Safety Attitude Questionnaire: Unit

advertisement

Welcome to the Leadership for Safety Webinar

Safety Attitude Questionnaire:

Unit-Level Results on Teamwork and Non-Punitive

Response to Error

The webinar will be starting momentarily…

If you are having technical difficulties please contact 202-495-3356 or ltiscornia@naph.org

Chat Box

Please use the Chat Box on the webinar screen to type your question or comment at any time.

NOW: Use the Chat Box to sign in.

Enter your organization and names of all people in the room.

Agenda for Today’s Webinar

• Unit-level COS results from San Francisco General

Hospital, and UT Tyler

• Unit by unit COS data, resilience, and readiness for change

• Run chart “poster session”

• Next month’s focus: Just Culture – How to know whether to hold an individual to account for a safety mishap.

Who is on Today’s Call?

Sue Currin, MS, RN

Jim Reinertsen, MD

Bart Hill, MD, MPA

St. Luke’s Treasure Valley

St. Luke’s Regional Medical Center

St. Luke’s Meridian Medical Center

Cook County Health & Hospitals System

John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital

Provident Hospital San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center

Contra Costa Regional Med. Center

Alameda County Medical Center

Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System

San Mateo Medical Center

Truman Medical Centers

TMC- Hospital Hill

TMC- Lakewood

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

Harbor-UCLA Med Center

LAC+USC Healthcare Network

Rancho Los Amigos National

Rehab. Center

Regional Medical Center at Memphis

Kimberly Horton, DHA,

MSN, FNP, RN, FACHE

Maricopa Medical Center

UT-Health Science Center at Tyler

Univ. Medical Center of El Paso

Harris County Health System

Ben Taub General

LBJ Hospital

Quentin Mease

LSU-HCSD

Interim

Bogalusa

Alfred Connors, MD

MetroHealth

Thomas Holton, MS, RN

David Coultas, MD, FACP

Jill Steinbruegge, MD, PhD

Bianca Perez, PhD

Arielle Gorstein

Leadership Summit staff

Guest speakers on today’s call

University of Texas – Tyler

Comparative Results By Unit

Teamwork Across Units

Unit 1 2012

1. Hospital units do not coordinate well with each other.

Database

Your

Hospital

36

33

Database

2. There is good cooperation among hospital units that need to work together.

3. It is often unpleasant to work with staff from other hospital units.

Your

Hospital

Database

Your

Hospital

4. Hospital units work well together to provide the best care for patients.

Database

Your

Hospital

Teamwork Within Units

1. People support one another in this unit.

Database

Your

Hospital

2. When a lot of work needs to be done quickly, we work together as a team to get the work done.

Database

Your

Hospital

48

33

50

58

58

58

Unit 1 2012

84

92

86

3. In this unit, people treat each other with respect.

Database

Your

Hospital

4. When one area in this unit gets really busy, others help out.

Database

Your

Hospital

Nonpunitive Response to Error

1. Staff feel like their mistakes are held against them.

Database

Your

Hospital

2. When an event is reported, it feels like the person is being written up, not the problem.

Database

Your

Hospital

3. Staff worry that mistakes they make are kept in their personnel file.

Database

Your

Hospital

85

74

77

67

69

Unit 1 2012

43

58

38

62

28

31

Unit 1 2010

36

45

46

55

49

45

56

64

Unit 1 2010

84

73

86

73

74

50

67

36

Unit 1 2010

43

36

38

36

27

36

Difference

-12

-22

13

-6

Difference

19

12

27

33

Difference

22

26

-5

Unit 2

2012

Unit 2

2010 Difference Unit 3 2012 Unit 3 2010 Difference Unit 4 2012 Unit 4 2010 Difference Unit 5 2012 Unit 5 2010 Difference

43

33

39

55 -22

44

35

43

14 21

48

100

46

60 40

41

75

39

65 10

57

56

63

53

64

62

-8

58

50

61

56

43

60

7

63

80

64

60

80

64

0

55

75

56

54

52

55

23

75

66

73

63

2 47

66

53

65

-6 80

71

80

69

0 92

65

71

63

21

63

Unit 2

2012

89

36 27

Unit 2

2010

89

Difference

57 47

Unit 3 2012

85

Unit 3 2010

84

10 100 100 0 92 62 30

Difference Unit 4 2012

92

Unit 4 2010

92

Difference Unit 5 2012

83

Unit 5 2010

83

Difference

100

90

100

90

0 82

81

81

81

1 100

90

100

89

0 100

86

78

86

22

100

80

100

80

0 85

77

75

76

10 100

88

100

87

0 100

73

87

73

13

33

43

33

31

100

77

100

77

0 85

64

75

62

10 100

77

100

75

0 100

65

74

65

26

67

Unit 2

2012

46

67

Unit 2

2010

46

0

Difference

52 56

Unit 3 2012

46

Unit 3 2010

46

-4 100 100 0 100 52 48

Difference Unit 4 2012

64

Unit 4 2010

64

Difference Unit 5 2012

48

Unit 5 2010

49

Difference

-12 13 -20 11 45

41

27

30

6

38

44

45

32

25

42

6

31

39

80

62

40

52

100

61

60

50

-20

50

46

50

35

39

46

43

34

7

25 18 7 15 6 9 80 20 60 42 48 -6

Unit by Unit COS data, Resilience, and Readiness for Change

7

9

From Bryan Sexton

Key Domain One: Teamwork

Driven by Answers to Six Questions

1.

Nurse input is well received in this clinical area.

2.

In this clinical area, it is difficult to speak up if I perceive a problem with patient care.

3.

Disagreements in this clinical area are resolved appropriately (i.e., not who is right, but what is best for the patient).

4.

I have the support I need from other personnel to care for patients.

5.

It is easy for personnel here to ask questions when there is something that they do not understand.

6.

The physicians and nurses here work together as a well-coordinated team.

10

A poor teamwork score (less than 60% reporting positive teamwork)…

• Results from persistent interpersonal dysfunction on the unit

• Predicts operational outcomes e.g. staff turnover, delays, etc.

Needs a specific leadership response: If teamwork score is low, find out which of the questions is dragging the score down and address that issue specifically

Key Domain Two: Safety Climate

Determined by scores on seven questions:

1. I would feel safe being treated here as a patient.

2. Medical errors are handled appropriately in this clinical area.

3. I know the proper channels to direct questions regarding patient safety in this clinical area.

4. I receive appropriate feedback about my performance.

5. In this clinical area, it is difficult to discuss errors.

6. I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns

I may have.

7. The culture in this clinical area makes it easy to learn from the errors of others.

Poor safety climate scores (<60%)…

• Predict poor clinical outcomes, and high staff injury rates

• Result from perceived lack of commitment to safety by leadership

• Leadership response: demonstrate eagerness to learn about safety problems, and willingness to do something about them

Key Support Domain: Resilience (Burnout)

Determined by scores on four questions:

1.

I feel fatigued when I get up in the morning and a have to face another day on the job

2.

I feel burned out from my work

3.

I feel frustrated by my job

4.

I feel I am working too hard on my job

Leadership Response:

For units with HIGH resilience, you can go ahead with a new initiative even if safety or teamwork scores are low (but you will need to address the specifics of why these scores are low)

For units with low resilience AND low teamwork/safety climate scores, you must first deal with the burnout issues before you can hope to accomplish

ANY change initiative.

The MetroHealth System

Run charts for 2010, 2011, 2012 for

VAP, CLBSI, and CAUTI

10

0

ICU

Non-ICU

40

30

20

60

Catheter Related Bloodstream Infections (CLBSI),

2010 to 2012

2.91*

2.58* *infections per 1000 catheter days

50

2010

14

40

2011

23

28

1.86*

2012

10

25

16

Total Hospital Acquired Catheter Related Bloodstream Infections

(ICU and non-ICU, 2010 to 2012)

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

4

3

6

5

2

1

0

2

0

4 4 4

14

0

4

1

8 8

4

1

5

3 3

5

2 2

1

8

7

5

3

6

2

4 4

3

9

1

2

6

1

2

1 1

3

17

40

30

20

60

50

10

0

VAP

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

2010 to 2012

4.81*

4.69*

*pneumonias per 1000 ventilator days

4.14*

2010

51

2011

51

2012

35

18

8

7

6

5

4 4

3

2

1

0

1

2

5 5

7 7

5

4

7

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

2011 to 2012

3

1

7

5

4

5

6

5

3

6

5

2

0

3

2

3

7

1

3

4

3 3

4 4

1

10

Jul-10

11

Jul-11

12

Aug-12

19

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

CAUTI

Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI)

2010 to 2012

8.71*

2010

167

4.12*

2011

119

*infections per 1000 catheter days

3.11*

2012

76

20

40

Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)

(ICU and non-ICU)

Change in CAUTI definition

36

35

33

30

25

20 20

27

26

23

29

31 31

24

28

23

19

16 16

15

10

5

7

13

11

6

10

8

7

10 10

7

4

7

6

3

4

8

5

3

4

9

0

0 1 2

21

250

200

150

100

50

0

Total BSI, VAP, UTI

2011 to 2012

51

51

118

2011

CAUTI CLBSI VAP

34% reduction

2011 to 2012

35

35

75

2012

Total BSI, VAP and CAUTI

2011 to 2012

40

35

34

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

16

22

25

15

18

23

30

16

13

18

13

14

17

26

22

7

16

12

17

9

12

13

Total VAP, CLBSI, & CAUTI Linear (Total VAP, CLBSI, & CAUTI)

23

Next Month:

Tuesday February 12 th 8am PT/9am MT/10am CT/ 11am ET

Just Culture

1. Have a brief conversation with the chief nurse, or the head of HR, and ask the following questions:

 Did we initiate disciplinary action against any staff member (nurse, pharmacist, physician, nursing assistant…) because of a safety mishap in the last year?

 If yes…by what method did we decide that this was a problem with the individual? What is our method for determining individual culpability for safety mishaps?

2. Be prepared to discuss what you’ve learned about your organization and how it decides when to hold people to account for their safety behaviors.

 Just Culture Algorithm, HR protocols, or other document

THANK YOU FOR JOINING US!

Monthly webinars are scheduled through

March…Tell us if you’d like to continue!

Feedback survey can be accessed in chat box.

Download