DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY 3677 Life in the Universe: Extra-solar planets Dr. Matt Burleigh www.star.le.ac.uk/mrb1/lectures.html Course outline • Lecture 1 – – – – Definition of a planet A little history Pulsar planets Doppler “wobble” (radial velocity) technique • Lecture 2 – Transiting planets – Transit search projects – Detecting the atmospheres of transiting planets: secondary eclipses & transmission spectroscopy – Transit timing variations Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Course outline • Lecture 3 – – – – Microlensing Direct Imaging Other methods: astrometry, eclipse timing Planets around evolved stars • Lecture 4 – Statistics: mass and orbital distributions, incidence of solar systems, etc. – Hot Jupiters – Super-Earths – Planetary formation – Planetary atmospheres – The host stars Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Course outline • Lecture 5 – The quest for an Earth-like planet – Habitable zones – Results from the Kepler mission • How common are rocky planets? • Amazing solar systems – Biomarkers – Future telescopes and space missions Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Useful numbers • • • • RSun = 6.995x108m Rjup = 6.9961x107m ~ 0.1RSun Rnep = 2.4622x107m ~ 4Rearth Rearth = 6.371x106m ~ 0.1Rjup ~ 0.01RSun • • • • MSun= 1.989x1030kg Mjup= 1.898x1027kg ~ 0.001MSun = 317.8Mearth Mnep= 1.02x1026kg ~ 5x10-5MSun ~ 0.05Mjup = 17.15Mearth Mearth= 5.97x1024kg = 3x10-6MSun = 3.14x10-3Mjup • 1AU = 1.496x1011m • 1 day = 86400s Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Blue: radial velocity, Green: transiting, Red: microlensing, Orange: direct imaging, Yellow: pulsar timing Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Gravitational microlensing • When a foreground star passes in front of a background star, light from the background star is bent by the gravitational field of a foreground lens to create distorted, multiple and/or brightened images – Consequence of general relativity • The milli-arcsecond separation between multiple images is too small to be resolved by modern telescopes. The combined light of all images is instead observed as a single image of the source • The brightness of the combined image is a function of the projected separation of the source and lens on the sky, and changes as the source, lens and observer move relative to one another Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Gravitational microlensing • If the lens is a single, isolated object, the lightcurve of the background source is simple, smooth and symmetric. • The background star appears to brighten and then dim as the projected separation between the source and lens first decreases and then increases. • For sources and microlenses in our own Galaxy, a typical timescale for the detectable rise and fall of the apparent brightness of the source star is weeks to months. • The basic shape is the same regardless of the relative path the source takes on the sky; the amplitude of the the lightcurve is determined by the minimum angular separation between the lens and source in units of the Einstein radius, ie θLS/θE . Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Gravitational microlensing • If the star has planets, the magnification pattern experienced by a background source is no longer circularly symmetric on the sky • The combined gravitational field of the star and planet can create strong deviations in the lensing pattern, called caustics – This means that the changes in the lightcurve of the background source can be quite dramatic if it does happen to cross the planet-affected area, even for Earth-sized planets. – In the diagram, the red patches are the caustics and P indicates the position of the planet • Because the planet has a gravitational mass that is much smaller than that of the lensing star, the percentage of the lensing pattern area influenced by the planet will be relatively small. – This means that the probability that the source will cross the planet-affected area is low, and thus the chance of detecting a planet by microlensing is also low, Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Gravitational microlensing • Beginning in the 1990s, millions of stars have been monitored every night in search of the few that are microlensed at that time – 30 planets found • Microlensing gives the mass ratio between the planet and its parent star, q=Mp/M∗ , and the angular separation between the planet and star on the sky at the time of the lensing event, θ∗,p/θE , in units of the Einstein ring radius – M* is obtained from the spectral type of the lensing star – The star’s proper motion gives the time to cross the Einstein ring Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Gravitational microlensing • Advantages – Can detect Earth-size planets across Galaxy – Can detect planets in other galaxies • Disadvantages – Must monitor millions of stars constantly (eg in galactic bulge) – Lensing event never repeats – Star too far away to study planet again Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Astrometry • The motion of a star around the centre of mass of a star-planet system can be detected by repeatedly measuring the position of the star on the sky • The amplitude of the motion in micro arseconds (10-6 arcsec) is given by: -1 æ q öæ a öæ d ö DQ = 0.5ç -3 ÷ç ÷ç ÷ è 10 øè 5AU øè 10 pc ø • Where q=(Mpl/M*), a = semi-major axis of the orbit in AU and d = distance to star in pc • For Jupiter at 5AU, the amplitude of the Sun’s motion as seen from another star is ~5x10-4 arcsec (right) • GAIA will discover ~10,000 Jupiters at 1-4AU around stars up to 200pc away Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Other methods • Pulsation timing: – Many stars, like white dwarfs, have very stable pulsation modes. The presence of a planet will be revealed in anomalous timings, just as with pulsar planets • Eclipse timing: – Close, eclipsing binary systems can also reveal the presence of planets through anomalous timings of the expected eclipses – A good example is the close eclipsing white dwarf + red dwarfs binary NN Ser, which appears to have 2 Jupiter mass planets orbiting it Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Direct detection • Imaging = spectroscopy = physics: composition & structure • Difficult • Why? – Stars like the Sun are billions of times brighter than planets – Planets and stars lie very close together on the sky • At 10pc Jupiter and the Sun are separated by 0.5” Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Direct detection • Problem 1: – Stars bright, planets faint • Solution: – Block starlight with a coronagraph • Problem 2: – Earth’s atmosphere distorts starlight, reduces resolution • Solution: – Adaptive optics, Interferometry – difficult, expensive – Or look around very young and/or intrinsically faint stars (not Sun-like) Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe First directly imaged planet? • 2M1207 in TW Hya association • Discovered at ESO VLT in Chile • 25Mjup Brown dwarf + 5Mjup “planet” • Distance ~55pc • Very young cluster ~10M years • Physical separation ~55AU • A brown dwarf is a failed star – Can this really be called a planet? – Formation mechanism may be crucial! Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe First directly imaged planetary system • In 2008 3 planets imaged around the star HR8799 • 130 light years away (40pc) • Three planets at 24, 38 and 68AU separation – In comparison, Jupiter is at 5AU and Neptune at 30AU • Masses of 7Mjup, 10Mjup and 10Mjup • Young: 60Myr – Earth is ~4.5Gyr Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Fomalhaut (alpha Piscis Austrini) • One of the brightest stars in the southern sky • Long known to have a dusty debris disk • Shape of disk suggested presence of planet • 2Mjup planet imaged by HST inside disk • 200Myr old • Like early solar system Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Direct detection: White Dwarfs • White dwarfs are the end state of stars like the Sun – What will happen to the solar system in the future? • WDs are 1,000-10,000 times fainter than Sun-like stars – contrast problem reduced • Over 100 WD within 20pc – At 10pc a separation of 100AU = 10” on sky – Planets should be located well away from the host white dwarf • At Leicester we are searching for planets around nearby WD with 8m telescopes and the Spitzer space telescope Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Log(L/Lsun) PN ejected to WD Thermal Pulse begins 4 AGB 2 He Helium Flash C+O RGB H 0 He WD cooling 4.2 3.8 3.4 Log Teff (K) Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe The end of our solar system Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe The end of our solar system • The inner planets, Mercury, Venus and probably Earth, will be destroyed by the expanding red giant – As a red giant (actually, asymptotic giant), the Sun’s radius will be ~1AU • Mars, the asteroids and outer gas giants will survive • As the red giant loses mass when it evolves to the planetary nebula stage, the outer planets orbits evolve outwards by factor: • Jeans (1924): M MS M WD • Where MMS and MWD are the main sequence and white dwarf masses in solar mass units (Msun) • Note: the relationship between a star’s mass and a white dwarf’s mass is given by: MWD = 0.12M MS + 0.36 • This is called the “initial-final mass relation”, and is derived from observations of white dwarfs in clusters (Casewell et al., 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1795) Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Spitzer 4.5micron image GJ3483 (LTT3059 / WD0806-661) 130” / 2500AU I maybe a planet… or a brown dwarf Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe I am the white dwarf Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Proper motion WD Companion • PM error +/-25mas/yr Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Calculating the planet’s mass • How can we estimate the mass of a directly imaged planet? – Planets of identical mass are assumed to be born with identical temperatures, & cool with age (no nuclear burning in core) – Thus by measuring their brightness, and estimating the host star’s age & distance, we can use a theoretical “evolutionary model” to convert the brightness to a mass! • Method: – (1) measure it’s brightness from the image – (2) determine the star’s distance (eg from it’s spectral type if its main sequence, or better still from its parallax) – (3) convert the star’s apparent mag to absolute mag – (4) estimate the star’s age (eg from it’s rotation period, or if it belongs to an open cluster or coeval moving group) – (5) compare the absolute mag to evolutionary model predicted masses and luminosities for the correct age • Caveats: – Ages of main sequence stars are notoriously difficult to measure – There is no guarantee that two planets of the same age and mass will have the same atmospheric chemistry, structure and temperature – Evolutionary models are only as good as the input physics and assumptions, and are particularly poor at predicting masses at very young ages (few million years) Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe Calculating the planet’s mass: example: GJ3483b • Measure apparent magnitude of object in Spitzer’s 4.5micron filter (“Band 2”) – Find m = 16.75 • • We know the distance d to the white dwarf star from its parallax (it’s 19.2parsecs away) So we can convert the apparent mag to an absolute mag – Absolute mag M is magnitude at 10pc – Use m – M = 5 log d – 5 (Pogson’s equation) – Find M = 15.33 • • We also know how old the white dwarf is from its temperature (white dwarfs cool steadily with time) – 2Gyr Look up a theoretical model which predicts brightness of gas giant planets at different ages • • • • • t (Gyr) = 2.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------M/Ms Teff L/Ls gIRS Blue IRS red Band1 Band2 Band3 Band4 0.0080 370. -6.73 4.29 18.25 18.74 18.93 15.44 16.99 18.16 0.0090 391. -6.64 4.35 17.99 18.55 18.65 15.20 16.76 17.87 • Jupiter is about 0.001M/Ms, so our planet GJ3483b is between 8-9 times the mass of Jupiter! Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe What did the original system look like? • The white dwarf GJ3483 has a mass of 0.58MSun – From the intial-final mass relation • MWD = 0.12M MS + 0.36 – The progenitor main sequence star had a mass of 1.83MSun (a late A or early F star) The white dwarf and planet are separated by 130” – At 19.2pc, 130” = 2500AU • (Note 1AU = 1” at a distance of 1pc) – Using the Jean’s relation between the initial and final separations the planet was originally located at a separation: 2500AU / (MMS/MWD) = 790AU – Still a very large solar system! Dr. Matt Burleigh 3677: Life in the Universe