Midland ISD 165901 Curriculum Development: Curriculum Management Plan (Board REGULATION) Midland Independent School District Curriculum and Instruction Curriculum Management Plan Design, Delivery, and Evaluation Vision Statement “Midland ISD will educate the future by maximizing the potential of every student.” School Board Goals Page 1 · MISD will support high academic standards. · MISD will uniformly use effective instructional strategies. · MISD will recruit, develop, and support highly motivated staff members who maximize student success. · MISD will prepare technologically advanced students. · MISD will provide facilities that support exemplary learning environments. · MISD will fully develop positive partnerships with Midland’s community and business organizations. · MISD will exercise fiscal responsibility. Updated 5/30/13 Midland ISD Curriculum Management Plan I. District Philosophy and Definition of Standards-Based Curriculum II. Standards-Based Curriculum Components and Definitions A. The Written Standards-Based Curriculum B. The Taught Standards-Based Curriculum C. The Assessed Standards-Based Curriculum III. Professional Development to Support Standards-Based Curriculum Design and Delivery for: A. Teachers B. Campus Administrators C. District Administrators VI. VII. Roles and Responsibilities Regarding Standards-Based Curriculum Management Glossary Appendices A. District Professional Development B. MISD Curricula a. ELAR/SLAR ESL b. Math c. Science d. Social Studies e. Advanced Academics C. Planning a Lesson C. Formative Assessments D. Analysis of a Lesson 2 V. Communication Plan for Design and Delivery of the Standards-Based Curriculum Page IV. Updated 5/30/13 Overview The purpose of the Midland Independent School District (MISD) Curriculum Management Plan is to coordinate improvement efforts in the development and implementation of the district’s standardsbased curriculum. The plan outlines the expectations and procedures regarding the written standardsbased curriculum (scope and sequence), the taught standards-based curriculum (resources and instruction), and the assessed standards-based curriculum (assessments) in accordance with Board policy. In accordance with EFA LOCAL, the superintendent or designee will design and deliver a challenging, standards-based curriculum that meets the needs of a diverse student population and is aligned from school to school and from classroom to classroom. I. District Philosophy and Definition of Standards-Based Curriculum The purpose of education is to impart the knowledge, concepts, processes, and attitudes necessary for all students to be successful in society. This includes the preparation necessary to develop critical thinking, creativity, innovation, and college and career readiness skills. Philosophy MISD will provide a learning environment where the students will acquire skills necessary to lead productive lives in a society that is rapidly changing. Through an educational program based on equity and excellence, MISD will ensure that all students have the opportunity to develop competency in the areas of: Academics: reading, writing, math, science, social studies, technology applications, other languages, and college and career preparation Human Relations: responsibility, respect for others, honesty, and communication Definition Standards-based curriculum in MISD is defined as the knowledge, skills, and processes to be taught and learned at the appropriate levels and/or courses. The curricula specify the content of the student expectations. Standards-based curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation shall include the following aligned components: the written, the taught, and the assessed curriculum. MISD campus/district administrators will monitor the curriculum to ensure the standards are being taught according to the instructional unit and specificity of the TEKS. TEKS Aligned Curriculum Written Curriculum 3 Assessed Curriculum Page Taught Curriculum Updated 5/30/13 II. Standards-Based Curriculum Components and Definitions M IS D ’s purpose and vision is based upon the following common definitions and principles about standards-based curriculum design and its implementation: Standards-Based Curriculum Alignment Alignment is the agreement and degree to which the written, taught, and assessed curricula are correlated. Research supports that adherence to a tightly aligned curriculum will result in higher student achievement. Standards-based curriculum principles are to be translated in documents, instructional practices, and student assessments through the development of an aligned written, taught, and assessed system. Standards-Based Curriculum Effectiveness Standards-based curriculum effectiveness is determined by the use of a variety of measures. These measures include indications of student mastery of the skills necessary to advance to the next grade/course and to prepare for college and career. The Written Standards-Based Curriculum Written standards-based curriculum is defined as those standards, goals, and objectives that students are to achieve while in school. The written standards-based curriculum is in alignment with the taught and assessed curricula. MISD expects adherence to the aligned, articulated curricula that promote continuity and cumulative acquisition of skills and knowledge from grade to grade and from school to school. The focus of the standards-based curriculum shall ensure: Emphasis on reading at grade level Mastery of basic skills of writing and mathematics Inclusion of objectives from state and national standards Page 4 Distribution of the Written Standards-Based Curriculum The written standards-based curriculum scope and sequence is p ro vi d ed for all grade levels. After subject-area curricula development is completed, curricula will be disseminated as follows: Curricula originals will be stored electronically Standards-based curriculum information will be available to the public Principals and teachers will have access to the standards-based curriculum scope and sequence Updated 5/30/13 The Taught Standards-based Curriculum The teaching of the standards-based curriculum shall be aligned with the written and assessed curriculum. The alignment of these three components of the curriculum is essential to bring about a high degree of consistency. The taught curriculum refers to instruction. Instruction is the process by which teachers plan, organize, and deliver the written curriculum, utilizing best practice strategies. Teachers are required to differentiate instruction as needed. Effective Instruction includes: Establishing a school climate that continually affirms the worth and diversity of all students Expecting that all students perform at high levels of cognition Ensuring that all students experience opportunities for personal success Varying the time for learning according to the needs of each student and the complexity of the task Having staff members take responsibility for successful learning Analyzing the content of each standard so that instructional strategies match content and assessment Sequencing tasks into a hierarchy of learning skills to maximize the effectiveness of instructional delivery Assessing student mastery of the standards to adjust instruction as needed to extend, enrich, or differentiate instruction Embedding technology tools into all aspects of the standards-based curriculum The Monitored Standards-based Curriculum The standards-based curriculum serves as the road map for instruction. It is a tool for creating high quality student learning opportunities. It requires a dynamic, on-going process for monitoring the implementation. Principle of the Monitored Standards-based Curriculum: Monitoring the standards-based curriculum is a vital component to the “taught” curriculum as it is an observation tool for student learning. All instructional district/campus administrators are expected to monitor the delivery of the standardsbased curriculum and determine the concept or skills being taught, the context within which it is being taught, and the cognitive level at which students are expected to demonstrate their learning. Administrators are expected to determine if all aspects of the lesson observed match the curriculum. Administrators are also expected to provide feedback to teachers regarding their teaching through both reflective questions and dialogue in an effort to improve the delivery of the district curriculum. [Regulation (Local)]. Page 5 The standards-based curriculum is monitored through a process that includes Instructional Focus Visits (IFV) and formal observations. The campus principal is the instructional leader responsible for monitoring the implementation of the district curriculum. The IFV observations include quick “snapshots” of the daily implementation of the curriculum and instructional strategies. Elementary IFV Blueprint Secondary IFV Blueprint Updated 5/30/13 Frequency It is recommended that all administrators conduct IFVs each week. Data collected in all content and specialized areas will be utilized as a basis for instructional conversation and reflection regarding teaching and learning. Tools: Lesson plans are submitted to and reviewed by campus administrators or designee. IFVs are used to monitor the delivery of the scope and sequence of the standards-based curriculum. Formative and summative assessments are used to monitor curriculum and adjust instruction. Additional Tools for Monitoring the Standards-based Curriculum Analysis of student assessment data Observation of teachers Interviews and conferences with individual teachers and/or teams Meetings with district curriculum personnel Opportunities for teachers to discuss and share ideas and strategies Incorporation of technology tools Student Data – Excellence in Teaching Initiatives (Kail’s group) Instructional Model and Instructional Delivery Planning a lesson- Excellence in teaching initiative A Philosophy for the Education of Educators “Get over the idea that only children should spend their time in study. Be a student so long as you still have something to learn, and this will mean all your life.” ~ Henry L. Doherty Updated 5/30/13 Page To meet the challenges inherent in helping first-year classroom teachers survive/succeed, a forum must exist for a community of experts, collaborators, mentors, and novice teachers to problemsolve and innovate in an environment of encouragement and supportive, calm constancy. Offering guidance in response to overwhelming need requires time. Time is at a premium. Educators are entrusted to teach new teachers all the behaviors, the planning, the reflection, and the best-practices implicit with excellence in teaching, but when? Too, this excellence in teaching cannot remain conceptual, but must be modeled: teachers must demonstrate for new teachers how to aspire to, how to inspire excellence in the classroom, teaching not only what is, but what is possible. Time must be 6 The relationship between education and individual success, happiness and self-actualization has long been a cornerstone of the American value system. Indeed, reverence for education is a global phenomenon, and is a global measurement of achievement. Education is a continuum, consisting of constant dialogue and constant reflection, transcending all boundaries pursuing every avenue of thought. But, this reflection is not about the education of students; rather, it is about the education of educators…new educators, to be exact. created in order to nurture our community of educators. Finally, the education of educators must be both pragmatic and social; all learning is best accomplished in an environment of praise, support, collaboration, clarity and relevance. It is incumbent upon every educator to remember that instruction must be learner-centered. It takes a village, and the community of Midland educators must, each of us, become the molders and the modelers of excellence. Planning a Lesson.pptx Teaching a lesson- Excellence in teaching initiative (Rowley’s Group) The Assessed Standards-based Curriculum Assessments shall focus on determining the extent to which students are progressing and mastering standards as well as the extent to which instruction is being delivered. Principles of the Assessed Standards-based curriculum: • Measures student progress • Guides teachers’ instruction at appropriate levels of challenge • Guides students’ learning • Guides district/campus improvement and programmatic decisions • Communicates progress to parents to support learning at home Formative assessments-Excellence in teaching initiative Formative assessments are for learning. Formative assessment is a practice that drives instruction in the classroom. Formative assessments are short, frequent, and engage every student so that teachers can adjust instruction and students can gage their level of understanding during a lesson. Embedding formative assessment at strategic points during instruction provides information that teachers can use to identify and respond to problem learning areas. Instead of calling on two-three students to answer a question, formative assessments involve all students in answering the questions in responding to the learning. Formative assessments are aligned with a daily objective to provide evidence by which a teacher can gage how well students are learning the essential standards. Formative assessment is a process of accumulating information about a student that in turn leads to helping teachers to make instructional decision that will improve that student’s understanding and achievement levels. Page 7 Lesson analysis- Excellence in teaching initiative Prezi Presentation Updated 5/30/13 III. Professional Development to Support Standards-based Curriculum Design and Delivery Teachers: Each year new teachers to MISD will receive a written and oral overview of the TEKS for the subjects they teach. The purpose of this professional development is to explain the links between standards-based curriculum and the state/local assessment blueprints. Standards-based curriculum documents are reviewed and revised annually to correspond with student learning needs and objectives. Professional development conducted during the summer as well as during the school year, will focus on specific areas of need identified in various ways regarding either the design or the delivery of the standards-based curriculum. Campus Administrators: Principals and assistant principals are the instructional leaders on their campus. Administrators know the rationale for the design of the standards-based curriculum and the various delivery strategies. Monitoring the standards-based curriculum is a critical component of a campus administrator’s leadership duties. District Administrators: District administrators are knowledgeable of the TEKS in order to evaluate and align standards-based curriculum and programs and to support effective instruction. IV. Communication Plan for Design and Delivery of the Standards-based Curriculum The design of the MISD Standards-based Curriculum Management Plan is primarily the responsibility of the Teaching and Learning Department. Every teacher impacted by the standards-based curriculum will have access to electronic copies of all curriculum documents. Every new teacher and new administrator to the district will receive an orientation to the MISD standards-based curriculum components including scope and sequences, instructional and assessment timelines, and unit plans. Principals and instructional staff will discuss instructional delivery of the standards-based curriculum at staff meetings, during regular and extended planning time, at grade level and departmental meetings, and with individual teachers. V. Roles and Responsibilities Regarding Standards-based Curriculum Management Updated 5/30/13 Page District Instructional Administration: The Teaching and Learning Division (T&L) designs the standards-based curriculum so that it is aligned 12th grade to Pre-Kindergarten. The MISD Executive Director of Professional Development will facilitate the planning, completion, and 8 Board of Trustees: See EFA (LOCAL) validation of professional development activities. The Superintendent, the Chief Academic Officer, along with T&L are responsible for organizing an assessment calendar process to maximize student performance. Through a collaborative effort district and campus staff will coordinate student assessments, data disaggregation, and evaluation of assessments. Campus Administration: The principal is the instructional leader of the delivery of the standardsbased curriculum at the campus level. Principals manage the implementation of the standards-based curriculum through a variety of strategies that include: • Analyze student assessment data • Ensure that campus assessments align with the written standards-based curriculum • Observe teachers • Interview and conference with individual teachers and/or teams • Meet with campus/district instructional staff to adjust instruction • Help parents understand their role in supporting standards-based curriculum learning Teachers: The teacher delivers the standards-based curriculum and meets with the grade level/department and vertical teams so that instruction and curriculum is coordinated and articulated. The teacher assesses the degree to which the design and delivery of the standards-based curriculum meets the needs of students. The District expects the teaching effort to be a part of a broad plan for quality education that ensures equity for all students. Teachers are responsible for evaluating students using a variety of formative assessments and all required district and state assessments. Page 9 Teachers: • Involve students in the learning process • Diagnose students' learning strengths and needs • Communicate learning strengths and needs to students, parents, and others • Encourage parents to support learning of the standards-based curriculum • Participate in the training needed to effectively carry out these functions Updated 5/30/13 VI. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Alignment: The agreement of the written, taught, and tested standards-based curriculum; vertical alignment refers to agreement throughout the PK-12 system; horizontal alignment refers to agreement within a grade level or course. Assessed Standards-based Curriculum: Assessments shall focus on determining the extent to which students are progressing and mastering standards as well as the extent to which instruction is being delivered. Core subjects: • Language Arts • Math • Science • Social Studies District Assessments: The district assessment is utilized to adjust instruction and to predict success on state assessments. These assessments cover the TEKS addressed on a specific test and are administered in unit, six week, and nine week increments. Objectives: Student skills/competencies expected for mastery of a course or discipline Skills: Student’s knowledge and learning expectations for a particular subject/discipline STAAR: State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness Standards-based curriculum: The knowledge, skills, attitudes, and processes to be taught and learned at the appropriate levels and/or courses Taught Standards-based curriculum: The instructional strategies, resources, and teacher lesson plans used to teach the standards-based curriculum TEKS: Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills, the state-mandated standards-based curriculum expectations for all students in every state-approved course of study Page 10 Written Standards-based curriculum: The district standards-based curriculum guides which outline the expectations for student mastery of a particular course/subject Updated 5/30/13 District Professional Development Plan A teacher new to the district should receive training in the following areas: School Data System (Schoolnet) Gradebook/Attendance Aesop (Subfinder) Email and Schoolwires Discipline Management Assessing curriculum – Cscope or other curriculum housing mechanism PDAS G/T training (as needed) Legal/Ethics topics Focus for Professional Development in 2013-14 for all teachers is Lesson Planning. This includes: Planning a Lesson Teaching a Lesson Formative Assessment Lesson Analysis Interpreting data and adjusting curriculum Knowledge of Content Standards (TEKS) District Resources available Summer Training AP summer institutes AVID summer institutes Region 18 trainings Core Department offerings During the School Day AVID Regional Training Core Department offerings Departmental Collaboratives After School 11 Data Analysis Make and Take sessions Planning sessions with coaches Vertical Team Department Chair Page Updated 5/30/13 12 Page Updated 5/30/13 Midland Independent School District Curriculum and Instruction English/Spanish Language Arts and Reading and English as a Second Language Curriculum and Management Plan Page 13 Design, Delivery and Evaluation Updated 5/30/13 Midland ISD Language Arts and Reading Department Plan Vision The Midland ISD Language Arts student-centered program is dedicated to stimulating student interest and developing student competence in the interrelated communication areas of reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Our differentiated approach is designed to provide success and challenge for all students in their use of language. Goals 1) All students will read on or above grade level in a variety of genres. 2) All students will successfully communicate thoughts and ideas through writing in a variety of genres. . Core Curriculum K – 5 (English and Spanish) Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) with embedded Texas College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS) K-2 Comprehensive Literacy Framework District Scope and Sequence aligned with CSCOPE CSCOPE Year at a Glance (YAG), Vertical Alignment Document (VAD), and Instructional Focus Document (IFD) English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) Page 14 6th Grade through English IV Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) with embedded Texas College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS) CSCOPE Year at a Glance (YAG), Vertical Alignment Document (VAD), and Instructional Focus Document (IFD), English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) Updated 5/30/13 Approved Resources Kindergarten (English) 1st Grade (English) CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Journeys Fountas and Pinnell Phonics Lessons CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Journeys Fountas and Pinnell Phonics Lessons Kindergarten (Spanish) CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Senderos Teacher Created Materials Exploring Nonfiction Building Fluency through Reader’s Theater Literacy, Language & Learning Early Childhood Themes Kindergarten (ESL) National Geographic REACH e-Assessment Imagine Learning English 2nd Grade (English) CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Journeys Fountas and Pinnell Phonics Lessons Texas Write Source Writing and Grammar adoption st 1 Grade (Spanish) 2nd Grade (Spanish) CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Senderos Adoption-Senderos Texas Fuente de escritura Teacher Created Materials (escritura y gramática) Exploring Nonfiction Time for Kids Nonfiction Teacher Created Materials Exploring Nonfiction Readers Time for Kids Nonfiction Building Fluency Readers through Reader’s Theater Building Fluency through Reader’s Theater 1st Grade (ESL) 2nd Grade (ESL) National Geographic REACH National Geographic REACH e-Assessment e-Assessment leveled readers leveled readers Imagine Learning English Imagine Learning English 4th Grade (English) 5th Grade (English) CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption Fountas and Pinnell Word Study Texas Write Source Writing and Grammar adoption Empowering Writers CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption Texas Write Source Writing and Grammar adoption Empowering Writers CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption Texas Write Source Writing and Grammar adoption Page 15 3rd Grade (English) Updated 5/30/13 4th Grade (Spanish) 5th Grade (Spanish) CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD ETA Hand 2 Mind- CSCOPE Literature Collection Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Senderos Texas Fuente de escritura (escritura y gramática) Empowering Writers 3rd Grade (ESL) National Geographic REACH e-Assessment leveled readers CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Senderos Texas Fuente de escritura (escritura y gramática) Empowering Writers CSCOPE YAG, VAD, IFD Houghton Mifflin Reading Adoption-Senderos Texas Fuente de escritura (escritura y gramática) 4th Grade (ESL) National Geographic REACH e-Assessment leveled readers 5th Grade (ESL) National Geographic REACH e-Assessment leveled readers 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade CSCOPE Holt McDougal Literature Holt McDougal On-Line Write Source Writing and Grammar Texas Portals to Reading Empowering Writers CSCOPE Holt McDougal Literature Holt McDougal On-Line Write Source Writing and Grammar Texas Portals to Reading Empowering Writers CSCOPE Holt McDougal Literature Holt McDougal On-Line Write Source Writing and Grammar Texas Portals to Reading Empowering Writers 6th Grade (ESL) National Geographic INSIDE e-Assessment leveled readers 7th (ESL) National Geographic INSIDE e-Assessment leveled readers National Geographic INSIDE the USA (Newcomers) Rosetta Stone (Newcomers) 8th (ESL) National Geographic INSIDE e-Assessment leveled readers National Geographic INSIDE the USA (Newcomers) Rosetta Stone (Newcomers) English I English II English III CSCOPE Holt McDougal Literature Holt McDougal On-Line Write Source Writing and Grammar CSCOPE Holt McDougal Literature Holt McDougal On-Line Write Source Writing and Grammar English I (ESL) National Geographic EDGE e-Assessment leveled readers National Geographic INSIDE the USA (Newcomers) Rosetta Stone (Newcomers) English II (ESL) National Geographic EDGE e-Assessment leveled readers National Geographic INSIDE the USA (Newcomers) Rosetta Stone (Newcomers) CSCOPE Holt McDougal Literature Holt McDougal On-Line Write Source Writing and Grammar The Language of Composition, Texas by Holtzbrinck Publishers English III (ESL) National Geographic EDGE e-Assessment leveled readers Page 16 3rd Grade (Spanish) Updated 5/30/13 English IV CSCOPE Holt McDougal Literature Holy McDougal On-Line Write Source Writing and Grammar Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound and Sense by Holt McDougal English IV (ESL) National Geographic EDGE e-Assessment leveled readers Interventions Programs Selected by the District Grades K – 2 Fountas and Pinnell Level Literacy Intervention IStation/ISIP Early Reading Estrellita-Spanish Language Power (Teacher Created Materials) Building Vocabulary (Teacher Created Materials) Grades 3 – 8 IStation READ 180 System 44 Language Power (Teacher Created Materials) (Bil/ESL 3-6 and Newcomer Academy) Building Vocabulary (Teacher Created Materials) (ESL) Grades 9-12 READ 180 System 44 SSI Summer School Curriculum Grade 5 Targeted Reading Instruction and Mentoring Minds Grade 8 Custom written curriculum Page 17 English I Custom written curriculum Updated 5/30/13 District Resources Available Summer Training: AP summer institutes AVID summer institutes Region 18 trainings CSCOPE Unit 1 Planning-ELAR/SLAR STEM Academy (Bilingual Teachers) Core Department Offerings: During the School Day Departmental Collaboratives After School Data Analysis Planning sessions with coaches Vertical Team Department Chair Professional Development for ELAR/SLAR ELAR audit showed that many teachers lack knowledge of the components of balanced literacy including instructional approaches for teaching the writing process. Proposed Professional Development K through 5 Guided Reading-English and Spanish (3 half day sessions) Empowering Writers- English and Spanish (2 days 3rd& new 4th) Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI) - English Only (1/2 day K-2 new teachers) Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment-K-5 English K-2 Spanish (1/2 day K-5 new teachers) Interactive Writing-English and Spanish (1/2 day K-1 new teachers) CSCOPE Unit Planning-English and Spanish iStation REACH (e-Assessment) Language Power and Building Vocabulary (after school) 18 6 through 8 CSCOPE (1 day) Empowering Writers (2 days) STAAR Training (1/2 day) IStation (1/2 day) Page 9 through 12 CSCOPE (1day) Updated 5/30/13 Page 19 STAAR EOC Training (1/2 day) Project Share (1/2 day) Updated 5/30/13 Midland Independent School District Curriculum and Instruction Mathematics Department Curriculum and Management Plan Page 20 Design, Delivery and Evaluation Updated 5/30/13 Midland ISD Mathematics Department Vision Plan The mission of the Midland ISD Mathematics Program is to promote the learning of mathematics by all students through a curriculum that is coherent and comprehensive. The instructional program will enable all students to understand and use mathematics in an increasingly technological world. Core Curriculum PK – 5: Everyday Math Scope and Sequence 6th Grade through Algebra 2: Cscope Year-at-a-Glance, Instructional Focus Document, and Vertical Alignment Document PreAP Mathematics (5th through Precalculus): College Prepatory Mathematics Approved Resources 1st Grade TEKS Everyday Mathematics 3rd Grade TEKS Everyday Mathematics CSCOPE as a resource 4th Grade TEKS Everyday Mathematics CSCOPE as a resource 6th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Holt CMP2 TEKS Everyday Mathematics 5th Grade TEKS Everyday Mathematics CSCOPE as a resource 7th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Holt CMP2 8th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Holt 21 TEKS Everyday Mathematics 2nd Grade Page Kinder Updated 5/30/13 Algebra 1 CPM Algebra I TEKS CSCOPE Holt TEKS CPM CPM Geometry Geometry TEKS CSCOPE Holt Algebra II TEKS CPM TEKS CSCOPE PreAP Algebra 2 TEKS CPM Interventions Programs Selected by the District Grades K : Targeted Mathematics Intervention Grades 1 and 2 – Bilingual Campuses Targeted Mathematics Intervention Grades 1 and 2 – Non Bilingual Campuses Do the Math Grades 3 – 5 Accelerated Math, Fasttmath, Closing the Distance, Engaging Math Activities, Region 4, tutorials Bilingual 3 – 5 Targeted Mathematics Instruction Grades 6 – 8 Math 180 Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II: Study Island, Closing the Distance, A+, OnTrack , tutorials before and after school and lunch SSI Summer School Curriculum: Grades 5 and 8 – Targeted Mathematics Instruction Page 22 Algebra I – Custom written curriculum through Math by Morrison Updated 5/30/13 Professional Development for Mathematics Mathematics audit showed that many of the K – 8 teachers are generalists and weak in content knowledge and math pedagogy. Proposed Professional Development for the improvement of content knowledge are as follows: K through 5 Van de Walle repeated for new and struggling teachers K through Precalculus New Math TEKS training 6 – Algebra 2 Lesson Planning and Content Knowledge Page 23 Continuation of Collaborative Teams Updated 5/30/13 Midland Independent School District Curriculum and Instruction Science Department Curriculum Management Plan Page 24 Design, Delivery and Evaluation Updated 5/30/13 Midland ISD Science Department Vision MISD will foster an environment where teachers work collaboratively to expand knowledge in the discipline of science, seek to provide students with a science foundation that will allow for success at all levels, and create a more scientific literate public. This will be accomplished through our commitment to excellent teaching, which emphasizes problem solving, hands on laboratories, student observation, and application of science to the real world. To support this vision the science department will be committed to professional development, updating the curriculum, making real world connections, providing materials, working collaboratively with all stake holders, and incorporating technology into the curriculum. Core Curriculum K – 6: CSCOPE Vertical Alignment Document (VAD), Instructional Focus Document (IFD), Year at a Glance (YAG) 7th Grade - Physics: CSCOPE VAD, IFD, and teacher modified YAG 4th Year Science Courses: State TEKS, Teacher created/District approved YAG and adopted course textbook Approved Resources 3rd Grade TEKS CSCOPE Harcourt AIMS Discovery Ed Edusmart SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites TEKS CSCOPE Harcourt AIMS Discovery Ed SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 4th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Harcourt AIMS Discovery Ed Edusmart SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 2nd Grade TEKS CSCOPE Harcourt AIMS Discovery Ed SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 5th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Harcourt AIMS Discovery Ed Edusmart Region 4 Materials SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 25 TEKS CSCOPE Harcourt AIMS Discovery Ed SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 1st Grade Page Kinder Updated 5/30/13 6th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Glencoe Discovery Ed SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites Biology TEKS Glencoe CSCOPE Discovery Ed Dana Center Res. Pearson Res. SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 7th Grade TEKS Glencoe CSCOPE Discovery Ed SREB Resources SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites Chemistry TEKS Glencoe CSCOPE Discovery Ed SREB Resources SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites Physics TEKS Prentice Hall CSCOPE Discovery Ed Dana Center Res. Pearson Res. SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites TEKS Prentice Hall (Conceptual) Holt (Pre-AP) CSCOPE Discovery Ed SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 4th Year NON-AP Courses IPC TEKS Glencoe CSCOPE Discovery Ed SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 8th Grade TEKS Adopted Textbook CSCOPE (if applicable) Discovery Ed District Approved Internet Sites AP Courses College Board Standards CCRS Adopted Textbook Discovery Ed District Approved Internet Sites Interventions (RtI dependent) K – 6th Grade: No identified intervention. Campus and teacher based. 7th – 8th Grades: Tutorials are offered before and after school, websites listed on District RtI plan, site based supplemental materials 9th – 12th Grades: Study Island, A+, OnTrack, tutorials before/after school and during lunch, STAAR Biology and STAAR Chemistry from Dana Center Summer School EOC Remediation Updated 5/30/13 Page Future vision of science intervention for MISD, at the middle and high schools, depends on a common understanding of true intervention. Campuses would utilize District approved and supported Programs. 26 Biology: Measuring Up Biology EOC Edition Professional Development for Science K - Physics – TEKS training K – Physics – Continuation of Collaborative Teams 6 – 8: National Math and Science Initiative (3 year training) Biology and Physics: STAAR Assessment by the Dana Center Chemistry: STAAR Training presented by National Math and Science Initiative Three Year Plan for 5th, 4th and 3rd Grades: Year One: 5th Grade: All 5th grade teachers to be brought in in groups of 10 each 6 weeks covering content, classroom management, notebooking, foldables, hands on ideas and literature connections. Year Two: New 5th Grade teachers and ALL 4th grade teachers: idea similar to year one but with topics focusing on 4th grade (New 5th Grade would receive the year one sessions) Page 27 Year Three: New 4th and 5th Grade Teachers and ALL 3rd grade teachers: idea similar to year one/two but with topics focusing on 3rd grade (New 5th/4th Grade would receive the year one/two sessions) Updated 5/30/13 Midland Independent School District Curriculum and Instruction Social Studies Department Curriculum and Management Plan Page 28 Design, Delivery and Evaluation Updated 5/30/13 Midland ISD Social Studies Department Vision Plan The mission of the Midland ISD Social Studies Program is to empower students with the knowledge, appreciation, skills and attitudes necessary for democratic citizenship, for rational decision making, and for purposeful living in an increasingly complex, multi-cultural, and changing world. The social studies program must provide integrative, meaningful, challenging, active, and value-based learning experiences for all students. Through these experiences planned and modeled by teachers, students will be encouraged to examine and evaluate character traits esteemed by members of a democratic society. Core Curriculum K – 6: CSCOPE (YAG, Year-at-a-Glance, IFD, Instructional Focus Document, VAD, Vertical Alignment Document) 7 - 8: CSCOPE (YAG, Year-at-a-Glance, IFD, Instructional Focus Document, VAD, Vertical Alignment Document, TEKS Verification Document) 9 – US History: CSCOPE (Teacher modified YAG, Year-at-a-Glance, IFD, Instructional Focus Document, VAD, Vertical Alignment Document, TEKS Verification Document) 4th Year Social Studies Courses: Page 29 CSCOPE (Teacher modified YAG, Year-at-a-Glance, IFD, Instructional Focus Document, VAD, Vertical Alignment Document, TEKS Verification Document) Updated 5/30/13 Approved Resources 3rd Grade TEKS CSCOPE Scott Foresman Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 6th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Prentice Hall Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites World Geography TEKS CSCOPE McDougal Littell Discovery Education Jarrett Publishing Materials Holt Test Bank SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites TEKS CSCOPE Scott Foresman Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 4th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Scott Foresman Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 7th Grade TEKS CSCOPE McDougal Littell Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites World History TEKS CSCOPE Glencoe McGraw Hill Discovery Education Jarrett Publishing Materials Holt Test Bank SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 2nd Grade TEKS CSCOPE Scott Foresman Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 5th Grade TEKS CSCOPE Scott Foresman Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 8th Grade TEKS CSCOPE McDougal Littell Discovery Education Jarrett Publishing Materials SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites US History TEKS CSCOPE Glencoe McGraw Hill Discovery Education Jarrett Publishing Materials Holt Test Bank SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 30 TEKS CSCOPE Scott Foresman Discovery Education SMART Notebook District Approved Internet Sites 1st Grade Page Kinder Updated 5/30/13 4th Year NON-AP Courses TEKS CSCOPE (if applicable) State Adopted Textbook Discovery Education Smart Notebook District Approved Internet Sites AP Courses College Board Syllabus / Standards CCRS State Adopted Textbook Discovery Education Smart Notebook District Approved Internet Sites Intervention Programs K – 6: None at this time 7 – 8: Tutorials before school, at lunch and after school 9 – US History: A+, Study Island, OnTrack, Tutorials before school, at lunch, and after school 4th Year Courses: Tutorials before school, at lunch, and after school EOC Summer School Remediation Curriculum 9 – World History, US History: Jarrett Materials, Test Prep Professional Development for Social Studies World History -- TEKS Training, Region 18 8 -10 World Geography, World History, Grade 8 Training, 3Strategies Page 31 7-12 Collaborative Teams Planning Updated 5/30/13 ADVANCED PLACEMENT / PRE-AP PROGRAM College Board Mission Statement AP Access and Equity Initiative: Access for All Students AP Access and Equity Initiative: Access for All Students: The College Board and the Advanced Placement Program encourage teachers, AP Coordinators, and school administrators to make equitable access a guiding principle for their AP programs. The College Board is committed to the principle that all students deserve an opportunity to participate in rigorous and academically challenging courses and programs. All students who are willing to accept the challenge of a rigorous academic curriculum should be considered for admission to AP courses. The Board encourages the elimination of barriers that restrict access for AP courses to students from ethnic, racial, and socioeconomic groups that have been traditionally underrepresented in the AP Program. Schools should make every effort to ensure that their AP classes reflect the diversity of their student population. College Board. collegeboard.com, Inc., 2008. http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc. Midland Independent School District Vision Statement and District Goals: Midland ISD will educate the future by maximizing the potential of every student. District Goals: · MISD will support high academic standards. · MISD will uniformly use effective instructional strategies. · MISD will recruit, develop, and support highly motivated staff members who maximize student success. · MISD will prepare technologically advanced students. · MISD will provide facilities that support exemplary learning environments. · MISD will fully develop positive partnerships with Midland’s community and business organizations. · MISD will exercise fiscal responsibility MISD Advanced Placement Mission Statement Page 32 Midland ISD is committed to the principle that all students deserve an opportunity to participate in a rigorous and academically challenging curriculum. Students who are willing to accept the challenge of a rigorous academic curriculum are encouraged to enroll into a Pre-AP/AP course. Updated 5/30/13 ADVANCED PLACEMENT PROGRAM The Advanced Placement (AP) program is a cooperative educational endeavor beteen secondary schools and colleges and universities. The AP program offers college-level courses and exams that give high school students the opportunity to receive advanced placement and/or credit in college. The purpose of the AP/Pre-AP program offers students the opportunity to develop higher level thinking skills through an immersion in rigorous content, an accelerated pace, and performance assessment at the synthesis and evaluative levels. Midland ISD is committed to the principle that all students deserve an opportunity to participate in rigorous and academically challenging curriculum. Because of this commitment, students are highly encouraged to take AP courses when appropriate. According to research, by the time students enter college the type of courses they took in high school is more important than test scores, class rank, or grade averages. Students participating in AP courses are significantly more likely to attain a college degree than those without an AP experience (Adelman 1999). Midland ISD currently offers over 20 AP courses at our high schools. What is Pre-AP? Pre-AP is a set of content-specific strategies designed to build rigorous curricula, promote access to AP for all students, introduce skills, concepts, and assessment methods to prepare students for success in the AP program, and strengthen curriculum and increase the academic challenge for all students. Midland ISD is committed to the principle that all students deserve an opportunity to participate in rigorous and academically challenging curriculum. Because of this, students are highly encouraged to take Advanced Placement (AP) courses when appropriate. According to research, by the time students enter college the type of courses they took in high school is more important than test scores, class rank, or grade averages. Students participating in AP courses are significantly more likely to attain a college degree than those without an AP experience (Adelman 1999). Midland ISD currently offers over 20 AP courses at our high schools. Many of the core courses in the major academic disciplines offer advanced courses referred to as Pre-AP. These courses lay the foundation for success not only in the AP program but ultimately in college coursework. They are on-grade level academically advanced courses designed to challenge motivated students to understand rigorous content. Pre-AP courses emphasize the same types of thinking skills and student expectations as the AP courses, although the course content is at the appropriate grade level. The coursework requires students to engage in independent and analytical assignments. Students who elect not to take AP courses will still benefit greatly from the curricula and requirements of the Pre-AP course of study. The Pre-AP program in Midland ISD is an inclusive program. A student may enroll in a Pre-AP class as long as the student is willing to accept the time, the rigor, and learning requirements of the class. Pre-AP junior high courses are designed to prepare students for high school Pre-AP and Advanced Placement (AP) courses. Updated 5/30/13 Page Midland ISD currently offers over twenty(20) AP and Pre-AP courses at each of our high schools and junior high schools. Content and curricular goals for each AP discipline are outlined in an AP Course Description supplied by the College Board and can be found on the College Board website. www.collegeboard.org/apcentral. 33 As students plan their schedules, they should consider the time commitments required in extracurricular and outside activities by carefully reviewing the course descriptions before making decisions. These courses are designed to prepare students for AP courses, but they also offer an excellent opportunity for students to enjoy a challenging, interesting course in areas where students exhibit strengths and curiosity. MISD AP AND PRE-AP COURSES 34 Pre-AP Courses Pre-AP Algebra I Pre-AP Algebra II Pre-AP Biology I Pre-AP Chemistry I Pre-AP English I Pre-AP English II Pre-AP French III Pre-AP Geometry Pre-AP German III Pre-AP Latin III Pre-AP Physics Pre-AP Pre-Calculus Pre-AP Spanish III Pre-AP World Geography Pre-AP World History 7th and 8th grade Pre-AP English 7th grade Pre-AP Mathematics 7th and 8th grade Pre-AP Science 7th grade Pre-AP Texas History 8th grade Pre-AP US History Page AP Courses: AP Biology AP Calculus, AB AP Calculus BC AP Chemistry AP Computer Science, A AP Macroeconomics AP Microeconomics AP English Language and Composition AP English Literature and Composition AP French Language AP German Language AP Government, United States AP Government, Comparative AP Latin – Vergil AP Macroeconomics AP Microeconomics AP Music Theory AP Physics C AP Psychology AP Spanish Language AP Spanish Literature AP Studio Art – Drawing AP United States History Updated 5/30/13 AP/Pre-AP Guiding Criteria High School 2013-2014 AP Classes: Met Level II on STAAR/EOC, TAKS, or equivalent test 85% grade in non Pre-AP/AP current course in content area 70% maintenance grade in Pre-AP/AP in 2012-2013 Pre-AP Classes: Met passing standards on STAAR/EOC, TAKS, or equivalent test 80% grade in non Pre-AP/AP current course in content area 70% maintenance grade in 2012-2013 Exception: 80% maintenance grade for Algebra I 8th grade AP/Pre-AP Guiding Criteria Junior High School 2013-2014 Pre-AP Social Studies, Science, Math, and/or English: 7th grade: 1567 Scale Score on STAAR reading (6th grade) 7th grade: 1584 Scale Score on Math STAAR (6th grade) 8th grade: 1615 Scale Score on STAAR reading (7th grade) 85 in current course content non Pre-AP area of previously completed semester. Pre-qualifying conditions for Algebra: To be considered for Algebra I in the 8th grade, a student must score 60% or higher on the IAAT AND 30 questions correct on the 7th grade Math STAAR. After this initial criteria has been met, the student must meet 2 of the 3 following criteria: 75 on Iowa Algebra Aptitude Test 85 semester average in current math class 36 questions correct on the Spring 2013 7th grade Math STAAR test Maintenance in Algebra I in 8th Grade: Students will be exited from Algebra I in the 8th grade if the following circumstances occur: The student receives an average below 80 on the 1st and 2nd six weeks grading period The student receives an average below 80 on two of the three 1st semester six weeks periods and/or a 1st semester average that is below 80. Foreign Language Guiding Criteria: Page 35 Pre-qualifying conditions for 7th graders taking Spanish I: 1567 Scale Score on STAAR reading (6th grade) 85 in 6th grade ELA Pre-qualifying conditions for Pre-AP Spanish III: 80 in Spanish II Updated 5/30/13 PROCEDURES TO WITHDRAW FROM AN AP OR PRE-AP COURSE During the registration process, students who wish to enroll in an AP or Pre-AP course will sign an Enrollment Agreement form that identifies roles and responsibilities. If a student wishes to withdraw from an AP or Pre-AP course during the school year, the following steps must be followed: 1. The student may only voluntarily withdraw from a course between the 16th day of the semester to the last day of the 2nd six weeks for either a one-semester or two-semester class. A student may also exit after completing the end of the first semester course. To exit a PreAP course within the designated time window, students must have completed the following steps: Attend a minimum of 3 documented tutorial sessions Attend a documented student/parent/teacher conference that includes the parent and teacher signatures on the exit form. The exit form must be submitted to the counselor’s office for consideration by the AP Steering Committee. 2. The student must have a 70 average in each Pre-AP course at the end of the first semester to automatically continue in that Pre-AP course for the second semester. If the student does not have a 70 average, the campus principal may consider extenuating circumstances and allow the student to continue in the course for the second semester on a probationary status. 3. Students enrolled in Algebra I in the 8th grade must maintain at least an 80 average to remain in the class. If a student’s grade falls below 80 during both the first and second six weeks, the student will be removed from the course. If a student’s grade falls below 80 at the end of the semester, it is strongly advised that the student exit from the course. 4. The AP and Pre-AP courses are rigorous and have high expectations. Parents and students should consider the course load when registering for classes. Students taking AP/ Pre-AP ELA and Social Studies courses will be required to participate in an AP Summer Reading Program assignment, which will be posted on the MISD website. 5. The AP courses are college-level work designed to prepare students to take the AP examination. The student enrolled in an AP course is expected to take the AP exam in each course in which the student is enrolled. Page 36 AP EXAMS Approximately 1200 institutions of higher learning award credit based on a student’s AP examination scores. AP examinations are structured to measure depth of knowledge, completeness of thought, and synthesis of ideas. Each AP exam contains both multiple choice and free response questions that require essay writing, problem solving, and other skills. Each exam receives an overall score based on a five-point scale, with collete credit usually given for scores of 3 or highe r. Scale: 5 – Extremely well qualified 4 – Well qualified 3 – Qualified 2 – Possibly qualified 1 – No recommendation AP exams are administered each year in May. AP Grade Reports are sent in July to each student’s home address, high school, and, if the student has requested, to designated colleges. Each college decides howmuch credit to award for AP scores. For more information, go to the AP Credit Policy search at: www.collegeboard.com/ap/creditpolicy. Updated 5/30/13 REQUIREMENTS FOR TEACHING AN AP OR PRE-AP COURSE AP and Pre-AP teachers should have at least three (3) years of classroom teaching experience before they become AP or Pre-AP teachers. A Master’s degree in the respective subject area is recommended but not required. AP eachers must submit their AP syllabus to the AP College Board Audit for approval in order to teach an Advanced Placement course. This syllabus must be submitted by August for the coming year in which the course will be taught. AP and Pre-AP teachers will attend a College Board AP Summer Institute (APSI) in the subject to be taught prior to teaching the course. If a new AP/Pre-AP teacher cannot attend an APSI, a plan to attend a two-day College Board AP/PreAP workshop during that school year in which the course is taught should be in place. A new AP/PreAP teacher will be paired with an experienced mentor, one who has been AP/Pre-AP trained and College Board approved through the AP Audit process and has taught at least one year in theAP/Pre-AP subject. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AP Summer Institute Training Cycle for AP and Pre-AP teachers: Year 1: Initial APSI (AP Summer Institute for AP and Pre-AP Teachers) 5 day training Year 2 and/or 3: Minimum of 6 hours of MISD training (advanced strategies, critical thinking, GT training, AVID, etc.) or College Board 1-day or 2-day workshop. These training must be approved by the campus Principal orAP Coordinator. Year 4: Repeat APSI 5 day training NOTE: High School teachers who teach multiple disciplines, such as Chemistry and Physics, need to be trained in each subject area. This can effectively be done in two (2) consecutive years. 2012-2013 TIER I: Advanced Placement teachers Tier I includes all instructors who teach a College Board approved Advanced Placement course and have an approved College Board AP Audit syllabus who have never attended an AP Summer Institute or who have not attended a summer institute within the last three (3) years.Other Fall and Spring: Additional Professional Development Advanced Placement Vertical Teams in ELAR, Math, Science, Social Studies College Board District Integrated Summary Report PSAT/NMSQT Summary of Answer and Skills 2013-2014 Tier II includes all high school Pre-AP/GT Pre-AP teachers -Grades 9 – 12 who have never attended an AP Summer Institute for Pre AP Teachers or Springboard training or who have not attended a summer institute within the last three (3) years. Updated 5/30/13 37 High School Pre-AP/GT Pre-AP teachers – grades 9 – 12 Page TIER II: Fall and Spring: Additional Professional Development Advanced Placement Vertical Teams in ELAR, Math, Science, Social Studies College Board District Integrated Summary Report PSAT/NMSQT Summary of Answer and Skills 2014-2015 TIER III: Junior High Pre-AP/GT Pre-AP teachers – grades 6 – 8 Tier III includes all junior high school Pre-AP/GT Pre-AP teachers, grades 6 – 8 who have never attended an AP Summer Institute for Pre-AP Teachers or who have not attended a summer institute within the last three (3) years. Fall and Spring: Additional Professional Development Advanced Placement Vertical Teams in ELAR, Math, Science, Social Studies College Board District Integrated Summary Report PSAT/NMSQT Summary of Answer and Skills AVID: (Advancement Via Individual Determination) 2013-2014: Summer District Training: AVID Summer Institute in Dallas: June 26 – 28. Fall District Training: Tutor Training and 8 hour update AVID Elective Teacher Workshop – 8 hour update Administrator’s Workshop – 1 / 2 day Monthly Reviews – 2-hour training each month Spring District Training: AVID Elective Teacher Spring Workshop Monthly Reviews – 2-hour training each month 2014 – 2015: Summer District Training: AVID Summer Institute Page 38 Fall District Training: Tutor Training and 8 hour update AVID Elective Teacher Workshop – 8 hour update Administrator’s Workshop – 1 / 2 day Monthly Reviews – 2-hour training each month Spring District Training: Tutor Training AVID Elective Teacher Spring Workshop Monthly Reviews – 2-hour training each month Updated 5/30/13 MENTORING NEW AP INSTRUCTORS MENTORING: Mentor: provides personal support inducts the new teacher into the new context support. (Harrison, 2005) provides professional A mentor should be viewed as being supportive of what instructors are already doing rather than “one more thing to do.” A mentor must address growing diversity of AP teachers. Page 39 TOP 5 CONCERNS OF TEACHERS IN THE FIRST THREE YEARS: 1. Classroom discipline 2. Motivating students 3. Dealing with individual differences 4. Assessing students’ work 5. Relations with parents (Vennman, 1984) BENEFITS OF MENTORING: Good mentoring can make the difference between a temporary instructor and a lifelong teacher. New instructors with mentors and new teacher meetings have higher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. (Smith & Ingersoll, 2004) CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE MENTORING: Long term interaction between teachers Structured relationship, which addresses concerns and expectations of new teacher Both instructors should have common goals and images about what mentor-mentee relationship should involve (Tauer, 1998) CHARACTERISTICS TO STRIVE FOR AS A MENTOR: Professional Positive Collaborative Responsive Supportive Empathetic Non-judgmental (Trubowitz, 2004) MODEL: Monthly after school meetings with new teachers from all departments Meetings guided by principal or other school administrators Readings concerning teamwork and early career issues Monthly journal with reactions to articles and personal concerns and victories Student shadowing Updated 5/30/13 EXAMPLES OF MEETING TOPICS: Working with parents and discipline concerns Finding one’s way around media center and electronic databases AP INSTRUCTORS: Bimonthly meetings to discuss issues such as registration, professional development opportunities, updates or curriculum changes BENEFITS OF A SCHOOLWIDE MENTORING PROGRAM: Realization of a strong support network which crosses content and discipline lines Introduced to other faculty members that can provide support and answer questions (principals, deans, other instructors) Feel a part of a group with other new instructors (Lynch, 2000) Questionnaire of what new teacher needs to learn Self-reflection – what new teacher needs and wants to know INCORPORATING NEW TEAM MEMBERS: Re-evaluate team norms and expectations each year Emphasize potential contributions of new team members Collectively set goals for team each year Be transparent in daily activities to build trust Find right balance for team between: isolating----- collaborating------ enabling ONE-TO-ONE MENTORING: SUMMER, JUNE – AUGUST Insure new teacher has textbook and all other relevant materials to begin preparing for class Share formative and summative exams Help new instructor create a syllabus and course expectations Assist new instructor in submitting materials for AP course audit Register for AP Summer Institute Assist instructor in administrative elements of school Request common planning time or lunch hour as well as rooms near each other Help create a timeline for course Page 40 ONE-TO-ONE MENTORING: FALL Help set up gradebook, request computer and library time, etc. Help set goals for grading period, semester, year Celebrate milestones Balancing the challenges of teaching/coaching/grading/etc. Preview weekly schedule Prepare for observations and feedback Prompt questions regarding content Daily check-in Insure new instructor is working with other people in department ONE-TO-ONE MENTORING: WINTER Reflect on successes and challenges of first semester Advice on review in preparation for summative exam Learning from results of summative exams and AP results Encourage and support new instructor during winter lows. Updated 5/30/13 Page 41 ONE-TO-ONE MENTORING: SPRING Reflect on goals set at the start of the year/semester Help with reviewing for the AP exam/timeline Creating valuable learning lessons post AP exam Preparing for the second semester summative Survey for student input on strengths and potential for growth Plan for continued activities and changes for the following year Allow new instructors to provide feedback regarding mentoring experience Make the new instructor aware of potential professional development opportunities Make clear that though the formal mentoring experience may be ending it will continue informally DISTANCE/INFORMAL MENTORING OPPORTUNITIES: List-Servs College Board mentoring program Content mentoring opportunities THINGS WE HAVE LEARNED ALONG THE WAY . . . Keep a framework in mind, but be flexible with your mentoring philosophy. Considerations: What is the personality of the mentee? How much are you comfortable sharing? Is your mentee new to teaching or just new to AP/school? Be part of the support system for the instructor without taking responsibility for their courses. Let the mentee find their own style (even if it is different from your own). Help them learn from their (and your) mistakes. Be patient and remember that all skills take time to develop. Make clear to the mentee that all observations and input are non-evaluative (Lynch, 2004) Relationship must be based on mutual trust (Trubowitz, 2004) Updated 5/30/13 SCHEDULE FOR MENTORING OF AP/PRE-AP TEACHERS FIRST SEMESTER: June - August: Meet with new teacher for introduction to AP Program and AP Strategies/Materials Share formative and summative exams Help new instructor create a syllabus and course expectations o New AP teachers must submit AP syllabus to College Board Audit for approval Register for AP Summer Institute if applicable Help create a timeline for course Walk through the College Board AP Central website for information and assignments September - December: Meet with new instructor to discuss developing lesson plans (twice a month) Preview weekly schedule and discuss AP strategies that work with lessons Help set goals for grading period, semester, year Conduct observations and present feedback Insure that new instructor is working with other people in department SECOND SEMESTER: Reflect on successes and challenges of first semester Review preparation for AP Exams process Set monthly meetings to review lesson plans Continue observations and present feedback Reflect on goals set at the beginning of year/semester Help with reviewing for AP exam Creating valuable learning lessons post AP exam Plan for continued activities and changes for the following year Discuss potential professional development opportunities with AP Summer InstituteS Page 42 Works Cited College Board. AP Central. https://apcentral.collegeboard.com. Harrison, J; T. Lawson & A. Wortley (2005). Facilitating the professional learning of new teachers through critical reflection on practice during mentoring meetings. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 267-292. Lynch, J.; J. DeRose & G. Kleindienst. (2006). Mentoring New Teachers. Techniques. Online www.acteonline.org. Smith, T.M.; & R. M. Ingersoll. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal 41(3): 681 – 714. Tauer, S. M. (1998). The mentor-protégé relationship and its impact on the experienced teacher. Teacher and Teacher Education, 14(2) 205-218. Trabowitz, S. (2004). The Why, How and What of Mentoring. Phi Delta Kappa, September, 59-62. Vennman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178. Updated 5/30/13 AP/PRE-AP/GT OBSERVATION RUBRIC TEACHER: DATE: SUBJECT: CAMPUS: TIME: STRATEGIES FOR RIGOR AND DIFFERENTIATION: Inquiry: Costa’s Higher level questioning: Level 1______ Level 2 ______ Level 3________ Socratic Method: Seminar_____ Open-ended discussion _____ Other _____ Learning Strategies: Memory Strategies _____ Organizing Strategies _____ Summarizing _____ Collaborative Learning _____ Critical Thinking Skills: Comparison-contrast _____Cause-effect_____Problem-solution_____ Induction _____ Deduction _____ Abstracting _____ Error Analysis _____ Evaluation _____ Classification _____ Critical Thinking Processes: Decision making _____ Problem solving _____ Investigation _____ Invention _____ Hypothesis testing _____ Synthesis writing _____ Critical Reading: Notetaking: Cornell Notes_____ Notes from Overhead_____ Annotation of text_____Summarizing_____ Critical Writing Analysis_____Synthesis_____Personal narrative_____Creative_____Quickwrite_____ Research and synthesis_____Technology_____ Bloom’s Levels: Knowledge_____Comprehension _____Application _____Analysis _____ Synthesis _____Evaluation_____ AP Multiple choice questioning_____AP Free Response writing_____ Methodology: Teacher directed_____Student-centered_____Project-based_____ Independent research study_____Lecture and/or Discussion_____ Levels of Rigor: Acquisition_____ Application _____ Assimilation _____ Adaptation_____ Page 43 NOTES/COMMENTS: Updated 5/30/13 AP ENGLISH IMPLEMENTATION OF AP STRATEGIES AND ASSESSMENTS AP Curriculum: In order to maintain the fidelity of rigor and differentiation of an AP English course, AP English Literature and Composition and AP English Language and Composition will follow the College Board Standards and their College Board approved AP Syllabus in conjunction with TEKS, as stated in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills 110.83. Advanced Placement English Language and Composition and 110.84 Advanced Placement English Literature and Composition. All AP/Pre-AP English courses will embed AP multiple choice practice questions into each unit plan. All AP/Pre-AP English courses will include at least 2 timed writing assessments each six weeks . All AP/Pre-AP course syllabi will indicate state TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards within the Advanced Placement unit lessons and implement the four stages of rigor. All AP courses will have the option to incorporate district curriculum into the AP curriculum with the flexibility to rearrange scope and sequence as needed. All Pre-AP English courses will follow district curriculum framework and provide differentiation through the implementation of AP strategies to meet the AP College Board Standards. AP English IV English Literature and Composition: 1. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success a. Embed AP syllabus into district curriculum framework by showing vertical alignment of TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS). b. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success and Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills 110.83. 2. Fall semester: Incorporate AP assessments and timed writings with option to use nine weeks assessments if it is aligned with AP curriculum. 3. Spring semester: Implement AP Practice Exam; Multiple Choice assessments; Open response timed writings AP English III English Language and Composition: 1. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success a. Embed AP syllabus into district curriculum framework by showing vertical alignment of TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS). b. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success and Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills 110.83 in conjunction with C-Scope Framework. 2. Fall semester, 2011: Incorporate AP assessments and timed writings with option to use nine weeks assessments if appropriately aligned with AP curriculum. 3. Spring semester: Implement AP Practice Exam; Multiple Choice assessments; Open response timed writings Pre-AP English: 1. Follow the district district curriculum framework and assessments, using AP strategies, additional AP multiple choice questions, and open response timed writings. Page 44 Summer Reading: All AP and Pre-AP English courses will require a summer reading program that includes an assignment to complete at the end of the reading. The summer reading choice will come from the College Board/AP Reading List. Updated 5/30/13 AP IMPLEMENTATION OF AP STRATEGIES AND ASSESSMENTS SOCIAL STUDIES GRADES 7 – 12 AP Curriculum: In order to maintain the level and fidelity of rigor and differentiation of MISD Advanced Placement courses, all Advanced Placement courses will follow their College Board approved AP Syllabus in conjunction with Texas state TEKS, as stated in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Subchapter D: AP US History 113.53; AP US Government 113.57; AP Comparative Government 113.58; AP Microeconomics 118.13; AP Macroeconomics 118.14; AP Psychology 113.59. Pre-AP World History and PreAP World Geography will follow the district CSCOPE Framework in conjunction with Texas state TEKS, as stated in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Subchapter D: World Geography 113.33; World History 113. 34. All AP course syllabi will indicate state TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards within the Advanced Placement unit lessons. All AP courses will include at least 2 timed writing/open response assessments each six weeks. All AP courses will have the option to incorporate district curriculum into AP curriculum with the flexibility to re-arrange scope and sequence as needed to meet the AP College Board Standards. All Pre-AP courses will include at least 1 timed writing/open response assessment each six weeks. All Pre-AP courses will follow the district curriculum framework and will provide differentiation through the implementation of AP strategies to meet the AP College Board Standards. AP US History/ AP US and Comparative Government/ AP Micro-/Macroeconomics: 4. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success c. Embed AP syllabus into district curriculum framework by showing vertical alignment of TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS). d. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success and Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills 110.83. 5. Fall semester: Incorporate AP assessments, timed writings, and DBQs with option to use nine weeks assessments if it is aligned with AP curriculum. 6. Spring semester: Follow AP Syllabus curriculum (with option to continue district curriculum) Implement AP Practice Exams; Multiple Choice assessments; and other assessments to include timed writings, DBQ writing throughout the semester. 7. Incorporate AP social studies strategies. Page 45 Pre-AP World History, Pre-AP World Geography, and Junior High Social Studies: 1. Follow district curriculum framework and TEKS with evidence of differentiation for PreAP and GT students, using AP strategies, additional AP multiple choice type of questions, and open response timed writings. 2. Assessments: Use district curriculum assessments and AP formatted multiple choice assessments, timed writings, and DBQ’s. 3. Incorporate AP social studies strategies Summer Reading: All AP and Pre-AP ELA/Social Studies courses will include a summer reading program with an assignment to be completed at the end of the reading. The summer reading choice will come from the College Board/AP-approved selections. Updated 5/30/13 AP IMPLEMENTATION OF AP STRATEGIES AND ASSESSMENTS MATH GRADES 7 – 12 AP Curriculum: In order to maintain the level and fidelity of rigor and differentiation of MISD Advanced Placement courses, all Advanced Placement courses will follow their College Board approved AP Syllabus in conjunction with Texas state TEKS, as stated in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Subchapter D: AP Calculus AB 111.54; AP Calculus BC 111.55. All Pre-AP courses, including junior high 7th grade Pre-AP Math, Pre-AP Algebra I, PreAP Algebra II, PreAP Geometry, and PreAP Precalculus will follow the district curriculum in conjunction with Texas state TEKS, as stated in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Subchapters B and C: Algebra I 111.39, Algebra II 111.40, Geometry 111.41; Precalculus 111.42; and Seventh Grade Mathematics 111.28, using the 8th grade TEKS. All AP course syllabi will indicate state TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards within the Advanced Placement unit lessons. All AP courses will include practice in at least 2 free response assessments each six weeks and sample AP multiple choice practice questions. An important goal of the free-response sections of the AP Calculus Exams is to provide students with an opportunity to communicate their knowledge of correct reasoning and methods. Students are required to show their work to assess the students’ methods and answers. (Source: AP Calculus Course Description, College Board). All AP courses will have the option to incorporate district curriculum into AP curriculum with the flexibility to re-arrange scope and sequence as needed to meet the AP College Board Standards. All Pre-AP courses will include at least 1 free response section where they show work each six weeks. All Pre-AP courses will follow the district curriculum and will provide differentiation through the implementation of AP strategies to meet the AP College Board Standards. Page 46 AP Calculus AB, AP Calculus BC: 1. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success a. Embed district curriculum into AP syllabus by showing vertical alignment of TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS) for those courses in which students must take EOC. b. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success and Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills 111. 54 and 111.55. 2. Fall semester: Incorporate AP assessments and free response timed examples, including problems with and without graphing calculator. 3. Spring semester: Follow AP Syllabus curriculum and implement sample AP Practice Exams; Multiple Choice assessments; and other assessments to include free response questions and problems with and without graphing calculator throughout the semester. 4. Incorporate AP social studies strategies. Pre-AP 7th Math: Follow district curriculum and TEKS with evidence of differentiation for PreAP and GT students, using AP strategies, additional AP multiple choice type of questions, and free response sections with and without the use of graphing calculator. 1. Assessments: Use district nine-week assessments and AP formatted multiple choice assessments free-response timed sections and incorporate AP strategies. Updated 5/30/13 AP IMPLEMENTATION OF AP STRATEGIES AND ASSESSMENTS SCIENCE GRADES 7 – 12 AP Curriculum: In order to maintain the level and fidelity of rigor and differentiation of MISD Advanced Placement courses, all Advanced Placement courses will follow their College Board approved AP Syllabus in conjunction with Texas state TEKS, as stated in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Subchapter D: AP Biology 112.62; AP Chemistry 112.63; AP Physics B 112.64; AP Physics C 112.65; AP Environmental Science 112.66. All Pre-AP courses, including junior high 7th and 8th grade Pre-AP Science, Pre-AP Biology, PreAP Chemistry, and PreAP Physics will follow the district CSCOPE Framework in conjunction with Texas state TEKS, as stated in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Subchapters B and C: Biology 112.34, Chemistry 112.35, Physics 112.39, Seventh Grade Science 112.19 and Eighth Grade Science 112.20. All AP course syllabi will indicate state TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards within the Advanced Placement unit lessons. All AP courses will include practice in at least 2 free response assessments each six weeks and sample AP multiple choice practice questions. Teachers are expected to devote 25 percent of instructional time to lab investigations and conduct at least two investigations per big idea. In conducting lab investigations, students will be encouraged to engage in the following: (Source: AP Biology Course Description, College Board). • Generate questions for investigation • Choose which variables to investigate • Design and conduct experiments • Design their own experimental procedures • Collect, analyze, interpret, and display data • Determine how to present their conclusions All AP courses will have the option to incorporate district curriculum into AP curriculum with the flexibility to re-arrange scope and sequence as needed to meet the AP College Board Standards. All Pre-AP courses will include at least 1 free response assessment each six weeks. Page AP Biology, AP Chemistry, AP Physics C, AP Environmental Science: 1. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success a. Embed district curriculum into AP syllabus by showing vertical alignment of TEKS, College Board Standards, and College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS) for those courses in which students must take EOC. b. Follow AP Syllabus in relation to College Board Standards for College Success and Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills 110.83. 2. Fall semester: Incorporate AP assessments and free response timed writings, with option to use nine weeks assessments if it is aligned with AP curriculum. 3. Spring semester: Follow AP Syllabus curriculum and implement sample AP Practice Exams Implement AP Practice Exams; Multiple Choice assessments; and other assessments to include timed writings, DBQ writing throughout the semester. 4. Incorporate AP social studies strategies. 47 All Pre-AP courses will follow the district curriculum and will provide differentiation through the implementation of AP strategies to meet the AP College Board Standards. Updated 5/30/13 Page 48 Pre-AP 7th and 8th Grade Science, PreAP Biology,, Pre-AP Chemistry, and PreAP Physics: 4. Follow district curriculum and TEKS with evidence of differentiation for PreAP and GT students, using AP strategies, additional AP multiple choice type of questions, lab work, and free response timed writings. 5. Assessments: Use district nine-week assessments and AP formatted multiple choice assessments, freeresponse timed writings. 6. Incorporate AP strategies Updated 5/30/13 DEVELOPING INSTRUCTIONAL STANDARDS WITH AP VERTICAL TEAMS WHAT IS AN AP VERTICAL TEAM? An AP Vertical Team is a group of teachers from different grade levels in a given discipline who work cooperatively to develop and implement a vertically aligned program aimed at helping students acquire the academic skills necessary for success in the Advanced Placement Program. PRIMARY GOALS: Improve academic performance for all students by introducing skills and concepts needed for success in AP and other challenging courses in earlier grades. Improve performance and participation in the Advanced Placement Program. TIMELINE: 2007 – 2008: --Organize AP English, Math, Science, and Social Studies Vertical Team --Implement open enrollment into the AP/PreAP program 2008 – 2009: --Develop an Academic Vocabulary Pacing Chart for grades 6 – 12 in the PreAP/AP program --Develop an ELA Skills Progression Chart in literary terms, grammar and Composition --Develop a standardized Science Lab Report with rubric --Mandatory requirement for all students enrolled in AP courses to take the AP Exam. MISD will pay for all AP exams. 2009 – 2010: --Field test the Academic Vocabulary Pacing Chart --Develop AP strategies across the content areas --Writing across the content areas; Composition pacing chart 2010 - 2011: --Develop course outlines, syllabi to align with College Readiness Standards --Develop and implement an Advanced Placement Summer Reading Program for English and Social Studies students in grades 8 – 12 2011 – 2012: -- Create comprehensive unit lesson plans that incorporate the four stages of rigor and demonstrate differentiation --Revise and implement an Advanced Placement Summer Reading Program for Engilsh and Social Studies students in grades 8 – 12 Page 49 2012 – 2013: -- Continue to develop comprehensive unit lesson plans that incorporate the four stages of rigor and demonstrate differentiation --Implement an Advanced Placement Summer Reading Program for Engilsh and Social Studies students in grades 8 – 12 Updated 5/30/13 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT IN ENGLISH/LANGUAGE ARTS Novel alignment Literary terms Summer reading Major works requirements Curriculum alignment Annotation VERTICAL ALIGNMENT IN SCIENCE: SCIENCE STANDARDS Common abbreviations and symbols Latin and Greek roots Graphing standards Scientific inquiry methods Lab reports and lab notebooks Lab report rubric Equipment Continuum 2. Realizing that student understanding and proficiency in the use of lab equipment is critical to student success on required assessments and to student access to advanced science courses, the AP Science Vertical Team has established a continuum of experiences with science lab equipment that is intended to support the development of student proficiency and understanding of science concepts. Specific goals of the AP Science Vertical Team include: a. Establish grade level expectations and standard experiences for science instruction 6 – 12. b. Integrate equipment skills needed for success in science courses including AP science courses into the curriculum. c. This portion of the equipment continuum is designed to emphasize the use of selected lab tools in the lower grades to support student understanding of their function and application in the upper grades and courses. 50 1. Page Updated 5/30/13 EQUIPMENT CONTINUUM: Measure mass with a Balance Pan balance Triple beam balance Digital balance after experience with triple beam balance Analytical balance PreAP/AP Use a Graduated Cylinder/Buret Rulers/meter sticks Graduated cylinders Burets Use a Microscope Scope on a rope (flexcam) Hand lens Compound microscope Use a pH Meter Indicators – household/commercial pH paper pH meter Use Spring Scales Rulers/meter sticks Spring scales PRE-AP SCIENCE STRATEGIES: Acquiring data by experimentation and observation Recording and manipulating data Communicating and sharing results Designing experiments Developing an understanding of science as a process VERTICAL ALIGNMENT IN MATHEMATICS: GRAPHING CALCULATOR CONTINUUM Identify the calculator skills needed for each math course Imbed calculator objective into course expectations Deliberate instruction and skill development VERTICAL ALIGNMENT IN SOCIAL STUDIES: FOCUS ON SKILLS PreAP 7th grade Texas History PreAP 6th grade Social Studies 51 PreAP World History PreAP World Geography PreAP 8th grade US History Page AP Psychology AP Government AP Macroeconomics AP US History Updated 5/30/13 SOCIAL STUDIES SKILLS CONTINUUM: Thesis development Document analysis Multiple choice tests Note-making Vocabulary DBQ / FRQ Page 52 CRITICAL VOCABULARY: Vocabulary critical to the understanding of the discipline Vertically aligned 6 – 12 Critical Vocabulary supported by: Content and grade/course specific training on good vocabulary instruction Master list of critical vocabulary for grades 6 – 12 Grade/course specific list of critical vocabulary words in the order in which they are to be taught along with a description of the words so that all teachers have a common understanding of how to teach the words Glossary of all the critical vocabulary words, the descriptions, and in which grade/course it is taught Grade/course specific list of resources to use when introducing each word Updated 5/30/13 ESTABLISHING AN INSTRUCTIONAL STANDARD FOR ALL VERTICAL TEAMS: Student Experiences: Timed writings (DBQ, FRQ) Thesis writing Document analysis Essential labs Lab reports Use of lab equipment Novels Vocabulary WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN . . . AN AP CLASS: A PRE-AP CLASS: AP course content * MISD PreAP curriculum Practice with AP testing format * Practice with MC and free response Periodic timed assessments testing formats Independent reading and * Periodic timed assessments Accountability * Increasing accountability for independent Efficient use of instructional time reading * PreAP Strategies VERTICAL TEAM TRAINING INITIATIVES Pre-AP: Interdisciplinary Strategies for English and Social Studies Thesis development Document analysis Interactive Lecture Book Study Phasing labs Multiple Choice Assessment Summer Reading – Assessing Student Reading Pre-AP Science Strategies Vocabulary instruction Notemaking Calculator Training Laying the Foundation Page 53 PROJECTED RESULTS: Increased Instructional Leadership Improved Student Skills Improved Staff Development Collaboration / Team Spirit Written, Aligned Curriculum Common Language Student Success Impact on Academic Classes Updated 5/30/13 Advanced Placement Vertical Team Primary Goals To improve academic performance for all students by introducing college readiness standards, strategies and concepts needed for success in AP and Pre-AP courses. To improve performance and participation in Advanced Placement program and on Advanced Placement exams. Strategies Writing: synthesis, analysis, comparison-contrast, timed writing prompts Inquiry: level two and level three questions Collaboration: group discussion, Socratic seminar, group projects, peer editing Reading: annotating text, summary, making notes Lecture, note making, collaboration, inquiry, writing, discussion, one-on-one sharing, presentations, research, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, application English Novel alignment (completed) Literary academic vocabulary (completed) Summer reading Major works requirements (research) Annotation Analytical writing Critical reading and thinking Timed writings AP Multiple choice questions Science Common abbreviations and symbols Latin and Greek roots Graphing standards Scientific inquiry methods Lab reports / lab notebooks / rubric (completed) Equipment continuum Math Graphing calculator continuum Identify claculator skills needed for each math course Embed calculator objective into course expectations Deliberate instruction and skill development Page 54 Social Studies Thesis development Document analysis AP Multiple choice tests and essential questions Note making Vocabulary alignment(completed) Updated 5/30/13 Vertical Team Training Initiatives PreAP Interdisciplinary Strategies for ELA and Social Studies Thesis development Analysis – documents Interactive lecture book study AP Multiple choice assessment Summer reading PreAP Science strategies Vocabulary instruction Note making Calculator training Laying the Foundations Page 55 Results Increased instructional leadership Improved student skills Improved staff development Collaboration / team spirit Written aligned curriculum Common language Student success Impact on academic classes CollegeBoard consultants / readers Updated 5/30/13 PROCEDURE FOR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR WORKS NOT ON THE APPROVED AP/PRE-AP READING LIST Advanced Placement Grade Level Reading List Proposals: Secondary Recommended for Classroom Instruction: Each proposal will include the following overview: title, author, synopsis, reading level, interest level, key literary elements, recommendations/awards, and the work’s literary significance. These books are acceptable for teacher assigned reading and direct class instruction. To Submit for Approval for Works Not On Protected Book List: Teachers may use works that do not appear on the protected book list. To use a work not on the list, the teacher should submit a proposal* by completing the following procedure: 1. Write a summary of the book that includes: title, author, synopsis, reading level, interest level, key elements, recommendations/awards, the work’s significance, and brief unit plan that shows how the work will be implemented. 2. This summary should be submitted to the principal, subject area supervisor, and the Director of Advanced Academics for approval prior to using the work. These individuals will confer to determine approval. 3. Following the instruction of the unit, the teacher will complete an evaluation form, which is distributed when a proposal is approved. After completing the evaluation form, the teacher will send it to the Director of Advanced Academics for final approval to add work to the Protected Book List. Page 56 * **NOTE: The teacher must have read the entire work before submitting the proposal. Updated 5/30/13 Advanced Placement Grade Level Reading List Proposal Secondary Teacher’s Name: _____________________________________ Campus__________ Background to Book: Author: _____________________Title of Work: ______________________________ Publisher:_____________________________ ISBN#:___________ Reading Lexile: ______ Grade Level:______ Interest Level: _________ Key Literary Elements: Recommendations/Awards: Work’s Literary Significance: Page 57 Brief Summary of Book”: Updated 5/30/13 ADVANCED PLACEMENT / PRE-AP UNIT PLAN TEACHER:___________ COURSE:_______________CAMPUS:__________GRADE LEVEL:______ UNITTITLE:_____________________________________________________________________ LEARNING STANDARDS/OBJECTIVES: Standard:__________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________ Acquisition Objective(s): Application Objective(s): Assimilation Objective(s): Adaptation Objective(s): LEARNING MATERIALS: Page 58 ACQUISITION: Organizing Strategies: __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Updated 5/30/13 Direct Instruction: Guided Practice: Independent Practice: Ongoing Assessment: APPLICATION: Thinking Skills: __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Direct Instruction: Guided Practice: Independent Practice: Page 59 Ongoing Assessment: Updated 5/30/13 ASSIMILATION: Thinking Process: __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Direct Instruction: Guided Practice: Independent Practice: Ongoing Assessment: ADAPTATION: (if applicable) Habits of Mind: __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Direct Instruction: Page 60 Guided Practice: Independent Practice: Updated 5/30/13 Ongoing Assessment: Page 61 SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT_______________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________ Updated 5/30/13 FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS Formative assessments are for learning. Formative assessment is a practice that drives instruction in the classroom. Formative assessments are short, frequent, and engage every student so that teachers can adjust instruction and students can gage their level of understanding during a lesson. Embedding formative assessment at strategic points during instruction provides information that teachers can use to identify and respond to problem learning areas. Instead of calling on two-three students to answer a question, formative assessments involve all students in answering the questions in responding to the learning. Formative assessments are aligned with a daily objective to provide evidence by which a teacher can gage how well students are learning the essential standards. Formative assessment is a process of accumulating information about a student that in turn leads to helping teachers to make instructional decision that will improve that student’s understanding and achievement levels. Page 62 “If you can both listen to children and accept their answers not as things to just be judged right or wrong but as pieces of information which may reveal what the child is thinking, you will have taken a giant step toward becoming a master teacher, rather than merely a disseminator of information.” Easley & Swoyer, 1975 Updated 5/30/13 Elementary Basic Formative Assessments Elementary Formative Assessments with Formative Assessments involving a Writing Response Activity Fact or Fib (students write facts or fibs after a unit of study, spin on true false) Fist to Five (Show your understanding on scale 1-5) Graphic Organizers (Assesses students’ conceptual understanding) Interactive Notebook (Reflections, data, vocabulary activities) KWL Chart (Chart divided - What I know? What I want to know? What I learned?) Response Boards (Dry erase, signs, magnetic boards, chalkboards – write answer and reveal) Think Pair Share (Teacher poses questions, students think, students pair with partner and discusses responses, share answers with whole class) Quick Write (Student writes at least 3 minutes on a topic) Read Write Pair Share ( Student reads material, writes in response to reading , engages in partner conversation, shares with whole class) Reflection Paragraph (5 minute paragraph using key vocabulary of the day and reflect on learning) Request (Students think and record questions while reading) Summary Star (One reflection on each point of the star) Two Stars & Wish (Peer editing-2 things they like & 1 thing they wish they saw) Yesterday’s News (Tell what yesterday’s lesson was & tell about key understandings) Apple and the Worm (Apple gives the answer, worm – justifies the answer) Balloon Pop (Put your question in a balloon…student pops to get the question) Beach Ball Review (Vis-a-vis topics on ball – student catches and responds) Cash Out (Reflect on read passage –what did you learn, how did you react, what surprised you, what idea helped) Class Quilt (Each student reflects on learning & ideas are combined on to make quilt) Cup Signal (Green cup = I understand well, yellow cup= Slow down a little, red cup = Stop I am totally lost) Fact or Fib (students write facts or fibs after a unit of study, spin on true false) I Used to Think…But Now I know (Student compare verbally or in writing ideas from beginning to end of lesson) Interest Scale (Post-it scale on a scale 1-10 based on level of understanding) Paint the Picture (Explain lesson only with drawing, no words) Pictionary (Draw vocabulary word without talking and students guess) Post It Note Showdown (Slap down the correct post-it note) Snowball (Write question or statement on paper, wad it up, throw it, pick up snowball & students share) Vegas Review (Roll the die and come up with that many things about a given topic) 63 Constructive Quizzes (Teacher made curriculum based assessments) Exit Slips (As students leave students record-3 things I learned, 2 interesting things, 1 question, etc.) Admit Slips (Graphic organizers, stems, questions, etc. as students enter class) Chain Notes (Teacher gives statement or question at the top of the page, student writes a responding statement then passes the paper to next person) Closing Thoughts/321 (Summarization 3 big ideas, 2 words to sum up learning, 1 question you have) Exit Slips (Example - As students leave they record -3 things I learned, 2 interesting things, 1 question) Page Admit Slips (Graphic organizers, question stems, questions, etc. student complete as they enter class) Bingo (Old fashioned review game – vocabulary, concepts, mixed ideas, etc.) Updated 5/30/13 Secondary Basic Formative Assessments Secondary Formative Assessments with Writing Formative Assessments involving a Response Activity Admit Slips (Graphic organizers, stems, questions, etc.) Admit Slips (Graphic organizers, stems, questions, etc.) Chain Notes(Teacher gives statement or question at the top of the page, student write a responding statement and passes paper to the next person) Exit Slips (Example - As students leave they record 3 things I learned, 2 interesting things, 1 question) Balloon Pop (Teacher puts question in a balloon…student pops to get the question) Beach Ball Review (Vis-a-Vis topic on ball – student catches and determines question) Exit Slips (As students leave students record 3 things I learned, 2 interesting things, 1 question) Fact or Fib (Students write facts or fibs after a unit of study, spin on true false) Graphic Organizers (Assesses students’ conceptual understanding) KWL Chart (What I know? What I want to know? What I learned?) Interactive Notebook (Students record authentic reflections, data, vocabulary activities, etc.) Response Boards (dry erase, signs, magnetic boards, chalkboards – write answer and reveal) Think Pair Share (Teacher poses questions, student thinks, student pairs with partner and discusses responses, share answers with whole class) Quick Write (Student writes at least 3 minutes on a topic) Read Write Pair Share (Student reads material, write in response to reading, engages in partner conversation, shares with whole class) Reflection Paragraph(5 minute paragraph using key vocabulary of the day and reflect on learning) Request (Students think and record questions while reading) Summary Star (One reflection on each point of the star) Yesterday’s News (Student tells what yesterday’s lesson was and tells about key understandings) Cash Out (Reflect on read passage –what did you learn, how did you react, what surprised you, what idea helped) Fact or Fib (Students write facts or fibs after a unit of study, spin on true false) I Used to Think…But Now I know (Students compare verbally or in writing ideas from beginning to end of lesson) Note on Back – (Students give clues about sticky note on students back) Paint the Picture (Explain lesson only with drawing, no words) Pictionary (Draw vocabulary word without talking and students guess) Picture Reveal (As students answer questions correctly, teacher reveals parts of a picture) Snowballs (Student writes question or statement on paper, wad it up, throw it, pick up snowball & students share) Spot Light (Flashlight on baggie word wall) Sticky Note Concentration (Words on the wall covered in post-it notes) Vegas Review (Roll the dice and come up with that many things about a given topic) 64 Constructive Quizzes (Teacher made curriculum based assessments) Page Bingo (Old fashioned review game – vocabulary, concepts, mixed ideas, etc.) Updated 5/30/13 DESCRIPTIONS OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS: Admit Slips: As students enter class they are given a sticky note or strip of paper where they write in response to a prompt. Students can write as a pre assessment or as a summary of yesterday’s learning. Apple and The Worm: Partner activity to review learning. Apple gives the answer. Worm justifies the answer. Balloon Pop: Teacher puts problem, vocabulary word, or comprehension question inside a balloon that is inflated. The student gets to pop a balloon and must answer what is inside. Bingo: This can be a review game – students take a variety of topics, vocabulary words etc., and place on grid. Beach Ball Review – Pass the beach ball 5 times across the room. The person who catches the 5th pass will comment on the information covered based on the prompt closest to his/her right thumb. Teacher uses a Vis-a-Vis pen and writes questions or vocabulary words to go with a lesson. CASH Out: CASH out requires students to reflect on a reading passage, article or video using four guiding questions: (1) What did you learn about the topic? (Cognitive) (2) How did you react to the topic? (Affective) (3) What surprised you about the topic? (Surprise) (4) What idea or topic was helpful to you? (Help) - Participants respond individually after the reading the passage or viewing a video, followed by a timed pair share in which each partner has one minute to share out his or her responses to each question. Chain Notes: Chain Notes begin with a question printed at the top of a paper. The paper is then circulated from student to student. Each student responds with one or two sentences related to the question and passes it on to the next student. Upon receiving the previous “chain of responses,” a student adds a new thought or builds on a prior statement. These are best used as a check for understanding after students have had sufficient opportunities to explore and learn about the concept addressed by the question in the note. Page 65 Class Quilt: Each student reflects on learning through an illustration and writing. Pages are hung together as a quilt by glue or string. Updated 5/30/13 Closing Thoughts: Teacher gives a reflective sentence starter that students use to give a closing thought before leaving the classroom. One thing I learned today I wonder I’m confused about I believe One question I have is I now know Constructive Quizzes/CBA’s (Teacher made tests/quizzes/ formative assessments): Each week the teacher creates a short quiz that covers the 1-2 TEKS that were taught in that week. The quizzes usually have between 3-5 questions. The teacher may ask questions that need a short response verses multiple choice. This gives insight into what the children are thinking. Or the teacher may use multiple choice questions. The results assist in planning for small groups the following week. If the class did poorly across the board on particular questions, then the teacher will reteach that skill whole group. As a unit progresses, the quizzes may get longer if the teacher adds one question from the previous week or weeks to the new current assessment of this week’s skills. This keeps all skills fresh on the student’s minds and gives the data about who “has” it and who needs continued intervention. Constructive quizzes will not only furnish teachers with feedback on their students, but they serve to help students evaluate their own learning. By using quizzes to furnish students with immediate feedback, the teacher can quickly determine the status of each student in relation to the learning targets. Cup Signal – (Stoplight): Red/yellow/green cups: Student each have three cups the colors of stoplights on their desks- one red, one yellow, one green. The cups go inside one another. The color of the outside cup indicates how well the student is making sense of what is currently being taught. Green means that the student understands. Yellow means that the student is not sure what he or she is learning. Red means that the student is lost and needs intervention from the teacher or another student. Exit Slips: Exit Cards are index cards or sticky notes that students hand to you, deposit in a box, or post on the door as they leave the classroom. On the Exit Card, your students have written their names and have responded to a question, solved a problem, or summarized their understanding after a particular learning experience. In a few minutes, the teacher can read the responses sort them into groups (students who have not yet mastered the skill, student who are ready to apply the skills, students who are ready to go ahead or to go deeper), and use the date to inform the next day’s or, even , that afternoon’s instruction. Page 66 Feedback provided by the Exit Cards frequently leads to the formation of a needs-based group whose members require re-teaching of the concept in a different way. It also identifies which of your students do not need to participate in your planned whole group mini-lesson, because they are ready to be challenged at a greater level of complexity. Updated 5/30/13 Example of an exit slip3-2-1: This is a summarization technique. List 3-2-1, vertically with stems. The stems are flexible and can be tailored for any content, example – 3. Big ideas you have learned 2. 1. Words which sum up your learning Question you have Fact or Fib (True or False): Students utilize this to reflect on unit of study, or literature selection. 1. 2. 3. Students make a list of fact statements from their learning For each fact, they need to decide if they will write the answer as a fact or fib Student can fold 5-7 index card or sticky note in half writing their statement on front and answer on inside Graphic Organizers: A graphic organizer is a “visual representation of knowledge” on a concept or topic. These include items such as Venn diagrams, word/idea webs or concept maps, cause/effect charts. Graphic organizers can be used to assess prior knowledge, record learning during a lecture or class reading, or organize knowledge after learning. Fist to Five: The teacher tells students that he or she would like to get a sense of how well each of them is understanding a concept or skill by asking every student to make a fist in front of his or her chest. At the count of three, the students display anywhere from zero to five fingers, keeping their eyes on the teacher and their hands in front of the chests, (Zero represents a student not understanding at all. One represents minimal understanding. Two represents some understanding, three represents that the student understands almost everything but could not explain it all to someone else. Four represents that the student understands everything and could probably explain it to someone else. Five represents that the student understands everything very well and feels confident about his or her capability of explaining it to someone else.) For example, after giving instructions for a lab activity, teachers might ask for a fist to five to do a quick check on whether students understand the directions before proceeding with the lab. Updated 5/30/13 Page Interactive Notebook- An interactive notebook is where students record notes on a lesson or reading. Students’ writing or drawings provide documentation of their thinking, which can be used to guide instruction. Activities are teacher-initiated but student directed. Teachers provide the prompts but students choose from a menu of activities. They can create illustrations, diagrams, flow charts, concept maps, etc. Students also have the opportunity to respond by writing. 67 I Used to Think…But Now I Know: This strategy asks students to compare verbally or in writing their ideas at the beginning of a lesson (instructional sequence) to the ideas they have after completing the lesson(s). It differs from K-W-L because both parts of the reflection occur after instruction. Interest Scale: The Interest Scale may be used two ways. It can be used to gauge student understanding of a topic being taught. The technique uses a chart marked with a scale (1-10) in which students place Post-it notes on a scale of low to high to indicate their level of understanding of a topic being studied. Students can complete prior to class or a leaving class. Students who place their note on number four or below need re-teaching. An Interest scale may also be used to gauge student interest in an upcoming topic. Student interest is a strong contributing factor to student learning. This strategy helps spot particular students or groups of students who may be disengaged and need differentiated strategies for motivating and interesting them in learning about the topic. KWL Chart: A chart/student paper is divided into 3 categories. (What I know? What I want to know? What I learned) This strategy is used to not only assess a student’s prior knowledge before a unit but also can be used as a formative assessment after a day’s lesson or overall unit. Note on Back: A Post-it note is placed on a student back, students give evidence from text or clues to help student guess what is on the sticky note. Vocabulary words, character, content ideas, etc. Paint the Picture: Paint the Picture visually depicts students’ thinking about an idea, for example in science, without using any annotations. This involves giving students a question and asking them to design a visual representation that reveals their thinking and answers the question. The picture needs to stand alone without labels and can be used to explain their thinking. Pictionary: Students illustrate concept/vocabulary words without speaking and partner guesses from the drawing. This can be a partner or group activity. Picture Reveal: Teacher takes a picture or cartoon and covers it with small sticky notes and places it on the overhead. Students are asked comprehension questions, asked to explain concepts, define vocabulary, solve math problems, etc. As each student answers a question correctly a sticky note is removed until students can guess the picture. Post-it Note Show Down: Students write true, false or fact or fib on post-it note. Teacher or students make a statement and students slap it down as they answer. First one down and correct wins. Quick Writes: Given a topic and short time frame, students write everything they know on the topic. Read Write Pair Share: This is a strategy that can promote content literacy. Page 68 1. Read: Students either read silently, or follow along as the teachers reads aloud. 2. Write: Students quickly write their impressions or reactions to the text, or answer a specific question 3. Pair: Students turn to a partner and talk about what they’ve written 4. Share: The teacher invites large group discussion. This strategy helps teachers avoid classroom discussion situations where only a few students participate. Updated 5/30/13 Reflection Paragraph – A reflection paragraph simply asks students to write what they learned in two to four sentences or with short time limits (5 minutes.) It encourages students to think in complete sentences and in broad schemas. These can be included in interactive notebooks ReQuest: Students record questions or thinking as they read a specific section. Response Board – Response cards are index cards, signs, dry-erase boards, magnetic boards, or other items that are simultaneously held up by all students in class to indicate their response to a question or a problem presented by the teacher. Using response cards, the teacher can easily note the responses of individual students while teaching the whole group. Additionally, response boards allow for participation by the whole class and not just a few students who raise their hands to respond. Snowball: 1. Student writes question or statement on paper, wad it up, and throw it. 2. Students pick up each other’s snowball & students answer/ share. Spotlight: Teacher prepares a content word wall of baggies. Inside each baggie is a question or vocabulary word that goes with the unit. Teacher or student shines a flashlight on a baggie student must answer the question or define vocabulary word that is inside the baggie in the spot light. This is serves as a motivating review. Summary Star - Star, Webbing, Cluster diagrams are a type of graphic organizer that condense and organize data about multiple traits, fact, or attributes associated a single topic. For example, a star diagram can be used to create a graphic display describing all you know about dinosaurs (when they lived, what kinds there were, how big they were, what they ate, where fossils have been found, etc.) or a graphic display of methods that help your study skills (like taking notes, reading, doing homework, memorizing, etc.). Another use is a story star, a star diagram used to describe the key points of a story or event, noting the 5 W's: who, when, where, what, and why Star diagrams are useful for basic brainstorming about a topic or simply listing all the major traits related to a theme. Think-Pair-Share: This is a cooperative discussion strategy that allows students to discuss their responses with a peer before sharing with the whole class. Updated 5/30/13 Page Two Stars and a Wish: This is a very simple technique for getting started with peer assessment. When any student gives feedback on another student’s work, he has to provide two things he thinks were good about the work (the two stars) and a suggestion for improvement (the wish). The comments are written on sticky notes so that if the recipient doesn’t find the feedback helpful, it can easily be removed. 69 Think – The teacher engages students’ thinking with a question, prompt, reading, visual or observation. The students should take a few minutes (not seconds) to think about the questions. Pair – Using designated partners, students pair up to discuss their respective responses. The compare their thoughts and identify the responses they think are the best, most intriguing, most convincing, or most unique. Share – After students talk in pairs for a few moments, the teacher asks pairs to share their thinking with the rest of the class Vegas Review: Students roll a die and have to come up with the same number of facts about a topic as the number they roll on the dice. Yesterday’s News: Often used as a Do Now or Admit slip. Students write a paragraph outlining the main concept or ideas they recall from the previous lesson. Committee Members: Jane Rambo April Paris Kelli Hamilton Kim Burnett Christine Morgan Kim Elkins Halston McCalla jrambo@midlandisd.net aparis@midlandisd.net khamilto@midlandisd.net kimburnett@midlandisd.net cmorgan@midlandisd.net kaelkins@midlandisd.net halston.mccalla@midlandisd.net Resources on Formative Assessments: Fisher, Douglas and Frey, Nancy: Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Techniques for Your Classroom. ASCD, 2007. www.nwea.org/.../dylan-wiliam-the-5-formative-assessment-strategies-to-improve-student-learning Embedded Formative Assessment - Dylan Wiliam - YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3HRvFsZHoo http://www.wordle.net//03%20Formative daretodifferentiate.wikispaces.com/.../03+-+Formative+Assessment+Strategies.pdf - Page 70 www.livebinders.com/play/play?id=143973 - Updated 5/30/13 Lesson Plan Self – Reflection and Evaluation Checklist I. II. On a scale of one to five how did this lesson go? 1 2 3 4 5 What problems did I have? Behavior Engagement Understanding Organization/planning None III. What will I do different for my next lesson? IV. What type of assessment did I use? V. How did my students perform on the assessment given? Poor okay good excellent Page Comments:____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ 71 Other: ________________ Updated 5/30/13 Team Analysis I. Identify Students that need additional time and support II. What areas are students struggling in? III. Plan for Improvement. IV. Identify Students that are highly proficient V. Plan for enrichment and extension of learning for those students. Page 72 VI. Team strategies that are working. How can they be implemented in each of the team member’s classroom? Updated 5/30/13