Predictability of High Impact Weather during the Cool Season over the Eastern U.S: CSTAR Scientific Objectives Brian A. Colle and Edmund Chang Stony Brook University - SUNY CSTAR Partners/Contributors: HPC – David Novak et al. EMC – Yucheng Song, Jun Du, and Jordan Alpert OPC – Joseph Sienkiewicz et al. WFO-OKX: Jeff Tongue et al. WFO-PHI: Al Cope et al. WFO-CTP: Richard Grumm et al. WFO-PIT: Josh Korotky et al. The operational community has made significant progress in ensemble modeling and products during the last decade However, why aren’t ensembles used more effectively in operations? • Ensemble underdispersion and biases limit ensemble skill. • Ensembles have not been comprehensively verified, especially for high impact weather. • Forecasters lack tools to understand the origin of ensemble spread and errors in realtime. • Forecasters have few ways to communicate uncertainty in their forecast products Novak, David R., David R. Bright, Michael J. Brennan, 2008: Operational Forecaster Uncertainty Needs and Future Roles. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 1069–1084. Short-Range Ensemble Systems Stony Brook Univ. 13 Member Ensemble (00 UTC) - 7 MM5, 6 WRFv2.2 members at 12 km grid spacing (NAM soil moisture and SST). - IC: NAM, GFS, CMC and NOGAPS. - CP: Grell, KF and Betts-Miller. - PBL MM5: Blackadar, MRF, MY - PBL WRF: MYJ and YSU. - MP MM5: Sice, Reis2 - MP WRF: Ferrier, WSM3. NCEP SREF 21 Member (21 UTC) - 10 ETA members at 32 km grid spacing. - 5 with BMJ CP and Ferrier MP. - 5 with KF CP and Ferrier MP. - 5 RSM members at 45 km grid spacing. - 3 with SAS CP and Zhou GFS MP. - 2 with RAS CP and Zhou GFS MP. - 3 WRF-NMM members at 40 km grid spacing. - 3 WRF-ARW members at 45 km grid spacing. - IC's are perturbed using a breeding technique. Daily NCEP/NCAR Composite of 500 mb Z Anomaly For GFS F96 Cyclone SLP Mean Errors (> 1.5 stndev) along the U.S. East Coast Positive Cyclone SLP Error (28 cases) GFS Underdeepened Events F96 Negative Cyclone SLP Error (35 cases) GFS Overdeepened Events F96 Colle and Charles: Accepted to WAF CSTAR Scientific Motivation • Improve the understanding of high • • • impact weather predictability during the cool season through objective verification of cyclones and Rossby wave packets (RWPs) in ensembles. Integrate RWPs more in operations: Better understanding of RWP climatology, downstream impact of targeted observations, and linkage with extreme weather. Better understanding of the predictability of some mesoscale phenomena (e.g., snowbands). Better ensemble construction and post-processing. From THORPEX International Science Plan (Shapiro and Thorpe, 2004) Forecaster Motivation • Forecasters need more knowledge of RWPs and how the packets are related to high impact weather, regime changes, etc... Schwierz et al (2004), Martius et al (2007) - Wave packet signal precedes Alpine heavy precipitation events, especially in DJF and SON • Relationship between ensemble sensitivity and wave packets may alert forecasters to the potential predictability of important weather phenomena days in advance. DJF 180 Longitude 180 • Forecasters need post-processed ensemble data and better ways to display uncertainty (ensemble) information. SON Stony Brook Wave Packet Diagnostics for Winter TPARC http://xs1.somas.stonybrook.edu/~chang/personal/Wave/main.htm Stony Brook Univ. – NCEP-HPC collaboration: Real-time Wave Packets in Operations Courtesy: Mike Bogner Relating Wave Packets to Medium Range Forecasts: Large spread regarding Eastern U.S. trough verifying 1200 UTC 4 November 2010 Courtesy: Dr. David Novak 500 mb Analysis Diffs 00 UTC 29 Oct 2010 GFS Height (thin yellow) ECMWF Height (thick yellow) and Isotachs (blue) Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program Operational since January 2001 Objective: Improve Forecasts of Significant Winter Weather Events Through Targeted Observations in Data Sparse Northeast Pacific Ocean in the 24-96 hour lead time range over CONUS Adaptive approach to collection of observational data: 1) Only prior to significant Winter Weather events of Interest 2) Only in areas that influence high impact event forecasts Results: 70+% of Targeted Numerical Weather Predictions Improve 10-20% error reduction for high impact event forecasts 2008 P-3 out of Portland, WA 12-hour gain in predicting high impact events – earlier warnings possible WSR data has 2.7 times more impact per obs than RAOB observations Courtesy: Yucheng Song Concept Take observations in key sensitive areas (target area) that will improve the forecast in the verification region. Target Obs. Area Verification Area Need additional observational platforms (primarily aircraft) Need method to determine where additional observations should be taken To Tv Observation errors taken from GDAS Ensemble forecast perturbation given Sensitivity maps for East Coast system at 12 UTC 4 Nov 2010 Use ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF, Bishop et al., 2001), which combines error covariance information from ensemble forecasts (~170 members) with error statistics associated with the routine and adaptive observational networks to predict the reduction in forecast error variance within a prescribed forecast verification region, due to the assimilation of any given set of adaptive observations. Red circle shows our key area of interest Black contours show us the sensitivity – larger the values the more impact observations in those areas at the Obs time would have on the key east coast area. -All maps based on ensembles initialized at 00 UTC 29 Oct Possible flight tracks are also overlaid. Sensitivity Map GFS forecast trough Chaba Sensitivity to hypothetical observations taken 00 UTC 30 October Courtesy: David Novak to improve the forecast over Eastern US 12 UTC 4 November Sensitivity Map GFS forecast trough Chaba/trough Sensitivity to hypothetical observations taken 00 UTC 31 October to improve the forecast over Eastern US 12 UTC 4 November Sensitivity Map GFS forecast Broad trough Ahead of trough Sensitivity to hypothetical observations taken 00 UTC 1 November to improve the forecast over Eastern US 12 UTC 4 November Sensitivity Map Ahead of trough GFS forecast Broad trough Downstream trough Sensitivity to hypothetical observations taken 00 UTC 2 November to improve the forecast over Eastern US 12 UTC 4 November Sensitivity Map GFS forecast Energy over the ridge Sensitivity to hypothetical observations taken 00 UTC 3 November to improve the forecast over Eastern US 12 UTC 4 November Sensitivity Map GFS forecast Verification region Sensitivity to hypothetical observations taken 00 UTC 4 November to improve the forecast over Eastern US 12 UTC 4 November Relationship Between Sensitive Regions and Wave Packet 300 hPa Packet Envelope Time 300 hPa U and V wind Asia = sensitive regions identified in previous slides USA Courtesy: Dr. David Novak Using Ensemble Data More Effectively in the Forecast Office Advanced Linux Prototype System (ALPS) http://www-sdd.fsl.noaa.gov/~ramer/alps/ensembles/ensembles.html Warm Season vs Fire Threat Days Surface Temperature Mean Error (12-36h) for SBU and SREF Ensembles NCEP SREF (oC) (oC) SBU 12-km Ensemble MYJ MM5 WRF SREF sub-group averages Courtesy: Michael Erickson Impact of Using Previous 5 Fire Threat Days for Bias Correction of Surface Temperature (12-36 h avg) NCEP SREF (oC) (oC) SBU 12-km Ensemble MM5 WRF Note: MAE for SBU+SREF ens mean is 1.84 K (~0.10 K less than best member, but comparable to SBU mean). Impact of Using Previous 5 Fire Threat Days for Bias Correction of Surface Temperature (12-36h avg) Raw: SBU 12-km Ensemble (oC) After Bias Correction (oC) Impact of Using Previous 5 Fire Threat Days for Bias Correction of Surface Temperature (12-36h avg) SBU 12-km Ensemble T > 282 K Improvement in BSS for Temp 25 Dec 2002 Ensemble of 12-km MM5, WRF, NCEP SREF (15/16 produced band) 18-21h Ensemble: 12 February 2006 Event (LESS PREDICTABLE – WHY??? Using ensemble sensitivity analysis from a ENKF system (Torn and Hakim 2008), one can identify where small changes to the initial conditions can have a significant impact on the subsequent forecast in the banding region. Forecasters can monitor observations in these sensitive regions. 25 Dec 2002: IC and 18 h PV (475-250 hPa) 36-km difference between farthest NW and SE band position IC -1 -2 0 1 -1 18 h 2 3 0 4 PVU 1 PVU 12 Feb 2006: IC and 18 h PV (475-250 hPa) 36-km difference between farthest NW and SE band position IC -1 -2 0 1 -1 2 0 18 h 3 1 4 PVU 2 PVU Summary • There are still many challenges in using ensembles more effectively in operations. • Recent progress has been made in the automated tracking and verification of wave packets. • Ensemble post-processing shows promise (e.g. Jun Du is now testing bias correction for SREF). • On-line CSTAR tutorials have been completed for Rossby wave packets, ALPS software, and targeted observations. • See our CSTAR Web page for more details, and if you want to join our CSTAR email group. http://dendrite.somas.stonybrook.edu/CSTAR/cstar.html