Chapter Pay-for-Performance: Incentive Rewards Managing Human Resources PowerPoint Presentation by Monica Belcourt, York University and Charlie Cook, The University of West Alabama Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to: 1. 2. 3. 4. Discuss the basic requirements for successful implementation of incentive programs. Identify the types of and reasons for implementing individual incentive plans. Explain why merit raises may fail to motivate employees adequately and discuss ways to increase their motivational value. Indicate the advantage of each of the principal methods used to compensate salespeople. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–2 Learning Outcomes (Cont’d) After studying this chapter, you should be able to: 5. 6. 7. Differentiate how gains may be shared with employees under the Scanlon and Improshare gainsharing systems. Differentiate between profit-sharing plans and explain advantages and disadvantages of these programs. Describe the main types of ESOPs and discuss the advantages of ESOP to employers and employees. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–3 Strategic Reasons for Incentive Plans Variable Pay Incentive Pay Programs Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–4 Figure 10–1 Types of Incentive Plans INDIVIDUAL GROUP ENTERPRISE Piecework Team compensation Profit sharing Standard hour plan Scanlon Plan Stock options Bonuses Improshare Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) Merit pay Lump-sum merit pay Incentive awards Sales incentives Incentives for professional employees Executive compensation Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–5 Incentive Plans Advantages Focus on performance targets Variable costs Team incentives encourage collaboration More effort, better pay Incentive Plan Effectiveness Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–6 Employee Opposition to Incentive Plans Include: Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–7 Successful Incentive Plans Include: Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–8 Highlights in HRM 10.1 Setting Performance Measures—The Keys Performance measures—at all organizational levels— must be consistent with the strategic goals of the organization. Define the intent of performance measures and champion the cause relentlessly. Involve employees. Consider the organization’s culture and workforce demographics when designing performance measures. Widely communicate the importance of performance measures. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–9 Effective Incentive Plan Administration Grant incentives based on individual performance differences. Have the financial resources to reward performance. Set clearly defined, accepted, and challenging yet achievable performance standards. Use an easily understood payout formula. Keep administrative costs reasonable. Do not “ratchet up” performance standards. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–10 Individual Incentive Plans Straight Piecework Differential Piece Rate Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–11 Computing the Piece Rate 60 minutes(per hour) = 5 units per hour 12 Minutes (standard time per unit) $7.50 (hourly rate) = $1.50 per unit 5 units (per hour) Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–12 Piecework: The Drawbacks Problems with piecework systems: Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–13 Individual Incentive Plans: Standard Hour Plan Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–14 Bonuses Bonus Spot bonus Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–15 Merit Pay Merit Pay Program (merit raise) Merit Guidelines Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–16 Problems with Merit Raises Include: Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–17 Motivation Through Merit Raises Develop employee confidence and trust in performance appraisal. Establish job-related performance criteria. Separate merit pay from regular pay. Distinguish merit raises from costof-living raises. Withhold merit payments when performance declines. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–18 Lump-Sum Merit Pay Lump-sum Merit Program Program under which employees receive a year-end merit payment, which is not added to their base pay. Advantages: Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–19 Incentive Awards and Recognition Awards Noncash Incentive Awards Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–20 Sales Incentives Sales Incentive Plans Straight Salary Straight Commission Salary and Commission Combinations Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–21 Incentive Plans for Salespersons Straight Salary Plan Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–22 Incentive Plans for Salespersons (Cont'd) Straight Commission Plan Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–23 Incentive Plans for Salespersons (Cont'd) Combined Salary and Commission Plan Advantages: Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–24 Incentives for Professional Employees Managerial and Executive Incentives Bonuses and merit increases Double-track wage systems Performance incentive bonuses Profit sharing and stock ownership Executive perquisites (perks) Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–25 Executive Compensation The Executive Pay Package Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–26 Figure 10–3 Types of Long-Term Incentive Plans Stock Option Phantom Stock Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) Restricted Stock Stock Purchase Performance Units Performance Shares Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–27 Executive Compensation: Ethics and Accountablility Incentive payments are excessive compared with return to stockholders. Time periods for judging and rewarding performance are too short. Quarterly earnings growth is emphasized at the expense of research and development. Emphasis is placed upon equaling or exceeding executive salary survey averages. Benefits do not relate closely to individual performance. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–28 Highlights in HRM 10.3 The “Sweetness” of Executive Perks • Company car • Spouse travel • Company plane • Medical exams • Executive eating facilities • Mobile phones • Financial consulting • Large insurance policies • Company-paid parking • Income tax preparation • Personal liability insurance • Country club membership • Estate planning • Luncheon club membership • First-class air travel • Personal home repairs • Home computers • Loans • Chauffeur service • Legal counseling • Children’s education • Vacation options Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–29 Group Incentive Plans Team Incentive Plans Establishing Team Incentive Payments Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–30 Gainsharing Gainsharing Plans Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–31 The Pros and Cons of Team Incentive Plans PROS Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–32 The Pros and Cons of Team Incentive Plans (Cont’d) CONS Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–33 Employee Bonus and Gainsharing Plans Scanlon Plan Rewards come from employee participation in improving productivity and reducing costs. Improshare Gainsharing based on increases in productivity of the standard hour output of work teams. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–34 Figure 10–4 Scanlon Plan Suggestion Process Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–35 The Network Improshare A gainsharing program under which bonuses are based on the overall productivity of the work team. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–36 Enterprise Incentive Plans Profit Sharing Challenges: Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–37 Enterprise Incentive Plans (cont’d) Employee Stock Options Plans Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–38 Employee Stock Ownership Plans Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–39 Employee Stock Ownership Plans Rewards and Risks of ESOPS Advantages Disadvantages Retirement benefits Liquidity and value Pride of ownership Single funding basis Incentive to work Falling stock Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–40 Effective Incentive Plans Direct relationship between performance and incentives. Link between effort and rewards. Money must be of value to the employee. Must be neither criterion deficient or criterion contaminated. No pressure from peers to reduce output or pressure to increase while risking safety. High trust in organization. Communication. Copyright © 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. 10–41