Chapter 14 Leadership © 2015 Cengage Learning MGMT7 What Is Leadership? • Leadership – The process of influencing others to achieve group or organizational goals. 3 Leaders • • • • • • • • vs. Doing the right thing “What should we be doing?” Vision, mission, goals, objectives Challenge the status quo Long-term view Expand people’s options and choices Inspire and motivate people to find their own solutions Concerned with ends, what gets done Managers • • • • • • • • © 2015 Cengage Learning Doing things right “How can we do what we’re already doing better?” Productivity and efficiency Preservers of status quo Short-term view Limit others’ choices Sole problems so that others can do their work More concerned with means, how things get done 14-1 Leaders versus Managers American organizations (and probably those in much of the rest of the industrialized world) are under led and over managed. They do not pay enough attention to doing the right thing, while they pay too much attention to doing things right. --Warren Bennis 1.1 5 Who Leaders Are and What Leaders Do Leadership Traits Leadership Behavior Does leadership success depend on who leaders are, such as introverts or extroverts, or on what leaders do and how they behave? 6 Leadership Traits • Trait Theory – Effective leaders possess a similar set of traits or characteristics. • Traits – Relative stable characteristic, such as abilities, psychological motives, or consistent patterns of behavior. – For example, according trait theory leaders are taller, more confident, and have greater physical stamina than nonleaders. 7 Leadership Traits Leaders are different than nonleaders in the following traits: Desire to Lead Drive Knowledge of the Business Cognitive Ability Emotional Stability Self-Confidence Honesty and Integrity 9 Leadership Traits • Desire to Lead-Want to be in charge and influence others • Drive-high level of effort, motivation, initiative, energy and tenacity. • Knowledge of Business-understand key technological decisions and concerns facing their company. • Cognitive Ability-capacity to analyze large amounts of seemingly unrelated, complex information. 10 Leadership Traits • Emotional Stability-remain even-tempered and consistent in their outlook and in the way they treat others. • Self-confidence-believe in one’s abilities. • Honesty-being truthful with others • Integrity-the extent to which leaders do what they said they would do. 11 Leadership Behaviors • Concerned with what leaders do. – The behavior they perform or the actions that leaders take to influence others. • Research shows that two basic leader behaviors emerged as central to successful leadership: – Initiating structure – Consideration 12 Leadership Behaviors • Initiating Structure(concern for production – The degree to which a leader structures the roles of followers by setting goals, giving directions, setting deadlines, and assigning tasks. Primarily affects subordinates’ job performance. • Consideration(concern for people) – The extent to which a leader is friendly, approachable, and supportive and shows concern for employees. Primarily affects a subordinates’ job satisfaction. © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-2 Blake/Mouton Leadership Grid © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-2 Situational Approaches to Leadership • Fiedler’s Contingency Theory • Path Goal Theory • Vroom and Yetton’s Normative Decision Model • These models all assume that the way a leader generally behaves toward followers depends on the situation. 15 Fiedler’s Contingency Theory In order to maximize work group performance, leaders must be matched to the right leadership situation. •Leaders are effective when the work group they lead performs well. •Leaders are generally unable to change their leadership styles, and they will be more effective when their styles are matched to the proper situation. •The favorableness of a situation permits the leader to influence the behavior of group members. 14-3 © 2015 Cengage Learning Fiedler’s Contingency Theory: Putting Leaders in the Right Situation Situational Favorableness Group Performance = Leadership Style To maximize work group performance, leaders must be matched to the right leadership situation. 3 17 Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Least Preferred Coworker Situational Favorableness Matching Leadership Styles to Situations 18 Least Preferred Coworker • • Leadership style = the way that leaders generally behave toward their followers. Leadership styles are tied to leaders’ underlying needs and personalities. – – • Since personality and needs are relative stable, then leaders are generally incapable of changing leadership styles. Leaders will be more effective when their leadership styles are matched to the proper situation Leadership style is measured by the Least Preferred Co-worker scale (LPC) – – Relationship-oriented Task-oriented © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-3 Leadership Style: Least Preferred Coworker Scale People who describe their LPC in a positive manner have relationship orientated leadership styles. People who describe their LPC in a negative manner have task orientated leadership styles. 20 Situational Favorableness The degree to which a particular situation either permits or denies a leader the chance to influence the behavior of group members. Three factors determine the favorability of a situation: •Leader-member relations •Task structure •Position power 14-3 © 2015 Cengage Learning Situational Favorableness • Leader-member relations – Refers to how well followers respect, trust, and like their leaders. • Task structure – The degree that the requirements of a subordinate’s tasks are clearly specified. • Position power – The degree to which leaders are able to hire, fire, reward and punish workers 22 Situational Favorableness © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-3 Matching Leadership Styles to Situations © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-3 Leaders and Situations • Fiedler assumes leaders to be incapable of changing their leadership styles. • The key − matching leaders to situations… • …or teaching leaders how to change situational favorableness 14-3 © 2015 Cengage Learning Path-Goal Theory Leaders can increase subordinate satisfaction and performance by clarifying and clearing the paths to goals and by increasing the number and kinds of rewards available for goal attainment. While providing the coaching, guidance, support, and rewards necessary for effective work performance, leader behaviors must complement and not duplicate the characteristics of followers' work environments. Thus, leader behaviors must offer something unique and valuable to followers beyond what they're already experiencing as they do their jobs or beyond that which they can already do for themselves. 14-4 © 2015 Cengage Learning Basic Assumptions of Path-Goal Theory Clarify paths to goals Clear paths to goals by solving problems and removing roadblocks Increase the number and kinds of rewards available for goal attainment Do things that satisfy followers today or will lead to future rewards or satisfaction Offer followers something unique and valuable beyond what they’re experiencing 27 Path-Goal Theory © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-4 Subordinate Contingencies • Perceived ability – how much ability subordinates believe they have for doing their jobs well. • Locus of control – internals vs. externals • Experience 14-4 © 2015 Cengage Learning Environmental Contingencies • Task structure – the degree to which the requirements of a subordinate's tasks are clearly specified. • Formal authority system – an organization's set of procedures, rules, and policies. • Primary work group – refers to the amount of work-oriented participation or emotional support that is provided by an employee's immediate work group. © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-4 Leadership Styles • Directive – letting employees know precisely what is expected of them, giving them specific guidelines for performing tasks, scheduling work, setting standards of performance, and making sure that people follow standard rules and regulations. • Supportive – involves being friendly and approachable to employees, showing concern for them and their welfare, treating them as equals, and creating a friendly climate • Participative – consulting employees for their suggestions and input before making decisions. • Achievement-Oriented – means setting challenging goals, having high expectations of employees, and displaying confidence that employees will assume responsibility and put forth extraordinary effort. 31 Path-Goal Theory: When to Use Directive, Supportive, Participative, or Achievement-Oriented Leadership © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-4 Normative Decision Theory Helps leaders decide how much employee participation (from none to letting employees make the entire decision) should be used when making decisions. 14-5 © 2015 Cengage Learning Vroom-Yetton-Jago Model • Many people believe that making tough decisions is at the heart of leadership. • However, experienced leaders will tell you that deciding how to make decisions is just as important. • The normative decision theory helps leaders decide how much employee participation (from none to letting employees make the entire decision) should be used when making decisions. 34 Normative Theory, Decisions Styles, and Levels of Employee Participation © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-5 Decision Quality and Acceptance • Using the right amount of employee participation: – improves decision quality – improves acceptance • Decision trees helps leader identify optimal level of participation 36 Normative Theory Decision Rules © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-5 Normative Decision Theory Tree for Determining the Level of Participation in Decision Making © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-5 Visionary Leadership Creates a positive image of the future that motivates organizational members and provides direction for future planning and goal setting. Charismatic Leadership Transformational Leadership 14-6 © 2015 Cengage Learning Charismatic Leadership The behavioral tendencies and personal characteristics of leaders that create an exceptionally strong relationship with followers. •Articulate a clear vision for the future that is based on strongly held values or morals •Model those values by acting in a way consistent with the vision •Communicate high performance expectations to followers •Display confidence in followers’ abilities to achieve the vision © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-6 Charismatic Leadership • There are two kinds of charismatic leaders. – Ethical charismatics provide developmental opportunities for followers, are open to positive and negative feedback, recognize others’ contributions, share information, and have moral standards that emphasize the larger interests of the group, organization, or society. – Unethical charismatics control and manipulate followers, do what is best for themselves instead of their organizations, want to hear only positive feedback, share information that is only beneficial to themselves, and have moral standards that put their interests before everyone else’s. Ethical and Unethical Charismatics © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-6 Reducing Risks of Unethical Charismatics 1. Have a clearly written code of conduct 2. Recruit, select, and promote managers with high ethical standards 3. Train leaders how to value, seek, and used diverse points of view 4. Celebrate and reward those who exhibit ethical behaviors 43 Transformational Leadership Generates awareness and acceptance of a group’s purpose and mission and gets employees to see beyond their own needs and self interests for the good of the group. Make their followers believe that they are a vital part of the organization © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-6 Components of Transformational Leadership • Charismatic leadership or idealized influence – • Inspirational motivation – • motivate and inspire followers by providing meaning and challenge to their work. Intellectual stimulation – • act as role models for their followers. encourage followers to be creative and innovative, to question assumptions, and to look at problems and situations in new ways, even if they are different from the leader's ideas Individualized consideration – pay special attention to followers' individual needs by creating learning opportunities, accepting and tolerating individual differences, encouraging two-way communication and being a good listener. © 2015 Cengage Learning 14-6 Transactional Leadership • Based on an exchange process in which followers are rewarded for good performance and punished for poor performance. • When leaders administer rewards fairly and offer followers the rewards that they want, followers will often reciprocate with effort. 14-6 © 2015 Cengage Learning Transactional Leadership • The problem, however, is that transactional leaders often rely too heavily on discipline or threats to bring performance up to standards. • This might work in the short term, but it’s much less effective in the long run.