Linda Flynn, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean & Professor University of Colorado College of Nursing Michael Yedidia, PhD Rutgers Center for State Health Policy Principal Investigator Project Director, Evaluating Innovations in Nursing Education Increase of 16-34 million people insured (34 million by 2016) (Congressional Budget Office, 2012) By 2019 increase of 15-25 million primary care visits per year (Hofer, Abraham, & Moscovice, 2011) Shortage of approximately 12,000 – 41,000 primary care physicians by 2025 (AAMC) According to HRSA 2012….NO. HRSA estimates that supply of NP will increase 30% by 2020 and PA supply will increase by 58% by 2020. The increase in NP and PA supply will reduce PCP shortage from 20,000 PCPs to 6,000 PCPs. In Colorado….. ◦ State graduates 125 new NPs per year ◦ A total of 140 NPs retire each year….(CCNE). ◦ Supply not keeping up with demand from retirement NOT counting population growth nor impact of ACA. ◦ Only 18% of NPs practice in rural areas (American Academy of Nurse Practitioners) ◦ Yet, 20-25% of residents live in rural areas ◦ An additional 4,000 primary care providers needed in rural areas (National Conference of State Legislators). BLS estimates RN demand up 26% (1 million RN increase) by 2020. 1/3 of increase in RN demand will come from ACA (333,333 RNs). RNs needed in home health care will increase 55% between 2010-2020. RNs needed for Primary Care Practices / Medical Homes = more training / education. Increase in NP demand expected, especially for rural areas. Demand for RNs will increase, particularly in outpatient settings and home health care. RNs increasingly need skills as care coordinators, case managers, patient educators, and chronic care specialists. Increased pressure on educational pipeline. Total of 78,089 qualified applicants turned away in 2013. Total of 1,358 existing faculty positions unfilled in 2013; an additional 98 new positions needed. Faculty vacancy rates of over 8% nationwide. Wave of faculty retirements expected. Inadequate doctoral-prepared pool and pipeline. Non-competitive salaries. Aging faculty workforce. Attrition of existing faculty for other than retirement (Fang & Bednash, 2014). Nurse Staffing Practice Environment •Resource Adequacy •RN/MD Relationships •Foundations for Quality •Input Into Affairs •Supportive Manager Surveillance Processes of Care Facility Characteristics (Aiken, et al., 1998; 2001) Nurse Outcomes Patient Outcomes Nurse Burnout ◦ Aiken, Clarke, Sloane (2002); Aiken et al. (2008); Lang et al. (2012); Flynn, Thomas-Hawkins, Clarke, 2009 Van Bogaert et al. (2010). Job Satisfaction / Intent-to-Leave / Attrition ◦ Choi, Flynn, Aiken (2011); Flynn (2007); Flynn, Thomas-Hawkins, Clarke (2009); Van Bogaert, et al. (2010). Poor Patient Outcomes ◦ Kutney-Lee, et al. (2009); Flynn, et al., (2012); Flynn, Liang, Dickson, & Aiken, 2010; Jarrin, Flynn, Lake, Aiken (2014). What are the modifiable aspects of work-life that are associated with burnout and intent-to-leave among nurse faculty? Stratified random sample of full-time faculty. Sample proportionately representative of all US programs by prelicensure offered (BS, AD); urban/rural; research intensity. Total of 3,975 faculty invited to participate in survey; 78.5% response rate! Final Sample = 3,120 faculty from 269 schools of nursing. Characteristic Mean (SD) Age 51.4 (9.38) Percent Within 5 years of retirement 15.8% Female 95% White 88% Education Master’s 70.6% Doctorate 19.7% Research Institution 25% Rank Professor 16.7% Associate Professor 19.4% Assistant Professor 30.8% Instructor 28.8% 76% taught in Pre-Licensure Program 24% taught in Graduate Programs 46.2% taught in schools offering ADN 53.8% taught in schools offering BSN or > 21.4% taught in schools in rural areas 28.6% 20.8% 24.4% 26.2% were tenured on tenure track NOT on tenure track school does not offer tenure Burnout (Emotional Exhaustion) ◦ Maslach Burnout Inventory EE Subscale Intent-to-Leave Academic Nursing ◦ How likely to leave in next 5 years (4-point scale) Demographics ◦ Age, gender, race/ethnicity, highest degree ◦ Health Status Institutional Characteristics ◦ Degree Programs Offered ◦ Research Intensity ◦ Urban/Rural Locale Job Characteristics ◦ Years in current institution ◦ Rank ◦ Tenure Status / Tenure Track/ Non-Tenure Track / Tenure Opportunity ◦ Teaching post-BSN students Administrative Responsibilities Salary Range Certified APRN Hours spent per week on…. ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Didactic Teaching / Prep Clinical Teaching / Prep Committees / Meetings Advising / Mentoring Students All Work Activities ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Developed 1 Course / 1 Major Course Revision Developed 2 Courses/ 2 Major Course Revisions Converted 1 or more courses to online format Published 1 or more articles in p-r journal Prepared 1 or more grant proposals Conditions of Work ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Workload Salary Benefits Job Security Resource Availability Content of Work ◦ Flexibility to balance work/family ◦ Autonomy/Independence ◦ Relationship with Adm ◦ Relationships with Students ◦ Relationships with Colleagues ◦ Meaningfulness of Work ◦ Rewards for Innovations ◦ Visibility in Job Mean hours worked = 48.3 hrs / week. 34.2% Major revision of 2 or more courses 19.8% Published 1 or more p-r articles 28.3% Submitted 1 or more grants 67.7% >61 plan to retire in 5 years 85% Very – Somewhat Satisfied with their work 39% High Levels of Burnout! Higher than staff nurses in hospitals and nursing homes! 20% Younger faculty intended to leave Academic Nursing within 5 years 31% 51-60 yrs old intended to leave Academic Nursing within 5 years Predictor OR CI p Within 5 years of retirement age 6.41 (4.77,8.62) <.001 Highest Degree BSN 2.70 (1.58,4.62) <.001 Highest Degree Master’s 1.91 (1.42,2.56) <.001 On Tenure Track but not Tenured 1.50 (1.08,2.08) <.05 Not on Tenure Track 1.49 (1.02,2.16) <.05 High Burnout (EE) 1.27 (1.00,1.61) <.05 Dissatisfied with Workload 1.26 (1.08,1.47) <.01 Dissatisfaction w/Teaching Support 1.19 (1.01,1.40) <.05 Dissatisfaction with Salary 1.18 (1.02,1.35) <.05 Dissatisfaction with Reward for Innovation 1.16 (1.04,1.29) <.01 Predictor OR CI p Dissatisfaction with Workload 1.82 (1.55,2.13) <.001 >50% Administrative Role 1.73 (1.32,2.27) <.01 Dissatisfaction with Flexibility to Balance Work and Family Life 1.58 (1.37,1.82) <.001 Poor Health 1.46 (1.28,1.67) <.001 Dissatisfaction with Meaningfulness of Work 1.36 (1.14,1.63) <.01 Dissatisfaction with Direction of Department / School 1.27 (1.09,1.48) <.01 Hours Worked per Week* 1.02 (1.10,1.03) <.001 Race / Ethnicity Non-White 0.68 (0.49,0.93) <.05 *Increase from 40 hrs – 50 hours of work per week associated with 22% higher odds of burnout. Constellation of Work-Life factors equal to retirement age in predicting intent-to-leave academic nursing! ◦ Burnout Workload / Hours per week worked Lack of flexibility to balance work / family life ◦ Dissatisfaction with Workload ◦ Dissatisfaction with Salary / Reward for Innovation ◦ Dissatisfaction with Teaching Support Monitor faculty workload / perceptions Implement strategies to increase flexibility of schedules Implement strategies to increase teaching support Explore needs of APRN faculty Explore needs of Non-Tenure Track Faculty Explore needs of Academic Leaders Planning grant funded by RWJF Schools invited to join as Members Annual Faculty / Student Survey (electronic) for Member Schools / Outcome Driven Large Database of De-identified Data / Schools own their data Benchmarking Capabilities www. NNERN.org (Under Construction)