Forensic Science

advertisement

Forensic Science

An Introduction to Scientific and

Investigative Techniques

Stuart H. James and Jon J. Nordby

Chapter 29

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition 1#

Chapter 29

Forensic

Psychiatry

Chapter Author: Robert L. Sadoff

Presentation created by Greg Galardi, Peru, Nebraska

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 2

Forensic Psychiatry

Is a subspecialty of psychiatry that deals with people who are involved in legal matters, either criminal or civil

Primarily assessment and evaluation of individuals, rather than the treatment of psychiatric patients

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 3

History of Forensic Psychiatry

Treatise of Medical Jurisprudence of

Insanity, published in Boston, Mass. in

1838 by Isaac Ray

Psychiatrists more involved in commitment procedures, changes in patient rights, and protecting the public through Tarasoff(1973) rulings in various states

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 4

Scope of Forensic Psychiatry

• Field of forensic psychiatry may be divided into three major subgroupings:

• Criminal forensic psychiatry

• Civil forensic psychiatry

• Administrative forensic psychiatry

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 5

Assessment of Competency

In general, forensic psychiatrist is called upon to assess an individual’s mental state in one of three ways:

Past – legal insanity or testamentary capacity

Present – competency to stand trial

Future – Prediction of dangerousness

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 6

Phases of Criminal Procedure

• Three phases of criminal procedure:

• Pretrial phase

• Trial phase

• Post trial Phase

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 7

Competency to Stand Trial

To be found competent to stand trial, a defendant must be free of mental illness that impacts his or her ability to know what is happening in the case

The Dusky case (1960) insists a defendant must have a rational as well as factual understanding of the case against him

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 8

Competency to Stand Trial

Jackson v. Indiana (1972) – defendant committed to a civil hospital after charges were suspended and case treated as civil rather than criminal

After a period of time, psychiatrist may be asked by court to give an opinion about whether defendant is competent to stand trial

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 9

Legal Insanity

Most states follow McNaughten (1843) rule from England to determine sanity

McNaughten rule is cognitive test of insanity

Model Penal Code of the American Law

Institute was used by Judge Bazelon in

Brawner case (1972)

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 10

Legal Insanity

• Model Penal Code of the American Law

Institute states:

“A person would be found not guilty by reason of insanity if at the time of the commission of the crime the person lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of their behavior or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.”

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 11

Legal Insanity

• Model Penal Code of the American Law

Institute has three elements:

Cognitive

Cognative – emotional

• Volitional

This test was used in Hinckley case in

1982 that led to John W. Hinckley being found not guilty by reason of insanity

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 12

Legal Insanity

• In 1984, Congress changed the law for

Federal jurisdiction in 1984, adopting the Omnibus Crime Code for Insanity, which stated the person would not be found guilty by reason of insanity if at the time of the commission of the crime the defendant could not appreciate the criminality of his behavior

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 13

Legal Insanity

Some states have adopted the “guilty but mentally ill” concept

• Pennsylvania and 13 states have adopted this concept

Plea is “guilty but mentally ill” instead of “not guilty by reason of insanity”

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 14

Diminished Capacity

• Generally acknowledged as an individual at time of commission of the alleged offense having a diminished ability to meet all criteria for the charges against that person, or person was not able to form the specific intent to kill, thus could not act in a knowing and purposeful manner

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 15

Posttrial Sentencing

Forensic psychiatrist may be called upon to give opinions about sentencing for particular individual who may require psychiatric hospitalization

For death penalty cases, psychiatrist may be called upon as to whether or not defendant is competent to be sentenced to death

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 16

Cases Requiring Forensic

Psychiatrist Testimony

Forensic psychiatrist may need to assess the role of alcohol, medication or legal drugs on defendant at time of commission of the crime

Issue of repressed or recovered memory may be assessed by psychiatrist

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 17

Cases Requiring Forensic

Psychiatrist Testimony

• In domestic relations crimes, psychiatrists may be called upon to discuss “syndrome diagnoses” such as rape trauma or battered spouse syndrome

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 18

Examination and Report of

Findings

• Forensic psychiatrist must have all data available for report. Data may include:

• Records of treatment, police reports, videotaped interviews, psychological tests, physical tests (MRI, x-ray, bloodwork, etc) and interviews with family, friends and witnesses

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 19

Examination and Report of

Findings

Forensic psychiatrist should work closely with attorney to review data and explain opinions rendered

Cross examination and weaknesses of case must be examined

All available data should be included in forensic psychiatrist’s report

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 20

Testifying in Court

When testifying in court, forensic psychiatrist gives all information prepared in advance during direct examination

Cross examination should not surprise forensic psychiatrist

Question often is whether mental illness rises to level of insanity

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 21

Training in Forensic Psychiatry

In 1968, American Academy of

Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) formed

Board certification started in the 1970s and currently is done by the American

Psychiatric Association and American

Board of Psychiatry and Neurology assumed the function

Over 25 accredited programs in United

States

CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition Chapter 29 22

Download