Note: This document should be used as a source of sample language. Please follow the required syllabus template for your School and add any missing additional language for online learning from this document. Instructor information section: Include online office hours when you are available for phone calls or near real-time answers to students, your phone number, your Skype username (if you use it), whether students can text you on your cell phone, etc. You may also want to include some language similar to this: Communication with the Instructor It is important to remember that while the Internet is available 24 hours a day, your instructor is not. You can expect that your instructor will respond to e-mail message to you within 2 business days during the week and may not be available to respond on weekends. Credit Hour Sample Language: Adapt this language to your course. Undergraduate: This course is offered for X credits; therefore, it is expected that you will spend X times 3 hours per week during the 15 week duration of this class. A suggested weekly schedule to divide your time is provided: (3 credit class example) Readings: 2 hours Interactive Discussion on the Readings: 2 hours (recommend ½ hour daily for at least 4 days a week) Assignments: 3 hours Weekly Work on Final Project: 2 hours Graduate: This course is offered for X credits; therefore, it is expected that you will spend X times 4 hours per week during the 15 week duration of this class. A suggested weekly schedule to divide your time is provided: (3 credit class example) Readings: 3 hours Interactive Discussion on the Readings: 3 hours (recommend ½ hour daily for at least 6 days a week) Assignments: 3 hours Weekly Work on Final Project: 3 hours Page 1 Name of course Syllabus Required Text/Material List your required books and include language like this: You may order your textbooks from the Andrews online bookstore: http://bookstore.mbsdirect.net/andrews.htm Technical Requirements This course is delivered online through Moodle, the Andrews Learning Management System. To participate in this course you will need access to the Internet (DSL, LAN, or cable connection desirable) and Web browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari) with the latest version. The website is: http://aumoodle.andrews.edu You will login with your Andrews username and password. Technical Assistance If you need technical assistance at any time during the course, or to report a problem with Moodle, please email dlit@andrews.edu or call 269-471-3960. If you need assistance with your Andrews username and password, email helpdesk@andrews.edu or call 269-471-6016. In your grades section, you may want to add this language: Viewing Grades in Moodle Click into the course in Moodle at http://aumoodle.andrews.edu. Click on the Grades link in the Administration Block on the left side of the course. Page 2 Name of course Syllabus If you are using School of Distance Education supported exam proctoring as one of your methods of verifying student identity, this language is recommended: Exam Proctoring Exams must be supervised by a school or community official, such as a teacher, librarian, registrar, or pastor, who is not related to the student. The student must state clearly on the exam request form the professional status, job title, or any other qualifications of the supervisor that will aid the testing department in the approval process. If a student is enrolled in another school while taking college courses, the exam should be taken under the direction of that school’s registrar or testing department. An exam cannot be sent to a supervisor who has the same address as the student unless the address is known to be that of a school, mission facility, etc. If you are attending a college or university, you must use the testing center at that institution. All college students must present photo identification to their supervisors before taking exams unless the examiner personally knows the student being tested. The following are sample guidelines for your interactive discussion. We encourage you to use this sample language to create your own discussion requirements. Sample Discussion Board Language #1 Nothing enhances your learning as much as case discussion between class members. How will this process work? First read the assigned chapter/ listen to the online lecture, then read and assess the case and respond to the questions posed. Going through this entire process before you post will make you look wiser, so please go through all the steps before you post! You will be given a set of case questions to read and answer before you can see how others responded. Once you have finished your initial post, you can then see what others have said. You must make two substantive responses to at least two posts. Jump in where you feel that your response will be worth others reading what you have to say. Respond thoughtfully to the posts of others. Be civil but honest, and confront when necessary. Since all will use the book and online lectures, you may want to start with posts that use this information as a starting point. Page 3 Name of course Syllabus 1) Read the assigned chapters and watch online lecture (did I already stress that?). 2) Post a thoughtful response to the instructor’s question(s). Your first post is worth ~5 pts. Then continue to comment and dialogue with others. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO RESPOND TO EVERYONE. IN FACT, DON’T! That would be like talking to everyone on a crowded bus. Pick a few good conversations and deepen them. Make dialogue. This takes the skill of managers, some pushing and probing but not too much. It also takes deep sensitivity. Be interactive but avoid chitchatty responses that only say “I think so too” or “nice comment.” Please make sure your headlines describe the content of your posts and responses. That makes it easier to follow the discussion LOGIC. Discussion Board Language Option #2 These case discussions are evaluated for their initial quality and then for the generative dialogue that they grow. I value a carefully crafted initial post. This follows the approach of 1 Corinthians 14:26-33 to orderly share one’s voice and then listen to others before the group works out a fuller perspective. Make sure you read other posts and comment. By the end of each case discussion you are successful if you have shared your view, read those of others, and produced “together” a better understanding. Grading (this is subjective but so is life!) Your points go up as you go through the following stages of engagement. Initial Post: A good first post increases your score by incorporating chapter readings, lectures, and your own carefully crafted thoughts about the case. Shared Discussion: Raise questions. You show you have done the course reading and read other’s posts by generating solid questions about their posts. You raise questions to generate dialog. Disagree or Agree: Talking to each other, comparing contrasting ideas and concepts. Full Dialogue: It generates thought and leads to the engagement of others and their ideas. This dialogue leads to fuller understanding of options and a broader more comprehensive understanding of the case. Discussion Board Guidelines Sample #3 In order to have meaningful discussions in which you are engaged, these guidelines will help you understand what it is you are supposed to do when participating in discussion forums. Page 4 Name of course Syllabus When you post your answer to a discussion question, include examples and information that backs up the statements you are making. Some discussion questions may ask you to apply what you’ve learned, in which case you will need to come up with examples from your experiences that pertain to the topic being discussed. When you answer the questions, be able to support your answer. Everyone is required to respond to at least two classmates’ posts for each discussion question. Simply typing “I agree” is not a suitable response, and points will be deducted. You should try to engage further discussion by asking further questions to the person to whom you are responding. The idea of all this is to make you think critically, and apply what you are learning to real-life situations to help you learn. The rubric used to grade the weekly discussion questions is posted below. Each discussion question will be worth 50 points. Criteria Exceptional Very Good Acceptable Needs No Improvement Submission Frequency (10 points) (8 points) & Quantity 3 or more posts At least 2 EACH week. posts EACH week. (7 points) At least 1 post EACH week. (6 points) (0 points) 1 post total or No Submission does not post in all weeks discussion is current. Quality (15 points) All posts use course terms and concepts accurately, focus on the topic, and show critical thinking. (12 points) Majority of posts use course terms and concepts accurately, focus on the topic, and show critical thinking. (10.5 points) Less than half of posts use course terms and concepts accurately, focus on the topic, and show critical thinking. (9 points) (0 points) No posts use No Submission course terms and concepts accurately, focus on the topic, or show critical thinking. Or, posts only once the entire discussion. Community (15 points) All posts acknowledge posts of others and expand the discussion using examples from reading, Web research, or personal experience as appropriate. (12 points) Majority of posts acknowledge posts of others and expand the discussion using examples from reading, Web research, or personal (10.5 points) Less than half of posts acknowledge posts of others and expand the discussion using examples from reading, Web research, or personal experience as appropriate. (9 points) (0 points) One or more posts No Submission violate Mutual Respect Policy and/or no posts acknowledge the contributions and ideas of class peers. Or, posts only once the entire discussion Page 5 Name of course Syllabus experience as appropriate. Citation (5 points) All posts use accurate citation in APA format where appropriate. (4 points) Majority of posts use accurate citation in APA format where appropriate. (3.5 points) Less than half of posts use accurate citation in APA format where appropriate. (0 points) (0 points) One or more posts No Submission are plagiarized. [This may be grounds for a zero in the entire discussion!] Or, posts only once the entire discussion Length (5 points) All posts are a reasonable length (100300 words). (4 points) Majority of posts are a reasonable length (100300 words). (3.5 points) Less than half of posts are a reasonable length (100-300 words). (3 points) (0 points) All posts exceed No Submission word limit or fail to meet word limit. Or, posts only once the entire discussion Discussion Board Rubric Sample #4 Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Promptness (10 points) & Initiative Consistently responds to classmates’ postings in less than 24 hours; demonstrates good selfinitiative Level 5 (8 points) Responds to most postings within a 24 hour period; requires occasional prompting to post (7 points) Responds to most postings several days after initial discussion; limited initiative; posts so close to due date, there is not time to interact with other class members (6 points) Does not respond to most postings; rarely participates freely (0 points) Did not do assignment; does not respond or post to classmates’ posts Level 1 Delivery of Post (10 points) Consistently uses grammatically correct posts with rare misspellings (8 points) Few grammatical or spelling errors are noted in posts (7 points) Errors in spelling and grammar evidenced in several posts (6 points) Utilizes poor spelling and grammar in most posts; posts appear “hasty” (0 points) Did not complete Relevance of Post (10 points) Consistently posts topics related to discussion topic; cites additional references related to topic (8 points) Frequently posts topics that are related to discussion content; prompts (7 points) Occasionally posts off topic; most posts are short in length and offer no further insight into the topic (6 points) Posts topic which do not relate to the discussion content; Makes short or irrelevant remarks (0 points) Did not complete Expression within the post (10 points) Expresses opinions and ideas in a clear and concise manner with obvious (8 points) Opinions and ideas are stated clearly with occasional lack of (7 points) Unclear connection to topic evidenced in minimal expression of opinions or ideas (6 points) (0 points) Does not Did not express complete opinions or ideas clearly; no connection to topic Page 6 Name of course Syllabus connection to topic connection to topic Contribution to the Learning Community (10 points) Aware of needs of community; frequently attempts to motivate the group discussion; presents creative approaches to topic (8 points) Frequently attempts to direct the discussion and to present relevant viewpoints for consideration by group; interacts freely Overall Score Level 5 45 or more Level 4 Level 4 40 or more 40 or more (7 points) Occasionally makes meaningful reflection on group’s efforts; marginal effort to become involved with group (6 points) Does not make effort to participate in learning community as it develops; it seems indifferent (0 points) Does not respond to classmates’ posts Level 4 40 or more Level 4 40 or more Discussion Board Guidelines Sample #5 Some “Discussion Starters” are listed in the course Content for each week. You need to reflect and speak to these but you should not feel limited to them. We expect your learning will be commensurate with the level of dialogue that occurs. The kinds of contributions that make meaningful posts include a) providing accounts of your own experience, b) asking expansive questions - ones with no right or wrong answer - ones to stimulate thinking and lead to deeper understandings, c) building on previous "posts" (whether to agree or disagree) by giving examples, asking sharpening questions, defining issues/terms, d) suggesting metaphors and e) sharing web links and other reference materials. The following chart offers guidelines to your posting. The more to the right you are in your contributions, the better the course will be for everyone. Four Mental Models of Bulletin Board Posting Mental Model Definition Posting Questioning You post your message as if you were submitting an assignment often repeating what has already been said - you don't respond to others. You ask questions but often they aren't connected with what others have said - you don't engender a response. Reflecting/Connecting Dialoguing You respond to what others have said - using their name or quoting them - sharing your personal experience(s) and metaphor(s) to further explain your viewpoint. You are present in the discussion listening, asking for clarification, sharing experiences, affirming others, and extending the conversation. Based on S. Freed, “Metaphors and Reflective Dialogue Online” in New Horizons in Adult Education. Page 7 Name of course Syllabus It is expected that you will contribute to the discussion board 4 – 5 times per week, so make your postings meaningful! IMPORTANT NOTE: At the end of each week, the Discussion Area for that week will close. You will not have another opportunity to post so make sure you follow the schedule carefully and stay with the class. Page 8