Stage 2 Classical Studies Formative Assessment Task 1 Name of Assessment: Greek Epic – Odyssey the Epic Hero Student Name: Assessment Type: Folio Assessment Conditions: Essay of up to 1200 words Learning Requirements: 1. demonstrate knowledge and understanding of selected texts, ideas, individuals, groups, institutions, practices, events, and artefacts of the classical world 2. recognise and reflect on the diversity of attitudes, beliefs, and values in the classical world 3. research, critically analyse, synthesise, and reflect on primary and secondary sources, including literary texts 4. recognise and use relevant terms, concepts, and skills, including skills of historical literacy 5. communicate informed and relevant arguments using different forms, with appropriate examples, ideas, and acknowledgment of sources. Assessment Design Criteria: KU1, KU3, RA1, RA2, RA4, C1, C2 Assessment Task: To what extent does Odysseus possess the qualities of an epic hero? Due Date: Your first tutorial Ensure that you have: □ Included relevant primary and secondary source material □ Adhered to the conventions of essay writing □ Demonstrated in-depth knowledge and critical analysis □ Developed an informed argument and a clear point of view □ Acknowledged all sources according to SACE guidelines 1 The Epic Hero: • • • • • • • He is a mythical figure He always seeks honour and glory He possesses qualities of intelligence, courage and physical strength He displays excellence in debate and action He travels widely He is helped by the gods He does not have to be perfect Epic Heroes in The Odyssey: Books 1-4 Odysseus Nestor Menelaus Agamemnon Achilles Telemachus (progresses from ‘Ls’ to ‘Ps’ by end of poem!) Ajax The Odyssey: In the first four books we do not meet Odysseus, but we hear much about him from the mouths of others. Formative writing task: To what extent does Odysseus possess the qualities or characteristics necessary in order for him to meet the criteria of being classified as an epic hero? Provide evidence and name your sources. Whilst giving evidence it is important to analyse the integrity of your sources, whether they be other individuals in the poem or outside primary or secondary sources. Remember to adhere to the conventions of essay writing as set-out below. 2 Structure of an essay: The following maps a commonly used structure for many academic essays. Use this outline to guide you as you compose your own argument. Opening Sentence Start your paper with a general statement about your topic that catches the reader’s attention such as a relevant quotation, anecdote or fascinating fact. Introduction Context Provide the information the reader will need to understand the topic. Thesis Statement State your arguable position on the topic that you will support with evidence in your body paragraphs. Summarise your argument Answer the question and explain how you intend to proceed. Include one sentence per main body paragraph, introducing your key points. Topic Sentence Provide the main idea of the paragraph. Supporting Evidence Include specific textual evidence: cited quotes; paraphrases or summary, evidence that supports your thesis from other sources: primary and secondary. Body Paragraphs Conclusion Analysis Explain to the reader the significance of the evidence you have provided. Think about why you chose to include it. How does the piece of evidence support your thesis? Transition Connect each paragraph with a sentence or two that demonstrates how each idea leads into the next, and how they work together to support your position. Provide the reader an overview of the main ideas you discussed, but also be sure to highlight the progression of your thought process. One sentence per main body paragraph, summarising up your key points. Don’t only restate your thesis but show the significance of your synthesis of the information, demonstrating how you have answered the question. 3 Performance Standards for Stage 2 Classical Studies - A Knowledge and Understanding In-depth knowledge and critical understanding of selected texts, ideas, individuals, groups, institutions, practices, events, and artefacts of the classical world. Discerning selection and application of factual knowledge that demonstrates critical understanding of the civilisations of Greece and/or Rome. Discerning and well-informed recognition of, and insightful reflection on, the diversity of attitudes, beliefs, and values in the classical world. B Well-considered knowledge and understanding of selected texts, ideas, individuals, groups, institutions, practices, events, and artefacts of the classical world. Well-considered selection and application of factual knowledge that demonstrates well-informed understanding of the civilisations of Greece and/or Rome. Well-informed recognition of, and thoughtful reflection on, the diversity of attitudes, beliefs, and values in the classical world. C Appropriate knowledge and understanding of selected texts, ideas, individuals, groups, institutions, practices, events, and artefacts of the classical world. Competent selection and application of factual knowledge that demonstrates informed understanding of the civilisations of Greece and/or Rome. Competent recognition of, and considered reflection on, the diversity of attitudes, beliefs, and values in the classical world. D Recognition and some understanding of texts, ideas, individuals, groups, institutions, practices, events, and artefacts of the classical world. Selection and application of aspects of factual knowledge that demonstrate some understanding of the civilisations of Greece and/or Rome. Some recognition, and superficial consideration, of some attitudes, beliefs, and values in the classical world. Research and Analysis Communication Extensive and balanced research into primary and secondary sources, including literary text(s). Clear, logical, coherent, and controlled communication of informed argument, using appropriate examples and ideas. Incisive critical analysis and synthesis of, and reflection on, research. Astute and selective integration and acknowledgment of source material. Selective recognition and controlled application of relevant terms, concepts, and skills, including skills of historical literacy. Fluent and lucid explanation of ideas, using a range of forms. Comprehensive definition and development of a point of view. Sound research, with breadth and balance, into primary and secondary sources, including literary text(s). Clear and relevant communication of informed argument, using mostly appropriate examples and ideas. Well-informed critical analysis and synthesis of, and reflection on, research. Well-considered integration and acknowledgment of source material. Well-informed recognition and application of relevant terms, concepts, and skills, including skills of historical literacy. Mostly clear and thoughtful explanation of ideas, using a range of forms. Well-considered definition and development of a point of view. Generally sound and balanced research into primary and secondary sources, including literary text(s). Generally clear and reasonably accurate communication of informed argument, using mostly appropriate examples and ideas. Competent critical analysis and synthesis of, and reflection on, research. Appropriate integration and acknowledgment of source material. Appropriate recognition and application of relevant terms, concepts, and skills, including skills of historical literacy. Generally clear explanation of ideas, using some different forms. Competent definition and development of a point of view. Superficial research into primary and secondary sources, including literary text(s). Superficial analysis and description of research. Basic recognition and application of relevant terms, concepts, and skills, including selected skills of historical literacy. Superficial argument, using limited examples and ideas, and tending mostly towards description. Some integration and acknowledgment of descriptions of source material. Attempted explanation of ideas, using one or more forms. Some definition, and partial development, of a point of view. 4 - E Knowledge and Understanding Research and Analysis Communication Some awareness of aspects of one or more texts, ideas, individuals, groups, institutions, practices, events, or artefacts of the classical world. Limited research into primary and secondary sources, including literary text(s). Some attempts at argument, using few examples and ideas and mostly descriptions. Limited description of research. Attempted selection and application of aspects of factual knowledge that demonstrate some awareness of the civilisations of Greece and/or Rome. Attempted use of some relevant terms, concepts, and skills, including selected skills of historical literacy. Limited integration or acknowledgment of descriptions of source material. Description of one or more ideas. Attempted development of a point of view. Attempted description of one or more aspects of attitudes, beliefs, and values in the classical world. 5