AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 8 – Courtroom Work Group and Criminal Trial Courtroom Work Group Courtroom professionals including… – – – – – Judge Prosecuting Attorney Defense Attorney Public Defender Other miscellaneous participants Each plays a particular role in overall administration of justice The Judge Elected or appointed public official who presides over a court of law and who is authorized to hear and sometimes to decide cases and to conduct trials The Roles of the Judge… – – – Rule on matters of law Decide guilt or innocence in bench trials Manage the court Judicial Discretion – Judge has the authority to make rulings based on laws and procedures The Prosecuting Attorney Attorney whose official duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on behalf of the State or the People against criminal defendants Roles of the Prosecutor… – – – Represent the People Act as quasi-legal advisor of local police Demonstrate guilt beyond a reasonable doubt Prosecutorial Discretion – Decision-making authority regarding how to handle individual cases The Defense Attorney Hired or appointed attorney who conducts legal defense of defendant and represents him or her before a court of law Roles of the Defense Counsel – – – Represent the accused Protect the Defendant’s rights File appeals Gideon vs. Wainwright (1963) – Extended right to counsel (Public Defender) to all indigent defendants The Bailiff Court officer whose duties are to keep order in the courtroom and to maintain physical custody of the jury Roles of the Bailiff – – – – – Act as court officer Ensure order Call witnesses Prevent the escape of the accused Supervise a sequestered jury Court Administrators, et al. Provide uniform court management – – – Court Reporter – Scheduling and record-keeping Personnel/budget administration Space-utilization and facilities planning Stenographer or recorder who creates record of all that occurs during a trial Clerk of the Court – Maintains all records in criminal cases Witnesses Subpoena – Lay witness – – – Written order requiring witness’s appearance in court Eyewitness, character witness, or other person called on to testify Not considered an expert Must testify to facts only, no opinions Expert witness – – Special knowledge and skills recognized by the court as relevant to determining guilt or innocence May express opinions/draw conclusions Jurors Members of a trial (or grand jury) who have been selected for jury duty and is required to serve as an arbiter of the facts in court Expected to render verdicts of “guilty” or “not guilty” – Trier of the Facts “Hung Jury” is the inability to give a verdict beyond a reasonable doubt The Victim Special type of witness Hardships of victimization – – – – – Uncertain as to their role Lack of knowledge regarding the legal system Trial delays that result in frequent travel, missed work, and wasted time Fear of retaliation Trauma of testifying and cross-examination The Defendant Defendants must be present at all stages of their trials – If initially present, the defendant may be voluntarily absent Defendants have choice in… – Counsel – Defense strategy – Information to divulge – Whether to testify – Whether to file an appeal The Press and Public The Sixth Amendment requires a public trial – – Press reports often create preconceived ideas, opinions, biases about a case Difficult to find impartial jurors Change of Venue – Movement from one jurisdiction to another to ensure a fair trial Nature and Purpose of the Criminal Trial Adversarial System – Prosecution vs. Defense In theory, justice is done when the most effective adversary is able to convince the judge or jury that his or her perspective on the case is the correct one Rules of Evidence – Govern the admissibility of evidence presented during trial Trial Initiation Sixth Amendment guarantees right to a speedy trial Speedy Trial Act (1974) – – Federal law requiring that criminal proceedings begin within specified period of time Applies only in federal courts, but some states have similar requirements Jury Selection Sixth Amendment guarantees trial by impartial jury Voir Dire – Process of questioning prospective jurors Challenges – For Cause – Specific reason Peremptory Attorney does not have to disclose reason Trial Proceedings Opening Statements – – – Initial statement of Prosecution or Defense describing the facts to be presented to prove the case Evidence is not offered Defense may focus on Prosecutor’s burden-ofproof requirement Presentation of Evidence – – Anything offered to prove/disprove disputed fact Assist judge/jury make decision in a case Types of Evidence Real Evidence – Direct Evidence – – If believed by jury, directly proves a fact Eyewitness accounts, videotaped documentation Circumstantial Evidence – Physical objects, materials, traces of physical activity Requires interpretation or inference to reach factual conclusion Probative Value – The degree to which evidence is useful in proving a disputed fact Witness Testimony Testimony – Oral evidence offered by a sworn witness on the witness stand during a criminal trial Perjury – Under oath or affirmation Unlawful, intentional lying under oath or affirmation to give truthful testimony on a relevant matter Special concerns for children as witnesses? The Hearsay Rule Hearsay – – Testimony that is not based on the personal knowledge of a witness Cannot be used in American courtrooms Exceptions include… – – Spontaneous Statements Dying Declarations Closing Arguments Closing argument = Oral summation of a case presented by the Prosecution or Defense in a criminal trial Provides a review and analysis of the evidence Final attempt to persuade the jury to draw a conclusion favorable to the presenter The Judge’s Instructions to the Jury The judge charges the jury to retire and reach a verdict The judge instructs the jury regarding… – – – – Objectivity Statutory elements of the charges Burden of proof “Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” Jury Deliberation and the Verdict Deliberation – Process of evaluating evidence presented at trial in order to reach a decision Verdict – – The decision of the jury in a jury trial or of a judge in a non-jury trial If verdict is “guilty”, sentencing will generally take place at a separate hearing