Your Facilities Master Plan: Building a Better Business Case Jim Turner Director, Workplace Solutions Program • Learning Objectives • Consider this project… • A simplified five-step process – – – – – Develop Objectives Prepare Criteria Consider Alternatives Analyze and Evaluate Alternatives Rank and Recommend • Other approaches • Q&A 2 …but first… The presentation used to focus on the facilities master plan – learning objectives: 1. 2. 3. 4. Collecting and analyzing facilities data Financial/resource objectives Construct a business case model Implementation road map Now it’s about developing a business case for facilities projects! 3 Building a Better Business Case Learning Objectives: • Business cases analyze the costs, benefits, and risks of a facilities project to support good decisions • The current and planned future use of the building is a major driver for facilities investment decisions • It is a good practice to consider as many alternatives that meet your requirements as possible • Business case evaluation metrics often include net present value and payback period 4 Consider this Project Strategy: Retrofit for energy efficiency • • • • Renew and retrofit to reduce capital program Reduce current costs: O&M, utilities Add new tenant offerings including chilled water and reliable emergency power Increase occupancy, improve rents, gain other tenant income based on updated services Eight major program elements: •Radiative barrier •Tenant ventilation control •Tenant day lighting •Lighting and plugs •Direct digital controls •Chiller plant retrofit •VAV air handling •Tenant energy management New York City (not Las Vegas, and not Legos) Program cost estimate: $500 million Sources: A Landmark Sustainability Program for the Empire State Building, Jones Lang LaSalle; Serious Materials on-line case study. Photos: Wikipedia 5 ESB Project Drill Down • Windows update became a key project element • Originally estimated at $20 million, came in at under $5 million • On-site process to upgrade rather than replace windows Detail of the 6,500 operable, double-pane ESB windows Learning Objective 1: Business Cases should analyze a project’s costs, benefits, and risks. Slide 6 Constructing the Business Case Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Evaluation of Alternatives Present Findings, Including ROI and Cost/Benefit Assessment of Future State Gap Analysis Specification of Alternatives Risk Analysis Cost Analysis Assessment of Current State Context and Objectives Sensitivity Analysis Benefits Analysis Evaluation Criteria Alternative Courses of Action Evaluation of Alternatives A simplified five-step process Slide 7 Ranking and Recommendation Step 1: Context and Objectives and Step 2: Gap Analysis Major drivers might include: •Current and future use of the facility •Forecast of utilization and other performance metrics •Legal, regulatory, or policy criteria of high importance CRITERIA Learning Objective 2: Current and planned future use of the facility is a major driver of investment decisions. INSIGHTS Personnel Impacts Changes in attrition that would result from the relocation; the ability to recruit civilian personnel as measured by cycle-time to fill a position and number of unfilled positions; assessed by job category Facilities Impacts Quality of destination space as measured by commonly used space quality standards (e.g., class A space) Environmental Impacts The anticipated level of migration efforts required to satisfy national Environmental Protection Act requirements Facility longevity Timeframe that facility will be available compared to period of interest Ease of travel to/from Average commute times; transportation infrastructure Political implications Expected implications from moving from one political district to another Slide 8 Step 3: Brainstorm Solutions to Meet Future Requirements • Soccer Field Project: (1) status quo, (2) improved natural turf field, and (3) artificial turf field • Wet Basement Project: (1) slight external grading and downspout relocation, (2) improve seals in isolation slabs and add optional redundant sump, (3) excavate foundation and reseal walls Learning Objective 3: It’s a good practice to consider a wide range of alternatives that will meet your requirements. Slide 9 Solutions Brainstorming Strategy Status Quo Existing Site Existing Site Existing Site Partial Relocation Partial Relocation Partial Relocation COA COA Description Number 1 Status Quo: Limited recap, retire in place 2a Existing Site: Data Center Equipment Recap Only 2b Existing Site: Data Center Densification Only Existing Site: Phased Renovation including New Building, Data Center 2c Centralization and Office Space Realignment Partial Move: Non-essential Administrative Functions Move (Lease or 3a Other Owned Facilities) Partial Move: Non-essential Data Center Equipment and Related 3b Support People Move Off-site (Co-location) Partial Move: HQ, Data Center and Core Functions Remain On-site, 3c Other Functions and Support Move Off to Leased or Owned Facilities Partial Relocation 3d Partial Relocation 3e Full Move 4 Partial Move: All Functions Remain Except Data Centers and Tenant Data Center Equipment and Support Partial Move: Partial Move, Tenant and Equipment Relocates, All Existing Functions Remain and are Realigned Full Move: New Site, New Building Note: Since this project had so many alternatives, we did a “down-select” to focus on the two most likely to be selected. Slide 10 Fleshing out the Alternatives • For each of the alternatives (COA stands for courses of action), a simple but thorough description might include: – A summary or overview of the COA – A list of assumptions about the COA – A list of requirements that may have to be put in place (these aid in the development of the cost evaluation) – A list of benefits that will be achieved – A list of risks – A cost analysis – focus on relevant cost, with enough detail to make a valid comparison Slide 11 Benefits Specifications Fleshing out the Alternatives Slide 12 Risks Fleshing out the Alternatives Slide 13 ESB Windows Project - Alternatives 1. Retrofit with new windows - demo and replace old ones 2. Traditional de-install and repair job – done by NJ specialist 3. Complete the repairs on-site, in an empty suite Slide 14 Step 4: Evaluating Risks, Costs, and Benefits Develop a thorough framework to evaluate the relevant costs and benefits of each alternative Slide 15 Examples of Costs to Consider Type Short Definition Initial Purchase Cost or Capital Investment Costs associated with initial planning, design, and construction; including acquisition, transportation, and installation Financing Costs Includes one time financing costs, or interest on interim construction financing O&M Costs Associated with maintaining or restoring to original condition, including routine maintenance, utilities, taxes, and contracted servicing Repair and Replacement Costs Associated with maintaining or restoring to original performance, including major renovation and repair, and non-annual services Alterations and Improvements Costs of planned additions, alterations, major reconfigurations, and other improvements Functional Costs Costs associated with performing intended use of the facility Salvage or Disposal Costs Values of land, building, or building elements at the time they are removed from service Slide 16 Examples of Benefits to Consider Benefits Detail of the 6,500 operable, double-pane ESB windows • $414K annual utilities savings from windows alone • Green benefits from reuse of windows • Other potential benefits: – Additional rent revenues • Mid-town rentals average $71/SF • ESB has over 2.85-million SF • Tax incentives for sustainability • Access to capital for financing Slide 17 Examples of Risks to Consider The Project Management Institute has useful tools for risk analysis, essentially evaluating likelihood of the event and estimated impact. Scale Very Low Low Moderate High Very High Cost Impacts Insignificant < 5% 5-10% 10-20% > 20% Schedule Impacts Insignificant < 5% 5-10% 10-20% > 20% Minor Areas Affected Major Areas Affected Scope Reduction/ Client Won’t Accept End Item Unusable Affects Only Demanding Apps Quality Reduced, Client Approval Needed Quality Reduced, Client Won’t Accept End Item Unusable Scope Impacts Quality Impacts Barely Noticeable Degradation Barely Noticeable Slide 18 Combining Costs and Benefits Item Cost* Item Benefit* $0.5M Utilities (Ann/ 20-years) $0.4M/ $8.0M Rental Space $0.2M Raised Rent (Ann./20Years) $3.0M $60.0M Materials and Labor $4.0M Tax Savings $? M Life-cycle repair and maintenance $0.5M Easier Capital $? M Access Total $5.2M Total Design $68+M * These are illustrative calculations! Sources: A Landmark Sustainability Program for the Empire State Building, Jones Lang LaSalle; Serious Materials on-line case study. Photos: Wikipedia Slide 19 Examples of Payback Measures Learning Objective 4: Business case decision metrics include net present value and payback period. NPV compares investment life-cycle costs with its returns by taking a sum of their discounted value. Essentially, it measures the excess or shortfall of cash flows. ROR is stated as a percentage, and is calculated as the ratio of the return from the investment relative to investment cost. The returns can be interest, profit, or net income, and the investment may be referred to as capital or principal. Payback period is the period of time required for the investment’s returns to “repay” the original cost. It measures how long it takes for the investment to “pay for itself.” Other customized measures may be used. Cost per customer describes the cost of acquiring a customer by dividing the total investment cost by the expected number of new customers gained. Slide 20 Scoring the Alternatives Strategy Status Quo Existing Site Existing Site Existing Site COA No. 1 2a 2b 2d Partial Relocation Partial Relocation 3a Partial Relocation 3c Partial Relocation 3d Partial Relocation 3e Full Move 4 3b COA Description Benefits Costs Risks Status Quo: Limited recap, retire in place Existing Site: Data Center Equipment Only Existing Site: Data Center Densification Only Existing Site: Phased Renovation including New Building, Data Center Centralization and Office Space Realignment Partial Move: Non-essential Administrative Functions Move (Lease or Owned Facilities) Partial Move: Non-essential Data Center Equipment and Related Support People Move Off-site (Co-location) Partial Move: HQ, Data Center and Core Functions On-site, Other Functions and Support Move to Leased or Owned Facilities Partial Move: All Functions Remain Except Data Centers and Tenant Data Center Equipment and Support Partial Move: Partial Move, Tenant and Equipment Relocates, All Existing Functions Remain and are Realigned Full Move: New Site, New Building Grade the alternatives on an appropriate scale, (e.g., 1 to 10; high, medium, low; if a full cost and benefits estimate was developed, use those dollar values) The key is quantifiable metrics! Slide 21 Putting it All Together Executive Summary Introduction/Overview – Subject, Purpose, Scope, Objectives – Background – Organization Methodology – Major Assumptions and Constraints – Criteria and Financial Metrics – Description of Cost Analysis Methodology Analysis of Alternatives – Description of Status Quo and Alternatives – Cost Analysis – Comparison of Alternatives Sensitivity and Risk Analysis Conclusions and Recommendations – Results Discussion – Recommendation – Scenarios for Implementation (Sources of Funding, Timeframes, etc.) Slide 22 Bonus Tips! • Imagine you’re telling a story – Start with the problem – the business need you’re solving • Identify your characters – Stakeholders who will approve or reject your business case – Beneficiaries who stand to gain from your proposal – Subject-matter experts to clarify how to solve the problem • Identify the alternatives for meeting the business need—the different ways your story might play out • Choose the best one, and create a project plan – the plot • After you estimate and analyze the costs, benefits and risks, and calculate the return on investment (ROI), you’ve reached the story’s satisfying end • Remember this isn’t a mystery novel—your story needs to be clear and easy to understand. Slide 23 Recap of Learning Objectives • Business cases analyze the costs, benefits, and risks of a facilities project to support good decisions – Slide 6 • The current and planned future use of the building is a major driver for facilities investment decisions – Slide 8 • It is a good practice to consider as many alternatives that meet your requirements as possible – Slide 9 • Business case evaluation metrics often include net present value and payback period – Slide 20 Slide 24 Wrap up Questions? …Thank you! • • Las Vegas (not New York City) The presentation is in your Conference packet, but you can also request a copy electronically from me at jturner@markonsolutions.com Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ji mturner Legos (not New York City) Slide 25