1. 2. 3. 4. Theoretical Approaches Modalities of Qualitative Research Sampling Methods Software Packages Qualitative research seeks to gain a comprehensive and holistic view of social life through the study of people in a wide range of natural settings. It is used to capture expressive information not conveyed in quantitative data about beliefs, values, feelings, and motivations that underlie behaviors. 1. How can you gather good data? 2. What should you do with the data? Grounded Theory: Theory that emerges from data Superimposed Theory: Start with theory & determine if the data support your theory Observational Studies ◦ Unstructured data collection ◦ Structured data collection Categorizing phenomena Checklists Rating scales Interviews central to the relevant group or process ◦ Focus groups ◦ Key Informants ◦ Critical incident reports Case study evaluation Qualitative Techniques Recording and analysis of key interactions Attention to data validity Attention to data reliability – Audiotape or videotape – Triangulation: collection from independent sources using differing means – Feedback from study participants – Thorough examination of outlying cases – Detailed documentation of analysis – Parallel review by independent investigators Researchers thoughtful reflections Researchers analyze the data based on themes Statistical packages 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Advantages Organize data Store data Easy to retrieve data Frequency count of words Easier to examine relationship between data 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Disadvantages Slow down analysis phase Stifle creativity Doesn’t do thinking for you Researcher is part of the analysis Loose context Don’t know what was said before, Can include more information as you input the data Qualitative method serves as an input to a primarily quantitative study Can generate hypotheses, develop content for questionnaires & interventions Example: You are uncertain about how to communicate with a particular group, so you conduct focus groups to develop the content for a survey or intervention Source: David Morgan (1999) Quantitative method serves as an input to a primarily qualitative study Can guide purposive sampling, establish preliminary results to pursue in depth Example: You are unsure which groups have the characteristics you are interested in, so you conduct a brief survey, prior to selecting the groups you will study in depth Source: David Morgan (1999) Qualitative method serves as an extension to a primarily quantitative study Can provide interpretations for poorly understood results, help explain outliers Example: You want to understand more about why the results of a survey or intervention came out the way they did, so you run focus groups to help interpret the results Source: David Morgan (1999) Quantitative method serves as an extension to a primarily qualitative study Can generalize results to different samples, test elements of emergent theories Example: You want to determine where else the conclusions from a case study are likely to apply, so you use a brief survey to determine the characteristics of other sites Source: David Morgan (1999) Researchers frequent immersion in the dayto-day lives of their subjects make some qualitative studies susceptible to measurement bias Researcher is not detached or unbiased Full disclosure has been suggested as a way to deal with bias Minimize bias in other ways Systematic description of the nature of the data collection methods to be used Presentation of a clear and convincing rationale why qualitative approaches are not only appropriate for addressing the research questions at hand but why they are the most likely to produce useful findings Source: Qualitative Methods In Health Research, Office of Behavioral & Social Sciences Research, NIH Focused discussion of the universe studied and the sample recruited for qualitative assessment (including accounting for the relationship between the sample to the universe, by using a clearly described sampling plan) Specification of the timeframes that bound data collection (e.g., observations designed to sample variation across hours of the day, days of the week, and weeks of the year Source: Qualitative Methods In Health Research, Office of Behavioral & Social Sciences Research, NIH Careful presentation of the nature of the data to be collected An orderly account of the analytic procedures to be performed, including specification of how findings can be interpreted Source: Qualitative Methods In Health Research, Office of Behavioral & Social Sciences Research, NIH Daly, Kerry. The Fit Between Qualitative Research and Characteristics of Families. In Jane Gilgun, Kerry Daly, and Gerald Handel (Eds), Qualitative Methods in Family Research (pp.3-11). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992. Emerson, Robert, Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. “In the Field: Participating, Observing and Jotting.” In Emerson et al., Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (pp. 17-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. Gold, Seven. “Ethical Issues in Visual Field Work.” In Grant Blank, James McCartney and Edward Brent (Eds.) New Technologies in Sociology (pp. 99-109). New Brunswick, New Jersy: Transaction, 1989. Harrell-Bond, Barabra. “Studying Elites: Some Special Problems.” In Michael Rynkiewich and James Spradley, Ethics and Anthropology (pp. 110-122). New York: Wiley, 1976. Lofland, John and Lyn Lofland. “Data Logging in Observation: Fieldnotes.” In John Lofland and Lynland, Analyzing Social Settings (pp. 89098). Albany, New York: Wadsworth, 1995. Morgan, David. “Planning and Research Design for Focus Groups.” In David Morgan, Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (pp. 31-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1997. Weiss, Robert. “Writing the Report.” In Robert Weiss, Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies (pp. 183-206). New York: Free Press, 1994.