Key Issues Location II 8.1 Elements of risk Quantitative methods of location analysis Buying Power Index Index of Retail Saturation Market expansion potential Gravity models: Reilly, Huff Regression as used in trade area analysis Selecting a Retail Site The Expansion Stage Use real estate firms, local personnel, etc. to identify a large number of possible sites The Qualitative Stage Use checklists or examine performance of analogous stores to screen possible sites for the best sites The Quantitative Stage Use quantitative modeling to further screen the likely sites by generating forecasted potentials for each site The Decision Stage Make a site selection decision based on the results of both the quantitative qualitative assessments Location II 8.2 Location Analysis Regional Analysis Area Analysis Site Analysis Location II 8.3 Information Minimizes Risk Risk Criteria Location II 8.4 Factors Affecting Interest in a Region or Trade Area Source: Levy & Weitz Location II 8.5 Methods: The “Quantitative” Stage • Measuring Demand • Decennial Census of the U.S. • Buying Power Index (BPI) • Private Firms • Issues Affecting Competition • Index of Retail Saturation • Market Expansion Potential • Private Firms • Measuring Trade Areas • Analog (similar store) Approach • Customer Spotting (trade-area mapping) • Gravity Models • Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation • Converse’s Breaking Point Model • Huff’s Model of Intermarket Attraction • Multiple Regression Analysis Location II 8.6 Decennial Census Data Complete Count Data Items Location II 8.7 Population Items Housing Items Relationship to household head Color or race Age Sex Marital status Typical Sampled Data Items Population Items State or country of birth Years of schooling Number of children Employment status Hours worked last week, year Last year in which worked Occupation Income, by type Country of birth & of parents Mother tongue Year moved into this house Means of transportation . Number of units at this address Telephone Private entrance to living quarters Complete kitchen facilities Rooms Water supply Flush toilet Bathtub or shower Basement Tenure (owner/renter) Property Value Contract rent Vacancy status Months vacant . Source: The Census and You, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Measuring Demand BPI: Buying Power Index Retail demand in an area as a % of total retail demand in the U.S. BPI = (.5 x Income) + (.3 x Sales) + (.2 x Population) Salt Lake City San Diego New York City BPI .471 .935 3.345 Decennial Census of the U.S. SMSA: Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area “a central city of 50,000+ population, the counties in which it is located, and other contiguous metropolitan counties that are economically and socially integrated with the central city” Private Firms Urban Decision Systems Map Objects (W3) Microvision Zip Code System Claritas Corporation’s PRIZM database Location II 8.8 Issues Affecting Competition: Index of Retail Saturation Shows the relationship between demand and supply for a store type -- the average retail spending per square foot of selling space IRS = population of area x per capita retail spending retail selling space (in sq. feet) Or just … IRS = area retail spending retail selling space Location II 8.9 Issues Affecting Competition: Index of Retail Saturation IRS = area retail spending retail selling space E.g., in Utah Valley (2000): Population = 358,000 Annual per capita retail spending = $10,377 IRS = 358,000 x $10,377 = $ X Location II 8.10 ??? Utah Valley Retail Selling Space Provo CBD University Mall Provo Towne Centre Shops at Riverwoods Carillon Square American Fork CBD Parkway Village Pason CBD Provo Big Lots Strip Mall Orem Center Street Springville CBD Pleasant Grove CBD Lehi CBD Brigham’s Landing East Bay Riverside Shopping Center Am Fork Shopping Center Northgate Shopping Center Park Place Macey’s Orem Timp Plaza University Festival Mall Expressway Square Edgemont Center North Park Shopping Center TOTAL Location II 8.11 1,400,000 1,260,000 950,000 190,000 525,000 320,000 443,000 360,000 100,000 260,000 175,000 120,000 100,000 120,000 300,000 250,000 115,000 110,000 220,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 85,000 40,000 125,000 8,013,000 IRS = 358,000 x $10,377 8,013,000 = $464 Interpretation? This number is too low Source: Colliers & Clarke, Provo, 2002; Utah Valley Economic Development, Provo/Orem Chamber of Commerce Issues Affecting Competition: Market Expansion Potential MEP - indicates an area’s potential for creating new demand MEP = Expected Sales Actual Sales Location II 8.12 Measuring Trade Areas: Analog Approach Information about customers, competition, and sales of current similar stores are used to predict sales of a new store or center. Steps: 1. Determine trade area for successful stores (customer spotting) 2. Characterize their primary, secondary, fringe trade areas 3. Match the characteristics of these stores with potential new store locations to determine the best site Store Location Successful Store Location II 8.13 Average Household Income WhiteCollar Occup. % of Residents Age 45+ Predominant PRIZM Profile Level of Competition Optics City $ 99,999 High 38% Blue Blood Est. Low Site A Site B Site C Site D High Low High High 25 80 30 50 Young Suburbia Gray Power Young Literati Money & Brains Medium Low Low Medium 60,000 70,000 100,000 120,000 Measuring Trade Areas Gravity Models Location II 8.14 Gravity Models: Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation Breaking Point Dist(B) Dist(A) A B At what point between A & B will shoppers go to A? B? A Provo pop’n = 358K Location II 8.15 45 miles B Salt Lake pop’n = 1275K Gravity Models A B C Site Possibility D Competitors How could we use a Gravity modeling approach here? Location II 8.16 Gravity Models: Huff’s Intramarket Area Model Prob(shoppingj) = f(selling spacej, travel timeij) Based on the premise that the probability that a given customer will shop in a particular store or shopping center becomes larger as the size of store or center grows and distance or travel time from customer shrinks Sq feet of selling space in j Probability that consumer living in area i will shop at store j Travel time from i to j Relative Attractiveness of store j Sq ft of selling space in other stores in trade area Total Attractiveness of other stores Travel time from i to other stores in trade area Location II 8.17 Gravity Models: Huff’s Intramarket Area Model Sq feet of selling space in j S1 P(Cij) = (Ti1) n j=1 Sj (Tij) Probability that consumer living in area i will shop at store j Travel time from i to j Relative Attractiveness of store j Sq ft of selling space in other stores in trade area Total Attractiveness of other stores Travel time from i to other stores in trade area where: P(Cij) = probability that consumer C living in area i will visit shopping center j Sj = square footage of selling space in j devoted to a particular class of merchandise Tij = travel time from area i to shopping center j = an estimated parameter to reflect the effect of travel time on various kinds of shopping trips (larger reflects greater weight for travel time) Location II 8.18 Gravity Models: Huff’s Intramarket Area Model University Mall 2 mi Riverwoods Shopping Center 3 mi Location II 8.19 4 mi i where: S1 = 10,000 square feet S2 = 15,000 square feet S3 = 20,000 square feet Ti1 = 2 miles Ti2 = 3 miles Ti3 = 4 miles = 2 Provo Town Centre thus: 10,000 P(Ci1) = 22 = .46 10,000 + 15,000 + 20,000 22 32 42 Interpretation? Regression Analysis Approaches Can use data from current successful stores to predict the probability of success for stores were they placed on sites being considered. E.g., predicted sales on site A = f(visibility of store from street, no. of competitors in trade area, population density in trade area, average age in trade area, average income in trade area, number cars per hour past site, etc.) Location II 8.20 Regression Fundamentals R2 = variance in Y explained by X Equation for a line? Y = a + bX … a? b? a = intercept … point where line crosses Y axis b = slope … Y / X Interpret: Y-axis e.g., sales Y = 1 + .5X Y = 1 + 1X 5 4 3 2 1 X-axis 1 Location II 8.21 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 e.g., population Regression Example from Branch-Bank Performance Model Variable Regression Coefficient t-value Cumulative R2 1.271 0.237 - 8.689 3.26 3.36 1.37 .55 .72 .79 0.002 0.038 -1.197 6.25 3.93 2.00 .57 .77 .81 CD: Checking deposits ($1,000): HI: Median household income ($l00) SF: Retail square footage (1,000) C: # of competing banks' branches SD: Savings deposits ($1,000): PP: Purchasing power ($1,000) EL: Employment level RH: Percentage of renter housing Location II 8.22 Regression Example Annual Sales for 10 Home Improvement Centers Store Yearly Sales ($000) 0 to 3-Mile Radius Population 1 $ 402 54,000 2 367 29,500 3 429 49,000 4 252 22,400 5 185 18,600 6 505 61,100 7 510 49,000 8 330 33,200 9 210 26,400 10 655 83,200 Source: John S. Thompson, Site Selection (New York: Lebar-Friedman), p. 133. Location II 8.23 10 Home Improvement Centers 800 -700 -- Sales ($000) 600 -- 10 7 500 -- 3 400 -366 -- 2 4 300 -- 9 200 -100 -- 8 6 Change in sales = slope = 0.007 Change in population 1 Change in sales Change in population 5 90.97 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Population (000) What is the regression equation? Location II 8.24 Critiquing a Multiple Regression Equation Is the equation complete on all important variables? Do the signs of the independent variables make sense? Is there logical reason to expect that the performance of a store is related to the independent variables? Are the regression forecasts kept within the range of the input data? Location II 8.25 Interpretation? Suppose Media Play has developed a regression equation to identify attractive retail trade areas and sites, based on a study of 100 of its stores having from $450,000 to $1 million in sales. Forecasted Annual Sales (in $000) = 200 + 8.4HHI + 1.2TC - 11.3CR where, HHI = mean trade-area household income (in $000) TC = average no. of cars per minute driving past the site CR = # competing retailers within a mile of site For an increase of ... $1000 in mean household income 50 cars per minute 1 retailer in the trade area Location II 8.26 Sales forecast will change by _________ _________ _________ Problems with this Equation? Forecasted Annual Sales (in $000) = 200 + 8.4HHI + 1.2TC - 11.3CR where, HHI = mean trade-area household income (in $000) TC = average no. of cars per minute driving past the site CR = # competing retailers within a mile of site Is the equation complete on all important variables? Do the signs of the independent variables make sense? Is there logical reason to expect that the performance of a store is related to the independent variables? Are the regression forecasts kept within the range of the input data? Location II 8.27 Multiple Regression Procedure 1. Select a group of existing stores 2. Identify a dependent variable (e.g., revenues) 3. Select a set of independent variables logically related to the dependent variable 4. Collect data on all variables for both existing stores (including revenues) and the proposed sites (no revenues of course) 5. Enter the data & develop the a regression equation 6. Use equation to forecast sales or share for the proposed sites 7. Focus further attention on sites having highest forecasts Location II 8.28 Regression Example: Hogi Yogi Method: 20 Hogi Yogi stores were initially analyzed by means of 70 variables per store, along with sales data. No. competitors: No. of frozen yogurt competitors within 1-mile radius Visibility: A subjective 1-7 index rating based on how visible the store is within the shopping center or on the street Data was examined for (1) the first 4 months of a store’s opening and (2) the first year of sales. Clustering: The degree to which the store is clustered with other restaurants (0 to 3) Using stepwise regression, all 70 were examined, to develop two equations: RGI: Secondary data on Restaurant Growth Index (which shows the relationship between restaurant supply & demand, by market, with average = 100 1. Initial 4-month sales upon opening a new store. 2. Sustained sales during the first year of operation University: Whether there is a university within 1 mile (0=no, 1=yes) Local owner: Whether the owner lives near the restaurant (0=no, 1=yes) Source: BYU Site selection study for Hogi Yogi, 1995 Location II 8.29 Regression Example: Hogi Yogi $ Sales during the first four months = -$262984 + No. competitors (-$31330) + Visibility ($13297) + Clustering ($27566) + 3-mile/capita income ($6.69)+ Size in sq ft ($56.7) + RGI ($1382) + University ($27521) + Local owner ($21422) Predicted Sales Source: BYU Site selection study for Hogi Yogi, 1995 Location II 8.30