The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists Training Overview Four separate modules: Module 1: Introduction to DPAS II Module 2: DPAS II and the Delaware Framework Module 3: The DPAS II Process Module 4: Component Five – Student Improvement 1 Materials for this module Power Point Presentation DPAS II Guide for Specialists http://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtml. 2 DPAS II Overview Statewide evaluation system Required for all public school educators (state law) Three versions: DPAS II for Teachers DPAS II for Specialists DPAS II for Administrators 3 Objectives of DPAS II Three objectives of DPAS II are to assure and support: Professional growth: enhancing the skills and knowledge of educators. Continuous improvement of instructional practice and student outcomes: educators commitment to continuously improving practice so that student performance is continuously enhanced. Quality educators in every school building and classroom: the collection of credible evidence about educator performance. 4 Who is evaluated through DPAS II for Specialists? Any educator who: Holds a Delaware teaching license Holds a Delaware certificate in a particular content area, AND Is employed as either a part-time or full-time teacher in a Delaware public school. Also, any specialist who teaches in a classroom setting part of the instructional day may be evaluated using the teacher process. 5 Who evaluates specialists? Supervisors of specialists who: Have successfully completed the DPAS II training and have been certified by the Department of Education May be a direct supervisor May be another supervisor within the district (e.g., a district office administrator, an administrator from another building, a designated teacher leader) 6 Design of DPAS II for Specialists DPAS II for Specialists is aligned to Delaware Professional Teaching Standards • Establish common set of knowledge, skills, and attributes expected of Delaware Teachers • Outlined in Delaware regulation – AND Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching • Defines professional practice and outlines criteria and elements of practice 7 Structure of DPAS II The DPAS II framework has three tiers Components – broad areas of specialist practice and responsibility Criteria – essential knowledge and skills related to each component Elements – observable areas of knowledge and skills related to each criterion 8 DPAS II: Components Teachers Specialists Administrators Component I Planning & Preparation Planning & Preparation Vision & Goals Component 2 Classroom Environment Professional Practice & Delivery of Services Culture of Learning Component 3 Instruction Professional Collaboration & Consultation Management Component 4 Professional Responsibilities Professional Responsibilities Professional Responsibilities Component 5 Student Improvement Student Improvement Student Improvement 9 Use of DPAS II Rubrics Evaluators are expected to use rubrics: To rate Appraisal Criteria observed To focus pre-observation, post-observation, and summative conference discussions with specialists To develop a common understanding of the specialist’s strengths and areas for improvement As a guide to organize relevant evidence of specialist performance Specialists are expected to use rubrics: For reflection and self-assessment To develop a common understanding of his or her own strengths and areas for improvement 10 DOE monitoring/auditing of DPAS II documentation quality Annual audit of DPAS II formative and summative evaluation documents Use of review criteria to ensure written evaluation documents provide: • Objective, specific, and relevant evidence of specialist performance and areas of commendation • Supportive, specific, and actionable guidance, including timelines, for any recommendations and/or expectations to improve performance Conducted by DOE staff All information is confidential 11 What’s new in 2013-2014? Changes to DPAS II, beginning in the 2013- 2014 school year: Provide more flexibility in the announced vs. unannounced observation(s) Additional credentialing of educators/instructional leaders not serving as “Evaluators.” Opportunity for LEAs to utilize one less criterion in each Component Provide flexibility in when/how Improvement Plans are utilized Require ratings at the criteria-level for observations and Summative Evaluations 12