The National Water Census * Part of the Initiative Overview of the Delaware River Basin Focus Area Study Jeffrey M Fischer fischer@usgs.gov 609-771-3953 Delaware Source Water Collaborative May 8, 2014 Objective of the Water Census: To place technical information and tools in the hands of stakeholders, allowing them to answer two primary questions about water availability: Does the Nation have enough freshwater to meet both human and ecological needs? Will this water be present to meet future needs? Water Availability Analysis The process of determining the quantity and timing-characteristics of water, which is of sufficient quality, to meet human and ecological needs. Technical Information Socio-economic Considerations Legal Considerations Regulatory Considerations Political Considerations USGS only deals with the Technical Information! Provide Enhanced Information On: Streamflow Evapotranspiration (ET) Ecological Flow Needs Groundwater Water Use and Consumption Thermoelectric Power Irrigation Public Supply Information available at: http://water.usgs.gov/watercensus Daily ET from Satellite Data Thermoelectric Consumptive Use Information Delivery A web application for delivering water availability information at scales that are relevant to the user Select the area of interest. Generate information on water accounting components. Work with the online tool to construct your water budget. Access trend information. Example from French Creek Beta version available on line in next few weeks http://water.usgs.gov/watercensus Focused Water Availability Assessments Testing grounds for the National Water Census Water Quality Groundwater Resources Water Use Eco Flows Surface Water Trends, Precipitation, etc Global Change State, Local, Regional Stakeholder Involvement Defined Technical Questions to be Answered Delaware River Basin Focus Area Study USGS Water Census Jeff Fischer, Susan Hutson, Jonathan Kennen, Kelly Maloney, Marla Stuckey, Tanja Williamson, Ward Freeman, And many more Stakeholder Results – Areas of Study Water Use – Improved acquisition, management, and integration of water-use and water-supply data. Robust Hydrologic Model – Evaluate growth of population centers, effects of land-use change, and effects of climate variability and climate change on water resources Ecological Water Needs – Development of ecologicalflow science for main stem & tributaries. Evaluate flow alteration effects for ungaged tributaries. Improve decision support tool on main stem Today’s talk focuses on Water Use and development of the Hydrologic Model. Delaware River Basin Water Use Temporal framework Susan Hutson Kristin Linsey Russ Ludlow Betzaida Reyes Jennifer Shourds Base year 2010 Multiple years as available 2005-2010 NJ and PA Water-use transactions Withdrawals Type of use Return flows Interbasin transfers Aquifer Storage and Recovery Data Collection Delaware River Basin Water Use 26,135 site-specific data records single and multiple years 6,343 unique sites include 5 interbasin transfers Water Type Count Percent Groundwater 4,580 72 Surface water 1,001 16 Return flows 762 12 Areal estimates Livestock Irrigation Self-supplied Domestic Data Collection Total Water Use* 8% Groundwater 7,000 Mgal/d 92% Surface Water 4,900 Mgal/d (70%) Thermoelectric Power Generation 1,600 Mgal/d (23%) Public supply and Self-supplied domestic 290 Mgal/d (4%) Industrial, Commercial, and Mining 200 Mgal/d (3%) Irrigation, Livestock, and Aquaculture * Hydroelectric power is an “in stream" use and is not included in this calculation. Thermoelectric 4,900 Mgal/d 0% GW 100% SW Withdrawals, in Mgal/d 40% 60% Saline Fresh 0 >0 - 10 10 - 100 100 - 200 200 - 300 300 - 3100 Public Supply and Self-Supplied Domestic Withdrawals 1,600 Mgal/d PS and DO Withdrawals Public supply withdrawals 1,500 Mgal/d 650 Mgal/d transferred out of basin 23% 77% PS and DO Water Use Self-supplied Domestic Withdrawals 120 Mgal/d 37% 63% SW GW Public Supply Public Supply Withdrawals Public Supply Transfers Public Supply Water Use Withdrawals,in Mgal/d 0 1 - 10 10 - 100 100 - 200 200 - 300 300 - 1000 Determining Self-Supplied Domestic Jack Monti and Jason Finkelstein Domestic use data not collected by U.S Census since 1990. Developed current domestic use estimates from: • USGS National Water Use Information Program • • • County use data every 5 years; 1985-2005 Estimates of total population served U.S. Census • • • Decadal data on population and housing units Block groups and blocks were analyzed 1990 census provided source of water information per block group housing units Statistical Determination of Domestic Use Buck County, PA Example Supply Housing Public House Pub Supply (percent) Units Units % 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Block Group 0.5 Used population density 95th percent value to forecast/predict future years. 0.4 0.3 0.2 Cut-off Limit 100% Line 95% Line 0.1 0 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Population Density per Sq Mile 100 percent domestic self supply Top five % flip to public supply 100 percent public supply Example for Sussex County, Delaware 1990 Population of P.S. block groups (pink): 53,521 1990 Water-use Program P.S. population : 54,430 Predicted population for P.S. blocks in 2000 (light and dark purple): 83,819 2000 Water-use Program P.S. population : 78,420 Basin-Wide Decadal Predictions 1990 2000 2010 Basin-Wide Results Delaware River Basin Block Group Populations* Year Total Domestic SelfSupply Public Supply Undetermined 1990 7,590,442 6,313,877 1,276,565 2000 8,061,808 6,544,054 1,517,754 2010 8,579,716 6,929,628 1,649,175 913 *Population totals not fully apportioned to Delaware River Basin extent (Total includes parts of counties not fully in basin) Industrial, Commercial, and Mining 290 Mgal/d 15% Industrial 240 Mgal/d 85% Commercial 34 Mgal/d Industrial, Commercial, & Mining 23% 77% Mining 18 Mgal/d 47% 53% Withdrawals,in Mgal/d SW GW 0 1 - 10 10 - 100 100 - 200 200 - 300 Agriculture Agriculture 200 Mgal/d* Irrigation 170 Mgal/d 44% 56% 9% Livestock 9.2 Mgal/d 91% Aquaculture 18 Mgal/d 39% 61% SW GW * 60 percent of total was reported values Withdrawals,in Mgal/d 0 1 - 10 10 - 100 100 - 200 200 - 300 Rasterizing Estimated Livestock & Irrigation Data Combined: 2010 USDA Crop Data Layer-CDL 2010 USGS county livestock or irrigation use data And distributed by land use over county Water Use Data Compilation & Dissemination USGS SIR Report 2014 Web-portal data delivery 8-digit subbasin 12-digit subbasin data and methods data 13 subbasins Report out by end of calendar year Web tool available in 2015 426 subbasins Estimating Streamflow Tool for predicting flow at ungaged basins based on correlation with historic flow at gaged sites – Marla Stuckey Hydrologic model to evaluate how water stressors such as population growth, land-use change, and climate change affect the availability of water resources – Tanja Williamson Both models are used in current evaluations and future predictions of ecological flow needs – Jonathan Kennen WATER Hydrologic Model Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) Used as a decision support tool to evaluate how water stressors such as population growth, land-use change, and climate change affect the availability of water resources. Model encompasses the whole non-tidal Delaware River Basin. Validated using precipitation, water-use, streamflow, and other information for the time period 2001 to 2011. Simulations of future streamflow and water-availability conditions centered on 2030 and 2060 will incorporate projected changes in water use, land use, and climate in the watershed. Tanja N. Williamson, Jeremiah Lant, Elizabeth Nystrom, Scott Hoffman, and Hugh Nelson WATER Hydrologic Model based on TOPMODEL TOPography-based hydrological MODEL Developed by Beven and Kirkby, 1979 “Physically-based watershed model that simulates the variable-source-area concept of streamflow generation.” (Wolock, 1993) Three fundamental assumptions steady-state recharge to the groundwater hydraulic gradient of the water table ≈ the surface slope transmissivity profile decreases exponentially with depth Beven, K.J. and M.J. Kirkby. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, v. 24, pp. 43-69. Wolock, David M. 1993. Simulating the variable-source-area concept of streamflow generation with the watershed model TOPMODEL. USGS WRI 93-4124. Water Budget Precipitation Infiltration Sub-surface flow Direct Saturated Areas or Impermeable Surface Over-land flow ET Evaporation Qout TOPMODEL topographic wetness index upslope contributing area TWI ln tan slope Grid cells with the same TWI are hydrologically similar Calculations need not be performed on every single grid cell. High values of TWI High potential for saturation Low values of TWI Low potential for saturation Soil Characteristics Calculated “m” SSURGO Variables Hydraulic conductivity (moderately Conductivity Multiplier high or higher) Field Capacity Available Water Capacity Porosity Thickness Ksat - High Ksat - Low Scaling Parameter f And….. ln conductivity multiplier soil depth Scaling Parameter “m” computed from processed SSURGO data m = readily drained soil porosity/rate of decrease with depth m porosity field capacity f WATER – A decision support tool Precipitation Record or Forecast Landscape Characterization Current Condition Gaged Streams Validated Model Simulated Hydrograph 45 5 40 10 35 15 30 20 25 25 20 30 15 35 10 40 5 45 0 50 30-Jun 20-Jun 10-Jun 31-May 21-May 1-May 11-May 21-Apr 1-Apr 11-Apr 22-Mar 12-Mar 2-Mar 20-Feb 31-Jan 10-Feb 21-Jan 2003 1-Jan Landscape change 0 Precipitation (mm) Changed climate Discharge (mm) Current conditions Potential Uses 50 11-Jan Scenarios Flow at ungaged sites Water availability Land management and water allocation decisions Resolution of Spatial Layers 0 Ksat NLCD CTI 13.55 13.15 12.75 12.36 11.96 11.56 11.17 10.77 10.37 9.97 9.58 9.18 8.78 8.38 0.06 7.99 0.1 7.59 0.08 7.19 Fraction of Watershed 0.12 6.79 6.40 6.00 5.60 5.21 4.81 4.41 4.01 3.62 3.22 2.82 2.42 2.03 TWI 0.16 Site 03207965 0.14 Histogram of TWI 0.04 Precipitation Record 0.02 Incorporate Water-Use Data Representative Values Long-term Median Seasonal 426 basins 12.48 km2 to 270.06 km2 Withdrawals Returns/Discharges Transfers Seasonal Contribution to Annual Total Percent of 2010 Total Data distributed over HUC 12 Basins. This will protect privacy information Permit Number Model Validation Minimally impacted basins 1.5 to 675 km2 (0.6 to 261 mi2) Comparison of streamflow estimates USGS streamflow data Evaluate potential bias in water budget Snowpack PET Sites will also be valuable for evaluating future land use change scenarios. Reservoir Management System Initial work focusing on basin areas upstream of reservoirs. Ultimately: WATER will export longterm record of flow in OASIS format Use OASIS for points downstream of reservoirs Non-OASIS users will use lake delay Flow Snow Snowpack Simulation – Upper Basin Simulation of Evapotranspiration Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) – Hamon (1963) Simulated Actual Evapotranspiration (AET) – limited by soil-moisture availability For Future Hydrologic Predictions WATER Model Needs Projections of Changes in: Water Use Climate Land Use (subject of next talk) Future: Global Circulation Models (GCM) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project CMIP5 GCMs Previously used in the basin NCAR CCSM GFDL ESM2G, NOAA GISS-E2-H, NASA CGCM4-CanES Change factor (delta) approach Target time periods 2030 2060 Representative Concentration Pathways RCP4.5 RCP8.5 Modeled Area 3736 basins 10 km2 GCM Area 6 – 10 Cells 100 – 200 km2 RCP scenario conditions At Conclusion of the Delaware Study Database of water withdrawal, use, and return flow information for watersheds Tool to estimate daily streamflow from 1960 to 2010 for ungaged streams Hydrologic model of the non-tidal portions of the watershed tributaries Flow and aquatic assemblage response relations for tributaries An updated Decision Support System for sections of the main-stem Delaware Jeff Fischer Fischer@usgs.gov 609-771-3953