MINING CHARTER PRESENTATION
TO PARLIAMENT.
PETRA QUARRY, BLOEMFONTEIN
APRIL 2013
OWNERSHIP
• 100% of Petra Quarry Pty Ltd is owned by:
• Inzalo Crushing and Aggregates Pty Ltd
• 74% of Inzalo Crushing and Aggregates Pty Ltd
is owned by Raumix Aggregates Pty Ltd, and..
• 26% of Inzalo Crushing and Aggregates is
owned by Vishal Chaggan
OWNERSHIP
RAUBEX GROUP LIMITED
BEE TRUSTS
26%
RAUMIX AGGREGATES 74%
INZALO CRUSHING AND AGGREGATES
OWNERSHIP
INZALO CRUSHING AND AGGREGATES
• Owns 100% of :
PETRA QUARRY Pty Ltd.
• License entity
SHARE CERTIFICATE
SHARE CERTIFICATE
DIRECTORS OF PETRA QUARRY Pty Ltd
•
•
•
•
•
Una Adonis (HDSA)
Freddie Kenny (HDSA)
Robert Shedlock
Tobie Wiese
Chester Aldridge
PROCUREMENT: CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
• Target for 2012 is 20% to be spent with BEE
Entities
• Total Capital spend R209 657.00
• Non discretionary spend: R 0.00
• Discretionary spend R209 657.00
• Spend with BEE entities: R209 657.00
• % spend with BEE Entities 100%
PROCUREMENT: SERVICES
• Target for 2012 is 50% to be spent with BEE
Entities
• Total service spend: R6 697 500
• Non discretionary service spend: R2 813 484
• Discretionary spend: R3 884 016
• Spend with BEE entities: R 1 882 572
• % spend with BEE entities 48%
PROCUREMENT: CONSUMABLES
• Target for 2012 is 25% to be spent with BEE
Entities
• Total consumables spend: R13 020 366
• Non discretionary service spend: R0
• Discretionary spend: R13 020 366
• Spend with BEE entities: R3 667 765
• % spend with BEE entities 28%
PROCUREMENT WITH SMME’s
• Sun Hygiene Services cc : R15 500 per annum
• Valashiya Transport : R66 000 per annum
• BEE entities paid on presentation of invoice
not 30 days after invoice
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY (percentage
HDSA at different levels)
Category
Top management
African
Male
Female
Coloured
Indian
White Subtotals White
Male Female Male Female Female (A) Male
1
1
Senior management
2
1
Middle Management
1
Junior Management
2
Core & Critical Skills (1)
11
Total of the above
14
1
0
2
0
0
5
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
Grand
totals (B)
3
14
3
21
2
5
14
5
26
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY (%HDSA at
different levels)
Subtotals as Grand totals A as
in table as in table percenta
above (A) above (B) ge of B 2010
Top management
TARGET
Points (office use only)
2011
2012
2013
Awarded
2014 Maximum (2)
2
5
40.00
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
3
Senior management
1
1
100.00
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
4
Middle Management
1
1
100.00
30%
35%
40%
40%
40%
3
Junior Management
3
5
60.00
40%
40%
40%
40%
40%
1
Core and Critical Skills
14
14
100.00
15%
20%
30%
35%
40%
5
TOTAL
21
26
400
16
0
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
(total HRD expenditure)
Expenditure items
a) Learnership
b) Artisans and apprentices
African
Coloured
Indian
White
Total
Male
Female Male Female Male
Female Female
149089
149089
80716
49805
130521
c) ABET Training
49208
d) Other training initiatives
24055
3402
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
303068
3402
49805
0
0
0
0
356275
e) Bursaries and scholarships
49208
27457
f) Transfer of skills and capacity building of mine
communities
g) Other school support & post matric
programmes
h) Support for South African based research
and development initiatives
i) Total HRD expenditure (R million) (A)
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
(as a % of payroll)
• Total HRD expenditure: R 356 275
• Total annual HDSA payroll: 4 197 811
• HRD expenditure as a percentage of HDSA
payroll: 356 275 / 4 197 811 = 11.9 %
• Total HDSA headcount is 39 persons out of a
total of 47 persons
Learnerships / ABET 2012/13
• 2 Mech. Eng Students completed practical left
us the end of February 2013 (all HDSA)
• 3 apprentices during 2012 (all HDSA)
• ABET training: 7 persons
MINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
a) Did the company consider the profiles of relevant communities, and identify
credible leaders of the communities?
b) Did the company consult with such leaders prior to the implementation of
projects?
c) Did the company consult with the leaders to identify projects within the needs
analysis and prioritise such projects?
d) Did the company consult with the relevant Ward/Municipality to determine
possibility of partnerships in respect of identified projects and the
Ward/Municipality's Integrated Development Plan (IDP)?
e) Has provision been made for the transfer of skills and capacity building within
the relevant community?
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
HEALTH AND SAFETY REPORT
• Number of persons on OHS rep. training : 4
training done on 8/3/12 valid for 2 years. This
represents 8.5% of workforce
• All mandatory reports submitted: i.e. annual
medicals, hygiene reports, personal exposure,
personal noise exposure, thermal stress.
• Adherence to HIV/AIDS and TB guidelines: 8
persons for HIV awareness 12/2/13. This
represents 17% of the workforce
HEALTH & SAFETY AUDIT (ASPASA)
• Conducted every year at each operation
• 85.1 % achieved on 23/7/2012
• ASPASA conducts its audits according to
OHSAS 18001. 2007 standards
ASPASA H&S AUDIT
ASPASA ISHE AUDIT
Premises:
Raumix Petra Quarry
Audit Date:
Audited by:
2012/07/23
M Z Van Deventer
INITIAL
POSSIBLE
POINTS
4.1
General Requirements
4.2
OH Policy
4.3.1
Hazard Risk Assessment
4.3.2
Legal Requirement
4.3.3
Objectives & Targets
4.4.1
Structure & Responsibility
4.4.2
Training
4.4.3
Consultation & Comunication
4.4.4 /4.4.5 Documentation & Document Control
4.4.6
Operational Control
4.4.7
Emergency Response
17
15
13
11
9
7
4.5.1 /4.5.2 Performance Measurement
4.5.3
Non-Conformance Control
4.5.4
Records Management
4.5.5
Auditing
4.6
Management Review
OVERALL COMPLIANCE SCORE =
5
3
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MINUS NOT
POINTS
APPLICABLE POINTS AWARDED
SCORE
16
0
16
100.00
51
0
51
100.00
311
14
201
73.26
82
21
53
91.21
62
0
62
100.00
106
12
75
79.79
132
0
128
96.97
109
37
64
88.89
508
19
387
79.14
1139
125
902
88.95
89
12
62
80.52
115
20
92
96.84
110
80
25
83.33
14
0
14
100.00
110
0
91
82.73
50
0
46
92.00
3004
340
2269
85.17
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEASURE
REQUIREMENTS
Item to consider:
a) Is the company in compliance with the
requirements of MPRDA Regulation 55 on
Monitoring and Performance Assessments of
Environmental Management Programme/Plan
8.1.1 Assess performance
towards achievement of the
objectives, targets and Actions of
b) If the company received feedback from DMR in
the EMP.
relation to compliance to regulation 55, has the
company acted thereon?
Are all mining activities and related activities
8.1.2
Monitor
and
Evaluate
8.1 Implementation of
included in the existing approved EMP's and
environmental changes and
approved EMPs
Amendments in terms of the MPRDA?
update the EMP
Have compliance audits been conducted (e.g. ISO
8.1.3 Undertake environmental
140001)?
compliance auditing
a) Are all closure liability assessments done for all
operations?
8.1.4 Periodic Assessment of the
b) Is the closure liability adequately funded as per
adequacy of Financial Provision
the prescribed method of financial provision in
terms of the MPRDA
8.2 Implementation of Progress towards
implementation of the
the approved
rehabilitation plan and concurrent
Rehabilitation plan
rehabilitation
8.3 Implementation of Progress towards
approved Closure
implementation of the closure
plan
Plan
Yes/No
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Are all operations with EMP commitments towards
concurrent rehabilitation, up to date with the
rehabilitation process?
yes
Have closure plans been developed, taking into
consideration sustainable closure?
yes
GUARANTEE R4.18m
ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT
ENVIRONMENTAL
• Environmental performance assessment date
was March 2012, report submitted to DMR
• Every month Greenmined Environmental
Management conducts an environmental
control report for Petra Quarry
• ASPASA Audit is done every second year, last
audit was done 26/3/2012
THANK YOU