T I TA N ST U D E N T U N I O N F E A S I B I L I T Y ST U DY
C A M P U S P R E S E N TAT I O N | A P R I L 3 0 , 2 01 2
P R E S E N TAT I O N O U T L I N E

OBJECTIVES

PARTICIPATION & PROCESS

PROGRAMS AND SERVICES

FEE SENSITIVITY

SATELLITE OPERATIONS

EXISTING CONDITIONS

PROJECT CONCEPT

NEXT STEPS

DISCUSSION
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
OBJECTIVE
To provide a comprehensive feasibility study of
the options available to the ASI as it considers
expanding the Titan Student Union facilities in
order to improve service delivery to the CSUF
campus community.
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
KEY QUESTIONS
1) Which program elements and services are underserving the
campus community and which of these spaces deserves
greatest priority in the future expansion of the TSU?
2) What is the fee sensitivity of CSUF students and what scope
of the facility expansion could be entertained through the
increase of the existing mandatory Campus Union Fee?
3) What other campus locations are students interested in
having student union services and should the TSU potentially
invest in establishing satellite operations?
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
KEY QUESTIONS
4) What extent can existing facility mechanical systems can still
be utilized and/or which systems upgrades should be
considered?
5) What scope of facility expansion can be financially supported
through existing ASI resources (cash reserves)?
6) What scope of facility expansion can be financially supported
through other contributing resources (e.g., donor funds, debt
capacity, 3rd part capital investment, etc.)?
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
P A R T I C I P AT I O N
• Conversations with
approximately 200
students in 10 total
focus groups/intercept
interviews
• 6,400 completed
survey responses
– Valid statistical data
– Sample representative
of University population
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
FOCUS GROUPS



Many visit the TSU for food during lunch time or to meet with
friends & study; TSU was described as being “good but could be
better” and “it feels like an office building”
Spaces & services of the TSU enjoyed by students:
 Games room, bowling alley, & outdoor courtyard
 Alumni lounge & meeting rooms for studying
 Food court options – Panda Express, Juice it Up, & Togo’s
Spaces & services of the TSU not enjoyed by students:
 Student org. offices, Portola Pavilion, & Titan Theater
 Inconvenient hours of operation – Food court closed on
weekends; not enough seating in food court area
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
BENCHMARKING
CSU Unions (n=4)
Ave Enrollm ent = 32,353
Functional Areas
Group 1: Food Service
Group 2: Ballroom Facilities
Group 3: Conference/Meeting Rooms
Group 4: Bookstore
Group 5: Additional Retail Services
Group 6: Theater/Auditorium
Group 7: Recreation/Entertainment
Group 8: Lounge Space
Group 9: Academic Related
Group 10: Student Organizations
Group 11: Administrative Offices
Group 12: Multicultural Centers
Group 13: Special/Misc. Components
Total Assignable Sq. Footage
Total Gross Sq. Footage
Gross/Net Ratio (Grossing Factor)
Efficiency Factor (% ASF/GSF)
ASF
22,797
%-Ttl ASF A S F / S t dnt
Select Unions
(n=11)
Ave Enrollm ent = 38,831
ASF
%-Ttl ASF A S F / S t dnt
18.2%
0.7
35,822
11,725
9.3%
0.4
13,981
11.1%
0.4
6,375
5.1%
3,004
2.4%
CSU Unions to
CSU Fullerton
CSUF Variance
Enrollm ent = 35,250
ASF
%-Ttl ASF A S F / S t dnt A S F / S t dnt Grp ASF
(0.2)
(3,476)
Select Unions to
CSUF Variance
A S F / S t dnt
Grp ASF
(0.4)
(16,501)
19.8%
0.9
19,321
21.7%
0.5
14,869
8.2%
0.4
14,471
16.3%
0.4
0.0
2,746
0.0
(398)
20,044
11.1%
0.5
8,695
9.8%
0.2
(0.2)
(5,286)
(0.3)
(11,349)
0.2
12,992
7.2%
0.3
0
0.0%
0.0
(0.2)
(6,375)
(0.3)
(12,992)
0.1
6,275
3.5%
0.2
1,694
1.9%
0.0
(0.0)
(1,310)
(0.1)
(4,581)
7,206
5.7%
0.2
11,254
6.2%
0.3
2,530
2.8%
0.1
(0.2)
(4,676)
(0.2)
(8,724)
23,539
18.8%
0.7
11,368
6.3%
0.3
7,971
9.0%
0.2
(0.5)
(15,568)
(0.1)
(3,397)
7,252
5.8%
0.2
12,717
7.0%
0.3
8,451
9.5%
0.2
0.0
1,199
(0.1)
(4,266)
0
0.0%
0.0
2,582
1.4%
0.1
1,740
2.0%
0.0
0.0
1,740
(0.0)
(842)
10,105
8.0%
0.3
14,045
7.7%
0.4
5,466
6.1%
0.2
(0.2)
(4,639)
(0.2)
(8,579)
7,208
5.7%
0.2
15,903
8.8%
0.4
11,827
13.3%
0.3
0.1
4,619
(0.1)
(4,076)
1,415
1.1%
0.0
2,103
1.2%
0.1
0
0.0%
0.0
(0.0)
(1,415)
(0.1)
(2,103)
10,931
8.7%
0.3
20,456
11.3%
0.5
6,875
7.7%
0.2
(0.1)
(4,056)
(0.3)
(13,581)
125,538
181,265
89,041
(36,497)
(92,224)
189,930
281,816
140,000
(49,930)
(141,816)
1.57
1.59
1.57
0.00
(0.02)
66%
63%
64%
-2%
0%
* "Select" data from institutions in B&D / WTW database with comparable mission / enrollment
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
Q6-23. Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following amenities and
spaces in the TSU (n=7,470):
Main Level outdoor space
Non-food retail
TSU Food Court dining
Lower Level outdoor space
Quiet/study lounge spaces
TSU Food Court seating
Mainframe Comp. Lab
Admin. Offices
Casual recreation
Social lounge spaces
TSU Lower Level dining
Large meeting rooms
Titan Bowl
Student org. offices
Titan Theater
Titan Pride Center
Small meetings rooms
Portola Pavilion
79%
79%
71%
67%
65%
64%
61%
60%
59%
59%
59%
58%
58%
57%
56%
56%
56%
55%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Students were very satisfied/satisfied most with main level outdoor space, non-food retail,
and TSU Food Court dining
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
•
TSU Primarily Viewed as a Lunchtime Destination – Food is a
Significant Driver
•
Average Student Visits Less Than 2 Times Per Week
•
Comfortable Place to Relax, Better Parking, New Furniture Top
Improvements to Increase Use
•
Email Kiosks and Commuter Lounge Most Desired New Spaces
•
Price/Value, Food Selection and Variety, Hours of Operation are
Top 3 Areas of Improvement for Food Service
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
DEMAND BASED PROGRAMMING

Demand for drop-in Union Spaces

Depth and Breadth

Activity Prioritization

Space Reconciliation
NEXT STEPS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
DEMAND BASED PROGRAMMING
Priority
Category
first
first
first
second
second
second
second
second
third
third
third
third
third
fourth
fourth
fourth
fifth
fifth
fifth
fifth
fifth
Activity
Peak
Accommodation
75% to 85%
75% to 85%
75% to 85%
55% to 65%
55% to 65%
55% to 65%
55% to 65%
55% to 65%
40% to 50%
40% to 50%
40% to 50%
40% to 50%
40% to 50%
25% to 35%
25% to 35%
25% to 35%
10% to 20%
10% to 20%
10% to 20%
10% to 20%
10% to 20%
Space
Type
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Peak
Demand
8,231
9,239
865
7,678
9,867
2,533
1,176
6,549
1,476
4,159
835
3,108
1,324
2,864
4,907
1,870
7,772
571
3,986
1,451
1,550
Space Allocation
Based on Prioritization of Demand
6,200
to
7,000
6,900
to
7,900
649
to
735
4,200
to
5,000
5,400
to
6,400
1,400
to
1,600
600
to
800
3,600
to
4,300
600
to
700
1,700
to
2,100
334
to
418
1,200
to
1,600
500
to
700
700
to
1,000
1,200
to
1,700
500
to
700
800
to
1,600
57
to
114
400
to
800
100
to
300
200
to
300
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Quiet Study Lounge
Food Service - Lunch
Convenience Store
Commuter Lounge
Informal Outdoor Social Space
Coffee House
Copy/Print Center
Informal Lounge / Gathering
Grab and Go - Lunch
Small Group Study Rooms
Grab and Go - Breakfast
Food Service - Breakfast
Bookstore
Food Service - Dinner
Crafts / Arts Center
Student Organization Work Space
Dance / Nightclub Venue
Grab and Go - Dinner
Theater / Auditorium
Art Gallery
Multipurpose Ballroom
1
COMBINED 1: Quiet Lounge, Informal Lounge, Commuter Lounge
22,500
14,000
to
16,300
2
COMBINED 1: Food Service & Grab and Go - Lunch
10,700
7,500
to
8,600
Population is based on current CSUF enrollment.
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
DEMAND BASED PROGRAMMING
Commuter Lounge
Quiet Study Lounge
8,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
7,000
6,000
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Sq. Ft.
Student Organization Work Space
Coffee House
2,000
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
Informal Lounge / Gathering
3,000
2,500
7,000
2,000
Sq. Ft.
6,000
5,000
1,000
4,000
500
0
Sq. Ft.
1,500
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
NEXT STEPS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
DEMAND BASED PROGRAMMING
Space Demand
Activity
Existing
Type
Difference
1
Quiet Study Lounge
Sq. Ft.
6,200
to
7,000
2,918
(3,282)
to
(4,082)
2
Food Service - Lunch
Sq. Ft.
6,900
to
7,900
7,342
442
to
(558)
3
Convenience Store
Sq. Ft.
649
to
735
600
(49)
to
(135)
4
Commuter Lounge
Sq. Ft.
4,200
to
5,000
0
(4,200)
to
(5,000)
5
Informal Outdoor Social Space
Sq. Ft.
5,400
to
6,400
4,168
(1,232)
to
(2,232)
6
Coffee House
Sq. Ft.
1,400
to
1,600
942
(458)
to
(658)
7
Copy/Print Center
Sq. Ft.
600
to
800
0
(600)
to
(800)
8
Informal Lounge / Gathering
Sq. Ft.
3,600
to
4,300
4,995
1,395
to
695
9
Grab and Go - Lunch
Sq. Ft.
600
to
700
0
(600)
to
(700)
10 Small Group Study Rooms
Sq. Ft.
1,700
to
2,100
438
(1,262)
to
(1,662)
*Surplus / (Deficit)
"Food Service - Lunch" includes all food court seating.
Population is based on current CSUF enrollment.
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
PROGRAM AREAS

Lounge Spaces – 6,000nsf to 8,000nsf

Student Organization Spaces – 5,000nsf to 7,000nsf

Conference & Meeting Rooms – 5,000nsf to 8,000nsf

Multicultural Center Space – 1,000nsf to 2,000nsf

Study Space – 1,000nsf to 1,500nsf

Food Service Seating – 1,000 to 1,500nsf

Support Space – 8,000nsf to 12,000nsf
FEE SENSITIVIT Y
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
FEE SENSITIVITY
The approval of Option A ($85 to $95 per semester) would offer :

An expansion of approximately 60,000 gross square feet (nearly half of the size of the current TSU)
and be able to include all of the spaces below:


Dedicated informal lounges with soft seating, tables, and study areas,

Small group study rooms,

Dedicated spaces for student organizations and clubs,

State of the art meeting rooms for clubs and organizations,

Expanded food court, and

Additional ballroom for large campus events.
Additionally, the Titan Student Union would undergo a moderate renovation of nearly 70% of existing
spaces. This renovation would bring portions of the facility up to the same standards and feel of the
expansion. Some of these renovated spaces could include the entry lobby, courtyard, meeting rooms,
and food court.
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
FEE SENSITIVITY
13%
17%
Very likely
25%
27%
Likely
33%
32%
Unlikely
29%
Very likely
25%
Very unlikely
Unlikely
Very unlikely
$85 - $95 - Option A
$50 - $60 - Option B
32%
Very likely
19%
Likely
15%
Likely
34%
Unlikely
Very unlikely
$20 - $30 - Option C
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
FEE SENSITIVITY
Q80. Which option to improve the TSU do you prefer? (n=6,480)
Option A - $85 to $95 per
semester
18%
16%
29%
Option B - $50 to $60 per
semester
Option C - $20 to $30 per
semester
12%
24%
None of the above options
I need more information
The preferred option is a tuition increase of $20 to $30 per semester.
NEXT STEPS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
FEE SENSITIVITY
Q84. How high a priority should CSUF place on improving the TSU? (n=6,437)
50%
45%
43%
39%
40%
30%
22%
20%
23%
19%
18%
16%
14%
10%
9%
14%
15%
9%
7%
7%
0%
Very high priority
High priority
Underclassmen
Moderate priority
Upperclassmen
Low priority
Very low priority
Graduate
58% of All Students said improving the TSU is a Moderate to High Priority
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
FEE SENSITIVITY
Q82. If CSUF improves the TSU to better meet your needs, how often would you
use it? (n=6,462)
50%
40%
33%
40%
28%
30%
30%
20%
20%
20%
10%
46%
10%
18%
17%
13%
9%
10%
6%
0%
0%
5 or more times 2 - 4 times per Once per week Less than once
per week
week
per week
Before Improvements
Never
5 or more times 2 - 4 times per Once per week Less than once
per week
week
per week
Never
After Improvements
The number of visits per week would increase an additional 42% for all students
from 1.9 to 2.7 times/week – Largest increase would be from non-core users
S AT E L L I T E O P E R AT I O N S
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
S AT E L L I T E O P E R AT I O N S



Students are most commonly in
McCarthy or Mihaylo Hall throughout
the day; however, largest number of
students leaves the campus from 5PM8PM
Mihaylo Hall provides coffee shop/grabn-go food concept (Starbucks) with
lounge and table seating on 1st floor
Potential opportunity to provide
convenience store concept or lounge
space near McCarthy Hall, limited need
for other union spaces
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
ARCHITECTURAL ASSESSMENT

Disjointed Wayfinding, Stratification of Levels, Separation of
Quiet Versus Loud Areas

Disjointed Circulation, Multiple Stairs

No Central Node, Gathering Space, Building Focal Point

Underutilized Lower Level – Garden Courtyard

Compartmentalized Second Floor

Food Court Kitchens Require Significant Investment
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
MECHANICAL ASSESSMENT

Existing TSC Plant Does Not Have Capacity to Accommodate
Expansion

Requires New Systems, Connection to Univ, or New Plant

16 AHUs are Obsolete and Will Need Replacement

Systems Controls are Outdated


Single Pane Glazing Should be Replaced with Efficient, LowE, Double-Glazing
Heating and Cooling in Cooking Areas Not Properly
Addressed
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
ELECTRICAL / PLUMBING
ASSESSMENT

Electrical Capacity at Panels is Maxed Out

Older Lighting Fixtures Have Already Been Replaced With New

Old Pipes are Creating Domestic Hot Water Issues

Only Portions of the TSU are Sprinklered
PROJECT CONCEPTS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
CONCEPT DRIVERS

Address Program Shortfalls

Align with Budget

Maximize Value of Improvement to Existing and New Spaces
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
E X PA N S I O N P OT E N T I A L

Rec Center
TSU
Bookstore

Capture Lower Games Court

Redefine Entry/Focal Point


Vis Arts
CPAC
Focus on Southeast Corner
of TSU
Work with Existing Building
Perceptions- Quiet / Loud
Improve Connection to
Bookstore and Campus
Arteries
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
NO FEE INCREASE
Total NASF
Quantity
Unit
Lounge Spaces / Information Desk
Informal Lounge Space
Small Group Study Rooms
Commuter Lounge
Internet / Email Stations
Print Stations
1
6
1
0
0
NASF
2,000
350
1,500
25
25
Total:
2,000
2,100
1,500
0
0
5,600
Food Service
Kitchen and Servery
Coffeehouse
1
0
1,000
1,500
Total:
1,000
0
1,000
Meeting Spaces
Meeting / Conference Room - Very Large
Meeting / Conference Room - Large
Meeting / Conference Room - Small
Meeting / Conference Room Storage
0
2
2
4
2,000
1,200
400
100
Total:
0
2,400
800
400
3,600
12
1
1
100
80
250
800
4
Total:
960
250
800
400
2,410
0
1
1,200
500
Total:
0
500
500
Student Organizations
Student Organizations Open Plan Workstations
Conference / Meeting Room
Open Seating / Lounge
Storage Lockers - Double Tier 15"
Additional Spaces
Multicultural Center
Support and Auxiliary Spaces
Total Student Union Facilities SF
Efficiency Factor:
Total Student Union Facilities SF
67%
13,110
6,555
19,665



New Construction Only, No
Renovation
Addresses Some Needs of
Student Community
TSU Infrastructure Issues
Still Remain

$6M Construction Cost

$10M Project Cost


Reserve Funded
Opens Fall 2016
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
E N R O L L M E N T H I S TO R Y F R O M 1 97 0
Fall Headcount
60,000
Project Opens
50,000
Expansion Opens
36,100
40,000
TSU Opens
36,000
30,000
20,000
24,400
21,500
Today
10,000
2030
2028
2026
2024
2022
2020
2018
2016
2014
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
1978
1976
1974
1972
1970
0
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
F E E C O M PA R I S O N
Institution
Chico State
San Jose State
Cal Poly
Northridge
San Diego State
Bakersfield
Sonoma State
Sacramento State
Long Beach State
Avg. (excluding CSUF):
CSUF:
*Based on Fall 2012 Figures
Fee / Year
$746
$648
$627
$506
$457
$435
$402
$398
$336
$506
$268
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
$30 / SEM FEE INCREASE
Total NASF
Quantity
Unit
NASF
Lounge Spaces / Information Desk
Informal Lounge Space
Small Group Study Rooms
Commuter Lounge
Internet / Email Stations
Print Stations
1
8
1
5
5
2,700
350
2,250
25
25
Total:
2,700
2,800
2,250
125
125
8,000
Food Service
Kitchen and Servery
Coffeehouse
1
1
1,000
1,500
Total:
1,000
1,500
2,500
1
3
2
6
2,000
1,200
400
100
Total:
2,000
3,600
800
600
7,000
25
2
1
200
80
250
1,200
4
Total:
2,000
500
1,200
800
4,500
1
1
1,200
1,500
Total:
1,200
1,500
2,700
Meeting Spaces
Meeting / Conference Room - Very Large
Meeting / Conference Room - Large
Meeting / Conference Room - Small
Meeting / Conference Room Storage
Student Organizations
Student Organizations Open Plan Workstations
Conference / Meeting Room
Open Seating / Lounge
Storage Lockers - Double Tier 15"
Additional Spaces
Multicultural Center
Support and Auxiliary Spaces
Total Student Union Facilities SF
Efficiency Factor:
Total Student Union Facilities SF
67%
24,700
12,350
37,050

$11.1M in New Construction

$5.6M in Renovation



$2.1M for Food Service

$2.9M for Infrastructure
$1M for Site / Bookstore
Connection
$32.2M Project Cost
STUDENT LOUNGE
STUDENT LOUNGE
COMMUTER LOUNGE
GROUP STUDY AREA
GROUP STUDY ROOMS
GROUP STUDY AREA
STUDENT ORG LOUNGE
MULTICULTURAL CENTER
STUDENT ORG WORK AREA
STUDENT ORG WORK AREA
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS
PROJECT COSTS
Project Budget (Form 2-7)
$32,276,275
Early Fee Funds
$8,057,000
Capital Contribution
$10,000,000
Existing TSU Debt
$3,000,000
Total Budget to be Serviced by Debt
$17,219,275
Capitalized Interest
$0
Cap Interest Earnings
$0
Reinvestment Proceeds / Const. Acct Earnings
($41,000)
Issuance Costs
$172,000
Total Project Budget
$17,350,000
Annual Debt Service
$1,129,000

$30 Per Semester Increase

Collections Start Fall 2013

Reserves Contribute $10 M

Opens Fall 2017
Operating Budget (2011/2012)
Revenues
Year of Operations
Academic Year
Total
General Services
Building Engineering
University Conference Center
Titan Bowl & Billiards
Graphic Services
Mainframe Computer Lounge
$291,972
$18,000
$150,792
$179,564
$17,305
$13,131
Information / Services
Marketing & Public Relations
Operations
Titan Recreation
$73,388
$96,292
$46,773
$450,548
$1,337,765
Total
$1,889,174
Totals:
Expenses
General Services
Building Engineering
Administration
University Conference Center
Titan Bowl & Billiards
Graphic Services
Art & Exhibit Program
Mainframe Computer Lounge
TSC Governing Board
Dell Capital Lease
Programming Support
Information / Services
Marketing & Public Relations
Operations
Titan Recreation
Emerg. Preparedness & Response
Totals:
$1,430,126
$263,451
$299,353
$189,169
$185,606
$17,308
$50,831
$64,484
$45,457
$102,055
$214,169
$216,185
$1,115,483
$1,843,715
$13,755
$7,940,321
($6,602,556)
2011/2012
TCUOP
Starting Balance
$16,842,908
Bad Debt Reserve
$48,340
Interest
$49,783
Contributions
$9,191,460
Deductions
$8,386,566
Total
$17,745,925
TCUCE
Starting Balance
$3,031,502
Bad Debt Reserve
$0
Interest
$8,201
Contributions
$0
Deductions
$0
Total
$3,039,703
TCUMR
Starting Balance
$2,794,079
Bad Debt Reserve
$0
Interest
Contributions
Deductions
Total
$7,767
$400,000
$0
$3,201,846
TCUCN
Starting Balance
$2,708,410
Bad Debt Reserve
$0
Interest
Contributions
Deductions
Total
$7,490
$350,000
$0
$3,065,900
2017/2018
Year 1
2018/2019
Year 2
2019/2020
Year 3
2020/2021
Year 4
2021/2022
Year 5
2022/2023
Year 6
Income
Total Existing
Total New
$1,462,000
$35,000
$1,491,000
$36,000
$1,521,000
$36,000
$1,552,000
$37,000
$1,582,000
$38,000
$1,615,000
$38,000
TOTAL INCOME
$1,497,000
$1,527,000
$1,557,000
$1,589,000
$1,620,000
$1,653,000
Expenses
Total Existing
Total New
$8,681,000
$514,000
$8,856,000
$524,000
$9,033,000
$535,000
$9,211,000
$544,000
$9,396,000
$556,000
$9,583,000
$566,000
TOTAL EXPENSES
$9,195,000
$9,380,000
$9,568,000
$9,755,000
$9,952,000
$10,149,000
($7,698,000)
($7,853,000)
($8,011,000)
($8,166,000)
($8,332,000)
($8,496,000)
Fee Subsidy
Existing TSU Fee
New TSU Fee
$9,291,000
$2,077,000
$9,469,000
$2,117,000
$9,650,000
$2,157,000
$9,834,000
$2,199,000
$10,023,000
$2,241,000
$10,215,000
$2,284,000
TOTAL FEES
$11,368,000
$11,586,000
$11,807,000
$12,033,000
$12,264,000
$12,499,000
$3,670,000
$3,733,000
$3,796,000
$3,867,000
$3,932,000
$4,003,000
Debt Service
Existing TSU Debt
New TSU Debt
Existing Rec Debt
$0
$1,129,000
$1,703,000
$0
$1,129,000
$1,706,000
$0
$1,129,000
$1,703,000
$0
$1,129,000
$1,704,000
$0
$1,129,000
$1,702,000
$0
$1,129,000
$1,704,000
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
$2,832,000
$2,835,000
$2,832,000
$2,833,000
$2,831,000
$2,833,000
Debt Coverage Ratio
1.30
1.32
1.34
1.36
1.39
1.41
$838,000
$898,000
$964,000
$1,034,000
$1,101,000
$1,170,000
Profit / (Subsidy)
NET OPERATING INCOME
CASH FLOW AFTER DEBT SERVICE
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
RISKS/UNKNOWNS

Campus Enrollment Growth

Projected at 0% for the Next Years, the Increasing

Construction and Operations Inflation

Existing TSU Debt Service Payments

Opportunities to Fund Through Reserves

Refinance
NEXT STEPS
NEXT STEPS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS

Develop an Information Campaign to Education Students
AND Faculty/Staff About Why the TSU Needs Improving

Timeline

Committees

Marketing Materials

Presentations

Partnerships
NEXT STEPS
OBJECTIVES
PARTICIPATION
PROGRAMS & SERVICES
FEE SENSITIVITY
SATELLITE OPERATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROJECT CONCEPT
NEXT STEPS

Identify Partners to Contribute Additional Funds or Other
Nearby Improvements

ASC / Bookstore

Third-Party Vendor

Additional Funding will Allow for Additional
Improvements to the Existing TSU
NEXT STEPS
T I TA N ST U D E N T U N I O N F E A S I B I L I T Y ST U DY
C A M P U S P R E S E N TAT I O N | A P R I L 3 0 , 2 01 2