Chapter

15

Marketing Cost and

Profitability Analysis

Business prophets tell us what should happen

– but business profits tell us what did happen.

Earl Wilson

A Comparison of Marketing Cost Analysis and Production Cost Accounting (Fig. 15-1)

Comparison

Factors

Bases for computing costs

Marketing Cost

Analysis

Marketing unit: territory, customer group, order size, as well as product

More complex

Production Cost

Accounting

Unit of product

Relatively simple

Source of cost incurred

Cost-volume relationship

Salespeople in the field

Less exact

Volume is a function of cost V=f( C )

Difficult to measure

Machines and closely supervised workers

More precise

Cost is a function of volume C=f(V)

Relatively easy to measure

Income and Expense Statement, 2002,

Colorado Ski Company ($000) (Fig. 15-2)

Net sales

Less cost of goods sold

Gross margin

Less operating expenses:

$27,000

18,900

8,100

Sales force travel

Supplies and telephone

Media space

Advertising salaries

Property taxes

Heat and light

Insurance

Administrative salaries

Other expenses

Total operating expenses

Net profit

372

178

870

218

120

168

84

930

120

6,300

$ 1,800

Expense Distribution Sheet, Colorado

Ski Company, 2002 (Fig. 15-3)

(showing allocation of ledger expense items to activity categories)

Activity Cost Categories

Personal Warehousing Order

Ledger expenses

Sales force travel

Supplies & telephone

Media space

Advertising salaries

Property taxes

Heat and light

Insurance

Administ. salaries

Other expenses

Totals

Totals

372,000

SellingAdvertising and ShippingProcessingAdministration

372,000

178,000

870,000

218,000

120,000

168,000

43,200 22,200

— 870,000

218,000

10,000 14,500

15,300 17,400

40,900 43,500

66,000

100,500

14,000

16,200

28,200

15,500

18,600

84,000 12,000 4,200

930,000 144,000 62,000

46,300 14,000

168,000 126,000

120,000 10,500 11,700 58,300 26,300

$6,300,000 3,847,000 1,220,000 480,000 240,000

7,500

430,000

13,200

513,000

Activity

Allocation basis

Total activity cost

No. of allocation units

Cost per allocation unit

Allocation of Activity Costs to Sales Regions,

Col Ski Co. 2002 (Fig. 15-4)

Personal

Selling

Warehousing Order

Advertising and Shipping Processing Administration

Allocation Scheme

Direct expense No. of pages No. of orders No. of invoice Equally among to each region of ads shipped lines regions

$3,847,000 $1,220,00 $480,000

$240,000 $513,000

61 pages 9,600 orders 120,000 lines 3 regions

$20,000/pg. $50 per order $2 per line $171,000/reg.

Region

Eastern

Midwestern

Western

Allocation of Costs units

21 pages 3,800 orders 39,500 lines cost $1,070,000 $420,000 $190,000 units — 11 pages 2,500 orders

$79,000

28,000 lines one

$171,000 one cost $747,000 $220,000 $125,000 units — 29 pages 3,300 orders

$56,000

52,500 lines cost $2,030,000 $580,000 $165,000

$171,000 one

$105,000 $171,000

Income and Expense Statement, by Sales

Region, Col Ski Co. 2002 ($000) (Fig. 15-5)

Net sales

Less cost of goods sold

Gross margin

Less operating expenses:

Personal selling

Advertising

Warehousing/shipping

Order processing

Administration

Total operating expenses

Net profit (loss)

Net profit (loss) as percentage of sales

Total Eastern Midwestern Western

$27,000 $9,000 $4,500 $13,500

18,900 6,300

8,100 2,700

3,150

1,350

9,450

4,050

3,847 1,070

1,220

480

240

513

6.70%

420

190

79

171

6,300 1,930

$ 1,800 $ 770

8.60%

802

220

125

56

171

1,975

580

165

105

171

1,374 2,996

($24) $ 1,054

(0.53%) 7.80%

Methods Used to Allocate Indirect Costs

(Fig. 15-6)

Method

Divide cost equally among territories or whatever market segments are being analyzed.

Allocate costs in proportion to sales volume obtained from each territory (or product or customer group).

Evaluation

Easy to do, but inaccurate and usually unfair to some market segments.

Underlying philosophy: apply cost burden where it can best be borne. That is, charge a high-volume market segment with a large share of the indirect cost. This method is simple and easy to do, but may be very inaccurate. Tells very little about a segment’

Allocate indirect costs in same proportion Again, easy to do but can be inaccurate and as the total direct costs. Thus if product A misleading. Falsely assumes a close accounted for 25 percent of the total direct costs, then A would also be relationship between direct and indirect expenses.

expenses.

Income and Expense Statement by Sales Region, Col Ski Co

2002, in $000, using contribution-margin approach (Fig. 15-7)

Net sales

Less cost of goods sold

Gross margin

Less direct operating expenses:

Personal selling

Advertising

Warehousing/shipping

Order processing

Total direct expenses

Contribution margin

Less indirect operating expenses:

Personal selling

Advertising

Warehousing/shipping

Order processing

Administration

Total indirect expenses

Net profit

Total Eastern M idwestern Western

$27,000 $9,000 $4,500 $13,500

18,900 6,300

8,100 2,700

3,150

1,350

9,450

4,050

3,082

732

160

845

254

64

130 43

4,104 1,206

$ 3,996 $1,494

765

488

320

110

513

$2,196

$1,800

595

127

42

1,642

351

54

30

794

57

2,104

$ 556 $1,946

Fig. 15-8 Ways to Increase Order Size and

Reduce Small Order Marketing Costs

•Ed ucate customers who buy from several different suppliers. Stress the advantages of purchasing from one supplier.

•For customers who purchase large total quantities in frequent small orders, stress the advantages of ordering once a month instead of once a week. Point out that the buyer eliminates all handling, billing, and accounting expenses connected with three of the four orders. Note further that the buyer writes only one check and one purchase order. In addition, stress that there will be only one bill to process and one shipment to put into inventory instead of three or four.

•Educate the sales force as well as customers. In fact, it may be necessary to change the compensation plan to discourage acceptance of smaller orders.

•Substitute direct mail or telephone selling for sales calls or unprofitable or small-order accounts; or continue to call on these accounts, but less frequently.

•Shift an account to a wholesaler or some other type of middleman rather than dealing directly, even by mail or telephone.

•Drop a mass-distribution policy and adopt a selective one. This new policy may actually increase sales because sales reps can spend more time with profitable accounts.

•Establish a minimum-order size.

•Establish a minimum charge or a service charge to combat small orders

Return on Assets Managed (ROAM)

Sales

Cost of goods sold

Gross margin

Salaries

Commission

Travel

District office expense

$ 10,000,000

7,000,000

3,000,000

150,000

850,000

150,000

400,000

Total direct expenses 150,000

Contribution margin $ 1,450,000

Accounts receivable 2,200,000

Inventories 2,000,000

Total assets $ 4,200,000

Profit on sales %

=

Contribution margin

Sales volume

=

1,450,000

10,000,000 x

100

=

14.5%

Asset turnover

=

Accounts receivable + Inventories

=

$ 4,200,000

=

2.38

ROAM = Profit on sales % x Asset turnover

=

10,000,000 4,200,000

= 14.5% x 2.38 = 34.5%