http://alhada-fisip11.web.unair.ac.id/ PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI MIKRO TENTANG FENOMENA KOMUNIKASI Nisa Kurnia I – Sosiologi Komunikasi 2012 Overview Micro approaches focused on person to person interaction. Overview Micro Perspectives Individu behavior as subject action, agent, agency Teori Pilihan Rasional Teori Pertukaran Perilaku (Homans) Teori Pertukaran Sosial (Peter Blau) Teori Dramaturgi Erving Goffman Teori Uses and Gratification Teori Pilihan Rasional Rational Choice Theory focused on individual behavior that based on rational choice Teori Pilihan Rasional Based on The Wealth of National by Adam Smith Individual act based on their personal interest Result in collectives profit Individual act based on preferences James S Coleman actor choose their acts based on maximized the usage for satisfying their needs. To intervene society = to intervene individual Based on utilitarianism philosophy very capitalistic Teori Pilihan Rasional Rational Act Theory, disadvantages: Unbalanced information received Rationality differences between individuals Not all “action” can be explained Rejects the existence of soul, instinct, emotional and irrational things Paying too much attention on the relationship between “micro” and “macro” Neglecting relationship between the macros Neglecting dialectics relationship Teori Pertukaran Perilaku (Homans) Functionalism preposition explanation about individual behavior Teori Pertukaran Perilaku (Homans) Skinnerian prepositions: Success preposition Repetition of the “success” Stimuli preposition Repeating advantage stimuli Value preposition Higher value tend to repeated Deprivation-Satiation Preposition Choosing another value Bless-Aggression Preposition Aggressive comes from unsatisfied self Teori Pertukaran Perilaku (Homans) Basic assumptions of Homan’s Theory: Based on elementary economic transaction principle Extrinsic and intrinsic profit Social structure as “exchange” arena Social exchange manifest on the tangible and intangible Individual roles on social system determination Society starts from group of individuals In group analysis, will find: Internal system External system Teori Pertukaran Sosial (Peter Blau) Based on collectivist structuralism thesis, focused on social property and structure Teori Pertukaran Sosial (Peter Blau) Blau’s Basic Assumption: Micro social reality can't be generalized Structure built from individual powerful dynamic process Adapt Perennial and counter adjustment: Dilemma, differentiation, dynamics and dialectical process. Micro structure built from interactions between individual Micro group can’t be controlled by social oblige Understanding how complex organization works Why people do association? Intrinsic and extrinsic needs Teori Pertukaran Sosial (Peter Blau) Blau’s Basic Assumption: Social structure built from individual behavior based on social exchange principles Social process change from simple to complex More complex group deliver power relation (neglect the social exchange principles) Power how individual coerce their will into another. Power, will this legitimized or resisted? Teori Pertukaran Sosial (Peter Blau) Blau’s “The Emergence Principle” group membership based on convention of values and norms as social transaction media. 4 Values functioned as social transaction media: Specific values as media of social cohession and solidarity Social stratification born from social achievement standard Values as collectives-legitimative function Opposition idea as reorganization and change medium. So, social complexity with collectives value will survive if... Teori Pertukaran Sosial (Peter Blau) Power Power born from individual contribution on collective values social stratification Authority rules society Authorative dilemma; between getting power and legitimacy Power legitimation determine by social values Is it general of specific? Teori Pertukaran Sosial (Peter Blau) 4 Types of Mediator Values Specific values function as social cohession and solidarity source General values as standard for social stratification Convention values as medium to reach goal Opposition ideas is mediu to reorganize and change 3 requirement for legitimized social complexity: Formal organized principles Socialization to the next generation Dominant grop must follow the values Teori Dramaturgi Erving Goffman Individu as actor, try to fullfil audience expectation. Teori Dramaturgi Erving Goffman Actor acts to adapt audience expectation Focused on “impression management” Based on simbolic interaction by Mead Actor technic to built and preserve particular impression on the audience Individual = Mind + Self Interaction will happen if actor can adapt to the audience expectation Identity built from this process Dramaturgical analogy Teori Dramaturgi Erving Goffman Social life area according to Goffman: stage being watched by audience Back stage actor built its impression Front Front stage = Setting + Front personal Front personal = Appereance+ Manner Front personal, following collective representation Audince also must know the rules of dramatical stage Teori Dramaturgi Erving Goffman Mystification technicques by actor By building social space Self as a result from dramatical influence built from dramatical interaction. Teori Uses and Gratification People choose media based on their needs and motives to reach gratification Teori Uses and Gratification Talking about what people do with media Audience actively finding and choosing media to fulfill their needs and wants Basic motives individual comes from their expectations of gratification Individual used media for many reason: Entertainment Giving information Selling Educationing Self actualitation Teori Uses and Gratification Expectancy Value Theory We expect therefor we choose the media Exposing self to media exposure in order to get the effects of gratification Media Dependency Theory: As world in chaos Fear appeal of the message People depend culturally on media http://alhadafisip11.web.unair.ac.id/