Robert L. Nichols rnichols@fgcu.edu
Overview of role
Undergraduate Instructional Assistants (UIAs)
Graduate Instructional Assistants (GIAs)
Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs)
Scheduling Instructional Assistants
Hire and manage new GTAs
Creating payroll information and maintaining records
Mentor & Train GTAs
Conduct training sessions in pedagogy and instructional technology
Facilitate Faculty Mentors and Teaching Cells
Change efforts should be focused on a single topic (Fuess & Mitchell, 2011)
Change process should be de-centralized and allow for a more participatory culture from the staff (Fuess & Mitchell, 2011)
The process of change should include perspective beyond faculty and engage other key stakeholders (Fuess & Mitchell, 2011)
A culture of mentoring is needed requiring all faculty to be trained in mentoring (Moran,
2012)
Eight elements for long-term sustainability (Coffey & Horner, 2012)
A contextually appropriate innovation
Staff buy-in
A shared vision
Administrative support
Leadership at various levels
Ongoing technical assistance
Data-based decision making and sharing
Continuous regeneration
Glickman, Gordon, and Ross-Gordon (2010) noted that teachers that are at a low developmental level need more direction from their supervisors.
Directive Control Behaviors
With the lack of experience, the beginning teacher is helped by the supervisor using a more direct approach with corrective feedback.
Directive Information Behaviors
This behavior is also appropriate when a teacher does not have as much knowledge about an issue as the supervisor.
Instructional Assistants works closely with faculty member (Harris, Lowery-Moore, &
Farrow, 2008)
Silva and Dana (2001) discussed a triad supervisory relationship
Recognize, explore, and value the collaboration
Glickman et al. (2005) proceeded to describe various observational types of instruments used for classroom observations.
Categorical frequency instruments
Performance indicator instruments
Visual Diagramming
Verbatim and selected verbatim
Detached open-ended narrative
Participant open-ended observation
Focused questionnaire observation
Stiggins and Chappuis (2005) stated the teacher should be provided with descriptive feedback.
Glickman et al. (2005) noted observations should be used as a formative assessment to help an instructor improve their and not as a summative assessment.
Coffey, J. H., & Horner, R. H. (2012). The sustainability of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports.
Exceptional Children, 78 (4), 407-422.
Fuess Jr., S. M., & Mitchell, N. D. (2011). General education reform: Opportunities for institutional alignment.
JGE: The Journal of General Education, 60 (1), 1-15.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., and Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2010). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach . Boston, Massachusetts:
Allyn & Bacon.
Harris, S., Lowery-Moore, H., and Farrow, V. (2008). Extending transfer of learning theory to transformative learning theory: A model for promoting teacher leadership. Theory into Practice , 47 (4), 318-326.
Moran, A. (2012). Crises as catalysts for change: Re-energising teacher education in
Northern Ireland.
Educational Research, 54 (2), 137-147. doi:
10.1080/00131881.2012.680039
Silva, D., & Dana, N. (2001). Collaborative supervision in the professional development school. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision , 16 (4), 305-321.
Stiggins, R., and Chappuis , S. (2005). Putting testing in perspective; It’s for learning.
Principal Leadership, 6 (2), 16-20.