NAME _____________________________________ UNIT 5 (2): THERMODYNAMICS: HESS’S LAW & ENTHALPIES OF FORMATION AND REACTION I-IV) The basics to Thermochemistry and Trivedi assignment In this section of notes, I am taking us back (temporarily) to enthalpy ….as it has a number of facets… V) A LITTLE BONDING 101 on BOND STRENGTH and HESS’S LAW A) Generally: Chemical stability (the resistance to reacting) increases as bond strength increases. Checkout: Covalent Bonding: http://www.bozemanscience.com/ap-chem-019-covalent-bonding B) When it comes to bond strength, there are two ideas to explore: bond energy and bond length. 1) Bond Energy: measure of bond strength in a chemical bond. It is the heat required to break one mole of molecules into their individual atoms. a) always a positive value as it applies to energy required to break a bond (endothermic) b) as the number of bonds between two species increases …the bonds get shorter and stronger. c) We study the bond strength of ionic compounds and molecular compound differently. We will explore these in our bonding unit, more fully … but for now… 2) When dealing with ionic compounds it is all about the Lattice Energy a) Lattice energy is heat of formation (∆H° f) released when 1 mol of ions in the gas phase bond to produce 1 mol of ionic solid (crystal) ii) Factors affecting lattice energy (and thus the bond strength of ionic compounds) are: the magnitude of the charges … As the magnitude of the charges on the ion species increases … meaning: The greater the charges, *the greater the increase in lattice energy because more energy is released upon formation and thus the stronger the ionic bond the radius of the ion species … As the radius (as the size) of the ion species increases, *the lattice energy decreases. iii) lattice energy has implications regarding the solubility of ionic compounds in water …Yes, Ksp rears its slightly soluble head again!!! 464 3) When dealing with molecular substances… (for which the upcoming Hess’s Law is most concerned) There is a bond length … and an associated bond energy too – although we think of these factors a bit differently from ionic compounds. Reflect back on Bozeman #19 and the determination of the bond length as the “sweet spot” where the repulsive nuclear forces and the attractive electron-nuclear forces balance out. http://images.tutorvista.com/cms/images/81/potential-energy-curve-H2-molecule.png a) For any given pair of atoms, the bond is stronger, the greater the overlap of atomic orbitals. This translates into …a shorter bond tends to be a stronger bond … b) There is a maximum level of overlap for bonding atoms. Once the maximum level of overlap occurs,* the repulsive forces between the 2 positive nuclei come into play. i) this brings us back to the diagram re: interaction of atoms c) This maximum or optimal overlap is called the bond length. i) Bond Length: is the average distance between nuclei of two bonded atoms in a molecule d) For example: With dihydrogen we say that the H─H covalent bond has a bond length of 0.074 nanometers & a bond energy of 4.52 eV or 7.24 x 10-19 Joules 465 4) Thus, with bond strength, there is a correlation between bond energy and bond length. a) There are tables listing average bond strengths https://wilenskychemistry.wikispaces.com/Thermodynamics+PowerPoint+3+(Hess's+Law+Part+2+breaking+and+making+bonds) i) The table lists average values. Absolute values may vary from the above values. For instance, The C – H absolute bond energy in methane may be slightly different than the absolute bond energy of the C – H bond in chloroform vs. methane chloroform Using electronegativity values, partial charge distribution, and / or ionic character of the bonds suggest a reason why the absolute values of the C – H bonds in the two molecules are slightly different. 466 b) There are tables which list bond lengths i) There are a number of factors which influence/affect bond length ⍟ The smaller the atoms * the shorter the bond length ⍟ The greater the effective nuclear charges of the bonded species, [the greater the attractive coulombic forces] …the shorter the bond length ⍟ The larger the electronegativity difference [ionic character] of the bonded species, …the shorter the bond length ⍟ The greater the bond multiplicity (single vs. double vs. triple) ….the shorter the bond length. Checkout: Bond Length and Bond Energy: http://www.bozemanscience.com/ap-chem-052-chemical-potential-energy C) Recall: Enthalpy is a state function… it is what it is … and does not depend upon how it became what it is … or how it evolved. 1) Thus, ∆H of a chemical process depends only on the amount of matter that undergoes the chemical changes and on the nature of the initial state of the reactants and the final state of the products. 2) So, the number of steps from reactants to products does not matter …. The sum of the enthalpy changes of those individual steps must be equal to the enthalpy changes associated with the direct synthesis (or a one-step process.) … 467 The visual learner in you may appreciate an Enthalpy Diagram. For instance, consider the combustion of methane in oxygen as a one step process or as a 2-step process, with the formation of CO as an intermediary product: CH(g) + 2 O2(g) → CO2(g) + H2O(𝓁) Combustion producing liquid water: 1 step process Combustion producing liquid water: 2 step process http://www.mikeblaber.org/oldwine/chm1045/notes/Energy/HessLaw/Energy04.htm The net reaction is the same … as long as we can write a series of equations that add up to the equation we need, and as long as we know a value for ∆ H for all intermediate reactions, we can calculate the overall ∆H. a) In a direct synthesis (a formation), the ∆H = ∆H° f with ∆H° f being the heat of formation … the energy exchange for the production of 1 mol of product from its constituent elements. We will see this heat of formation throughout this packet. D) Hess’s law: (really a very sweet concept) When a reaction occurs in a series of steps, ∆H (the change in enthalpy, a.k.a., the heat of reaction) for the overall reaction should equal the sum of the enthalpy changes for the individual steps. That is: When a reaction is the sum of two or more other reactions, the ΔH for the overall process is the sum of the enthalpy changes for the constituent reactants 1) Hess’s Law is a neat means of calculating enthalpy changes which may be fleeting or difficult to measure. a) per your text (p187) “It is impossible to measure directly the enthalpy for the combustion of carbon to form carbon monoxide. Combustion of 1 mol of carbon with 0.5 mol of O2 produces both CO and CO2, leaving some carbon unreacted. … But, solid carbon and carbon monoxide can both be completely burned in O2 to produce CO2. We can therefore us the enthalpy changes of these reactions to calculate the heat of combustion of carbon” 468 b) We are going to look at 3 ways of employing Hess’s Law… We will find the: i) overall ΔHrxn when given synthesis reactions and heats of reaction ii) overall ΔHrxn when given a complete reaction equation and heats of formation. We will use: ΔH°rxn = Σ n ΔH°f (products) – Σ m ΔH°f (reactants) iii) overall ΔHrxn when given a complete reaction equation and bond energies. We will use: H = (bond energies of broken bonds) - (bond energies of formed bonds) 2) Here’s How I see It….A Summery for the 3 Applications of Hess’s Law HESS'S LAW Hess's Law: given reactions and Heats of Reaction This is all about rearranging synthesis equations and adding the changes in enthalpy Strategy 1: Arrange the given equations to get the reactants and the products of the master equation. (Reverse the signs of ∆H where necessary.) Hess's Law given standard molar enthalpies This approach uses the sum of the heats of formation of the products minus the sum heats of formation of the reactants: ΔH°rxn = Σ n ΔH°f (products) – Σ m ΔH°f (reactants) Strategy 2: Add up the molar enthalpies of formation (Hf°) of the products (each multiplied by the stoichiometric value for "n" Get the correct # of moles of the substances on each side per the master reaction. Make sure other substances in the equations Subtract from that sum, the sum of the molar enthalpies of formation of the reactants, multiplied by their value of "m" cancel when the equations are added. Hess’s Law given a reaction and bond strengths Only an approximation for ΔH: The difference between the energy absorbed to BREAK the bonds of reactants minus the energy released to MAKE the bonds of the products, is really: Strategy 3: Account for the moles of each reactant and multiply the moles of bonds by bond energies. Do the same for the products. Subtract the two sums using: H = (bond energies of broken bonds) - (bond energies of formed bonds) Checkout: Hess’s Law: http://www.bozemanscience.com/ap-chem-053-net-energy-change 469 Before moving on: What effect does reversing a reaction have on the value of ∆H? * You keep the numeric value the same, but reverse its sign. What effect does multiplying the coefficients of the reaction equation by “2” have on the value of ∆H? * It doubles the value of the heat of reaction. 3) Strategy 1: Hess’s Law: given reaction equations and given heat of reaction (ΔH) values e.g. Calculate the heat of reaction (change in enthalpy, ∆H) of the synthesis of methane from solid carbon and hydrogen gas. C(s) + 2 H2(g) CH4(g) Given: E1 C(s) + O2(g) CO2(g) ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol rxn E2 H2(g) + ½ O2(g) H2O(g) ΔHᵒ2 = -285.8 kJ/mol rxn E3 CH4(g) + 2 O2(g) CO2(g) + 2 H2O(g) ΔHᵒ3 = -890.3 kJ/mol rxn **************************************************************** We see methane is a reactant in E3 ... so reverse it to make it a product (to match the above master rxn) CO2 + 2 H2O CH4 + 2 O2 ΔHᵒ3 = +890.3 kJ/mol rxn Next, double E2 ... this will give you 2 mol of hydrogen gas ...just as in the above master rxn 2 H2 + O2 2 H2O ΔHᵒ2 = -571.6 kJ/mol rxn Keep E1 intact, for it give you C as a reactant... NOW you have: E1 C + O2 CO2 ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol E2 2 H2 + O2 2 H2O ΔHᵒ2 = -571.6 kJ/mol E3 CO2 + 2 H2O CH4 + 2 O2 ΔHᵒ3 = +890.3 kJ/mol Cross out common species on the reactant and product side & sum the enthalpies… E1 C + O2 CO2 ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol E2 2 H2 + O2 2 H2O ΔHᵒ2 = -571.6 kJ/mol E3 CO2 + 2 H2O CH4 + 2 O2 ΔHᵒ3 = +890.3 kJ/mol C + 2 H2 CH4 ΔH = -74.8 kJ 470 TRY THIS: Calculate the change in enthalpy for the formation of CS2(s) from Cs and S(s) C + 2 S CS2 ans: ∆Hf = 116.8 kJ Notice you’re given an overall “target” reaction Notice you’re given a series of other equations Notice you’re given heats of reaction …hint: use strategy 1 …rearrange and add enthalpies C(s) + O2(g) CO2(g) S(s) + O2(g) SO2(g) CS2(s) + 3 O2(g) CO2(g)+ 2SO2(g) E1 E2 E3 ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol ΔHᵒ2 = -296.8 kJ/mol ΔHᵒ3 = -1103.9 kJ/mol *remove …. Re-write the correct reaction equations and each one’s change in enthalpy …before checking …. * E1 C + O2 CO2 ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol rxn * E2 2S + 2O2 2 SO2 ΔHᵒ2 = -593.6 kJ/mol rxn * E3 CO2 + 2SO2 CS2 + 3 O2 ΔHᵒ3 = +1103.9 kJ/mol rxn TRY THIS: Calculate ∆H for the synthesis reaction: C(s) + ½ O2(g) → CO (g) ans: ∆Hf = -110.5 kJ Notice you’re given an overall “target” reaction Notice you’re given a series of other equations Notice you’re given heats of reaction …hint: use strategy 1 …rearrange and add enthalpies E1 E2 C(s) + O2(g) CO2(g) CO(g) + ½ O2(g) CO2(g) ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol ΔHᵒ2 = -283.0 kJ/mol *remove …. Re-write the correct reaction equations and each one’s change in enthalpy …before checking …. E1 C(s) + O2(g) CO2(g) ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol E2 CO2(g) ½ O2(g) + CO(g) ΔHᵒ2 = +283.0 kJ/mol C(s) + ½ O2(g) → CO (g) Note that only ½ mol of O2(g) is cancelled 471 TRY THIS: Calculate the change in enthalpy for the reaction: C(s) + H2O(g) → CO(g) + H2(g) This one has a small twist to the process … can you figure out that twist??? ans: ∆Hrxn = +131.3 kJ Notice you’re given an overall “target” reaction Notice you’re given a series of other equations Notice you’re given heats of reaction …hint: use strategy 1 …rearrange and add enthalpies E1 E2 E3 C(s) + O2(g) CO2(g) 2 CO(g) + O2(g) 2 CO2(g) 2 H2(g) + O2(g) 2H2O(g) ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol ΔHᵒ2 = -566.0 kJ/mol ΔHᵒ3 = -483.6 kJ/mol *remove …. Re-write the correct reaction equations and each one’s change in enthalpy …before checking …. C(s) + O2(g) CO2(g) ΔHᵒ1 = -393.5 kJ/mol CO2(g) CO(s) + ½ O2(g) ΔHᵒ2 = +283.0 kJ/mol H2O(g) H2(g) + ½ O2(g) ΔHᵒ3 = +241.8 kJ/mol C(s) + H2O(g) → CO(g) + H2(g) Twist to process: The 2 boldfaced reactions were reversed and multiplied by -1/2 TRY THIS! Consider the following heats of combustion: Chang AP Achiever p 92 CH3OH(ℓ) + 3/2 O2(g) → CO2(g) + 2H2O(ℓ) ∆H° = -730 kJ/mol O2(g) → CO2(g) ∆H° = -390 kJ/mol ½ O2(g) → H2O(ℓ) ∆H° = -290 kJ/mol C(graphite) + H2(g) + Determine the enthalpy of formation of methanol CH3OH(ℓ) 1) 2) 3) 4) -240 kJ/mol +50 kJ/mol -1400 kJ/mol -680 kJ/mol CO2(g) + 2 H2O(ℓ) → CH3OH(ℓ) + 3/2 O2(g) ∆H = +730 kJ/mol C(graphite) + O2(g) → CO2(g) ∆H = -390 kJ/mol 2H2(g) + O2(g) → 2 H2O(ℓ) C(graphite) + 2 H2(g) + ½ O2(g) → CH3OH(ℓ) ∆H° = -580 kJ/mol Hint 1:* You have reactions and heats of reaction. Have you considered manipulating the equations so as to create the balanced reaction equation to form methanol, (make methanol the product) Hint 2 * As you manipulated the reaction equations, did you change the signs of delta H appropriately? Hint 3: * Add up the heat of reaction values …. ans:* choice 1 -240 kJ/mol 472 And now for something completely different … E) 1) Hess’s Law given Standard Enthalpies of Formation The magnitude of any enthalpy change depends on the temperature, pressure and state (gas, liquid or solid crystalline form) of the reactants and products. To compare enthalpies of different reactions, we must define a set of conditions, called a standard state, at which most enthalpies are tabulated. The standard state of a substance is its pure form at atmospheric pressure (1 atm) and the temperature of interest, which we usually choose to be 298 K (25°C) Recall: The standard enthalpy change of a reaction is defined as the enthalpy change when all reactants and products are in their standard states. We denote a standard enthalpy change as ∆H°, where the superscript, °, (pronounced: naught) indicates the standard state. The standard enthalpy of formation of a compound, (∆H°f) is the change in enthalpy for the reaction * that forms only 1 mole of the compound from its elements with all substances in their standard states. By definition the standard enthalpy of formation of the most stable form of * any element is zero!!! i) due to the fact that there is no formation reaction needed when the element is already in its standard state. e.g.) the ∆H°f for graphite, H2(g), O2(g) and all other elements = 0 kJ/mol When an element exists in more than one form under standard conditions (allotropy), the more stable form is used. Thus, O2(g) is assigned a ∆H°f = 0, whereas O3 and O are not. We can see this again and again in the literature, as graphite is considered to be the more thermodynamically stable isotope over diamond (for the forms of C). H2 is used in lieu of H, I2(s) is more stable than I2(g), or Cl2(g) is more thermodynamically stable than Cl2(𝓁). Generally speaking, the form of the element per its phase on the periodic table is the more thermodynamically stable form/phase of the element … due in large part to the 1 atm criterion. unit = kJ/mol Essentially: ΔH°rxn = Σ nΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) …seen with entropy where ∑ is “sum of” and n and m are the relevant stoichiometric values 473 c) So, let’s kick it back for a minute and look at how the definition affects various issues. In thermodynamics, All formations are syntheses, but not all syntheses are formations C(graphite) + ½ O2(g) + 2 H2(g) → CH3OH(g) represents a formation reaction … (All the criteria are met …. the reactants are all elements and in the most thermodynamically stable form/phase & only 1 mol of product is made.) SO3(g) + H2O(𝓁) → H2SO4(𝓁) does NOT represent a formation reaction (the reactants are not elements) 3/2 O2(g) → O3(g) does NOT represent a formation reaction (Ozone is not the most stable form of the element oxygen, thus in this case ∆H°f ≠ 0 kJ/mol) The REVERSE rxn would represent a formation reaction. Al(s) + 3/2 I2(s) AlI3(s) represents a formation reaction…the reactants are in their most stable form/phase and only 1 mol of product is produced. TRY THIS! For which of these reactions at 25°C does the enthalpy change represent a standard enthalpy of formation? For each that does NOT, what changes are needed to make it an equation whose ∆H is an enthalpy of formation? (Brown and LeMay 191) 1) 2 Na(s) + ½ O2(g) → Na2O(s) *This does represent a heat of formation… This corresponds to 2 important factors: only 1 mole of product it produced from its elements and those elements are in their standard (most stable) states. 2) 2 K(𝓁) + Cl2(g) → 2 KCl(s) *This does NOT represent a heat of formation. It is accurate in that a compound is produced from its elements. However it fails to meet the definition, because 2 moles (not 1) are produced and the potassium is not in its standard state (solid). Thus the reaction would need to be re-written as: K(s) + ½ Cl2(g) → KCl(s) 3) C6H12O6(s) → 6 C(diamond) + 6 H2(g) + 3 O2(g) * This does NOT correspond to a heat of formation. It is not a synthesis …it is a decomposition. C is not most stable as diamond at room temp. and 1 atm pressure. To be made correct the reaction should be re-written as: 6 C(graphite) + 6 H2(g) + 3 O2(g) → C6H12O6(s) 474 E 2) Strategy 2: Using Hess’s Law Given ONLY Standard Enthalpies of Formation Calculate the heat of reaction (∆Hrxn) for the complete combustion of propane in oxygen gas, given by the balanced chemical reaction: C3H8(g) + 5 O2(g) → 3 CO2(g) + 4H2O(𝓁) Standard Enthalpies of Formation Substance Hf ° kJ/mol C3H8(g) -103.85 CO2(g) -393.5 -285.8 H2O(𝓁) Why has O2(g) been omitted from the table of Hf°? * It is an element, and as such its heat of formation = 0 kJ/mol Use: ΔH°rxn = Σ nΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) Account for Moles: *1 mol of reactant C3H8(g) = -103.85 kJ 4 mol of product H2O(𝓁) = -1143.2 kJ 3 mol of product CO2(g) = -1180.5 kJ ΔH°rxn = *(-1180.5 kJ/mol) + (-1143.2 kJ/mol) - (-103.85 kJ/mol) * -2323.7 - (-103.85) = -2,219.9 kJ/mol TRY THIS! Calculate the standard enthalpy change for the reaction: CH2N2(s) + O2(g) → CO(g) + H2O(𝓁) + N2(g) Notice you’re given an overall “target” reaction Notice you’re given heats of formation… Use strategy 2 Substance CH2N2 (s) CO(g) H2O(𝓁) ∆Hf ° kJ/mol +62.4 -110.5 -285.8 * Account for moles: 1 mol reactant CH2N2(s) = +62.4 kJ 1 mol product CO(g) = -110.5 kJ 1 mol product H2O(𝓁) = - 285.8 kJ * ΔH°rxn = Σ nΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) (-110.5) + (-285.8) - (62.4) -396.3 - 62.4 = 458.7 kJ ans: -458.7 kJ 475 TRY THIS! Pentaborane-9, B5H9 is a colorless, highly reactive liquid that explodes when exposed to oxygen gas. Using the provided heats of formation, calculate the energy exchange for this combustion. The equation for the combustion is: (Chang AP Achiever p. 89) 2 B5H9(𝓁) + 12 O2(g) → 5 B2O3(s) + 9 H2O(𝓁) Notice you’re given an overall “target” reaction Notice you’re given heats of formation… Use strategy 2 Substance B5H9(𝓁) B2O3(s) H2O(𝓁) ∆Hf ° kJ/mol 73.2 -1263.6 -285.8 *Account for Moles: 2 mol reactant B5H9(𝓁) = 146.4 kJ 5 mol product B2O3(s) = -6318 kJ 9 mol product H2O(𝓁) = -2572.2 kJ * ΔH°rxn = Σ n ΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) * ΔH°rxn = -8890.2 - 146.4 = -9036.6 kJ ans: -9036.6 kJ are released when 2 moles of pentaborane-9 are combusted. TRY THIS! Calculate the energy exchange when 25.00 grams of Pentaborane-9, are combusted in oxygen gas. Using the provided heats of formation, calculate the energy exchange for this combustion. The equation for the combustion is: Substance ∆Hf ° kJ/mol 2 B5H9(𝓁) + 12 O2(g) → 5 B2O3(s) + 9 H2O(𝓁) B5H9(𝓁) 73.2 B2O3(s) -1263.6 Notice you’re given an overall “target” reaction -285.8 H2O(𝓁) Notice you’re given heats of formation… Use strategy 2 BUT then use stoich to apply the moles of compound actually combusted. * Account for moles: 2 mol B5H9(𝓁) = 146.4 kJ 5 mol B2O3(s) = -6318 kJ 9 mol H2O(𝓁) = -2570.5 kJ * ΔH°rxn = Σ n ΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) * ΔH°rxn = -8888.5 - 146.4 = -9034.9 kJ which is for 2 moles of pentaborane-9 * Thus: kJ = 25.00 grams | 1 mol | -9034.9 kJ | = -1789.1 kJ 63.126 g 2 mol ans: -1789.1 kJ 476 TRY THIS! Nitroglycerin is a powerful explosive that forms four different gases when detonated: Calculate the enthalpy change that occurs when 10.00 grams of nitroglycerin are detonated. 2 C3H5N3O9(𝓁) 3 N2(g) + 6 CO2(g) + 1 2 O2(g) + 5 H2O(g) *Account for moles: 2 mol reactant C3H5N3O9(𝓁) = -728 kJ 6 mol product CO2(g) = -2361 kJ 5 mol product H2O(g) = -1209 kJ Substance ∆Hf ° kJ/mol C3H5N3O9 -364 CO2(g) -393.5 H2O(g) -241.8 ans: -62.6 kJ *Equation: ΔH°rxn = Σ n ΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) * ΔH°rxn = (- 3570) - (-728) = -2842 for 2 mols of nitroglycerin.. * kJ = 10.0g | 1mol nitro| -2842 kJ | 227 grams 2 mol nitro TRY THIS! A Twist: Consider the following reaction of the combustion of propane and the heat of formation information: C3H8(g) + 5 O2(g) → 3 CO2(g) + 4H2O(𝓁) ∆Hrxn =-2,220 kJ/mol What is the heat of formation of the unknown hydrocarbon? *Account for moles: 1 mol reactant C3H8 = ??? 3 mol product CO2 = -393.5 4 mol product H2O = -1142 Substance ∆Hf ° kJ/mol C3H8(g) ??? CO2(g) -393.5 -285.5 H2O(𝓁) * Equation: ΔH°rxn = Σ n ΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) * -2,220 kJ = (3)(-393.5 kJ/mol ) + (4)(-285.5 kJ/mol) - x *-2,220 kJ = (-1180.5 kJ) + (-1142 kJ) - x *-2,220 kJ = -2322.5 kJ - x ans: -102 kJ 477 TRY THIS! Consider the following reaction representing the combustion of sulfur dioxide gas: (Chang AP Achiever p. 94) a) Calculate ∆Hrxn for this process given the following information: 2 SO2(g) + O2(g) → 2 SO3(g) *ΔH°rxn = Σ n ΔH°f (products) - Σ mΔH°f (reactants) * 2 (-395.2) - 2(-296.1) + 0 *-790.4 - (-592.2) = -198.2 kJ b) Is this an exothermic or an endothermic reaction? Species ∆Hf °(kJ/mol) SO2(g) -296.1 O2(g) 0 SO3(g) -395.2 Hint 1: * Think Hess’s Law and Strategy 2 ans: -198.2kJ ans: *exothermic, due to a – (negative) ∆H value c) Calculate the amount of heat liberated in the above process when 2.075 grams of SO3(g) are produced. * kJ = 2.075 grams | 1 mol | -198.2 | = -2.568 kJ 80.063g 2 mol ans: *-2.568 kJ d) What volume in liters, of SO3(g) would be produced at 20 °C and 1 atm of pressure in the above combustion reaction involving the transfer of 50.00 kJ of energy? *PV = nRT (1)(V) =n(0.08206)(293K) *to convert for “n” …. mol = 50.00 kJ | 2 mol | 198.2 kJ *n = 0.5045 mol of SO3 gas. *V = (0.5045 mol)(0.08206 L atm mol-1 K-1)(293 K) *= 12.1 Liters Hint 1:* Hmmm You’re asked about the volume of a gas with a temperature, a pressure …. sounds like an ideal gas law … solving for V …. BUT! you need an “n” or moles … . Hint 2:* You are given an energy transfer …and you know 2 mol produce 198.2 kJ … You could use this info saying : If 2 moles produce 198.2 kJ …then how many moles are produced with only 50.00 KJ? ans: 12. 1 Liters 478 F) Strategy 3: Using Hess’s Law given bond energies to approximate ΔH If we know which bonds are broken and which bonds are made during a chemical reaction, we can estimate the enthalpy change of the reaction (Hrxn) even if we don't know the enthalpies of formation (Hf°) for the reactants and products: H = (bond energies of broken bonds) - (bond energies of formed bonds) This approach can be very helpful, especially with newly synthesized compounds, for which a complete data file of chemical and physical characteristics has yet to be produced. 1) Use the following table of average bond energies and the reaction between 1 mol of chlorine and 1 mol methane, approximate the change in enthalpy for the reaction. http://www.mikeblaber.org/oldwine/chm1045/notes/Bonding/Strength/Bond09.htm Average Bond Energies Bond (kJ/mol) C-H 413 C-C 348 C ≡C 839 C=O 799 C-Cl 328 H–H 432 H – Cl 431 O–H 467 O=O 495 Cl – Cl 242 Bonds broken: *1 mol of Cl-Cl bonds, 1 mol of C-H bonds Bonds formed: *1 mol of H-Cl bonds, 1 mol of C-Cl bonds Notice that I am taking a shortcut… I accounted for only 1 mol of C – H bonds as broken. You can change this all up …And if you found it easier, you could account for 4 mol of C – H bonds broken … but be sure to account for 3 mol of those C – H) as being formed on the product side. You’ll get the same approximation of change in enthalpy. Equation: H = (bond energies of broken bonds) - (bond energies of formed bonds) H = [(Cl-Cl) + (C-H)] - [(H-Cl)+(C-Cl)] = *[242 kJ + 413 kJ] - [431 kJ + 328 kJ] = -104 kJ Thus, the reaction is exothermic (because the bonds in the products are stronger than the bonds in the reactants) 479 2) Approximate the ΔHrxn for the complete combustion of ethane. Average Bond Energies Bond (kJ/mol) C-H 413 C-C 348 C ≡C 839 C=O 799 C-Cl 328 H–H 432 H – Cl 431 O–H 467 O=O 495 Cl – Cl 242 Bonds broken: *1 mol C-C bonds 6 mol of C-H bonds 7/2 or 3.5 mol O=O bonds Bonds made: *4 mol C=O bonds 6 mol of O-H bonds H = (bond energies of broken bonds) - (bond energies of formed bonds) = *[348 + (6 * 413) + (3.5 *495)] - [(4*799) + (6*467)] *4559 (rounded) - 5998 =-1439 kJ ans. 3) Hydrogenation of double and triple bonds is an important industrial process. Approximate in kilojoules the standard enthalpy change ΔH for the hydrogenation of ethyne (acetylene) to ethane: H−C≡C−H + 2 H2 → C2H6 or rather…. H−C≡C−H + 2 H-H → H H | | H–C–C–H | | H H Bonds Broken: *2 mol H-H bonds 1 mol C≡C bonds Bonds Made: *1 mol C – C bonds 4 mol H – H bonds quation: H = (bond energies of broken bonds) - (bond energies of formed bonds) = *[(2 * 432) + 839] - [348 + (4 * 413)] 1703 - 2000 -297 kJ ans 480 TRY THIS: 1) Which of the following is a statement of Hess’s Law? 1) If a reaction is carried out in a series of steps, the ΔH for the reaction will equal the sum of the enthalpy changes for the individual steps. 2) If a reaction is carried out in a series of steps, the ΔH for the reaction will equal the product of the enthalpy changes for the individual steps 3) The ΔH for a process in the forward direction is equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to the ΔH for the process in the reverse direction. 4) The ΔH for a process in the forward direction is equal to the ΔH for the process in the reverse direction 5) The ΔH of a reaction depends on the physical states of the reactants and the products. 2) Which of the following statements is true? 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Enthalpy is an intensive property The enthalpy change for a reaction is independent of the state of the reactants and products Enthalpy is a state function H is the value of q measured under conditions of constant volume The enthalpy change of a reaction is the reciprocal of the ΔH of the reverse reaction. 3) Which of the following is a statement of the first law of thermodynamics? 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) EK = ½ mv2 A negative ΔH corresponds to an exothermic process ΔE = Efinal – Einitial Energy lost by the system must be gained by the surroundings. Water has one of the higher specific heat values at 4.184 J/g•K Ans: 1) 1 2) 3 3) 4 481