Radio astronomical probes of Cosmic Reionization and the 1st luminous objects Chris Carilli April 3, 2007 MIT Brief introduction to cosmic reionization Objects within reionization – recent observations of molecular gas, dust, and star formation, in the host galaxies of the most distant QSOs, and more… Neutral Intergalactic Medium (IGM) – HI 21cm telescopes, signals, and challenges USA – Carilli, Wang, Fan, Strauss, Gnedin Euro – Walter, Bertoldi, Cox, Menten, Omont Ionized Neutral Reionized Chris Carilli (NRAO) Berlin June 29, 2005 WMAP – structure from the big bang Hubble Space Telescope Realm of the Galaxies Dark Ages Twilight Zone Epoch of Reionization • Last phase of cosmic evolution to be tested • Bench-mark in cosmic structure formation indicating the first luminous structures Constraint I: Gunn-Peterson Effect End of reionization? f(HI) <1e-4 at z= 5.7 f(HI) >1e-3 at z= 6.3 Constraint II: CMB large scale polarization -- Thompson scattering during reionization Page + 06; Spergel 06 TT Scattered CMB quad. => polarized Horizon scale => 10’s deg e = 0.09+/-0.03 zreion= 11+/3 TE EE Fan, Carilli, Keating ARAA 06 QuickTime™ and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to see this picture. 8Mpc Gnedin03 Current observations => zreion = 6 to 11 (+/-3) Not ‘event’ but complex process, large variance time/space (eg. Shull & Venkatesan 2006) Limitations of measurements CMB polarization e = integral measure through universe => allows many reionization scenarios • Still a 3 result (now in EE vs. TE before) Gunn-Peterson effect • Lya to f(HI) conversion requires ‘clumping factor’ (cf. Becker etal 06) • Lya >>1 for f(HI)>0.001 => low f() diagnostic GP => Reionization occurs in ‘twilight zone’, opaque for obs <0.9 m Radio observations of z ~ 6 QSO host galaxies IRAM 30m + MAMBO: sub-mJy sens at 250 GHz + wide fields dust IRAM PdBI: sub-mJy sens at 90 and 230 GHz +arcsec resol. mol. Gas, C+ VLA: uJy sens at 1.4 GHz star formation VLA: < 0.1 mJy sens at 20-50 GHz + 0.2” resol. mol. gas (low order) Magic of (sub)mm: distance independent method of studying objects in universe from z=0.8 to 10 L_FIR ~ 4e12 x S250(mJy) L_sun SFR ~ 1e3 x S250 M_sun/yr FIR = 1.6e12 L_sun obs = 250 GHz Why QSOs? Spectroscopic redshifts Extreme (massive) systems MB < -26 => Lbol > 1e14 Lo MBH > 1e9 Mo Rapidly increasing samples: z>4: > 1000 known z>5: 80 z>6: 15 Fan 05 QSO host galaxies – MBH -- Mbulge relation Magorrian, Tremaine, Gebhardt, Merritt… Most (all?) low z spheroidal galaxies have SMBH: MBH=0.002 Mbulge ‘Causal connection between SMBH and spheroidal galaxy formation’ Luminous high z QSOs have massive host galaxies (1e12 Mo) MAMBO surveys of z>2 QSOs J1148+5251 1e13 Lo 2.4mJy • 1/3 of luminous QSOs have S250 > 2 mJy, independent of redshift from z=1.5 to 6.4 • LFIR =1e13 Lo = 0.1 x Lbol: Dust heating by starburst or AGN? Pushing into reionization: QSO 1148+52 at z=6.4 • Highest redshift quasar known (tuniv = 0.87Gyr) • Lbol = 1e14 Lo • Black hole: ~3 x 109 Mo (Willot etal.) • Gunn Peterson trough (Fan etal.) 1148+52 z=6.42: Dust detection MAMBO 250 GHz 3’ S250 = 5.0 +/- 0.6 mJy LFIR = 1.2e13 Lo Mdust =7e8 Mo Dust formation? • AGB Winds ≥ 1.4e9yr • tuniv = 0.87e9yr => dust formation associated with high mass star formation: Silicate gains (vs. eg. Graphite) formed in core collapse SNe (Maiolino 07)? 1148+52 z=6.42: Gas detection VLA 46.6149 GHz CO 3-2 IRAM Off channels Rms=60uJy VLA • FWHM = 305 km/s • z = 6.419 +/- 0.001 • M(H2) ~ 2e10 Mo • Mgas/Mdust ~ 30 (~ starburst galaxies) • C, O production (~1e8 Mo) => Star formation started early (z > 8)? 1148+52 CO Excitation • Tk ~ 100K • nH2 ~ 105 cm-3 => Typical of starburst galaxy nucleus 2 J1148+52: VLA imaging of CO3-2 0.4”res rms=50uJy at 47GHz 1” 0.15” res CO extended to NW by 1” (=5.5 kpc) tidal(?) feature Separation = 0.3” = 1.7 kpc TB = 35K => Typical of starburst nuclei Merging galaxies? Testing MBH - Mbulge relation at high z CO FWHM + size => Mdyn~ 2e10/(sin)^2 Mo Mgas~ 2e10 Mo Mbulge ~1e12 Mo (predicted) 1148+5251 1148+5251 Radio-IR SED TD = 50 K Elvis SED Radio-FIR correlation FIR excess = 50K dust Radio-FIR SED follows star forming galaxy SFR ~ 3000 Mo/yr [CII] 158um PDR cooling line detected at z=6.4 30m 256GHz PdBI Maiolino etal 0.3” L[CII] = 4x109 Lo Size ~ 0.5” (~ 2.5kpc) L[CII]/LFIR = 3x10-4 ~ ULIRG Enriched ISM on kpc scales SFR ~ 6.5e-6 L[CII] ~ 3000 Mo/yr SDSS J0927+2001 z=5.8 FIR-luminous QSO host + ‘submm galaxy’ companion separation = 87kpc Biased massive galaxy formation at early times? SharkII CSO 850GHz rms= 6mJy 10” Radio-FIR correlation LFIR ~ 1e13 Lo SFR ~ 2500 Mo/yr Chance projection < 1% •FIR-luminous z~6 QSOs: SFR ~ few e3 Mo/yr => form large spheroid in dynamical timescale ~ 1e8 yr •Coeval formation of massive galaxy + SMBH within 1 Gyr of big bang? Z~6 Low z IR QSOs: major mergers AGN+starburst? Low z Optical QSOs: earlytype hosts Building a giant elliptical galaxy + SMBH by z=6.5 10.5 Li, Hernquist, Roberston.. Multi-scale simulation isolating most massive halo in 3 Gpc^3 (co-mov) 8.1 Stellar mass ~ 1e12 Mo forms in series (7) of major, gas rich mergers from z~14, with SFR ~ 1e3 - 1e4 Mo/yr 6.5 SMBH of ~ 2e9 Mo forms via Eddington-limited accretion + mergers BH feedback regulates star formation ISM abundance quickly evolves to solar Evolves into giant elliptical galaxy in massive cluster (3e15 Mo) by z=0 Mstars=1e12Mo MBH = 2e9Mo The ALMA revolution -- observing normal galaxies into cosmic reionization Panchromatic view of galaxy formation: ALMA reveals the cool universe: dust and gas -- the fundamental fuel for star formation LFIR = 1e11 Lo cm: star formation, AGN (sub)mm dust, molecular gas Near-IR: stars, ionized gas, AGN Cosmic Stromgren Sphere • Accurate redshift from CO: z=6.419+/0.001 Ly a, high ioniz Lines: inaccurate redshifts (z > 0.03) • Proximity effect: photons leaking from 6.32<z<6.419 White et al. 2003 z=6.32 •‘time bounded’ Stromgren sphere: R = 4.7 Mpc tqso = 1e5 R^3 f(HI)~ 1e7yrs or f(HI) ~ 1 (tqso/1e7 yr) Loeb & Rybicki 2000 CSS: Constraints on neutral fraction at z~6? Nine z~6 QSOs with CO or MgII redshifts: <R> = 4.4 Mpc (Wyithe et al. 05; Fan et al. 06; Kurk et al. 07) GP => f(HI) > 0.001 If f(HI) ~ 0.001, then <tqso> ~ 1e4 yrs – implausibly short given QSO fiducial lifetimes (~1e7 years)? Probability arguments suggest: f(HI) > 0.1 P(>x_HI) Wyithe et al. 2005 90% probability x(HI) > curve =tqso/4e7 yrs Cosmic ‘phase transition’? CSS => rapid rise in f(HI) around z ~ 6 to 7 Many difficulties (Lidz + 07, Maselli + 07) * f(HI) R^-3 * pre-QSO reionization => clumpy IGM/ragged edges Studying the pristine neutral IGM using redshifted HI 21cm observations (100 – 200 MHz) TCMB 1 z 1/ 2 0.008( )( ) f HI (1 ) TS 10 1e13 Mo Large scale structure cosmic density, neutral fraction, f(HI) Temp: TK, TCMB, Tspin 1e9 Mo Multiple experiments under-way: ‘pathfinders’ ~1e4 m^2 MWA (MIT/CfA/ANU) 21CMA (China) LOFAR (NL) SKA 1e6 m^2 Signal I: Global (‘all sky’) reionization signature in low frequency HI spectra Gnedin & Shaver 03 140MHz IGM heating: Tspin= TK > TCMB Ly coupling: Tspin=TK < TCMB All sky => Single dipole experiment with (very) carefully controlled systematics (signal <1e-4 sky), eg. EDGES (Rogers & Bowman 07) Signal II: HI 21cm Tomography of IGM Zaldarriaga + 2003 z=12 9 TB(2’) = 10’s mK SKA rms(100hr) = 4mK LOFAR rms (1000hr) = 80mK 7.6 Signal III: 3D Power spectrum analysis only LOFAR + f(HI) SKA McQuinn + 06 Signal IV: Cosmic Web after reionization Ly alpha forest at z=3.6 ( < 10) Womble 96 N(HI) = 1e13 – 1e15 cm^-2, f(HI/HII) = 1e-5 -- 1e-6 => Before reionization N(HI) =1e18 – 1e21 cm^-2 Signal IV: Cosmic web before reionization: HI 21Forest 19mJy z=12 130MHz • radio G-P (=1%) • 21 Forest (10%) • mini-halos (10%) • primordial disks (100%) z=8 159MHz • Perhaps easiest to detect (use long baselines) • Requires radio sources: expect 0.05 to 0.5 deg^-2 at z> 6 with S151 > 6 mJy? Signal V: Cosmic Stromgren spheres around z > 6 QSOs LOFAR ‘observation’: 20xf(HI)mK, 15’,1000km/s 5Mpc => 0.5 x f(HI) mJy Pathfinders: Set first hard limits on f(HI) at end of cosmic reionization Easily rule-out cold IGM (T_s < T_cmb): signal = 360 mK 0.5 mJy Wyithe et al. 2006 Challenge I: Low frequency foreground – hot, confused sky Eberg 408 MHz Image (Haslam + 1982) Coldest regions: T ~ 100 (/200Mz)^-2.6 K Highly ‘confused’: 1 source/deg^2 with S140 > 1 Jy Solution: spectral decomposition (eg. Morales, Gnedin…) Foreground = power-law or gently curving over ~ 100 MHz Signal = fine scale structure on scales ~ few MHz Freq Signal/Sky ~ 2e-5 Signal 10’ FoV; SKA 1000hrs Foreground Xcorrelation/Power spectral analysis in 3D – different symmetries in freq space Challenge II: Ionospheric phase errors – varying e- content TIDs – ‘fuzz-out’ sources ‘Isoplanatic patch’ = few deg = few km Phase variation proportional to ^2 QuickTime™ and a Cinepak decompressor are needed to see this picture. Solution: Wide field ‘rubber screen’ phase selfcalibration 15’ Virgo A VLA 74 MHz Lane + 02 Challenge III: Interference 100 MHz z=13 200 MHz z=6 Solutions -- RFI Mitigation (Ellingson06) Digital filtering Beam nulling Real-time ‘reference beam’ LOCATION! VLA-VHF: 180 – 200 MHz Prime focus X-dipole Greenhill, Blundell (SAO); Carilli, Perley (NRAO) Leverage: existing telescopes, IF, correlator, operations $110K D+D/construction (CfA) First light: Feb 16, 05 Four element interferometry: May 05 First limits: Winter 06/07 Project abandoned: Digital TV KNMD Ch 9 150W at 100km RFI mitigation: location, location location… 100 people km^-2 1 km^-2 0.01 km^-2 (Briggs 2005) Destination: Moon! No interference No ionosphere (?) RAE2 1973 GMRT 230 MHz – HI 21cm abs toward highest z radio galaxy and QSO (z~5.2) RFI = 20 kiloJy ! 229Mhz 0.5 Jy rms(20km/s) = 5 mJy 232MHz 30mJy rms(40km/s) = 3mJy N(HI) ~ 2e20TS cm^-2 ? Radio astronomy probing cosmic reionization •‘Twilight zone’: obs of 1st luminous sources limited to near-IR to radio wavelengths • Currently -- pathological systems (‘HLIRGs’): coeval formation SMBH+giant ellipt. in spectacular starburst at tuniv<1Gyr •EVLA, ALMA 10-100x sensitivity is critical to study normal galaxies •Low freq pathfinders: HI 21cm signatures of neutral IGM •SKA: imaging of IGM END • Focus: Reionization (power spec,CSS,abs) • Very wide field: 2x2 tile(?) • Correlator: FPGA-based from Berkeley wireless lab • Staged engineering approach: GB05 8 stations Boolardy07 16 stations PAPER: First images/spectra Cas A 1e4Jy 180MHz 140MHz Cygnus A CygA 1e4Jy 1e4Jy 3C348 400Jy 3C392 200Jy ALMA first fringes (Emerson +) ATF, Socorro NM Saturn 90 GHz March 2, 2007 Using all ALMA electronics ALMA Status •Antennas, receivers, correlator all fully prototyped and evaluated: best mm receivers and antennas ever! •Site construction well under way: Observation Support Facility and Array Operations Site •North American ALMA Science Center (C’Ville): gearing up for science commissioning and operations (successful international operations review Feb 2007) •Timeline: Q1 2007: First fringes at ATF (Socorro) Q1 2009: Three antenna array at AOS Q3 2010: Start early science (16 antennas) Q4 2012: Full operations Signal VI: pre-reionization HI signal eg. Baryon Oscillations (Barkana & Loeb) Very difficult to detect ! z=50 => = 30 MHz Signal: 30 arcmin, 50 mk => S_30MHz = 0.1 mJy SKA sens in 1000hrs: T_fg = 20000K => z=50 rms = 0.2 mJy z=150 HCN emission: Dense gas directly associated with star formation n(H2) > 1e5 cm^-3 (vs. CO: n(H2) > 1e3 cm^-3) z>2 J1148+52 Solomon et al z=2.58 70 uJy index=1 Stratta, Maiolino et al. 2006: extinction toward z=6.2 QSO and 6.3 GRB => Silicate + amorphous Carbon dust grains (vs. eg. Graphite) formed in core collapse SNe? Sources responsible for reionization Luminous AGN: No Star forming galaxies: maybe -- dwarf galaxies (Bowens05; Yan04)? mini-QSOs -- unlikely (soft Xray BG; Dijkstra04) Decaying sterile neutrinos -- unlikely (various BGs; Mapelli05) Pop III stars z>10? midIR BG (Kashlinsky05), but trecomb < tuniv at z~10 GP => Reionization occurs in ‘twilight zone’, opaque for obs <0.9 m Needed for reion. [CII] -- the good and the bad [CII]/FIR decreases rapidly with LFIR (lower heating efficiency due to charged dust grains?) => luminous starbursts are still difficult to detect in C+ Normal star forming galaxies (eg. LAEs) are not much harder to detect! J1148 z=6.4: gas, dust, star formation • FIR excess ~ 1e13Lo, Md~7e8Mo • Giant molecular gas cloud ~ 2e10Mo, size ~ 5.5kpc • Star formation rate ~ 3000 Mo/yr 1. Radio-FIR SED 2. Gas reservoir + Dust/Gas 3. CO excitation, TB 4. [CII]/FIR ~ ULIRG • Merging galaxy: Mdyn (r<2.5kpc) ~ 5e10 Mo • Early enrichment of heavy elements and dust => star formation started tuniv < 0.5 Gyr • Dust formation in massive stars? • Break-down of M- at high z? • ‘Smoking gun’ for coeval formation of massive galaxy + SMBH within 870 Myr of big bang? • Consistent with ‘downsizing’ in massive galaxy and SMBH formation (Heckman etal. 2004; Cowie et al. 1996) LFIR vs L’(CO) z>2 1000Mo/yr J1148+525 z=6.42 Index=1 1e11 Mo Index=1.7 M(H_2) = X * L’(CO), X=4 (Milkyway), X=0.8 (ULIRGs) Telescope time: t(dust) = 1hr, t(CO) = 10hr