Matthew Kutzler Structural Option Spring 2004 Buildings C and D Campus Square, Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA Campus Square – Buildings C and D Located at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, PA Complex consists of four dormitories and a parking deck Buildings A and D are structurally similar, as well as Buildings B and C Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Location Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Presentation Contents Building Overview Proposal Breadth: Acoustics Depth: Structural Breadth: Construction Management Conclusions Acknowledgements Questions Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Project Team – Owner: Lehigh University – Architect: Bohlin Cywinski Jackson – Mechanical/Plumbing/Electrical: Brinjac Engineering, Inc. – Civil and Structural: Barry Isett & Associates – Construction Management: Alvin H. Butz Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Statistics – – – – Function: residential and retail Zoning: building height limited to 70 ft Total cost: $23 million Building C: 49,565 sq ft (multipurpose - 18,010 sq ft) Floors 1-2: campus bookstore; 3-5: apartments – Building D: 30,654 sq ft Floors 1-3: apartments Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Architecture – – – – 250 beds in double, triple, and quad apartments Floor-to-ceiling height is 8’ Red brick face Aluminum storefront framing Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Floor Plan Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Structural – Gravity – Building C: Steel frame on floors 1-3 Load bearing masonry walls on floors 4-5 8” precast hollow core plank Typical bays are 20’ x 20’ Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Structural – Gravity – Building D: Load bearing masonry walls 8” precast hollow core plank Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Building Overview Structural – Foundations: Continuous strip footings along the perimeter Interior spread and combined footings – Lateral: 8” concrete masonry shear walls Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Presentation Contents Building Overview Proposal Breadth: Acoustics Depth: Structural Breadth: Construction Management Conclusions Acknowledgements Questions Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Proposal Criteria to maintain – Floor-to-ceiling height – Current floor plan – Architectural scheme Campus Square – Buildings C and D Goals – – – – – – – Framing Foundations Lateral system Vibration Fire Protection Acoustics Construction Management Matthew Kutzler – Structural Presentation Contents Building Overview Proposal Breadth: Acoustics Depth: Structural Breadth: Construction Management Conclusions Acknowledgements Questions Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Acoustics BOCA requires an STC and IIC of 45 Current STC – Precast plank: 58 – Masonry walls and partitions: 52 Current IIC – Precast plank: 50 Dictates slab thickness of proposed systems – 4” slab: STC= 44 IIC = 25 Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Acoustics Solution – STC rating of 60 – IIC of 59 – Floorboard reduces airborne and impact noise Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Presentation Contents Building Overview Proposal Breadth: Acoustics Depth: Structural Breadth: Construction Management Conclusions Acknowledgements Questions Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Pan Joist System Slab – 4 ksi normal weight concrete – 3.5” (1 hour fire rating) – #3 @ 12” o.c. Joists – – – – 40” pans 12” x 8” 2 - #6 top and bottom #3 @ 12” o.c. for shear Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Pan Joist System Girder Reinforcement Tributary Girder Span (ft) Width (ft) Top Bottom Shear a 20 10 5 - #7 4 - #5 #4 @ 12" b 20 20 5 - #8 4 - #6 #4 @ 6" c 20 6 7 - #6 2 - #6 #5 @ 12" d 20 13 5 - #8 3 - #6 #5 @ 12" Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Pan Joist System Columns – A: 20’ x 10’ … exterior – B: 20’ x 13’ … corridor – C: 20’ x 20’ … interior, other than the corridor – 18” x 18” – 4 - #9’s Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Pan Joist System Typical Footings Calculated Column A (spread) B (comb.) C (spread) Size 9' x 9' 16‘ x 12' 12' x 12' Depth 1'-6" 2'-6" 2'-0" Campus Square – Buildings C and D Reinf. 9 #7 E.W. #9 @ 12" E.W. 12 #8 E.W. Specified Depth Reinf. 2'-4" 9 #7 E.W. (T + B) 2'-6" #9 @ 12“ E.W. (T + B) 2'-4" 12 #8 E.W. (T + B) Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Pan Joist System Lateral – Shear walls removed – Total drift: 0.515” < 1.53” Vibration – No calculation needed Fire Protection - 3.5” slab is adequate for one-hour fire rating Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Steel Joist System Slab – 3 ksi normal weight concrete – 4” slab on 24 gage UFS form deck – 44 – W4.0 x 4.0 welded wire fabric Joists – Apartments: 18K3 @ 2’-10” – Corridors: 16K3 @ 3’-0” Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Steel Joist System Beams and Girders – – – – Perimeter: W16 x 31 Corridor: W16 x 31 Other beams: W12 x 19 Other girders: W16 x 31 and W18 x 35 Columns – W12 x 72 Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Steel Joist System < Bay 1 Bay 2 > Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Steel Joist System Typical Footings Calculated Column A (spread) B (comb.) Size 8' x 8' 15' x 10' C (spread) 11' x 11’ Depth 1'-6" 2'-4" 2'-0" Campus Square – Buildings C and D Reinf. 8 #6 E.W. #9 @ 12" E.W. 11 #8 E.W. Specified Depth Reinf. 2'-4" 8 #6 E.W. (T + B) 2'-4" #9 @ 12" E.W. (T + B) 2'-4" 11 #8 E.W. (T + B) Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Steel Joist System Existing Campus Square – Buildings C and D Proposed Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Steel Joist System Vibration – – – – AISC criteria Apartment and corridor bays analyzed Passed walking excitation criteria Frequency was below 9 Hz so no floor stiffness check required Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Structural – Steel Joist System Fire Protection – Steel joists: max spacing of 48” o.c. – Bridging: 1/2” diameter bars – Ceiling: Acoustical material or gypsum board Design No. G205 Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Presentation Contents Building Overview Proposal Breadth: Acoustics Depth: Structural Breadth: Construction Management Conclusions Acknowledgements Questions Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Construction Management Cost Comparison – Framing – Floors – Formwork Cost Comparison Campus Square – Buildings C and D Existing $595,800 Concrete $774,457 Steel $564,961 Matthew Kutzler – Structural Presentation Contents Building Overview Proposal Breadth: Acoustics Depth: Structural Breadth: Construction Management Conclusions Acknowledgements Questions Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Conclusions Which system has the advantage? Existing - steel w/ Steel joists w/ cast- Concrete frame precast plank in-place slab and pan joists Cost x Labor Time x Building Height x Weight x Lead Time Plenum Space x x x x x x Lateral System x Crane Rental x Acoustics x x Fire Protection x x Vibration x x Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Acknowledgements Barry Isett & Associates – Ross Sotak – Jeff Thoms Alvin H. Butz Lehigh University – Tony Corallo AE Faculty AE Classmates Family and friends Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural Questions? Campus Square – Buildings C and D Matthew Kutzler – Structural