Quality Control Quality assurance in laboratories May 2007 E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Learning objectives • At the end of the presentation, participants should – Understand the principles of Quality control – Understand the importance for internal and external quality control schemes E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Quality is.... • invisible when GOOD • impossible to ignore when BAD E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Quality ? •= sum-total of all the characteristics of a product/service that has a bearing upon the utilization of the product/service to the entire satisfaction of the consumer E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Quality ? •Consistency – Accuracy – Precision •Right result – First time – Every time E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Objectives of quality in lab • Support provision of high quality health-care – Reduce morbidity – Reduce mortality – Reduce economic loss • Ensure credibility of lab • Generate confidence in lab results E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Consequences of poor quality • Inappropriate action – Over-investigation – Over-treatment – Mistreatment • Inappropriate inaction – Lack of investigation – No treatment • Delayed action • Loss of credibility of laboratory • Legal action E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Quality assurance = Internal quality control + External quality assessment Continuously and concurrently assessing lab work E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Retrospectif and periodic A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Assessment of Quality System Man-driven • Audit, On-site Material-driven • Quality Assessment inspection • Internal • Internal • External • External • Schematic way: External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) • Accreditation E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 1 - Internal quality control in laboratory • = set of procedures undertaken by the staff to ensure quality of reports • Total process beginning with sample collection up to final reporting E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Quality in labs is mutual responsibility of….. • Laboratory specialists • Clinicians • Public health physicians E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Factors influencing internal quality Sample Transport Sample handling Sample receiving Sample Collection Analysis Patient preparation Outside laboratory Within laboratory Requisition Results Patient Reports Doctor E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 1.1 - Factors influencing quality: Pre-analytical • Investigation – Right Ex: blood culture in the first week of enteric fever and not Widal • Specimen – Ex: No stool in SARS • Collection technique – Ex: Stool from bedpan→ collect stool in a clean container • Storage and transportation – Ex: Not kept in cold chain- overgrowth of other bacteria • Quantity – Ex: Not enough serum for serology • Labeling – Ex: Mismatch of sample • Laboratory – E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T Ex: Not necessary test capacity A N D R E S P O N S E 1.2 - Factors influencing quality: Analytical PROFICIENCY OF PERSONNEL: Education, Training, Aptitude, Competence, Commitment, Adequate number, CME, Supervision, Motivation USE OF APPROPRIATE CONTROLS: • Internal: Labs, Calibrated against national • External: Supplied by manufacturer, National, International REAGENTS STABILITY, INTEGRITY AND EFFICIENCY: Stable, Efficient, Desired quality, Continuously available, Validated EQUIPMENT RELIABILITY: Meet technical needs, Compatible, User & maintenance friendly, Cost effective, Validated SPECIFICITY & SENSITIVITY OF SELECTED TEST: Adequate ST, Sufficient SP, cost effective, compatible with, available infrastructure and expertise, interpretable, meets the needs/ objectives, validated ANALYTICAL FACTORS DOCUMENTATION: Assessment All the written policies, plans, procedures, instructions and records, quality control procedures and recorded test results involved in providing a E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists service or the manufacture of a product Procedural reliability using Standard Operating Procedures N S E Documentation • If you have not documented it, • you have NOT done it … • If you have not documented, • it is a RUMOUR !!! E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Value of Documentation • Ensures processes and outcomes are traceable • Processes can be audited, thus external assessments can take place • Tool for training • Reminds you what to do next E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) • = comprehensively written document that describes the laboratory procedure and all other related issues SOP for Gram Staining • Essential for ensuring uniformity in laboratory procedures E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Validation • = is about determining whether something does what it is supposed to do E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Importance of validation • Validation - before you introduce something • Re-validation – after you have changed/modified – periodic • Validation is applied to: – SOP – reagents – equipment – software E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 1.3 - Factors influencing quality: Post-analytical • Right recording and reporting • Right interpretation – Range of normal values • Right turnaround time • Report to right user E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Reporting • Unequivocal message • Numerical value with units as and when required KISS ! E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D (Keep it short and simple) R E S P O N S E Bottom-line •Quality costs , •but poor quality costs more … € E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Training • The quality system is only as good as the staff who actually work with it • No matter how good the quality system is on paper, quality cannot be achieved if the theory cannot be translated into practice • Training policy and plan • Training must include an understanding of why quality is important • Training should be need based, for all staff and reviewed E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 2 - External Quality Assessment • 3 types, mainly 2: • An EQA organizer provides surveys in which identical material will be tested by all participating laboratories • ex: WHO/NHLS programme in Africa • Participating laboratories send specimens to EQA organizer for Rechecking • ex: Tuberculosis bacilloscopy quality control in Morocco • On-site visits with physical assessment) E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E EQA • According to the ISO definition, EQA (also known as ‘proficiency testing’ (PT) or ‘EQ Control = EQC’) refers to: • a system of objectively checking laboratory results by means of an external agency • including comparison of a laboratory's result at intervals with those of other laboratories • the main objective being the establishment of trueness E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E What makes microbiology different to other EQA schemes? • Microbiology samples are fundamentally non-uniform. • Microbiological taxonomy is fundamentally imprecise. • Microbiological samples are changing. • Traditional microbiological analysis depends upon behavior, not constitution. • Microbiology has many “right” answers. E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Objectives of EQA schemes for laboratories • Laboratory oriented objectives: • 1. Identifying possible deficiencies in laboratory practice, and guiding participants in any corrective actions to be taken for improvement; • 2. Identifying the reliability characteristics of particular methods, materials and equipment under routine conditions and suggest corrective actions as appropriate; • 3. Assessing and monitoring the impact of training; help for the preparation of future trainings E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Objectives of EQA schemes for laboratories • Public health oriented objectives: • 4. Providing the basis for the comparability of results during epidemiological surveillance and disease control • 5. Collecting information on laboratory measurements ( intra- and interlaboratory) to alert professionals and/or government bodies about problems related to traceability and harmonization of results, and establish limits of acceptability of results as appropriate for a given purpose; • 6. Collecting information for the purpose of licensing or accreditation of laboratories; E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 2.1 Example of EQA organizer: CMPT, Canada E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 2-2 Rechecking (RC) • Participating laboratories send specimen to be rechecked on a regular basis to the EQA body • Targeted specimens and/or randomized specimens • Usually blind, can be single or multiple • Example of tuberculosis bacilloscopy in Morocco: – 180 centres in the country – All positives smears (targeted) – 10% of all negative smears (randomized) E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 2.3 On-site visits • Laboratory assessment • Laboratory licensing and/or accreditation • Combined with the other types of EQA • – After repeated problems (corrective action) – During on-site supervision (routine checking) – After training session (practical implementation of the training ) In addition to the assessment of the existing conditions, QC material can also be provided (slides, strain, sera, specimen for rapid tests …) E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E The ideal situation: 2 types together and very targeted on-site visits • On-site visits: – Expensive, heavy – Only for one laboratory – Very much time consuming – Very effective if motivated staff – Very complementary to all other schemes especially rechecking • On-site visits should be used with « extreme » situations – « Initial » situation: laboratory assessment, licensing – « Bad » situation: repeated problems, failures in training – « Good » situation: accreditation E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E 3- Accreditation • = process of inspection of laboratories and their licensing by a third party to ensure conformity to pre-defined criteria • Very very long task (As example, around 20% of French laboratories are accredited by COFRAC, it takes around 2-3 years to follow the roadmap) • Last step of the entire process 1. Quality assurance (procedures, way of working) 2. IQC 3. EQC 4. Networking of the laboratories 5. … and then only accreditation if 1-4 completed E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Carry home messages…….. • Quality assurance measures what a lab can do to improve reliability • As an epidemiologist, you may engage the laboratory in a dialogue and tactfully ask about QA measures in place • BE CAREFUL ! An epidemiologist is NOT in a position to assess the reliability of the lab or to evaluate its QA procedures as this requires a specific expertise E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E To summarize •The determinants that ensure the quality of the laboratory & therefore the specimen results are: INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL: Set of procedures undertaken by the staff to ensure quality of reports Pre-analytical Analytical Post-analytical Investigation Specimen Collection technique Storage and transportation Quantity Labeling Laboratory Proficiency of personnel Recording and reporting Reagents stability, integrity and efficiency Equipment reliability Specificity & sensitivity of selected test Procedural reliability using standard operating procedures Use of appropriate controls Documentation Assessment EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT: a system of objectively checking laboratory results by means of an external agency ACCREDITATION: Process of inspection of laboratories and their licensing by a third party to ensure conformity to pre-defined criteria External quality assessment scheme Rechecking On-site visits Combination of any two or more of the above Laboratory license E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E Interpretation Turnaround time Quality Control Developed by: The Department of Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response of the World Health Organization with the assistance of: European Program for Field Epidemiology Training Canadian Field Epidemiology Programme Thailand Ministry of Health Institut Pasteur E P I D E M I C Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E