rd in line for succession Usually one votes in case of a tie Majority leader and minority leader: floor leaders, schedules bills, rounds up votes for party favors, stepping stone to Speaker position, spokesperson for minority party Party whips keep leaders informed (go betweens for leaders and members), round up votes of party members, pressure members to support leadership, inform members of important bills Committee assignments and legislative schedule are set by each party Senate Party Leadership • President of the Senate is the Vice President of U.S. (rarely present, only votes in ties) – symbolic office • President pro tempore presides; this is the member with most seniority in majority party (a largely honorific office, no real powers) • Real leaders are the *majority leader and the minority leader, elected by their respective party members – first Senator heard on the floor, determines Senate agenda, influences committee assignments • Party whips: keep leaders informed, round up votes, count noses • Each party has a policy committee: schedules Senate business, prioritizes bills • Committee assignments are handled by a group of Senators, each for their own party Committees REAL work of Congress Bills are worked out or killed in committees Investigate problems and oversee the executive branch Four types of committees: 1) Standing Committees (*legislation) Most important, basically permanent, handle bills in diff. policy areas, only comm. to propose legislation by reporting a bill to full House (Senate-16, House-19) *Most important: Ways and Means (taxes), Senate judiciary, Rules Committee 2) Select Committees (*special, temporary issues) Formed for specific purposes, temporary (but may become standing committees), sometimes produce legislation Ex. Investigated Watergate scandal 3) Joint Committees (*joint special issues) Select comm. consisting of members from both House and Senate, conduct business between houses, help focus public attention on major issues, oversee institutions , investigations 4) Conference Committees (*compromise bill) Consist of members from houses, hammer out differences between House and Senate versions of similar bills, make a compromise bill to be sent back to each house for approval 1995-1996 (104th Congress, Republicans) reformed # of committees (reduced from 252-198), term limits on committee chairmen (6 yrs) Each member of House serves on 1-2 standing committees (unless limited to one of exclusive); Senators may serve on two major committees (average – 7 subcommittees) and one minor committee Committee Membership Chairman and majority of each standing committee comes from majority party with a minority of minority party members (try to be proportionate to Congressional party split) Assignments are based on personal and political qualities of the member, region, reelection help Members from safe districts (elected with more than 55% of the vote, guaranteed reelection) can be on an important committee that helps the nation and public welfare, while marginal districts (elected with less than 55% of vote, reelection is not secure) need committees that suit the need of constituents (ex. Kansas rep on Agricultural committee) Method of committee membership: Each party has a Committee on Committees Speaker of the House selects Select and Conference Committee members (powerful!) Committee Chairmen (House) • Powerful – decides what is on the committee agenda – 1910 House Revolt transferred power to chairmen and away from Speaker of the House – 1910-1970 Chairmen chosen by seniority system • Member with the longest continuous service of majority party on committee is placed automatically as chair – 1970 reform – secret ballots of majority members elected chairmen, may only chair 1 committee, committee meetings usually public, increased staff size for all • Before 1970s, work was done primarily by chairmen behind closed doors • Reforms gave more rights to members, especially with little seniority • Took away extreme power of chairmen, but still very powerful • In practice, most chairmen are still senior members – 1995 Republican Reforms – 6 year term limits by House chairmen Functions of Committees Proposed bills are assigned to specific committees, the comm. Controls the life or death of the bill 11,000 bills are introduced in each 2 year session, committees wean the bad bills out Pigeonholed – when a bill is put aside in a committee for possible future consideration majority of bills are forgotten forever and never make it out of committee Those approved move to subcommittees who hold hearings over bill – supporters and critics of the bill appear at hearings and are questioned by subcomm. Bill is then marked up (changed or rewritten) and returned to full committee where more alterations may be made Sent to Rules Committee (House – decides on rules for the bill, may be amended by members, amount of debate) or straight to floor (Senate) A Bill’s Destiny: Option 1: Killed by committee or chair (not considered) Option 2: Option 3: Pigeonholed (temporarily Sent to subcommittee for put aside for future further consideration consideration) How a bill becomes a law • • • • • • • • • Bill must be introduced by a member of Congress Bill is referred to a committee for consideration (amendments, thrown out or pigeonholed) – May be referred to multiple committees (multiple referral) or parts (sequential referral) Revenue bills (tax reforms) must originate in the House Most bills die in committee – Full House or Senate may use discharge petition to get a bill out of committee (218 mem) Some sent to subcommittee to hold hearings (individuals, interest groups, Congressional members speak for/against inform, public support) After hearings and mark-up sessions, the committee reports a bill out to the House or Senate Bill must be placed on a calendar to come for a vote before either House House Rules Committee sets the rules for consideration (open vs. closed debate, time limits set in House) Senate has unlimited debate – filibuster – unlimited debate, used to eliminate a bill; more commonly used today due to double tracking – disputed bill is shelved and business continues – Filibuster may be ended by a cloture – vote to end debate, 60 senators, must be bipartisan agreement – Longest filibusters: Strom Thurmond (24 hours continuously), team of senators- 57 days for Civil Rights Act of 1964 How a Bill becomes a law (Contd) • Bills are debated on the floor of the House or Senate – Quorum required – minimum number of members present in House to conduct business (100 members for the Committee of the Whole which is led by a comm. Chairmen and is debated by members and amended; 218 for House to vote) – Open v. closed in House – Amendments must be germane (relevant) to bill in House – Riders – provisions attached to a bill that is not germane to the bill’s purpose in order to get a legislator’s “pet project” passed many riders on a bill = “Christmas tree bill” – allowed in Senate • • • If there are major differences in the bill as passed by the House and Senate, a conference committee is appointed compromise bill revote The bill goes to the president The president may sign it or veto it (president’s check) – Pocket veto – bill given to President 10 days before end of Congress session • • • If the president vetoes it, it returns to house of origin Both houses must support the bill, with a two-thirds vote, in order to override the president’s veto If a bill does not go through entire process within life of 2 year Congress, must be reintroduced completely next Congress Founders made the process long, cautious, and deliberate so that many people could consider and approve of a change -efficiency and haste is the hallmark to oppressive government Methods of voting • Voice vote – Shout “yea” or “nay” • Division (standing) vote – Members stand to be counted • Teller vote – Members file past the clerk, first the “yeas” and then the “nays” • Roll-call vote – Call members names to vote, recorded • Electronic vote – Roll call vote that permits members to insert plastic card into slot (House), recorded – Vote appears on a “score board” marquee Resolutions • Congress also passes 3 types of resolutions • Simple Resolution – – – – Either House or Senate Establishes rules, regulations or practices Does not have force of law, not signed by president Ex. Setting a rule, congratulating someone • Concurrent Resolution – Comes from both houses – Settles housekeeping and procedural matters affecting both Houses – Not signed by president, no force of law • Joint Resolution – Requires approval of both houses, signed by president – Force of law – Passed when Congress react to an important issue that needs immediate attention – Ex. After 9/11 attacks, joint resolution condemning attacks and allowing Bush to take preliminary military action Criticisms of Congress Pork barrel legislation and Earmarks Bills that give benefits to constituents (local bridges and highways) in hope of gaining votes rather than welfare of entire nation Federal money being wasted? 2005 Consolidated Appropriations Act – funded 11,000 projects (hall of fames, theme parks) Logrolling Members of Congress support another member’s pet projects in return for support of his or her own project, esp. pork barrel “You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” Abusing franking privilege Special interest group influences Inefficiency – Gridlock Term limits needed? Members become unresponsive to their constituents but expertise needed? Congressional Caucuses • Caucus: informal groupings of members of Congress sharing the same interests of point of view – created to advocate a political ideology or a regional or economic interest – Goal: to shape agenda of Congress by elevating their issue – Functions: press for committees to hold hearings and organize votes on bill in their favor • Intra-party caucuses: members share a similar ideology (Democratic study group) • Personal interest caucuses: members share a common interest in an issue (environment, arts) • Constituency caucuses: established to represent groups (race and gender), regions or both (Congressional Black Caucus, Vietnam Veterans, Congressional Women’s caucus) Congressional Staff Constituency service is a major task of members’ staff, many control local offices Legislative functions of professional staff include devising proposals, negotiating agreements, organizing hearings, and meeting with lobbyists and administrators, scheduling member’s time, dealing with media Members’ staff consider themselves advocates of their employers # of staffers have increased drastically over years (over 30,000 staffers; Senators average 30; House = 15) Growth of staff from 1930-2000 Functioning differences House of Representatives • Germane amendments only (relevant to the bill) • Rules Committee, limited debate • Formal rules due to size • Gerrymandering and malapportionment senate • Non-germane riders • No Rules Committee • Filibuster- unlimited debate • Less formal due to small size • No gerrymandering of malapportionment due to not having a district