Principles of Maritime Energy
Management
Content
 Shipping contributes to Climate Change
 The Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator, EEOI
 The Energy Efficiency Design Index, EEDI
 Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan, SEEMP
2
ISO 50001: Energy Management
Systems Standard
NATIONAL SEMINAR ON
STANDARDS FOR QUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT
22nd and 23rd June, 2011
Energy Management
“The judicious and effective use of energy to
maximize profits (minimize costs) and enhance
competitive positions”
“The strategy of adjusting and optimizing energy, using systems
and procedures so as to reduce energy requirements per unit of
output while holding constant or reducing total costs of
producing the output from these systems”
Objectives of Energy Management
 To achieve and maintain optimum energy procurement and
utilization, throughout the organization
 To minimize energy costs / waste without affecting
production & quality
 To reduce import dependency
 To enhance energy security, economic competitiveness, and
environmental quality
The weight of Energy savings compared to other technologies
Global CO2 emissions forecast, G.tons CO2 / year
ISO 50001: Energy Management Systems StandardIntroduction
 ISO 50001- the International Standard for Energy Management
Systems (EnMS)
 This Draft International Standard was released in April 2010 and
may be ready for publication by mid-2011.
 Energy Management Systems offers a comprehensive and
structured approach for energy efficiency improvement.
 ISO/FDIS 50001: 2011(E) defines EnMS as “set of interrelated or
interacting elements to establish an energy policy and energy
objectives, and processes and procedures to achieve those
objectives “
 Applicable to any organization, whatever the size, industry or
geographical location
 An organization embracing ISO 50001 is likely to further accelerate
adoption of energy efficiency practices and to continuously improve
its energy performance and cost.
ISO 50001: Energy Management Systems StandardIntroduction ( contd.)
 Application of the standard can be tailored to fit the requirements of
the organization, including degree of documentation, resources and
complexity of the system
 This
International
Standard
can
be
used
certification/registration
and/or
self-declaration
of
organization's energy management system.
for
an
 The fact that it's based on measurement and verification will help
organization stay on track to meet their declared energy policies.
 Adoption of ISO 50001 by any organization will:
•
Reduce energy bills
•
Make manufacturing more sustainable
•
Promotes energy efficiency throughout the supply chain
•
Helps in meeting National GHG reduction targets
Need for ISO 50001
 Need to minimize fossil fuel use and mitigate GHG
Fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas make up the bulk
of the India’s primary energy sources and, their consumption is a
major source of greenhouse gas emissions, leading to concerns
about global warming if not used efficiently .
 Need to adopt Energy Management.
With India’s demand for energy growing, the need to adopt alternative
approaches (like increased energy efficiency, renewable energy,
etc.) to meet energy demand is also growing. Just in this respect,
‘Energy Management’ comes on the scene, which although is
not new to India, yet its penetration and adoption is slow due to
various reasons.
ISO 50001-EnMS Requirement
 ISO 50001 specifies requirements for an organization to establish,
implement, maintain and improve an energy management system.
 Specifies energy management system (EnMS) to :
• develop and implement an energy policy,
• establish objectives, targets, and action plans which take into
account legal requirements

This International Standard specifies requirements for all factors
affecting:
• energy supply, uses and consumption
• measurement, documentation and reporting,
• design and procurement practices for energy using equipment,
processes, systems, and personnel.
ISO 50001 does not prescribe specific performance criteria with
respect to energy
Demings “Circle”
EEOI, EEDI & SEEMP
ΙΟΎΝΙΟς 2012
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.
Plan - Do - Check – Act (PDCA)
 ISO 50001 is based on the Plan - Do - Check - Act (PDCA) continual
improvement framework and incorporates energy management
practices into everyday organizational activities. As per ISO/FDIS
50001:2011(E):
• ⎯Plan: conduct the energy use assessment, establish the baseline,
energy performance indicators (EnPIs), objectives, targets and
action plans necessary to deliver results that will improve energy
performance (measurable results related to energy efficiency, use
and consumption) in line with the organization's energy policy;
• ⎯ Do: implement the energy management action plans;
• ⎯Check: monitor and measure processes and the key characteristics
of operations that determine energy performance against the energy
policy and objectives, and report the results;
• ⎯Act: take actions to continually improve energy performance and
the EnMS.
ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL FOR
ISO 50001
CONTINUAL
IMPROVEMENT
ENERGY POLICY
ENERGY PLANNING
MANAGEMENT
REVIEW
IMPLEMENTATION
AND OPERATION
INTERNAL AUDIT
CHECKING
CORRECTIVE AND
PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
MONITORING, MEASUREMENT
AND ANALYSIS
Plan
 ENERGY POLICY
 ISO/FDIS 50001 defines Energy Policy as “Statement by the organization
of its overall intentions, and direction of an organization related to its energy
performance, as formally expressed by top management.”
 The energy policy provides a framework for action and for the setting of
energy objectives and energy targets and is documented, communicated,
and understood well within the organization.
 Appropriate to the scale and nature of the organization energy use.
 Availability of necessary resources and support.
 Commitment to comply with applicable regulations and other requirements.
 Setting and reviewing of energy objectives and targets.
 Supports the purchase of energy efficient technology and services.
 In India, energy policy declaration by an organization is seen as a top
management commitment to continual improvement of organization's
energy performance
Energy Conservation Approach
Reduce specific consumption of energy by 2% every year over next ten years
Intent
To lessen the burden on the environment by reducing energy on a continuous basis and conserve natural resources.
Requirements
Implement the following fundamental practices related to energy consumption in our organization. These practices have to be taken up on a
continuous basis.
1. Monitor energy and water consumption for the whole plant with section wise breakup
2. Establish specific energy (kWh or kCal or kL / ton or unit of production)
3. Develop an in house programme to sustain energy conservation activities in the plant.
Strategies
PLANNING & ACHIEVEING
TARGET
DEFINE
PLAN
COLLECTION OF
DATA
TRACK & MANAGE
DEVELOP THE
STRATEGIES
DEVEELOP SCHEDULE
COMAPARISON
DATA
PLAN & TAKE
ADOPTIVE
ACTION
OF
ANALYZE
RESOURCES
ANALYSIS OF DATA
DEVELOP RISK
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Energy Conservation Team
COLLECT STATUS
PREPARE REPORT
TO DOCUMENT THE
RESULTS
Plan (contd.)
 ENERGY PLANNING
 Consistent with energy policy and has the following activities:
• Energy review- determination of Energy performance for identification of
energy saving opportunities
• Energy baseline- establishing basis for energy performance comparison.
• Energy performance indicators (EnPIs)- setting EnPIs, measure of energy
performance.
• Objectivesestablishing, implementing and maintaining documented
energy objectives.
• Targets- setting targets consistent with the objectives.
• Action plans- formulating action plans to achieve objectives and targets,
legal/ regulations and other requirements and shall include:
• ⎯ designation of responsibility;
• ⎯ the means and time frame by which individual targets are to be achieved;
• ⎯ a statement of the method by which an improvement in energy
performance shall be verified;
• ⎯ a statement of the method of verifying the results.
Do
 IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION
• Organization to use the action plans and other outputs resulting from the
planning process for implementation and operations and would require:
• Competence, training and awareness of work force on their role,
responsibilities and duties
• Communicate internally with workforce on energy performance, EnMS and
establish a process through which suggestions can be invited to improve
EnMS
• Records and document of the implementation and operation of the EnMSscope and boundaries, energy policy , objectives , targets, action plan and
other documents as required
• Operational Controls of those operation and maintenance activities related
to significant use of energy
• Design of new, modified and renovated facilities, equipment, systems and
processes that can have a significant impact on energy performance.
• Procurement of energy efficient products, services and energy.
.
Check
 MONITORING ,MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS
• Key characteristics of
operations that determine energy
performance are monitored, measured and analysed at planned
intervals
 Corrective and preventive actions
• Significant energy uses and other outputs.
• Energy Performance Indicators (EnPIs).
• Effectiveness of Action plans.
• Energy measurement plan.
• Evaluation and correction of deviations of the energy performance.
• Control of records.
Check (contd.)
 INTERNAL AUDIT
• Conduct internal audits to ensure that
Management System(EnMS) confirms to:
• planned arrangements for energy management
• energy objectives and targets established;
• effective implementation
Energy
Act
 MANAGEMENT REVIEW

Top management shall review the organization's EnMS to ensure its
continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness.

Inputs for review will include:
• Calendar of review.
• Records.
• Follow-up actions from previous management reviews.
• Energy policy.
• Energy Performance Indicators(EnPIs).
• Legal compliance and other requirements.
• Energy objectives and targets.
• Results of the audit.
 CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS.
• Projected energy performance.
• Recommendations for improvement.
• Resources.
Act
 Continual Improvement
 A recurring process which results in enhancement of overall energy

•
•
•
•
performance and the EnMS
Output of Management Review will include:
Changes in the energy policy.
Changes in the EnPIs.
Changes in the targets, goals and objectives.
Allocation of resources.
Comparison between ISO 50001, ISO 9001 and
ISO 14001
•
•
•
•
•
ISO 50001 is proposed to be in line with ISO 9001 and ISO 14001
standards that address quality management and environmental
management issues.
ISO 50001 is based on the same Plan-Do-Check-Act approach of ISO 9001
and ISO 14001 and it draws extensively on the structure and content of the
QMS and EMS.
Implementation of ISO 9001 means what the organization does to fulfill the
customer's quality requirements, and applicable regulatory requirements,
while aiming to enhance customer satisfaction,
Implementation of ISO 14001 means what the organization does to
minimize harmful effects on the environment caused by its activities, and to
achieve continual improvement of its environmental performance.
Similarly ISO 50001 implementation is expected to address what the
organization does to effectively manage energy resources and performance
that is relevant to global standards.
ISO 50001 in Indian Context








India has enacted the Energy Conservation Act in 2001, which has been amended in
2010
The five major provisions of EC Act relate to:
Designated Consumers (mainly energy intensive industries) to comply with the
specific energy consumption norms for the manufactured products and services and
establishment of energy management system,
Standard and Labeling of energy consuming appliances, gadgets and equipment to
ensure promotion of energy efficiency of the new stocks entering the market
Energy Conservation Building Codes ensuring that new commercial buildings
constructed in the country have less electricity consumption
Creation of Institutional Set up (Bureau of Energy Efficiency) for effective
coordination of the energy conservation efforts in the country and
Establishment of Energy Conservation Fund at Centre and States to provide
necessary financial support for energy efficiency initiatives in the country.
Energy efficiency institutional practices and programs in India are now mainly
being guided through various voluntary and mandatory provisions of the
Energy Conservation Act
ISO 50001 in Indian Context (contd.)





The National Action Plan on Climate Change was released by Honorable
Prime Minister of India in June 2008
The Action Plan Outlines 8 Missions including National Mission for
Enhanced Energy Efficiency (NMEEE)
The basic objective of the NMEEE mission is to ensure a sustainable
growth by an approximate mix of 4 E’s, namely- Energy, Efficiency, Equity
and Environment
In one of the four components of NMEEE, namely, Perform Achieve and
Trade (PAT), energy baseline parameters and energy saving targets are
being fixed for 8 sectors of energy intensive industry including Thermal
Power Stations under EC Act (amended)
PAT process has really made aware the manufacturing sector to how to
establish energy performance baseline, normalized energy performance
indicators, targets fixation process and action plans to achieve targets.
ISO 50001 in Indian Context (contd.)
 In order to achieve the targets, as set , the plant is required to have
a strong energy management system , well defined energy policy
and qualified human resource.
 More than 200 industrial units and other establishments have
already declared their energy policy and have certified energy
managers and energy auditors.
 India has now about 8414 Certified Energy Managers, out of which
6073 are also qualified as Certified Energy Auditors, from the
previous 11 examinations conducted by Bureau of Energy Efficiency
since 2004.
 These professionally qualified energy managers and energy
auditors have expertise in energy management, project
management, financing and implementation of energy efficiency
projects, and policy analysis
 In view of the above , it may be relatively easier for Indian industry to
adopt ISO 50001 Standard
CONCLUSIONS
 A new international ISO 50001 standard, applicable to any
organization whatever the size, industry or geographical
location, will benchmark energy management, and establish a
framework for organization to manage energy use efficiently.
 It is estimated that the standard could influence up to 60
percent of the world’s energy use.
 This International Standard is based on the Plan-Do-CheckAct continual improvement framework and incorporates
energy management in organization practices.
 It does not establish absolute requirements for energy
performance beyond the commitments in the energy policy of
the organization and its obligation to comply with relevant
legislation.
CONCLUSIONS
 Developing Best Practice Guides on sector specific energy
conservation technologies and methodologies will facilitate the
implementation of ISO 50001
 ISO 50001 is designed to be used independently, but can be
aligned or integrated with other management systems (e.g., ISO
9001 and 14001).
 ISO 50001 will be a voluntary system, but may tend to become
de facto essential requirement as rapid uptake by competitors
will drive non-participating organizations to adopt it as well.
 An organization embracing ISO 50001 is likely to further
accelerate adoption of energy efficiency practices and to
continuously improve its energy performance and cost.
Shipping contributes to
Climate Change
34
Shipping is an increasing contributor to Climate Change, but the
improvement potential is large
 In 2007, the CO2 emissions from shipping
where 847 M ton, or 2.7% of total global
GHG emissions
 This is projected to increase to 6% of total
global emissions in 2020
 Improved ship design can reduce the
emissions to 10 – 50%
 Improved operational arrangements could
reduce another 10 – 50%
IMO GHG Study (2009)
Relative importance of GHG emissions
Sources
Gases
Relative importance
(climate factor *
shipping average
amount)
Engines/Boilers
CO2
10 000
CH4
1
N2O
80
Refrigerants
HCFC/HFC
30
Cargo (Tankers)
CH4 in
VOC (2%)
75
37
Shipping emissions
 The shipping
industry
contributes
with double
the amount of
GHG as to
aviation
 Vessels sailing
the major
trading routes
are largely
contributing to
GHG
emissions
Typical CO2 efficiencies today
Crude
LNG
General Cargo
Reefer
Chemical
Bulk
Container
LPG
Product
RoRo/Vehicle
Rail
Road
0
50
100
39
150
200
g CO2 / ton*km
250
300
Grounds for concern…
Scenarios for CO2 emissions from International Shipping
from 2007 to 2050 in the absence of climate policies
CO2 emissions from ships (million tons CO2 / yr)
8000
7000
6000
A1FI
A1B
A1T
A2
B1
5000
B2
Max
4000
Min
3000
2000
1000
0
2000
2010
2020
2030
40
2040
2050
Gt CO2 emissions international shipping
Cutting CO2 emissions from business as usual
Known measures;
most already
cost-effective
Business as usual scenario
More expensive
or breakthrough
technologies
CO2 emission targets
41
EEOI
Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator
43
Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator – EEOI
MEPC.1/Circ.684
“Guidance for Voluntary Use of the Ship
Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator
(EEOI)”
 CO2 Indicator targeted for Ship Owners usage
 Index calculation based on:
- Total fuel consumption
- Actual distance traveled (from log book)
- Cargo mass or alternative cargo unit
44
Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI)
 Management tool to monitor the CO2 emission performance of ships, or fleets, with
regards to CO2 emissions.
 Directly relates the ratio of mass of CO2 emitted per unit transport work.
EEOI = Mass of CO2/(transport work)
 It offers a high level energy efficiency reference on the overall level (total emissions),
enabling internal benchmarking of the organisation’s performance (incl. commercial)
- However to effectively manage energy usage, this must be supported by more targeted
performance monitoring
 Offers opportunities for:
- quality control / Improved data reporting, recording and assessment,
- benchmarking of performance, and
- overview of total emissions
Daily
• Q/A of data
• Trending
Sea Passage
• Same cargo mass
• Benchmarking
Voyage
• Benchmarking
Yearly
• Total emissions
• CR reporting
• Benchmarking
Several reasons for index value variations

Ship size / type

Cargo requirements

Utilization of cargo space

Speed

Length of ballast (repositioning) voyages

Differences in port stay / cargo operation
inclusion

Ship condition (engine condition, hull and
propeller fouling, etc)

Weather and currents

Errors in measurement and registration
46
EEOI – the details
 Objective – to provide an indicator for the energy
efficiency of a ship in operation
 Only recommendatory in nature, however, impact
of future political developments uncertain
 Applies to all ships doing transportation work,
intended to cover all cargo types
 Carbon conversion factors pre-defined for various
fuel types
 Cargo mass term flexible; expressed as metric
tonnes, TEU, passengers, car units, lane meters,
railway cars, freight vehicles etc.
 Distance sailed is actual distance over ground
 Voyage defined as period from departure from one
port to the departure from next. Alternative
definitions are accepted
 Rolling average calculations are accepted
47
Establishing an EEOI
 The EEOI should be representative of the energy efficiency of the ship in operation
and be measured over a consistent period of time, which represents the overall
trading pattern of the vessel.
 In order to establish the EEOI, the following main steps are described as being
needed.
1. define the period for which the EEOI is calculated*;
2. define data sources for data collection;
3. collect data;
4. convert data to appropriate format; and
5. calculate EEOI
* Ballast voyages, as well as voyages which are not used for transport of cargo, such
as voyage for docking service, should be included. Voyages for the purpose of
securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea should be excluded.
Calculation example
49
Using the EEOI as a benchmarking tool
Estimated EEOI for vessel - ~6500 dwt General Cargo
(5000-10000 dwt general cargo segment)
Fleet segment 100 day rolling average
Daily EEOI
14,0
100 day rolling average
EEOI (grams per tonne*nm)
12,0
10,0
8,0
6,0
4,0
2,0
26.05.2007
19.05.2007
12.05.2007
05.05.2007
28.04.2007
21.04.2007
14.04.2007
07.04.2007
31.03.2007
24.03.2007
17.03.2007
10.03.2007
03.03.2007
24.02.2007
17.02.2007
10.02.2007
03.02.2007
27.01.2007
20.01.2007
13.01.2007
06.01.2007
30.12.2006
23.12.2006
16.12.2006
09.12.2006
02.12.2006
25.11.2006
18.11.2006
11.11.2006
04.11.2006
28.10.2006
21.10.2006
14.10.2006
07.10.2006
30.09.2006
23.09.2006
16.09.2006
09.09.2006
0,0
 By gathering data over longer period trends can be identified
 Rolling average to be calculated over a longer period – IMO recommends at least 1
year or 6-10 voyages
 Example above shows how a ship can be compared with itself and a group of ships
50
Benchmarking ships, fleets, operational modes
90
Total Fleet: Voyage - Dept to Dept
80
Total Fleet: Voyage - Dept to Arrival
Total Fleet: Voyage - Sea Voyages
g CO2 / (t Cargo*nm)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship Ship
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Room for improvement
EEOI – as a framework for efficiency measurements / benchmarks - may provide a
driver for efficiency improvements
Average marginal CO2 reduction cost per reduction option on world fleet
Voyage execution
40
Boiler consumption reduction
Engine monitoring
Auxiliary power reduction
20
Cost per tonne CO 2 averted ($/tonne)
Optimal trim
0
-20
Wind power
-40
Fleet optimization and
speed reduction
Weather routing
-60
Hull condition
Propulsion efficiency devices
-80
Propeller efficiency
-100
0
50
100
150
200
CO2 reduction (mill tonnes per year)
Baseline: 925 MT
52
Industry concerns…
 Great leeway in definition of index terms
complicates comparison based on indicator
value only
 Actual change in CO2 emissions not
necessarily reflected by change in indicator
value
 Voluntary calculation may lead to mandatory
regulation, regionally or internationally
53
EEDI
Energy Efficiency Design Index
54
IMO - Energy Efficiency Design Index
MEPC.1/Circ.681
“Interim Guidelines on the Method of
Calculation of the Energy Efficiency
Design Index for New Ships”
MEPC.1/Circ.682
“Interim Guidelines for Voluntary
Verification of the Energy Efficiency
Design Index”
55
EEDI
 Where: The EEDI can be calculated and
verified for all new ships of the ship type
categories as listed in the table below. The
calculations will be based on the ship main
characteristics and engine performance also
with the design speed power curve adjusted
with the sea trial data provided by the builder
 Why: The purpose of the EEDI is to
establish the minimum efficiency of new
ships depending on ship type and size,
provide a fair basis for comparison and to
stipulate the development of more efficient
ships in general. Verification of EEDI is
voluntary today but is expected to be
mandatory in (near) future (MEPC.61).
 When: Tentative entry into force dates and
reduction rates for the ship type segments
covered by the EEDI: Assuming adoption
at MEPC 62– entry into force in 2013
New requirements on CO2 from 2013
 After protracted negotiations the MEPC voted to adopt amendments to MARPOL Annex VI
with entry into force 1 January 2013, making the EEDI and SEEMP mandatory subject to
provisions described below.
- The EEDI requirements will apply to new ships above 400 GT only, where "new ship" means a ship:
- for which the building contract is placed on or after 1 January 2013; or
- in the absence of a building contract, the keel of which is laid or which is at a similar stage of construction on or after 1
July 2013; or
- the delivery of which is on or after 1 July 2015
- A SEEMP will have to be present aboard all vessels at the first renewal or intermediate survey after1
January 2013, when an International Energy Efficiency Certificate will be issued.
57
The Principles Behind the EEDI
 Clear parallel to the millage standard in the automotive industry, but also taking the “benefit to
society” (i.e. useful work capacity) into account.
Attained design CO 2 index 
Environmental cost
Benefit for society
 In more specific terms….
Attained design CO2 index 
CF SFC P
Capacity Vref
 The index is measured as grams CO2 / capacity * nautical mile
 Baselines can be defined to compare different designs
58
The Formula - Explained
 The basic principle is retained but complexity increased
 Minor adjustments can be expected but no major changes
 Calculation methods for diesel-electric and hybrid propulsion systems to be
further explored, expected finalized in 2013
 No guidelines on weather factor fw at present
 Guidelines on CO2 abatement technologies (Peff) to be developed
59
Reference lines (Baselines)
 Reference lines derived for defined fleet segments (1998 - 2007) through data filtering and
regression analysis
 Reference lines form the basis for requirements per ship type, a.k.a ”Required Design Index”.
Precise level of ”Required Design Index” is a political decision
 ”Attained Index” for specific ships to be calculated per ship on design data, and to be less
than ”Required Index”.
 Reference lines and Attained Design Index calculated by same formula, but with correction
factors set to 1.0 for baseline
60
Reference line values
Ship type
Capacity
a
c
Bulk carrier
dwt
961.79
0.477
Gas tanker
dwt
1120.00
0.456
Tanker
dwt
1218.80
0.488
70%*dwt
174.22
0.201
General cargo
dwt
107.48
0.216
Reefer
dwt
227.01
0.244
Combination
dwt
1218.80
0.488
Container
 The reference lines are calculated as a*Capacity-c
 The capacity for container vessels was changed at MEPC62 and the reference line
will have to be recalculated
61
Ship types included in EEDI
 In addition roro and passenger vessels are scheduled to be included as soon as calculation methods and
reference lines are ready
 Ships with diesel-electric, turbine or hybrid propulsion system will not be included before calculation methods
are developed
 The reduction factor for small ships will be reviewed in 2013
 In 2015 IMO shall review the reduction rates based on technological developments and may adjust further
implementation dates and reduction rates
62
Example for container ships
Increasing requirement
in each Phase
Minimum size for
required EEDI level
Container ships
40
35
30
EEDI
25
20
15
Reference line to be
updated by the IMO
Tentative
Required
Required
Required
Required
10
5
reference line - to be updated
EEDI: 2013-2015
EEDI: 2015-2020
EEDI: 2020-2025
EEDI: 2025-
0
0
5 000
10 000
15 000
Dwt
Increasing EEDI
requirement relative
to reference line
63
20 000
25 000
30 000
EEDI – timeline for implementation
 MEPC 62 – July 2011
- Amendment to MARPOL Annex VI adopted
 MEPC 63 – March 2012
- Guidelines for propulsion power needed to maintain manoeuvrability
to be finalised
 MEPC 64 – October 2012
- Guidelines on ship specific voluntary structural enhancement to be
finalised
 Entry into force, Phase 0 – January 2013
 MEPC 65 – July 2013
- Guidelines for CO2 abatement technologies to be finalised
- Review of requirements for small ships and large tankers and bulker
 MEPC 66 – March 2014
- Framework for including roro, passenger, diesel-electric and hybrid
propulsion ships to be adopted
 Phase 1 – January 2015
- Review of technological developments and adjustment of time
periods and reduction factors
64
Two-step verification process
Port state control will only check for the presence of a valid International Energy EfficiencyCertificate
65
EEDI Calculation and Verification Procedure
66
SEEMP
Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan
67
Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan – SEEMP
MEPC.1/Circ.683
“Guidance for the Development of a
Ship Energy Efficiency Management
Plan”
 Document Management Plan targeted for Ship Owners
 Contains a list of measures to make the ship in question more energy efficient
 There are no efficiency targets associated with the SEEMP, only for reference
 Shipyards may be asked to contribute to document the performance of specific measures
 Mandatory from 2013 as part of MARPOL Annex VI and the new International Energy
Efficiency Certificate
68
The Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan
Energy Management measures
“Guidance for the
Development of a Ship
Energy Efficiency
Management Plan
(SEEMP)
(MEPC.1/Circ.683)”,
issued 17 August 2009
Voyage
performance
Hull/propeller
condition
Rudder autopilot
Trim and draft
Voyage planning
Weather/current
routing
Energy
consumers
Cargo operations
Tank heating and
cleaning
Thruster operations
Engine tuning
Engine utilization
Total fuel
management
Pre-bunkering
process
Bunkering process
Post-bunkering
process
Organization
/Strategy
69
IMO – MEPC 62 July 2011
 MEPC 62 : adoption of new requirements on CO2 including making the Ship Energy Efficiency
Management Plan (SEEMP) mandatory for
- new ships
- existing ships
 Valid from 1 January 2013, at the first renewal or intermediate survey after this date
 The SEEMP :
- provides an approach for monitoring ship and fleet efficiency performance over time, and encourages the
ship owner, at each stage of the plan, to consider new technologies and practices when seeking to
optimize ship performance.
- SEEMP will not be subject to approval by flag states or Recognized Organizations such is the case with
class, but will be part of a new chapter 4 of MARPOL Annex 6 on Regulations and be required under the
International Energy Efficiency Certificate (IEEC).
 The IEEC requires under Regulation 22 that ‘… each ship shall keep on board a ship
specific Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) … (and) shall be developed
taking into account guidelines adopted by the (IMO).’
70
SEEMP
 How can you make a SEEMP ?
 Easy way :
- Just fill in a template, change the name of the vessel.
- Done !
 Hard way:
- It basically takes longer than 2 lines in a ppt presentation
71
Before we start….Is there any help for me ???
72
IMO – MEPC.1/Circ.683 SEEMP
Key features:

Recognises that operational efficiencies will
make an invaluable contribution to reducing global
carbon emissions

Purpose is to establish a mechanism for a
company and/or a ship to improve the energy
efficiency of a ship’s operation that is preferably
linked to a broader corporate energymanagement
policy

Guidance only

SEEMP to be customised to characteristics and
needs of individual companies and ships

Four step process suggested:
1. Planning
2. Implementation
3. Monitoring
4. Evaluation
73