Section IV: A Limited Monarchy in England (Pages 402-407) This section is about: The conflicts between the kings of England and Parliament over religion and political power. How parliament gradually took on more power and imposed significant limitations on the monarchy with the English Bill of Rights. •One of the two “Main Ideas” on page 402 impacts America – and who we are (even today). •Which one do you think? Why? •The big argument in England at this time is on page 407: King vs. Parliament. •What is Parliament? The Early Stuarts and the English Civil War Queen Elizabeth died and James VI of Scotland (distant cousin) took over. King James I (same guy) was the son of Mary Queen of Scots. Now – England and Scotland's thrones were combined (first time). He and the kings who ruled after him are called the Stuarts (family name) James I and Rule by Divine Right King James I was anti-Puritan. Many members of Parliament were Puritan. Puritans didn’t like Protestant ideas. Parliament was afraid James I would add some new taxes (he needed more money and many of them were landowners who’d have to pay them). So, the King and Parliament were not going to get along very well. …………………… James I claimed he ruled by divine right. He was responsible only to God – not Parliament. Parliament was not ready to accept this – and absolute power was against English tradition. James I remained anti-Puritan. He even had the Bible translated into English (the King James version is still one of the most widely used bibles). Some Puritans had enough and many decided to leave England – including one group who took a boat to America (the Mayflower). Charles I and Civil War 1625: Charles I took over: with the same ideas about absolute monarchy as his father. He married a French Roman Catholic (similar to the Anglican Church) and that also made many angry – and more people (Puritans) left for the Americas. Remember – he was also king of Scotland (many of them were Calvinists). When he tried to change them to Anglicans, they revolted. To stop the revolt, he needed the help of Parliament – and he didn’t get it. There was a civil war – Charles led one group – Oliver Cromwell led the winners. 1649: Charles was tried for treason, found guilt, and was beheaded – yes beheaded. Horrible Histories: The English Civil War Oliver Cromwell and the Commonwealth Oliver Cromwell then ruled England for a while (as a republic called a commonwealth). At the time, Scotland didn’t like that their king was beheaded, so they came after Cromwell. Cromwell also had problems with the Irish Roman Catholics. To get control of England, Cromwell felt a need to use martial law (the military was in charge) People were tired of all this and by 1660, Parliament decided to bring back a Monarch (Charles II), who had been in France at the time. Oliver Cromwell’s story is interesting: Despite being a devout Puritan, he drank, danced, hunted, enjoyed music, and did not even object to horse racing or plays. Cromwell is said to have loved practical jokes. In spite of his achievements and successes, in January, 1661, twelve years after the execution of Charles I and three years after Cromwell’s death, his corpse was dug up and brought to Tyburn (the tradition site of public executions). There his body was hanged and decapitated. The Execution of Cromwell Restoration, Revolution, and the Triumph of Parliament Charles II was a better ruler and politician than his father and grandfather. But there were still some problems between him and Parliament (who he didn’t want to get mad) Charles II is Welcomed Back to England Charles II and the Restoration Charles II is sometimes called “the Merry Monarch” – as he had learned to admire the French (and their art and plays). He was also tolerant of religious issues - too much for Parliament who was afraid he sided with the Roman Catholics (his Catholic brother James was next in line to the throne). To get even, Parliament passed a law that said the king had to take communion with the Church of England. Parliament even passed a bill to keep James from becoming king. To keep that from happening, Charles ended Parliament – so when he died, his brother did become king. The Glorious Revolution and the English Bill of Rights As soon as he was King, James II appointed many Roman Catholics to important positions – and had his son baptized Roman Catholic. Parliament was so mad, they offered the throne to William of Orange (who was married to James daughter, Mary). Later that year, William and Mary showed up with their army, and with no actual fighting, James II left and wasn’t a factor in anything again. This is called England’s Glorious Revolution. …………… When they took over, William and Mary (and Parliament) approved an English Bill of Rights. This was similar to the Magna Carta (500 years earlier). This gave most political rights in England to the Parliament. They would pass laws, raise taxes, maintain an army, etc…. This was also the start of habeas corpus – all the rights people have when being accused of a crime. Change in England William and Mary (and the king/queen) now had limits to their power (a limited monarchy) with a balance of power (both the people and the government both having power) A Prime Minister was going to run the country. 1694: Mary died 1700: William died 1701: parliament passed a law that no Roman Catholic could be king of England. 1707: The Parliaments of England and Scotland merged. And, Scotland joined England and Wales, and they all became called Britain, or Great Britain Robert Walpole One writer of the time: John Locke He wrote that one person should never be in charge of the government. Governments were formed because people allowed them to be formed. This was called the contract theory of government: the government made a contract with the people to protect certain rights, such as life, liberty, and property. If a government failed in this, a new government could be put in place. Horrible Histories: The Rulers of England