NAVFAC SOUTHEAST
Navy Energy Program and Initiatives
LCDR J. Doug Herrin, P.E., C.E.M.
October 4, 2012
NAVFAC SE AOR
Shaw
Charleston
Beaufort
Meridian
Pensacola
Barksdale
Fort Worth
Albany
Kings Bay
Mayport
Keesler
Gulfport
Blount Island
Jacksonville
New Orleans
Panama City
Whiting Field
Orlando
Cape
Canaveral
Corpus Christi
Key West
Kingsville
Guantanamo
Bay
Haiti
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
2
NAVFAC SE Business Volume
Workload - Operations
FY12
Capital Improvements
FY13
(projected)
• Work-In-Place (WIP)
$ 783 M
$ 819 M
• Design (DIP=$643M FY 12, DIP = $578M FY 13)
$51.4 M
$46.2 M
$ 6.00 M
$10.0 M
$ 278.0 M
$ 279.0 M
• Facilities Sustainment & FSC Support
$ 47.3 M
$ 53.0 M
• Utilities
$ 273.7M
$ 263.0 M
• BSVE
$ 30.8 M
$ 28.0 M
$ 2.8 M
$ 2.8 M
•Quality(excludes salary $’s)
$ 12.0 M
$ 10.0 M
• ERN
$ 26.0 M
$ 25.1 M
$ 9.0 M
$ 9.0 M
$ 77.3 M
$ 68.5 M
$ 1.591 B
$ 1.614 B
Contingency Engineering
Public Works
• Facilities-In-Place (FIP)
Environmental
• Environmental Services (In-House)
• BRAC
Asset Management – Planning/Real Estate-In-Place
TOTALS:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
3
Navy Energy Priorities
Security
•
“Protection from vulnerabilities related to the commercial electric grid,
which is susceptible to physical and cyber attack, natural disaster, and
malfunction” – Naval Energy: A Strategic Approach (2009)
•
Navy increases shore energy security by decreasing energy consumption,
increasing energy efficiency, increasing use of alternatives, and increasing
the reliability of its energy supply to critical assets
Independence
•
“achieved when naval forces rely on energy resources that are not subject
to intentional or accidental supply disruptions” – Naval Energy: A Strategic
Approach (2009)
•
Fuel itself, transportation, and each terminus on its route should remain
secure from genesis to use
•
Provide secure, reliable, and affordable energy to our Navy and Marine Corps
•
Mitigate dependence on, and vulnerability to the commercial grid and become
more energy efficient in the process
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
4
Department of the Navy’s Energy Profile
•
DOD is the single largest energy consumer in the nation
•
DOD accounts for 80% of the Federal Government’s energy consumption
•
Department of the Navy
•
102 installations worldwide
•
90, 045 buildings totaling more than 663M square feet
•
Consumes 28% of DoD’s operational and shore energy
•
FY11 installation energy
•
Consumed 8,850 GWh of electrical power
•
Produced or procured approximately 1,770 GWh of renewable energy
on or near its installations – 20% of demand
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
5
Geothermal Energy
A 270-megawatt renewable energy geothermal power plant at Naval Air
Weapons Station China Lake provides on average 1.4 million megawatthours of electricity to the California power grid annually, enough power for
180,000 homes. The China Lake plant was built using a public-private
venture business model.
http://greenfleet.dodlive.mil/energy/shore/renewable/geothermal/
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
6
Efficiency and Demand Reduction
•
DON is a leader in Federal use of financed energy contracts
•
Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs)
•
Utility Energy Service Contracts (UESCs)
•
Since 2008, Navy has implemented 70 ESPCs and 275 UESCs
•
DON has implemented $1.4B of life-cycle efficiency improvements
•
Reduced energy intensity (power per square foot – MBtu/KSF) by -16.9%
relative to 2003 Navy baseline toward goal of -18% at end of FY11
Strategy includes concentrating on reducing energy consumption
through the award of energy efficiency projects while simultaneously
pursuing financed renewable energy projects
•
Projects should match or beat life-cycle costs for brown power within the
regional market
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
7
Navy Shore Energy Strategy
Transform Navy From
Culture of Consumption to
Culture of Conservation
Through Transparency
and Accountability
Energy Security:
- Redundancy
- Resiliency
- Reliability
Navy
Energy Culture
ENERGY
SECURITY &
COMPLIANCE
Renewable Energy
& Sustainability
The Right Technology
at the Right Time
- Watch
- Partner
- Lead
Energy Efficiency
Energy
Efficiency
First (OPNAV)
“Compliance” is unique to the Shore
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
8
Energy Pyramid
Pyramid
Penn State University
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
9
Technology
• Technology
o Controls
o Magnetically levitated centrifugal compressors
o LED lighting, induction lighting
o Insulation, solar hot water
o More efficient chillers, glazing, plumbing fixtures
o Metering and smart grid
• Cost/Benefit
o Building lifecycle > 67 years
o Maintenance cost on specialty items particularly important
o Limited ability to source select
o Economic difference within region: Key West, GTMO
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
10
Design Standards
• Primary Standards
o Unified Facilities Criteria
o International Building Code 2009
o Anti –Terrorism Force Protection (ATFP), UFC 40010-01
o USGBC LEED Gold
o ASHRE 90.1-2010
o Whole Building Design Guide
• Individual base requirements: IAP, Force Protection,
Airfield criteria, etc
• Source selection for Design Build often evaluates
design approach for best value: TOC and mission viability
• Competing priorities
– Energy, ATFP, Environmental, Cost require thoughtful design
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
11
SE Industry Energy Partnership
– Energy partnership forum is held to introduce new technology and
solutions that we can integrate into facilities maintenance and
construction projects
– By partnering with industry, we leverage their expertise to meet
our energy reduction and security goals
– New technologies should be submitted to NAVFAC Engineering
and Expeditionary Warfare Center (805) 982-3764
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
12
CNRSE Installation Awards
SECNAV
Annual Energy
Awards
Panama City
Jacksonville
Kings Bay
Fort Worth
Gulfport
GTMO
Pensacola
Kingsville
Mayport
Orlando
Corpus Christi
Key West
Meridian
New Orleans
Whiting Field
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
No Award
No Award
Gold
Blue
No Award
No Award
No Award
No Award
No Award
Blue
No Award
No Award
No Award
No Award
Gold
Gold
Blue
Gold
Blue
No Award
No Award
Gold
No Award
Blue
Blue
No Award
Blue
No Award
Blue
Blue
Gold
Blue
Small Shore
Winner
No
Award
No Award
No Award
Gold
Blue
Blue
Blue
No Award
No Award
No Award
No Award
Blue
Gold
Gold
Platinum
Blue
Blue
Blue
Blue
Gold
Blue
Blue
Blue
Gold
Gold
Blue
Blue
Gold
Large Shore
Platinum
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
Blue
Blue
Gold
Gold
Gold
Blue
Blue
PLATINUM
GOLD
GOLD
GOLD
GOLD
GOLD
GOLD
GOLD
GOLD
GOLD
BLUE
BLUE
BLUE
BLUE
BLUE
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
13
Energy Reduction Progress
NRSE Energy Reduction Progress
140
2003
Baseline
135
130
125
Where we need your
help
Intensity (MBtu/KSF)
120
115
110
Baseline
105
Goal
100
Intensity Progress
95
90
85
80
Our challenge
75
70
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
2014
2015
14
Energy Funding
FY 11 and 12 Energy Funding
900
800
700
OMN
600
Total FY Investment ($M)
Average
Base
goes
from
~$3M/ YR
to
~$11M/ YR
in
Direct
Energy
Investment
356
eMILCON
3rd Party Financing
500
LEED w/MILCON
400
300
200
100
0
MMRP Eff
eMMRP
193
ECIP
73
80
60
35
32
23
34
60
35
20
FY12
FY11
PB 12 FY 12
Energy Program
~ $781M
Geothermal
PB 11 FY 11
Energy Program
~ $238M
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
15
PB13 FY13 – Total Energy Funding
ECIP~ $23M
LEED w MILCON
~ $60M
3rd Party
Financing ~ $120M
Geotherm. ~ $9M
eMMRP ~ $41M
PB 13 FY 13
Energy Program
~ $650M
OMN ~ $ 396M
Average Base = $9.3M/ YR in Direct Energy Investment
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
16
Energy Project Types and Funding
(current and projected)
RMe – CNIC’s Energy Special Projects Program
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
$220M (26 projects @ $12M = 6%)
$325M (56 projects @ $56M = 18%)
$210M projected (51 projects @ $24M = 12%)
$215M projected (Projects due to CNIC on 18 Nov 2012)
$225M projected
ECIP – Energy Conservation Investment Program
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
$23M ($15M)
$43M ($2M)
To be announced
Projects submitted to CNIC on 15 Aug 2012
UESC/ESPC
Annual financed payments of $11M from UT Budget
Three projects in FY12 ($11M)
Navy goal of $300M in FY12/13
eROI Tool
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
17
Energy Contracts FY12
Contract Type
eSRM:
Energy
Conservation
ECIP
Scope
Location of Work
Contract
Capacity/
Duration
Type
Projected
IFB/RFP
Projected Award
Date
Retro-Commissioning
CBC Gulfport
$0.5M
FY12, Q1
Controls
CBC Gulfport
NAS Pensacola
NAVO Stennis
NS Mayport
$4.2M
FY12, Q1
Lighting Upgrades
NAS Corpus Christi
NAS Pensacola
$2.1M
FY12, Q1
HVAC Upgrades
NAS Corpus Christi
NAS Pensacola
NAS Key West
NAS Kingsville
NAS Whiting Field
NS Mayport
NAS Meridian
$3.8M
Misc. Energy Conservation
NS Mayport
NAS Corpus Christi
NAS Kingsville
NAS Pensacola
NAS Meridian
$1.7M
Solar LED Street Lights
NS GTMO
$1.8M
MACC
FY12, Q4
Building Energy Audits
Various Locations
$3.0M
SCAN
FY12, Q1
TOTAL
FY12, Q1
FY12, Q2
Small Bus.
FY12, Q1
$17.1M
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
18
Energy Contracts FY13 (projected)
Contract Type
Energy
Conservation
(RMe, ECIP)
Scope
Location of Work
Contract
Capacity/
Duration
Type
Projected
IFB/RFP
Retro-Commissioning
NAS Pensacola
NAS Jacksonville
NAS Meridian
NAS Corpus Christi
NAS Kingsville
NAVSTA GTMO
NAS Key West
NSA Panama City
$6.8M/
1YR
FY13, Q1
Controls (DDC)
NAS Meridian
NAS Jacksonville
NAS JRB New Orleans
$2.2M/
1 YR
FY13, Q1
Lighting Upgrades
(Building, Street, Airfield)
NAS Pensacola
NAS Jacksonville
NAVSTA GTMO
NAS Key West
$25.1M/
1 YR
HVAC Upgrades
NAS Jacksonville
CBC Gulfport
NAS Pensacola
NAS Key West
NS Mayport
NAS Meridian
NSA Panama City
NSA Orlando
$18.2M/
1 YR
Solar Thermal
NSA Panama City
SUBASE Kings Bay
$2.7M/
1 YR
FY13, Q1
Misc. Energy Conservation
(Bldg envelope, Water, Boiler)
NS Mayport
NAS Pensacola
$3.0M/
1 YR
FY13, Q1
TOTAL
$58M
Small Bus.
(Does not
include
GTMO
projects)
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
Projected Award
Date
FY13, Q1
FY13, Q1/Q2
FY13, Q1
19
eROI Tool Overview
What is eROI?
eROI is ratio of PV of total benefits over PV of total cost. Provides a consistent,
quantifiable approach to prioritize energy projects that create value, using criteria
that includes “hard” benefits, such as cost savings, as well as “soft” benefits, such
as meeting stakeholder expectations.
eROI = (Present Value of Benefit)
(Present Value of Cost)
Why is eROI useful?
Using a weighted criteria approach, eROI tool enables Navy to rank and compare
hundreds of energy projects submitted by installations, then invest in projects that
deliver best ROI. Navy-wide optimized portfolio of energy projects and investments,
created by this tool, positions Navy to achieve its energy consumption goal with
efficient use of resources.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
20
1 Gigawatt Initiative
• State of the Union (24JAN12 ): Navy Will Purchase “Enough
Capacity to Power a Quarter of a Million Homes a Year”
– 250K Homes = 1 GW of Power (~Honolulu, Orlando, Jackson, MS)
– Coso Geothermal Plant ~270MW capacity
• 180MW current output of Coso Geothermal Plant provides power for approximately
120K homes (average load of 1.5KW per home)
• Draft 1 GW Task Force Charter
– Assigns membership, roles/responsibilities to Secretariat, Navy & Marine Corps
Echelon I & II commands
– Focus primarily on larger projects using third party financing
– Finalize the “Strategy” in 2012
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
21
Net Zero Installations
• SECNAV Goal: 50% net-zero installations by FY20
– SECNAV Instruction 4101.3 of 3 Feb 12 defines a Netzero Installation as:
“A DON Installation which, over the course of a fiscal year, matches
or exceeds the electrical energy it consumes ashore with electrical
energy generated from alternative or renewable energy sources. The
alternative fuel generated electrical energy may be: 1) generated on
the installation; or 2) generated off the installation but purchased for
and consumed on the installation.”
• Determine which installations have the best opportunity to
achieve net zero in the most cost effective way
• Determine what alternative energy projects to pursue at each
installation based on NPV and ROI methodologies
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
22
Net Zero Study
 NREL providing primary support to NZEI planning and
assessment.
 Funding:
 DOE provided initial start up for NREL REO analysis for many
Navy and Marine Corps Installations.
 CNIC provided additional funds to complete the NREL REO
analysis for all installations as well as to conduct site visits to 3540 installations to validate the REO data and other related work
 USMC also using NREL to conduct site visits to validate the REO
data and other related work
 Objective: develop cost effective strategy to achieve SECNAV
goal of 50% of installations to be NZEI by 2020
 Approach
 High level pre-screen of all bases for renewable energy
opportunities
 Select most cost effective sites for more in depth analysis (site
visits)
 Outcome: develop budget estimates for implementation for next
POM cycle
 Current Status: Navy/Marines-NREL Interagency Agreement
approved in last month and now moving out
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
•
Sites and Data provided by
NAVFAC ESC
– NAF El Centro, CA
– NAS Fallon, NV
– NS Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba
– NB Guam
– NAS Key West, FL
– NSB New London, CT
– JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam,
HI
– Pacific Missile Range
Facility, HI
– NS Rota, Spain
– NB San Diego, CA
23
Technologies Evaluated
• Evaluated for the following renewables:
– Wind
– Solar (PV (photovoltaic), thermal and hot water)
– Biomass gasification boiler
– Solar ventilation preheating
– Day lighting
• Technologies not evaluated:
– Waste-to–energy (to be added for future screenings)
– Geothermal (to be added for installations that have potential)
– Landfill gas (to be added to future screenings)
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
24
NREL’s REO Screening Tool
• NREL’s REO tool is an early planning tool used to evaluate
renewable energy options, estimate costs, and recommend a mix of
technologies that meets the site’s energy goals
• REO aggregates energy systems data such as electric and thermal
energy use, utility rates, incentives, and RE resource data
• REO results allow agencies to quickly and efficiently prioritize RE
opportunities
• Costs, incentives, and other assumptions can change quickly
• REO is often used as part of the iterative project development
process
• REO helps to inform project development and prioritize resources,
but the results do not represent the final exact answer
• More detailed analysis is required prior to making project investment
decisions
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
25
Results are NOT Conclusive
• This is the beginning of a multi-phased planning and analytical
process involving the following stages
1) Preliminary screening (resource identification)
2) Exploration (resource verification)
3) Viability analysis (technology readiness levels)
4) Feasibility analysis (economic conditions)
5) Suitability analysis (siting and permitting –
operational/environmental/land use compatibility)
• This REO analysis addresses portions of
the first four phases above
• Site visits and follow-on efforts required
to complete the first four phases
• Suitability analysis (phase 5) will be completed for
viable sites after phases 1-4
• Projects will be developed for viable sites after phase 5
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
26
DoN Smart Power Partnership Initiative (SPPI)
• Group DoN installations into regional smart grids (at DoN FCAs)
–
–
–
Regional (DoN) real time visibility/monitoring of external supply, internal
generation, utility systems, energy use (bldgs/systems)
Aggregate load and generation; participate in/establish incentive programs (i.e.
Demand Response); move renewable power through the market (virtual wheeling)
from point of generation to point of use
Define essential smart/micro grid capabilities and develop an ROI plus energy
security based methodology to prioritize investments
• “Power Partnerships” with internal and external stakeholders
–
–
–
–
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Regional Transmission
Organizations (RTOs), Independent System Operators (ISOs), Public Utility
Commissions (PUCs), Energy Service Providers (ESPs), Direct Access
Cooperatives (Western, Southwestern, Southeastern, Bonneville Power), Local
Utility, etc.
Indentify and prioritize critical power requirements
Identify and prioritize deferrable/discretionary loads
Develop Pre-Planned Responses, Load Shedding Plans and Plans for Continuity
of Critical Power
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
27
Navy Smart Energy Background
There have been a number of innovations recently towards a
concept known as “Navy Smart Energy.”
• Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)
• NDW Energy Vision and Smart Energy CONOPS
• NDW Smart Grid
• NW Energy and Utility Operations Center and Integrated ICS
• A number of centralized Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
Operation
Centers
 SW Area Wide Energy Management System (central DDC and SCADA)
 Dahlgren and Little Creek central DDC
 Kings Bay SCADA
And a number of studies/proposals are underway that further the
concept.
• Norfolk Naval Station UEM OT-IC Project Study
• Smart Energy Project Development Studies (26 sites): SW, ML and MW
• Smart Power Partnership Initiative (SPPI)
These innovations and continued progress on the concept have led
to interest in the possible benefits of a corporate wide approach.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
28
Smart Energy Defined
The Smart Energy is a data-driven process targeted to specific objectives.
Results  What overall objectives does Navy want to
accomplish?
Objective/
Results
Approach
Actions
Analysis / Diagnosis
Data/Status
Actions  What key actions will help accomplish this?
Analysis  What key information does Navy need to
support the actions?
Data  What critical raw data is needed to
develop the analysis?
The objectives are savings and energy reduction through specific actions.
• Integrated System of Industrial Controls: DDC, SCADA, AMI
• Active Facility Management (ICS:DDC)
• ICS:SCADA (improved reliability, energy security)
• Identification of Energy Efficiency Opportunities (analytics leading to project
development)
• Actionable Stakeholder Metrics (tenant awareness)
• Enhanced Demand Response (cost Reduction, grid support, SPPI)
• Predictive Maintenance opportunities
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
29
Energy: The Key Element
We can create a more sustainable, cleaner and safer
world by making wiser energy choices. – Robert Alan
Corporate
Customers
All commodity usage consumes energy.
Non-renewable
Energy
behavior change
Renewable
Energy
control & sensing
reporting & policy
EMS/DDC
Commodity
Production &
Distribution
SCADA
Monitoring
Operations
Centers
AMI
Monitoring is the key to knowing where and how
commodity usage may be reduced.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
30
Navy Smart Energy
Power
Industry
(e.g. Utility Supplier
& Regulators)
$$
DoN
Smart
Power
Cluster
Integrating Across the Enterprise
Navy / USMC
Installation
Program Drivers
Navy / USMC Utilities
(Microgrid)
Navy / USMC Facilities
(HVAC & Lighting)
Smart Power
Partnership
Control
Sensors
SCADA
DDC
Sensors
Building
Managers
Control
DoN Benefits
• Energy Security
• Behavior Change
• Real-Time Energy Management
• Customer Visibility into Usage
• Utility Cost Saving
• Energy Awareness
• Demand Response
• Load Balancing
• Improved Efficiency
• Integration of Renewables
• Accurate Billing
• Loss Identification
• Meets Regulatory Requirements
• Enterprise Benchmarking
• Improved Customer Satisfaction
• Predictive Maintenance
• Reduced Metering Overhead
• Fault Prediction
• Production & Distr. Control
• Enhanced Safety
Power
Quality
Time of
Use
Operation
Centers
DoN Target Cluster Areas
• SECNAV Energy Mandates
• Legislative Requirements
• (e.g. EPACT 2005)
• Budget Constraints
• Executive Orders
• Navy / USMC Mission
Navy / USMC
Installation
Energy Managers
DoN
Corporate
AMI
DoDD 8320.02
NetCentric
Data Strategy
DDC &
SCADA
Historical Data
Defense
Information
System Agency
Utility
Usage
Navy /USMC
Region
Meta Data
Discovery
Meter Data
Management
(MDM)
Data Acquisition &
Integration
via
PSNET
Data Consumer
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
via
NMCI
CIRCUITS
Authors: Chet Braun & Eric Lynch
Last Update: 10/19/2011
31
Integrated System of Industrial Controls
Commodity Production, Distribution and Consumption
AMI
Meters
Collection of ICS Devices
SCADA & DDC Control
• DDC, SCADA and AMI devices
treated equivalently
• Data point aggregation allows for
reorganization
• Operator screens may display any
information in any format,
independent of vendor software
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
32
Questions?
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast
33